ItShallPass:


The Book called the Acts of Apostles which majorly featured Paul was not written by him.

And who wrote Acts?

Maynman:

And who wrote Acts?

The important thing is that it wasn't written by Paul.

ItShallPass:


The important thing is that it wasn't written by Paul.

That's not important at all.

Who wrote it?
When was it Written?
Is it Paul or saul that the person mentioned?


The author of Acts never knew any Paul

Maynman:

That's not important at all.

Who wrote it?
When was it Written?
Is it Paul or saul that the person mentioned?


The author of Acts never knew any Paul

Is this a digression? I don't understand what you meant by "The author of Acts does not mention any Paul."

First off, are you here to debate the authorship of the book of Acts or the Apostleship of Paul? I have pointed out to you that the writer of the Acts of Apostles which made Paul popular as an Apostle was not Paul. Whoever that person is to you is not my concern. My point is that Paul was not the one who popularized himself as an apostle.

Read slowly, The author of Acts never knew any Paul.

ItShallPass:


Is this a digression? I don't understand what you meant by "The author of Acts does not mention any Paul."

First off, are you here to debate the authorship of the book of Acts or the Apostleship of Paul? I have pointed out to you that the writer of the Acts of Apostles which made Paul popular as an Apostle was not Paul. Whoever that person is to you is not my concern. My point is that Paul was not the one who popularized himself as an apostle.

What's the correlation. Read your statement.

"I have pointed out to you that the writer of the Acts of Apostles which made Paul popular as an Apostle was not Paul."

You are using a forgery book to defend another forgery 😂
Who is the writer of this "Acts of Apostles"
when was it written?

kkins25:


Point me to Hebrew scriptures that clearly demonstrated the Trinity. Please stop directing me to your Greeko-roman aka European Fathers..

Schoary consensus is that Paul did write, or at least, narrated most of the letters bar the book of Hebrews. Other letters/Epistles had been updated by anonymous folks too though. So, no one knows for sure.

Who is the angel of the LORD in the Hebrew bible.
Philo was a Jew and was never a Christian. He never met Christ. What did he say about logos.

The Targum which is the ancient aramaic bible has the word logos in it as memra- what does it
represent?

Maynman:
Read slowly, The author of Acts never knew any Paul.


What's the correlation. Read your statement.

"I have pointed out to you that the writer of the Acts of Apostles which made Paul popular as an Apostle was not Paul."

You are using a forgery book to defend another forgery 😂
Who is the writer of this "Acts of Apostles"
when was it written?

I'm not here to debate the authorship of the Acts of Apostles. I think you should do the slow reading because I made that clear already.

What makes you question Paul's Apostleship? That's what I'm discussing you. I made that clear too.

And I have also pointed out that Paul didn't declare himself an apostle, someone else wrote that about him. Whether you regard that book as a forgery or not us none of my business. The point is that the Apostleship of Paul and his recognition as such, was not the doing of Paul.

kkins25:

What's nonsense is you claiming that your claims of authorship of the gospels are credible. How did you arrive at such conclusions?

One of the strongest criteria used to disqualify Mathew and John is that they couldnt speak greek. That's largely unfounded. The gospels themselves prove otherwise.

ItShallPass:


I'm not here to debate the authorship of the Acts of Apostles. I think you should do the slow reading because I made that clear already.

What makes you question Paul's Apostleship? That's what I'm discussing you. I made that clear too.

And I have also pointed out that Paul didn't declare himself an apostle, someone else wrote that about him. Whether you regard that book as a forgery or not us none of my business. The point is that the Apostleship of Paul and his recognition as such, was not the doing of Paul.

You said nothing, you brought up a book called "acts of apostle", and I question you on who wrote it, when and where it was written.

You are using a forgery book to defend another forgery 😂
Who is the writer of this "Acts of Apostles"
when was it written?

kkins25:


What da actual Fvck, bro?

