LordReed:


Have you practiced the techniques in this book? Have you used the algorithmic sequence to produce a desired object in the world on demand?

Also as an aside how do you tell difference between who is trying to hoodwink you from a genuine person? What criteria do you use?

I knew you will run away

This 'Naysay' condition comes from the high propensity to rather troll than learn.

You don't ask someone for a taste of a pudding, you taste it.

On the authenticity of the author's work, he could have quote the Bible with "As a man thinketh, so is he", and he would have taught you how to manifest anything from the ethers via thought and some little sunshine within you (which people like you will doubt exists anyways).

Don't ask me questions. Read up and we'll talk.

A001:
No poster worth engaging here on the subject except the handful I've already discussed with. You're not worth my time if you don't have at least a degree in Physics or haven't done some research in the field. Dolt wey no fit solve a simple PDE. I said I developed some models of Physics to explain certain natural phenomena, you dey ask for them on Nairaland. Why would anyone post that kind of research on this sort of forum and expose his details?

You are small, you don't even know what "physics" mean, when you are done deluding yourself, your mind will be at rest.

chieveboy:


I knew you will run away

This 'Naysay' condition comes from the high propensity to rather troll than learn.

You don't ask someone for a taste of a pudding, you taste it.

On the authenticity of the author's work, he could have quote the Bible with "As a man thinketh, so is he", and he would have taught you how to manifest anything from the ethers via thought and some little sunshine within you (which people like you will doubt exists anyways).

Don't ask me questions. Read up and we'll talk.

You are too quick to impugn someone. Run away how? You've read the book, how is asking if you've practiced the techniques now running away? I am trying to engage you and you are acting like a flower wilting under the glare of the sun. You don't seem ready to have your assertions scrutinized with this your behaviour. If you aren't ready to engage meaningfully then say it, your passive aggressiveness is getting irritating.

Take a cue from A001, when I asked him a question, he didn't reply with condescension he gave a succinct answer.

I didn't ask about the authenticity of the author's work, I asked: how do you tell difference between who is trying to hoodwink you from a genuine person? What criteria do you use? What is so difficult in answering these questions?

LordReed:


You are too quick to impugn someone. Run away how? You've read the book, how is asking if you've practiced the techniques now running away? I am trying to engage you and you are acting like a flower wilting under the glare of the sun. You don't seem ready to have your assertions scrutinized with this your behaviour. If you aren't ready to engage meaningfully then say it, your passive aggressiveness is getting irritating.

Take a cue from A001, when I asked him a question, he didn't reply with condescension he gave a succinct answer.

I didn't ask about the authenticity of the author's work I asked: how do you tell difference between who is trying to hoodwink you from a genuine person? What criteria do you use? What is so difficult in answering these questions?

Do not blame me at all. I am responding to you based on what I knew you and the your group. A001 is just being introduced to your group and I'm sure he'll know better.

On asking me: Most times, the problem we face in dealing with people on subject as this even when they encroach on our threads by trolling (e.g you introductory message on this thread), is the problem of establishing information parallels given a neophyte or an absolute ignoramus (no insult intended here).

So for us to tango, you must do some findings, then our interaction will be tilted towards a debate or Qs and As rather than jesting, trolling and getting worked up when the favor is returned.

So go ahead and read, the idea is not for you to understand entirely, its for you to come from the position of knowledge rather than scandal-mining or trolling.

chieveboy:


Do not blame me at all. I am responding to you based on what I knew you and the your group. A001 is just being introduced to your group and I'm sure he'll know better.

On asking me: Most times, the problem we face in dealing with people on subject as this even when they encroach on our threads by trolling (e.g you introductory message on this thread), is the problem of establishing information parallels given a neophyte or an absolute ignoramus (no insult intended here).

So for us to tango, you must do some findings, then our interaction will be tilted towards a debate or Qs and As rather than jesting, trolling and getting worked up when the favor is returned.

So go ahead and read, the idea is not for you to understand entirely, its for you to come from the position of knowledge rather than scandal-mining or trolling.

I have been interacting with A001 for years so don't use that excuse. If you are unable to leave your own stereotyping behind, with what mouth are you using to accuse others of being unwilling to learn? Are you not fully demonstrating you are the one unwilling to learn?

How is asking you if you've tried the techniques jesting, trolling and getting worked up? You are the one getting worked up because I asked you a question to show I'm willing to engage. I even included a detail to show you I was even reading the damn book but you are throwing it in my face for what reason?

chieveboy:


Okay sorry about that and I apologize...although it was 90% prognosis and 10% yab...
The person behind this keyboard doesn't cry. You don't have what it takes please...

