Nawa ...for this tinubu matter o.

Buy monetized YouTube channel at an affordable rate. Zero eight one 67692079.
Hurry...first come first serve

, YOU THE CITIZEN CHOOSE YOUR OWN TYPE OF LEADER, THEN YOU DON'T HAVE TO REGRET YOUR ACTION, THIS IS NIGERIA WE LIVE

Judolisco:
what happened to d female that attended CSU... U guys said he didn't attend CSU previously.....d sch said you can get certificates from 3rd party vendors.....they never said his certificate was forged....

What happened to the 1970 Govt college Lagos that he graduated from before the school was founded?

Thank you jare. Awon oni ranu!

Eriokanmi:
You must have passed a PHD in law to refute what the legal luminary had said. I guessed it was because his statement wasn't in your mentor's favour. Shior!

Dem don come oo... Haba!
Na d strategy to still keep dis man?🙄

Iamgrey5:
Therr Judge said that certificate forgery is a criminal offense that has to be proven beyond reasonable doubt.

And there's reasonable doubt already established.

You should know where he is going with this.

This is not a criminal case. The supreme court here cannot impose criminal penalties like jail terms on offenders.
The beyond reasonable doubt standard does not hold.
The standard is what would a "reasonable man think"
Or "preponderance of evidence"

Mynd44:



The problem is that the judge himself has raised the issue of reasonable doubt

Isn't it Tinubu's lawyer that's supposed to be raising this? This clearly shows bias on the part of the judge. I thought he was supposed to be making judgement based on arguments .... not raising arguments. Thus judge needs to be removed from this case if the Supreme Court is to continue being the bastion of justice

It is well

MXrep:

Allow those with in depth knowledge to discuss this matter abeg

Exactly and don't introduce sentiments, let us be factual

I remember many US democrats trying to bend and stretch the law as much as possible to get Trump, arguing that it is justified because Trump is a "bad man" and "illegitimate president".

They generally argued that Trump is not above the law but they had to be reminded that he is certainly not below the law either.

Opponents of BAT should remember that too. True justice is a two-way street.

tit:


This is not a criminal case. The supreme court here cannot impose criminal penalties like jail terms on offenders.
The beyond reasonable doubt standard does not hold.
The standard is what would a "reasonable man think"
Or "preponderance of evidence"

At the bolded.. Unfortunately Law doesn't deal what you think is reasonable but what the law states..

Nonny95:


What happened to the 1970 Govt college Lagos that he graduated from before the school was founded?

yes before the govt sch prop, there was a trending female that you guys claim attended CSU.... That pbat didn't attend CSU at all... My question is, have you accepted that BAT attended CSU?

EyeCumInPiece:
Everything about the Druggie is conflicting. Nothing in his life is ever straight.

Your argument is valid but don't use the tweet from the Lunatic Reno Omokri to back it up. He's a mad man and his opinion doesn't makes your valid. Be original and stop giving the mad man the undeserved attention

Originalsly:


Isn't it Tinubu's lawyer that's supposed to be raising this? This clearly shows bias on the part of the judge. I thought he was supposed to be making judgement based on arguments .... not raising arguments. Thus judge needs to be removed from this case if the Supreme Court is to continue being the bastion of justice

The Judge mad the statement after all the lwayers adopt their statements..

I will not say anything but I know that this is Nigeria and what our judges and lawyers are. The outcome is very obvious for obvious reason. Justice Okoro is running away blind seeing the truth

Nonny95:
There’s one letter and one deposition under oath. As a judge, Principle of Orality’ in Litigation must be appreciated.

A deposition under oath is not a letter, infact it gives clearer view to anyone's sworn statement, which the Judge is trying to create technicality for.

If your written statement is yes and during cross examination your yes turns no, then you're not saying the truth.

When you remember this is Nigeria and not Netflix then you will understand this statement from a judge.

We know justice okoro's antecedents, he should go on to approve certificate forgery. Nigerians will remember him for that.

Don't mind them my brother. All these Judges need to be schooled. They should strike out the case let the whole world know how corrupt the Judicial system in Nigeria is.

Shameless people!

Imagine the mumu question a judge is asking the public. Is this man well at all?

fergie001:

That should be Agim

I knew where we were going since Feb 27

This abracadabra no be here
I think he's referring to the letter from Jamal Orr.
Is Jamal's letter having more weight or equal weight with a deposition under oath?

Originalsly:


Isn't it Tinubu's lawyer that's supposed to be raising this? This clearly shows bias on the part of the judge. I thought he was supposed to be making judgement based on arguments .... not raising arguments. Thus judge needs to be removed from this case if the Supreme Court is to continue being the bastion of justice

It simply means not everyone is crazy like the Obidients and the Mikano boys.
This is an abuse of the court process, case should be thrown out.

tesppidd:


Now The Supreme Court of Nigeria is going to discard evidences before it and to make it's own decisions but rely on a letter from CSU.