It's a plausibility or they actually woke up as the scriptures said 'they slept'- a term used for people risen from the dead.

The point here is that it didn't make headline is not a valid excuse to discredit it.

2 other events of that day also didn't make headlines but we now know they happened.

SIRTee15:

It's a plausibility or they actually woke up as the scriptures said 'they slept'- a term used for people risen from the dead.

The point here is that it didn't make headline is not a valid excuse to discredit it.

2 other events of that day also didn't make headlines but we now know they happened.

Comparing earthquake to zombies awakening 😂😂

Maynman:

You said nothing, you brought up a book called "acts of apostle", and I question you on who wrote it, when and where it was written.

You are using a forgery book to defend another forgery 😂
Who is the writer of this "Acts of Apostles"
when was it written?

Whoever the writer of the book is, as long as it's not Paul, my stand remains. My point is that Paul didn't impose himself as an apostle on Christiandom.

ItShallPass:


Whoever the writer of the book is, as long as it's not Paul, my stand remains. My point is that Paul didn't impose himself as an apostle on Christiandom.

When was this book written, me writing about Superman does not mean Superman exist. You don't understand your point and your wack logic.

Who made Paul or saul an apostle?
How did Saul change his name to Paul? 😂😂

You are using a forgery book to defend another forgery 😂
Who is the writer of this "Acts of Apostles"
when was it written?

Maynman:

When was this book written, me writing about Superman does not mean Superman exist. You don't understand your point and your wack logic.

Who made Paul or saul an apostle?
How did Saul change his name to Paul? 😂😂

You are using a forgery book to defend another forgery 😂
Who is the writer of this "Acts of Apostles"
when was it written?

Would you please establish your point with civility without the unnecessary attacks? Answer your own questions if you think any betrter. I am not here to be queried by you.

ItShallPass:


Answer your own questions if you think any betrter. I am not here to be queried by you.

I was on my own when you quoted me, so what's the problem?

The author of Acts didn't know Any Paul.

Maynman:

I was on my own when you quoted me, so what's the problem?

The author of Acts didn't know Any Paul.

Why should I take your word for it? Can't you prove your point?

ItShallPass:


Why should I take your word for it? Can't you prove your point?

Who told you to take my word for it?

Go and know it yourself.

Maynman:

Who told you to take my word for it?

Go and know it yourself.

Why speak the word when you know you cannot defend it?

ItShallPass:


Why speak the word when you know you cannot defend it?

listen to your advice boy.

See you fellow man
https://www.vanguardngr.com/2012/09/telling-lies-in-gods-name/

Maynman:
listen to your advice boy.

See you fellow man
https://www.vanguardngr.com/2012/09/telling-lies-in-gods-name/

Take the advice kid. Are you the author of the content on that link? I'll debate the author and not the referrer.

ItShallPass:


Take the advice kid. Are you the author of the content on that link? I'll debate the author and not the referrer.

The facts is there in the link why not dispute ONE, I'll tutor you boy

Maynman:

The facts is there in the link why not dispute ONE, I'll tutor you boy

Kid, the link contains the warped ideologies of an ignorant Muslim. Are you that Muslim?

ItShallPass:


Kid, the link contains the warped ideologies of an ignorant Muslim. Are that Muslim?

Dispute ONE, let's see boy. And the person is a fellow Christian like you, so many excuses, let's see your level kid, dispute ONE.

https://www.vanguardngr.com/2012/09/telling-lies-in-gods-name/

Maynman:

Dispute ONE, let's see boy. And the person is a fellow Christian like you, so many excuses, let's see your level kid, dispute ONE.

https://www.vanguardngr.com/2012/09/telling-lies-in-gods-name/

Kid, I'll dispute it with you only if you're the author. Otherwise it's your cup of tea to believe the gibberish he wrote.

And hey, no Christian thinks so awkwardly and reads the writings of Paul upside down like that guy did in the link which you now see as your pillar for debates.

