shoodboi2:


This is the first time I'm hearing that Russia captured Bakhmut. You guys always claimed Bakhmut was still in Ukraine's hands.

Maybe by this time next year, you'll inform us on the cities that Russia captured last year.

Obviously you're not following the war. Like I always so quote what I said not what someone else said.

Crixus13:


Nato wasn’t even born then, and it was the ussr. You might want to read about the circumstances surrounding their three and a half month war as your comment shows you know little or nothing at all about it

Lol, whenever your Motherland have issues with their neighbors, they invade them and you're wondering why Ukraine were skeptical Russia would stick to their part of the agreement.

Crixus13:



So much for a democracy 🤢

What's your preferred form of govt?

WritterNg:
⚡The British Global Maritime Risk Management Company, Ambrey has stated that an Unknown Incident has been reported near the Bab al-Mandab Strait in the Red Sea.

It's like these Houthis re just firing giant knockouts at their ships.

shoodboi2:


This is the first time I'm hearing that Russia captured Bakhmut. You guys always claimed Bakhmut was still in Ukraine's hands.

Maybe by this time next year, you'll inform us on the cities that Russia captured last year.

😂 🤣 😂 🤣 😂 🤣 😂 🤣 😂

Tiopii:



LOL. Russia doesn't war with NATO, conventionally it has no chance. It is very clear. Russia don't have the economy or military might to succeed.

Not with hundreds of ICBMS flying from all angles. Why would Russia sit back and let itself get into a conventional war with 31 rich countries?

FoolishBoy419:


Not with hundreds of ICBMS flying from all angles. Why would Russia sit back and let itself get into a conventional war with 31 rich countries?

Do you think it would be fair if Russia went against like 6 other nuke capable countries? If there's any chance of survival for those countries Russia would come out the worst hit.

Even in the nukes battle they are outmatched and outnumbered.

FoolishBoy419:


It's like these Houthis re just firing giant knockouts at their ships.

Which one is giant knock out again

Ni

Crixus13:


Nato wasn’t even born then, and it was the ussr. You might want to read about the circumstances surrounding their three and a half month war as your comment shows you know little or nothing at all about it

My bad, I got the country wrong, I meant Georgia. This happened 2008 I think. I'm guessing Georgia was trying to join NATO.

You see why Russia's neighbours don't trust them. Once bitten twice shy.

Tiopii:


The last Ukraine city Russia captured was Bahkmut and that was over a year ago. The majority of Russia's advance came in the beginning of the war, when Ukraine was unprepared and getting themselves in order.

You finally proved beyond all reasonable doubt that you know nothing about what you say, would have taken you literally seconds to find out if your claim is true but you’d rather make it anyways. Educate yourself young man. Your claim on bahkmut being russia’s last captured city is false

FoolishBoy419:


There's a chance that USA warned them ahead of time. If their target is just the infrastructure, they can give them 10 minutes to evacuate before striking.

Some sources are saying that over 40 are dead though.

If you have been following me i differentiated millitary situation from political situation....


This is not a war yet so it is a political situation, it is millitary standard to inform the other party about an attack.


It is worth noting that only legitimate government can be informed so the other party will be informed indirectly this does not they will recieve full information hence there is likely to be casualties.


You now see that millitaries around the world communicate very well and you should stop watching propaganda

Tiopii:



I'm glad you admit Russia has no chance conventionally. If it's by conventional means the War would be fought in Russia.

And you talk like only Russia possess nukes, if any scenario when nukes are used between the US and Russia, Russia would be in the worst situation.

Might for might, militarily and economically, The US is obviously the stronger country. Even the USSR struggled against the US and it led to it's eventual collapse.

You just like to feel like Russia is fighting NATO, while there's no doubt NATO is aiding Ukraine, the scenario would be by far different if it's an actual NATO vs Russia.

Russia has no response to the US arsenal. It isn't sentiment it's pure fact. This Russia/Ukraine war has given substantial data bout Russia military tech to NATO.

All i can say to you is to shut up with you opinions and get an education. Would do you much good than just talking. Now you assume i mean russia wouldn’t be devastated after a nuclear holocaust, when in fact you can’t hide your ugly bias for the clowns you support. Saying Russia would lose more from a nuclear holocaust, how can that be?. A country that possesses more nuclear weapons than the combination of all the nuclear weapons of her enemies?, a country with a lot more land size than her enemies combined?. You must be tripping. Russia doesn’t have any response to the US’s arsenal?, boy you’re clowning. And economy wise who has the most to lose?, your favorite organisations that’s who so how dare you downplay their losses in the event of a nuclear war and say all that vomit you regurgitated up there. Learn to think man

Tiopii:



I'm glad you admit Russia has no chance conventionally. If it's by conventional means the War would be fought in Russia.

And you talk like only Russia possess nukes, if any scenario when nukes are used between the US and Russia, Russia would be in the worst situation.