On the work of physics: You will search for the book "Something from No Thing by AR Bordon Lulu.com"

Please prove me wrong (about understanding) and open a thread for us to see what you read. I need to eliminate that stereotype (of lack of understanding) I have on you, Maynman, knownunknown, and others.

Lol, stupid bastard. You ill educated jackasses around here talking about “lack of understanding” are hilarious. A pretend “physicist” and another clown presenting unsubstantiated nonsense as proof of magic.

KnownUnknown:


Lol, stupid bastard.

Lol

chieveboy:


Lol

Indeed!

LordReed:


I have been interacting with A001 for years so don't use that excuse. If you are unable to leave your own stereotyping behind, with what mouth are you using to accuse others of being unwilling to learn? Are you not fully demonstrating you are the one unwilling to learn?

How is asking you if you've tried the techniques jesting, trolling and getting worked up? You are the one getting worked up because I asked you a question to show I'm willing to engage. I even included a detail to show you I was even reading the damn book but you are throwing it in my face for what reason?

Oh stereotyping is actually Profiling and in my case, it was an informed grouping.

You came into the thread and made a comment and the rest of the group followed jesting and trolling.

Asking me if I tried the techniques is simply your characteristic way of hoping to discredit the author's work. This is buttressed by the statement "how do you know you're not being hoodwinked" or so. Of all things your mind could go to, it went to the idea of "hoodwinking" right before going back into the book...prognosis alert!

I learnt fast and caught that antic real quick!

You showed you're unwilling to learn right from all that digging of supposed scandals of Mormons even when I made it clear I was neither promoting Mormonism neither was I discrediting them.

These seemingly small details are what I read so well my friend, so you rightly belong in the troll group. Look at the insults your friends here hurl at A 001...

A001:
I said I developed some models of Physics to explain certain natural phenomena,

Put down the crack pipe and turn on the Chelsea game. What a joke!!!

KnownUnknown:


Lol, stupid bastard. You ill educated jackasses around here talking about “lack of understanding” are hilarious. A pretend “physicist” and another clown presenting unsubstantiated nonsense as proof of magic.

What do you know and what do you have to offer then? We don't know anything on physics and whatnot, what do you know about the physics of Consciousness, Manifestation, Nature?

My best guess is: you only have a skull-load of trolling, jesting and insults. That's my assumption I'm sorry.

chieveboy:


Oh stereotyping is actually Profiling and in my case, it was an informed grouping.

You came into the thread and made a comment and the rest of the group followed jesting and trolling.

Asking me if I tried the techniques is simply your characteristic way of hoping to discredit the author's work. This is buttressed by the statement "how do you know you're not being hoodwinked" or so. Of all things your mind could go to, it went to the idea of "hoodwinking" right before going back into the book...prognosis alert!

I learnt fast and caught that antic real quick!

You showed you're unwilling to learn right from all that digging of supposed scandals of Mormons even when I made it clear I was neither promoting Mormonism neither was I discrediting them.

These seemingly small details are what I read so well my friend, so you rightly belong in the troll group. Look at the insults your friends here hurl at A 001...

You are jest projecting your quick judgement and stereotyping of people on to me very clearly.

I think I am done with this. Have a good day.

chieveboy:


My best guess is: you only have a skull-load of trolling, jesting and insults. That's my assumption I'm sorry.

Absolutely, and I’m not sorry. Boy, you’re simply too stupid for me to respect.

A001:

Spirituality can also deal with facts and be based on science. It depends on your definition of spirituality. Note I said spirituality, not religion. You can have one without the other.

It's actually good to adopt a science-based approach to spirituality. There's actually a physics underlying what religious people call "spirit".

It's all energy and consciousness. The physics here doesn't require faith at all. It's even deeper and more fundamental than even Quantum Physics.

This clown is a physicist? On which planet?! Damn sure not this one, maybe in another “realm”.

KnownUnknown:


Absolutely, and I’m not sorry. Boy, you’re simply too stupid for me to respect.

Lol. When did I mention i needed respect from a Nairaland troll?

A001:

Nature is actually far, far complex than what you, or anyone, can imagine. If you take a leaf and put a small hole on it, then look through that hole.

What you see is what physicists mainly perceive as all that exists: A tiny segment of reality. Our eyes and instruments can only detect a tiny segment of the vast ranges of segments of the EM spectrum.

There are tons of realms we don't even know, but they exist right around us.

There are waves that exist beyond (below) the radio wave segment of the EM spectrum that most humans aren't even aware of. These are waves of extremely low frequencies (ELFs), too tiny for the human eye or our instruments to see/detect.

What I'm talking about here is a whole new realm entirely. It's these waves religious people call the soul, spirit and the likes.