ItShallPass:


I'm not here to debate the authorship of the Acts of Apostles. I think you should do the slow reading because I made that clear already.

What makes you question Paul's Apostleship? That's what I'm discussing you. I made that clear too.

And I have also pointed out that Paul didn't declare himself an apostle, someone else wrote that about him. Whether you regard that book as a forgery or not us none of my business. The point is that the Apostleship of Paul and his recognition as such, was not the doing of Paul.

It's like u don't know that madman U discussing with. There's a reason I stopped debating with him.
My best advice for u in religious section is to avoid him at all cost. He's already an outcast here, few people debate him.
His head is filled with conspiracy junks and desperately looking for where to offload them.
That's how he will be jumping from one topic to another without concluding on any, moving around in circles.
He just want to debate for the sake of it not to prove anything.
Him head no correct at all.

ItShallPass:


Kid, I'll dispute it with you only if you're the author. Otherwise it's your cup of tea to believe the gibberish he wrote.

And hey, no Christian thinks so awkwardly and reads the writings of Paul upside that like that guy did in the link which you now see as your pillar for debates.

Boy you can't even dispute ONE, you just talking and talking because you are empty.
So as a Christian reading Paul writings after he got the so called vision, where did he go to?
You are Little, boy.

"Dispute ONE, let's see boy. And the person is a fellow Christian like you, so many excuses, let's see your level kid, dispute ONE."

https://www.vanguardngr.com/2012/09/telling-lies-in-gods-name/"

SIRTee15:



It's like u don't know that madman U discussing with. There's a reason I stopped debating with him.
My best advice for u in religious section is to avoid him at all cost. He's already an outcast here, few people debate him.
His head is filled with conspiracy junks and desperately looking for where to offload them.
That's how he will be jumping from one topic to another without concluding on any, moving around in circles.
He just want to debate for the sake of it not to prove anything.
Him head no correct at all.

Basing your life on what you have to debate on, mad man.
You yourself see the errors but your beliefs has blinded you.

I'm 100 percent sure you are doubting 😂

SIRTee15:



It's like u don't know that madman U discussing with. There's a reason I stopped debating with him.
My best advice for u in religious section is to avoid him at all cost. He's already an outcast here, few people debate him.
His head is filled with conspiracy junks and desperately looking for where to offload them.
That's how he will be jumping from one topic to another without concluding on any, moving around in circles.
He just want to debate for the sake of it not to prove anything.
Him head no correct at all.

Thanks for the clarification. I guessed as much about him. He even wanted to drag me into unnecessary debates that had nothing to do with the Apostleship of Paul which he queried. Rather than defend his baseless talk, he was referring me to an unintelligent content written by someone like himself on Vanguard.

ItShallPass:


He was referring me to an unintelligent content written by someone like himself on Vanguard.

Yey you can't dispute just ONE thing from it 😂

ItShallPass:



And hey, no Christian thinks so awkwardly and reads the writings of Paul upside down like that guy did in the link which you now see as your pillar for debates.

You are right.
"Approximately 97% of the world’s Christians believe and follow the Pauline Doctrine."

Read more on Pauline doctrine.
https://www.worldhistory.org/Paul_the_Apostle/

Maynman:

Boy you can't even dispute ONE, you just talking and talking because you are empty.
So as a Christian reading Paul writings after he got the so called vision, where did he go to?
You are Little, boy.

"Dispute ONE, let's see boy. And the person is a fellow Christian like you, so many excuses, let's see your level kid, dispute ONE."

https://www.vanguardngr.com/2012/09/telling-lies-in-gods-name/"

Bring him to Nairaland, let's see how he fairs. As for you his follower, you're none of my business.

ItShallPass:


Bring him to Nairaland, let's see how he fairs. As for you his follower, you're none of my business.

You can't even dispute ONE from it, you are little boy.
Basing your life on forged books written by UNKNOWN AUTHORS.

And next time if you are gonna be empty don't quote me, just talking and talking 😂😂