Hi guys. It's been a while since I've posted. I've been busy researching on the topic I am going to share with you all today as well as some other personal stuff.

If you are new to my research, this thread might seem crazy at first, but I urge you to have some patience and try to observe the evidence I put forward and come to your own conclusion.

This is going to be one of my most important threads because I will enter a series of rabbit holes and touch topics I've never touched before.

For the open-minded folks and truth seekers, this thread is definitely going to be interesting and very eye opening.

I plead with the moderators to leave my thread on this section. I've spent a lot of time on this research and it will be defeating if it's moved to some other section where people won't see it. Nairaland is the only way I can reach my fellow Nigerians.

Also, for those who might feel the need to interject and debunk whatever I post, please wait till I finish. I tend to build up on my arguments post by post. The likes you are trying to get by derailing the thread won't put any food on your table.

On that note, let's begin.

Following

Before I start posting picture evidence, I'll like to lay out the premise on which my argument rests.

I've delved into this subject extensively and I am confident that few hundred years ago there was a great cataclysm on our planet

Before this cataclysm the humans on Earth were very advanced, more advanced than we are now. This cataclysm can be likened to a global earthquake of massive proportion that caused massive cities to sink beneath the ground.

This great civilization was like a one world government that sprawled across the entire length and breadth of the globe. From Europe to Africa, to the Americas and to Asian. The dress style, culture and most importantly, the architectural style of this great people was the same throughout the world.

But something wiped them out. And they were replaced by our current humans who occupied their cities and the elite among them rewrote history, even as far as adding 1000 years to the timeline.

I understand that the above may seem unbelievable especially for someone new to this topic, but please I implore you to have patience and examine the evidence that I'll put forward.

I may be slow with posting as I'm currently doing other thing simultaneously, but before the end of today I'll have greased your appetite.

Ourtruth247:
I understand that the above may seem unbelievable especially for someone new to this topic, but please I implore you to have patience and examine the evidence that I'll put forward.

I may be slow with posting as I'm currently doing other thing simultaneously, but before the end of today I'll have greased your appetite.

I have being looking out for your posts time and time again, but you've been offline for like forever.
Well done.
I look forward to this.
Thanks.

Sanfrancisco before the earthquake

The first evidence I'll put forward is from a video footage.

The picture below is from a video footage of San Francisco before the "earthquake" that wiped most of the city to the ground. The reason I put earthquake in quotes is because I'm certain it wasn't an earthquake but a deliberate destruction of evidence by the colonizers of this city.

On the picture you can clearly see that the building was Erected in the year 896.

This is in direct contradiction to official history. According to official history, the city of San Francisco was built from scratch by the European immigrants in the 18th and 19th century. How then is it possible to see a building Erected almost 1000 years before?

Following!

The Portuguese tombs in India.

According to official history, we are told that the Portugese first stepped foot in India in 1498 when the Portugese explorer Vasco De Gama arrived on the west coast of India

However, when you examine the Portugese tombstones found in the church ruins in the Vasal fort in India you notice something interesting

The dates on the tomb read buried in the year 684 and 601.

If the Portugese first stepped foot in India in 1498, how then do we see tombstones written in Portugese and dated 800+ years before?

Evidently the Portugese explorers first stepped in India in the year 498. But 1000 years was added to make it 1498

The lies of Pompeii

We have all heard about Pompeii. The Roman city that was destroyed in the year 79AD by volcanic eruption and buried beneath the ash for almost 1700 years, only to be discovered in the year 1763.

What if I told you that Pompeii was destroyed less than 500 years ago?

Well below are some hard evidence. These are maps made by explorers in the 16th and 17th century that show the city of Pompeii.

If the city was buried and no one knew about it, how is it shown in maps as a bustling city just less than 500 years ago?

The lies become even clearer

The first picture is the three graces; a painting recovered from Pompeii after it was "discovered"

The second picture is a painting by Rafael in the 16th century.

Notice the eerie similarity?

The big question is how did a 16th century painter paint a picture that was from a first century city, supposedly unknown to man?

The obvious answer is that the so called Pompeii was a city that thrived at the same time Rafael made his own painting. The implication of this finding is massive and I will explain in the coming posts.

Following

Where did they all go?

If you look at the paintings found on the excarvated walls of the city of Pompeii, you see a people whose lifestyle and culture are similar to those of the so called Greeks and Romans. But we are also told that that this kind of culture and lifestyle ended after the fall of Rome and then Europe entered into a dark age that lasted roughly 1000 years.

But if Pompeii, a very roman-esque culture thrived in the 16th century, it means that the so called dark age of Europe never happened. It was fabricated. The downfall of "rome" is simply the end of a global advanced civilization that happened less than 500 years ago. The ruins of this civilization was found in major cities across the world, its buildings were repurposed and and history was rewritten.

And make no mistake, when I refer to the downfall of rome, I don't mean the whole whitewashed Julius Caesar crap we are fed. I am speaking of a world wide advanced civilization made up of people of all races; black, white, asian, arab etc.

If you are still not convinced, there is still more evidence to share.

