markkuss:
This guy is a piece of trash..to be fore warned is to be fore harmed

Kyhuani:



You wrote a 600 words piece and it was flooded with errors. Am I the cause of your problems ?

markkuss:
This guy is a piece of trash..to be fore warned is to be fore harmed

Kyhuani:



You wrote a 600 words piece and it was flooded with errors. Am I the cause of your problems ?

markkuss:


I wrote 600 hundred words test write using My premium grammarly on top, you are saying its flooded with errors. You can't even pay 600 naira for a test write. Let's assume its 1 naira per word..smh

Writerholic:


Who requests “600 words” test job Where is that done?

Kyhuani:



Paste the contents here let the forum members judge it

markkuss:


https://docs.google.com/document/d/14Kyf3STWtU1ttyq0MHW4VzBv6DjQFg306icfgkuPG_0/edit?usp=drivesdk


This is one of the sample you requested I follow on the writing style

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Le2MNs6nCnAgUJiJ0rE4OV_5TUabv4mb/edit?usp=drivesdk&ouid=107728963235017540912&rtpof=true&sd=true

Kyhuani:




Dude. Copy and paste the contents so forum members can read

markkuss:


Its google docs..they can view it all the same..you even blocked me on WhatsApp..

You are a scammer!!

Dvea:
In all honesty, the article is good. A few repetitions in the middle, but overall, it can pass. The only issue is it reads like an academic work, not a simple blog. So, if it was meant for the former, then fine, but for the latter, it used much bigger grammar that could have been simplified for the everyday reader.

It took me a while to read through because of the use of complex words. But I don't think this is enough reason not to make payment. You could only say that he didn't write in line with your tone or voice and ask him to rewrite.

Just my opinion.

Kyhuani:



A whole you.


Please just go. I'm disappointed.


As for payment have you asked him if he was informed it was an unpaid test to which he affirmed interest in ?


Poke noser

Dvea:


Don't ask for opinions if you don't want answers. Your post was about the quality of the work, not whether you agreed on an unpaid test.

Kyhuani:



Just carry your wahala dey go. Olodo Oshi

Dvea:


And that's how you've sold yourself as a problematic person to work with. Have a fantastic weekend.

Kyhuani:



Smh. Talkative. You can't see the whole fifteen lines lacks substance. So when you create your contents a whooping fifteen lines would be spent gallivanting around the subject matter. And after that, the next sessions aren't well developed to captivate the interest and mind of the reader. You don't see errors everywhere

Shey you all employ writers, take him under your enrollment since you can cry more than the bereaved. Hypocrite

Dvea:


I really don't feel like arguing with anyone this weekend but....

First off, I said it reads like an academic work, and it needs to be reworked because it's difficult to read... but of course, that's one you did not read. The entire write-up looks like a song of the eighties only because he chose to write it with big words and unnecessary grammar. No simplification at all. That doesn't mean it doesn't have flow. He had a structure in mind; if you read it from a neutral ground, it is an article with a point. The question here (which, by the way, isn't what you were complaining about or which you spoke about) is whether the work is for a blog or some academic writing. You complained that the work is bad and makes no sense, which, as I said, fundamentally, it is good. You didn't mention if this was for a blog. You only asked to judge the work. You said to judge if the work makes sense. It does. It's just written in an unnecessary educational manner. The work makes sense; there were no grammar issues that I could pick up. The only points I picked and stated were big grammar and repetition in the middle.

And I stand by the point you could have simply told him to rewrite if it wasn't the tone and style you wanted and then decide if he can meet your desired tone. I mentioned payment because you both did. He complained you didn't pay, and you complained that you wouldn't pay for the type of work.

Your problem is you forget you brought your argument to the public, and the public will use the information they have to judge. It is not my business to question both of you about your agreement terms. All I did was give an answer when you asked for a public judgment.

Besides, most writers had to be honed. I've worked with tens of writers off and on this platform. Many of them start off weird, and you need to fine-tune them to fit your tone and standard. If you've searched for writers, you'll know not many are outrightly good. The most important thing is how is their tenses. Can they read a topic and understand how to write it? Do they understand the fundamentals of non-fiction writing from fiction?

Those are the core points; everything else can be managed. Maybe it's me, but I haven't found a writer who doesn't have one noticeable issue when it comes to sentence structuring and presentation. If you plan to say goodbye to everyone coming your way, you'll be searching for long. And by the looks of your posts across the platform, it seems you have been searching for long.