It's real, and I've actually developed the physics and mathematics, though I don't use either soul or spirit to refer to these waves.

This is a new field of physics entirely with tons of potential applications, including the design of living systems such as humans.

I am really really sorry about the actions of trolls in this thread. I am really sorry.

I believe your ongoing work will peel off a later off the scales in people's eyes on the subject of Consciousness and other side of nature. All the best!

chieveboy:


I am really really sorry about the actions of trolls in this thread. I am really sorry.

I believe your ongoing work will peel off a later off the scales in people's eyes on the subject of Consciousness and other side of nature. All the best!

Lmao! Whew!

chieveboy:


I am really really sorry about the actions of trolls in this thread. I am really sorry.

I believe your ongoing work will peel off a later off the scales in people's eyes on the subject of Consciousness and other side of nature. All the best!

Thank you. I'm not even bothered by those ones. None of those people can solve a simple problem in Physics. Give them a simple wave function of a quantum mechanical system to solve and analyze and watch them become mute.

They're dull people apart from LordReed, who I've even been engaging for at least 15 years or thereabouts on this forum. The physics underlying consciousness is even more fundamental and more mind-bending than Quantum Physics.

Though I've done and published a thesis of over 120 pages on this new physics and the mathematics underlying consciousness and a range of other natural phenomena, my work isn't meant for discussion on a forum like Nairaland at this stage.

This isn't a scientific community. Research in science follows a specific protocol, and peer review is highly important. This is the stage of my papers now on the subject.

The project took 5 years to complete up to the current level and is still ongoing. That's why I can't say much on the subject here.

I believe an objective (scientific) understanding of consciousness will be achieved in the coming years. A new field of Physics with its own mathematical frameworks is required for this.

A001:

Thank you. I'm not even bothered by those ones. None of those people can solve a simple problem in Physics. Give them a simple wave function of a quantum mechanical system to solve and analyze and watch them become mute.

They're dull people. The physics underlying consciousness is even more fundamental and more mind-bending than Quantum Physics.

Though I've done and published a thesis of over 120 pages on this new physics and the mathematics underlying consciousness and a range of other natural phenomena, my work isn't meant for discussion on a forum like Nairaland at this stage.

This isn't a scientific community. Research in science follows a specific protocol, and peer review is highly important. This is the stage of my papers now on the subject.

The project took 5 years to complete up to the current level and is still ongoing. That's why I can't say much on the subject here.

I believe an objective (scientific) understanding of consciousness will be achieved in the coming years. A new field of Physics with its own mathematical frameworks is required for this.

You're welcome. I will lay hands on your work when available I believe. Cheers and Godspeed!

A001:

Thank you. I'm not even bothered by those ones. None of those people can solve a simple problem in Physics. Give them a simple wave function of a quantum mechanical system to solve and analyze and watch them become mute.

They're dull people apart from LordReed, who I've even been engaging for at least 15 years or thereabouts on this forum. The physics underlying consciousness is even more fundamental and more mind-bending than Quantum Physics.

Though I've done and published a thesis of over 120 pages on this new physics and the mathematics underlying consciousness and a range of other natural phenomena, my work isn't meant for discussion on a forum like Nairaland at this stage.

This isn't a scientific community. Research in science follows a specific protocol, and peer review is highly important. This is the stage of my papers now on the subject.

The project took 5 years to complete up to the current level and is still ongoing. That's why I can't say much on the subject here.

I believe an objective (scientific) understanding of consciousness will be achieved in the coming years. A new field of Physics with its own mathematical frameworks is required for this.

That project will be a waste, I assure you.
You started the project with a fixed assumption that's why you will fail!

Maynman:

That project will be a waste, I assure you.
You started the project with a fixed assumption that's why you will fail!

Honestly man...

So daft

"Fixed assumption" and I warned him to always use locomotive assumption but he refused

Maynman:

That project will be a waste, I assure you.
You started the project with a fixed assumption that's why you will fail!

Lols, you're obviously very ignorant. Some scientists of the past human eras had actually developed this kind of physics I'm working on and achieved wonders with it, ranging from the design of plants and animals (including humans) mimicking those that evolved naturally, the creation of languages, even planets and stars, the design of religions, cultures, and much more.

https://www.mdpi.com/2411-9660/3/3/43
https://www1.grc.nasa.gov/research-and-engineering/vine/petal/

Check out those papers. Those NASA scientists are working on some applications covered in the field of physics I just developed.

When I was even doing my project, I never knew these people had even started work on this periodic table as far back as 2018–2020. Coincidentally, I started building something similar as one of the applications of the physics I developed for consciousness and a range of other natural phenomena.