What a Supreme Court!

He's told you that you need to prove beyond reasonable doubt. That's what to expect.

Kukutente23:

This abracadabra no be here
I think he's referring to the letter from Jamal Orr.
Is Jamal's letter having more weight or equal weight with a deposition under oath?

Once there are conflicting letters/reports, it's a recipe for throwing out the suit.

Fraud or forgery is a criminal matter and must be proven beyond any reasonable doubts. 1+1 must be 2 and not 11. As it is said in criminal cases, it is better to free an accused than convict an innocent.

If for example, CSU was cross-examined then it could have slightly made some difference, nonetheless in the face of conflicting certificates, it's already otilo.

That's exactly what happened in the LP-Mbah case.

/
Witnesses do lie in different ways. Any unscrupulous entity can write a letter of exoneration. That's why the only evidence admissible for interpretation is the one under oath made under threat of perjury.



/

tit:


This is not a criminal case. The supreme court here cannot impose criminal penalties like jail terms on offenders.
The beyond reasonable doubt standard does not hold.
The standard is what would a "reasonable man think"
Or "preponderance of evidence"

You arrived late.

SC already pronounced that forgery is criminal in nature and must be proven beyond reasonable doubt in election petition cases though SC did not comment on the part where the "proven criminal" walks out free from court and goes on to contest another election

Nonny95:
There’s one letter and one deposition under oath. As a judge, Principle of Orality’ in Litigation must be appreciated.

A deposition under oath is not a letter, infact it gives clearer view to anyone's sworn statement, which the Judge is trying to create technicality for.

If your written statement is yes and during cross examination your yes turns no, then you're not saying the truth.

When you remember this is Nigeria and not Netflix then you will understand this statement from a judge.

We know justice okoro's antecedents, he should go on to approve certificate forgery. Nigerians will remember him for that.

Very clear that whoever posted this is an operative of the PDP or LP. But, you know what, you have failed very publicly.

CSU’s depositions were clear beyond any doubt:

1. Tinubu graduated from CSU
2. The diploma he presented resembled replacements issued to others at around the same time

Even a school-boy judge would know that DEPOSITION UNDER OATH carries more weight than any letter that may have emanated from anywhere.

It’s clear you’re masturbating on this matter, thinking that because the name OKORO has links with the SadEast and BIAFRA, you can lean on the judge to do the evil that you so desperately wish for!

May God punish you and your entire co-conspirators.

You may think that Justice Okoro will dovetail to the BIAFRA agenda and do something that favours you CHILDREN OF HATE but even if he does, he can only issue a minority judgement - that’s the best case scenario for Atiku and his co-conspirators from BIAFRA land.

Shame on you for even trying to raise this nonsense!!!

Zico5:
These people are just evil and dangerous entities. They are only diminishing the chance of any igbo to rule this country. Who will vote people like this to rule over them. We can truly see that this is beyond good governance and politics. Let them continue to play tribal war. 2027 is not far. We shall see this to the end

Haaa kilode bayi? Where did they mention Igbo that is making you hyperventilate? Justice Okoro is from Cross river state please. What brought Igbo Yoruba or hausa into this discuss? Are you this damaged that you see Igbo in everything you do? Omaa se o?

Law 101 : Yes and no is not an answer by that a criminal case has been prove beyond any reasonable doubt.

seanfer:


At the bolded.. Unfortunately Law doesn't deal what you think is reasonable but what the law states..

Unfortunately for you, the law uses the thinking of a reasonable man in non criminal cases.
Election petition is a non criminal case
Anybody bringing up "beyond reasonable doubt standard" is misleading himself.

Iamgrey5:
He is saying there's reasonable doubt to dismiss ATIKU'S case.

Exactly

Mynd44:

Stop believing everything you read on twitter.

One is a sworn statement, the other is a deposition.

The problem is that the judge himself has raised the issue of reasonable doubt

Na the country all of us dey. Everybody yansh go burn. By the time Tinubu is done with you all, all of una eyes go clear.

Kukutente23:

You arrived late.

SC already pronounced that forgery is criminal in nature and must be proven beyond reasonable doubt in election petition cases though SC did not comment on the part where the "proven criminal" walks out free from court and goes on to contest another election

So you think the justices are dumb?

Nonny95:


What happened to the 1970 Govt college Lagos that he graduated from before the school was founded?

Let me educate you.

The issue you raised was never part of the initial petitions. It came up after a search so it becomes part of new issues Atiku want the Court to consider.

Supreme Court is not a Trial Court. It's a Court of Policy.