But no, you just chose to spend this Saturday evening in anger and argument.

Kyhuani:




Busy body, get lost !

Dvea:


What a waste of time. Good luck finding those who'll work with you.

Kyhuani:



I've found more than enough. Get lost hypocrite

Dvea:


And that's how you've sold yourself as a problematic person to work with. Have a fantastic weekend.

Dvea:


I really don't feel like arguing with anyone this weekend but....

First off, I said it reads like an academic work, and it needs to be reworked because it's difficult to read... but of course, that's one you did not read. The entire write-up looks like a song of the eighties only because he chose to write it with big words and unnecessary grammar. No simplification at all. That doesn't mean it doesn't have flow. He had a structure in mind; if you read it from a neutral ground, it is an article with a point. The question here (which, by the way, isn't what you were complaining about or which you spoke about) is whether the work is for a blog or some academic writing. You complained that the work is bad and makes no sense, which, as I said, fundamentally, it is good. You didn't mention if this was for a blog. You only asked to judge the work. You said to judge if the work makes sense. It does. It's just written in an unnecessary educational manner. The work makes sense; there were no grammar issues that I could pick up. The only points I picked and stated were big grammar and repetition in the middle.

And I stand by the point you could have simply told him to rewrite if it wasn't the tone and style you wanted and then decide if he can meet your desired tone. I mentioned payment because you both did. He complained you didn't pay, and you complained that you wouldn't pay for the type of work.

Your problem is you forget you brought your argument to the public, and the public will use the information they have to judge. It is not my business to question both of you about your agreement terms. All I did was give an answer when you asked for a public judgment.

Besides, most writers had to be honed. I've worked with tens of writers off and on this platform. Many of them start off weird, and you need to fine-tune them to fit your tone and standard. If you've searched for writers, you'll know not many are outrightly good. The most important thing is how is their tenses. Can they read a topic and understand how to write it? Do they understand the fundamentals of non-fiction writing from fiction?

Those are the core points; everything else can be managed. Maybe it's me, but I haven't found a writer who doesn't have one noticeable issue when it comes to sentence structuring and presentation. If you plan to say goodbye to everyone coming your way, you'll be searching for long. And by the looks of your posts across the platform, it seems you have been searching for long.

But no, you just chose to spend this Saturday evening in anger and argument.

Kyhuani:



I've found more than enough. Get lost hypocrite

markkuss:


How..you will never get who to work for you..

You are a piece of shit

Dvea:

This is such a nice write up. Are you recruiting any time soon?
I really don't feel like arguing with anyone this weekend but....

First off, I said it reads like an academic work, and it needs to be reworked because it's difficult to read... but of course, that's one you did not read. The entire write-up looks like a song of the eighties only because he chose to write it with big words and unnecessary grammar. No simplification at all. That doesn't mean it doesn't have flow. He had a structure in mind; if you read it from a neutral ground, it is an article with a point. The question here (which, by the way, isn't what you were complaining about or which you spoke about) is whether the work is for a blog or some academic writing. You complained that the work is bad and makes no sense, which, as I said, fundamentally, it is good. You didn't mention if this was for a blog. You only asked to judge the work. You said to judge if the work makes sense. It does. It's just written in an unnecessary educational manner. The work makes sense; there were no grammar issues that I could pick up. The only points I picked and stated were big grammar and repetition in the middle.

And I stand by the point you could have simply told him to rewrite if it wasn't the tone and style you wanted and then decide if he can meet your desired tone. I mentioned payment because you both did. He complained you didn't pay, and you complained that you wouldn't pay for the type of work.

Your problem is you forget you brought your argument to the public, and the public will use the information they have to judge. It is not my business to question both of you about your agreement terms. All I did was give an answer when you asked for a public judgment.

Besides, most writers had to be honed. I've worked with tens of writers off and on this platform. Many of them start off weird, and you need to fine-tune them to fit your tone and standard. If you've searched for writers, you'll know not many are outrightly good. The most important thing is how is their tenses. Can they read a topic and understand how to write it? Do they understand the fundamentals of non-fiction writing from fiction?

Those are the core points; everything else can be managed. Maybe it's me, but I haven't found a writer who doesn't have one noticeable issue when it comes to sentence structuring and presentation. If you plan to say goodbye to everyone coming your way, you'll be searching for long. And by the looks of your posts across the platform, it seems you have been searching for long.

But no, you just chose to spend this Saturday evening in anger and argument.

Kyhuani:



My Lise isn't dependent on your negatives and narratives