I came across NASA's version much later after publishing my papers, and their own table is far from complete and is missing some key metrics.

When NASA's PeTaL (or similar ones) mentioned above is fully developed in the coming years, combined with the physics underlying consciousness, scientists will be able to achieve tons of wondrous feats such as exploring planets physically and designing of living systems and setting up colonies in other planets.

The knowledge of this physics and that table were among the key tools the past humans that developed this planet used in the ancient past to design humans, animals, plants, microbes, and tons of other living systems, create languages and build towns, nations, and continents.

It's these past humans religious people worship as God in ignorance today.

Today's scientists are now laying the foundation to achieve similar feats in the future. You're very ignorant about a lot of things.

chieveboy:


Honestly man...

So daft

"Fixed assumption" and I warned him to always use locomotive assumption but he refused

Dummy, your enkanker slave master you are following, hope you know how he derived his doctrines

A001:

Lols, you're obviously very ignorant. Some scientists of the past human eras have actually developed this kind of physics I'm working on and achieved wonders with it, ranging from the design of plants and animals (including humans) mimicking those that evolved naturally, the creation of languages, even planets and stars, the design of religions, cultures, and much more.

https://www.mdpi.com/2411-9660/3/3/43
https://www1.grc.nasa.gov/research-and-engineering/vine/petal/

Check out those papers. Those NASA scientists are working on some applications covered in the field of physics I just developed.

When I was even doing my project, I never knew these people had even started work on this periodic table as far back as 2018–2020. Coincidentally, I started building something similar as one of the applications of the physics I developed for consciousness and a range of other natural phenomena.

I came across NASA's version much later after publishing my papers, and their own table is far from complete and is missing some key metrics.

When NASA's PeTaL (or similar ones) mentioned above is fully developed in the coming years, combined with the physics underlying consciousness, scientists will be able to achieve tons of wondrous feats such as exploring planets physically and designing of living systems and setting up colonies in other planets.

The knowledge of this physics and that table were among the key tools the past humans that developed this planet used in the ancient past to design humans, animals, plants, microbes, and tons of other living systems, create languages and build towns, nations, and continents.

It's these past humans religious people worship as God in ignorance today.

Today's scientists are now laying the foundation to achieve similar feats in the future. You're very ignorant about a lot of things.

Daft thing, have you looked up the history of where the periodic table comes from?
The people that derive it, which physics degree do they have?

Maynman:

Daft thing, have you looked up the history of where the periodic table comes from?
The people that derive it, which physics degree do they have.

Lols, are you too dumb to check the profile of the NASA scientists on Google? You obviously don't know jack about those works I shared, and instead of reading about it online to educate yourself and cure your deep ignorance, you quoted me to make a fool of yourself as usual.

You're obviously too dull for me to be engaging here.

No be me go dey engage a person suffering from congenital retardness early in the morning, person wey no get work, sleeping and waking up on Nairaland daily

A001:


It's these past humans religious people worship as God in ignorance today.

Today's scientists are now laying the foundation to achieve similar feats in the future. You're very ignorant about a lot of things.

There was no time people worship"God", they worship different things we modern people now call "god".
Do you even know the history of how god became God?
If you are not an indoctrinated slave, why don't you find another term for this thing and not use "God", then define that term which your fellow scientists can understand.

I already told you, your project is a failure.

A001:
No be me go dey engage a person suffering from congenital retardness early in the morning, person wey no get work, sleeping and waking up on Nairaland daily

Workaholic, while you looking for purpose of life, don't forget life Itself.

That your very idea of God is a farce, I assure you

A001:

Lols, are you too dumb to check the profile of the NASA scientists on Google? You obviously don't know jack about those works I shared, and instead of reading about it online to educate yourself and cure your deep ignorance, you quoted me to make a fool of yourself as usual.

You're obviously too dull for me to be engaging here.

Numbskull, can you quote a line in that link you sent that agreed with your jargons, just a line.

You are desperate to prove your fantasy

Maynman:

Dummy, your enkanker slave master you are following, hope you know how he derived his doctrines

I do, he derived it from locomotive assumption

chieveboy:


I do, he derived it from locomotive assumption

Locomotive enckanker slave, illiterate when last did you soul travel 😂
Do you even know what "soul" means, that it will travel
Or is it astral projection 😅, madame blavaskty has gotten a hold of your mind.

The retardeeen no even read the paper. Why will I reply you when you don't even read? Nothing in your head, and you're not the type that reads. I'd simply bin any silly mentions. Asking me a question already answered clearly in the paper I shared.

There are some people I don't even want to be engaging on this forum at all. And Seun needs to give us a block button to ward off unnecessary mentions from mentally dysfunctional people on his forum.