Spot the difference

Look closely at the two photos below

The first photo is a painting of "ancient" rome. Notice I am putting the word "ancient" in quotes.

The second photo is the Palace of fine arts built in Sanfrancisco.

Why does an American building supposedly built in 1906 look like it was cropped out of Ancient rome? It even looks more like ancient rome than actual paintings of ancient rome.

Also notice how old and weathered the building looks.

I mean just do a simple google search of the term "world fairs 1800s" and you will see structures that look like they were cropped out of ancient rome all littering American cities like Sanfrancisco and Chicago.

We are told that buildings like this were built by settlers for world fairs and later destroyed. I mean who would destroy something so beautiful and magnificient, unless they were trying to hide something

7.50pm...you done?
Can we comment now?

Coz I'm not yet convinced.

There could be more evidence to support your assertion, but this isn't sufficient to hold sway.

MyExpression:
7.50pm...you done?
Can we comment now?

Coz I'm not yet convinced.

There could be more evidence to support your assertion, but this isn't sufficient to hold sway.

I'm not done.

Auctioning of cities.

I found this ad made by a real estate firm that shows the city of Seattle being sold.

I did more digging and I found multiple photos of this sort of auctioning being done across multiple cities in United States in the 1800s

In the photos you find these old European-esque looking buildings spread across these cities and we are told that they were all built by settlers in few years after they arrived.

If they were built by settlers, why are huge parts of the cities sold like old unused household appliances?

Following.

You find these Roman type buildings all across the world, from Russia to India to North Africa, but the reason I'm focusing specifically on America is because we are told it was an empty wasteland built recently by the settlers.

Fort Jefferson

It's not just the buildings you find in US during the 19th century, you also find forts like the one below, known as the fort Jefferson.

It's a 16 arces fort built with 16 million bricks. Just let that sink in.

The big question is why would immigrants settling into a new location waste time, energy and money in building a fortress using 16 million bricks.

This isn't even the most amusing part of the big lie, it's the fact that the fort was built within a year. From 1825 - 1826. This alone is a mockery of our collective intelligence.

Even if they had a machine that was pumping out 12,000 bricks per day, which they obviously didn't, it would take them 3.65 years to make just the bricks alone.

This fort, just like the buildings are remnants of an advanced civilization erased from the history we have been taught

U go explain tire

Yet all your evidence were provided and copied from research done by white people.

Your trash evidence is excessively derivative.

How about you go out there and get some physical annd original evidence like these white people do?

All your trash are always pictures and bunch of text snippets copied from the internet with no single shred of meaningful evidence or originality.


You're really jobless n will soon go mad

dkidd:
U go explain tire

Lol.
At times I wonder if it's really worth it

anslemarinze52:


Lol.
At times I wonder if it's really worth it

Until he starts traveling to explore all the clues and evidences while carrying his followers along he's just rambling and will not be taken seriously. Shebi him want be real live Indiana Jones?

BlackhatMentor:
Yet all your evidence were provided and copied from research done by white people.

Your trash evidence is excessively derivative.

How about you go out there and get some physical annd original evidence like these white people do?

All your trash are always pictures and bunch of text snippets copied from the internet with no single shred of meaningful evidence or originality.


You're really jobless n will soon go mad

Exactly why I said him go explain tire... He's not ready yet. Na boredom still dey do am. When he's better engaged him go face reality

BlackhatMentor:
Yet all your evidence were provided and copied from research done by white people.

Your trash evidence is excessively derivative.

How about you go out there and get some physical annd original evidence like these white people do?

All your trash are always pictures and bunch of text snippets copied from the internet with no single shred of meaningful evidence or originality.


You're really jobless n will soon go mad

Is he forcing you to believe him . Why the hate.
He is satisfying his hunger for knowledge beyond what is known and you are making fun of him.
In one of his previous threads he called someone a npc(the 'npc' was causing distraction), i also think you are npc.
Not everyone is satisfied with the stories they were fed, some actually try to see beyond the accepted narratives.

A pastor somewhere now will shout "I knew it!" after seeing this thread. He will be like, I was very sure the world would come to an end by year 2000 but these occultic people went and altered the years in the space and got me confused. Ndi uchu.

Sangoamadioha1:



Is he forcing you to believe him . Why the hate.
He is satisfying his hunger for knowledge beyond what is known and you are making fun of him.
In one of his previous threads he called someone a npc(the 'npc' was causing distraction), i also think you are npc.
Not everyone is satisfied with the stories they were fed, some actually try to see beyond the accepted narratives.

Unfortunately all his research are also stories fed to him

No body alive knows what year it is. Islamic year is in 1400s same with some other places in the world.The current one has been adopted by the powers that be. What is the big deal now

Can this be weed

dkidd:

Until he starts traveling to explore all the clues and evidences while carrying his followers along he's just rambling and will not be taken seriously. Shebi him want be real live Indiana Jones?

U feel sponsor his trip

ednut1:
No body alive knows what year it is. Islamic year is in 1400s same with some other places in the world.The current one has been adopted by the powers that be. What is the big deal now

what other places apart from Islamic people and Islamic countries (Iran and Afghanistan to be precise) is in 1400s?