Might for might, militarily and economically, The US is obviously the stronger country. Even the USSR struggled against the US and it led to it's eventual collapse.

You just like to feel like Russia is fighting NATO, while there's no doubt NATO is aiding Ukraine, the scenario would be by far different if it's an actual NATO vs Russia.

Russia has no response to the US arsenal. It isn't sentiment it's pure fact. This Russia/Ukraine war has given substantial data bout Russia military tech to NATO.

Is that something to be proud of?, that a single country does not outnumber a group of 30 Nations?. Learn to think

Tiopii:


Obviously you're not following the war. Like I always so quote what I said not what someone else said.

Would you look at this able people, he’s looking for someone to give him an education

Tiopii:


Lol, whenever your Motherland have issues with their neighbors, they invade them and you're wondering why Ukraine were skeptical Russia would stick to their part of the agreement.

My motherland?. My motherland is Nigeria you assuming fvck. Learn to think

Tiopii:


What's your preferred form of govt?

Your problem is that you think everything is black and white. Democracy good, autocracy bad when in reality and through time we’ve had and still have democracies that have been highly and ruthlessly authoritarian and we’ve also had and still have autocracies that have been very democratic, expressing only the will of the people. As they are the government of the people themselves. So to your question frankly I wouldn’t know, democracy has proven to be a pain in my own country and i wish it wouldn’t continue this way for us. A military or autocratic rule could do better or worse for us, but only the people should choose how they are governed. No one else has a right to dictate or imply what type of government is good and what is bad. All systems of government currently on our green earth are flawed, none better than the other. We only have good and bad peoples, good and bad leaders.

Tiopii:


Do you think it would be fair if Russia went against like 6 other nuke capable countries? If there's any chance of survival for those countries Russia would come out the worst hit.

Even in the nukes battle they are outmatched and outnumbered.

Do you actually hear yourself talk Sir?, i do and it’s without logic or common sense. Now take your 6 nuclear capable nations and add up their warheads, is it anything close to the number of warheads russia possesses? No sir. Now add the land mass of those same nations together and compare to that of Russia, does it come close? No Sir. So acre for acre, warhead for warhead pray tell how in your mind does russia come out worse hit?. How are they outmatched and outnumbered Nuclearly if i may use that term and i need you to think this time before you respond to me

Tiopii:
Ni

My bad, I got the country wrong, I meant Georgia. This happened 2008 I think. I'm guessing Georgia was trying to join NATO.

You see why Russia's neighbours don't trust them. Once bitten twice shy.

Even at that my assertion is still correct, ukraine and georgia in 2008 were announced as potential intakes into the nato alliance despite all of russia’s protests

Tiopii:


I'm glad you admit Russia has no chance conventionally. If it's by conventional means the War would be fought in Russia.
And you talk like only Russia possess nukes, if any scenario when nukes are used between the US and Russia, Russia would be in the worst situation.
Might for might, militarily and economically, The US is obviously the stronger country. Even the USSR struggled against the US and it led to it's eventual collapse.
You just like to feel like Russia is fighting NATO, while there's no doubt NATO is aiding Ukraine, the scenario would be by far different if it's an actual NATO vs Russia.
Russia has no response to the US arsenal. It isn't sentiment it's pure fact. This Russia/Ukraine war has given substantial data bout Russia military tech to NATO.

If you had done some little research on world nuclear military capabilities, it would've saved you some quality time posting these, if it were to be on facebook i would've click to see the face attached to this post. Really sad!

Common sense should point out that Russia has the strongest and fiercest millitary on earth.. you know how i knew this? If it takes more than 30 people to come together to fight one person then none of them would stand a chance to fight that same person one on one simple bro.. Leave all these conventional and none conventional talk, who told you that even using bombs of any kind with any missiles are conventional fighting If you're talking about conventional fight, leave/limit it to gun-man-man. Fighting is fighting and any capabilities of any kind too na capability, if easy why didn't all of them go get it and if all them has it, why come together then
When fighting a fight with group of people more in number than you, you wouldn't mind ending everything on this planet if you have the capabilities, and my friend, Russia's is one of the few if not the number 1 country on earth that can make that happen, they have the technology and means of delivering it so stop blabbing.

Tiopii:


Lobbying is party of politics.

Lobbying is corruption.

ulaeto:


If you had done some little research on world nuclear military capabilities, it would've saved you some quality time posting these, if it were to be on facebook i would've click to see the face attached to this post. Really sad!

Common sense should point out that Russia has the strongest and fiercest millitary on earth.. you know how i knew this? If it takes more than 30 people to come together to fight one person then none of them would stand a chance to fight that same person one on one simple bro.. Leave all these conventional and none conventional talk, who told you that even using bombs of any kind with any missiles are conventional fighting If you're talking about conventional fight, leave/limit it to gun-man-man. Fighting is fighting and any capabilities of any kind too na capability, if easy why didn't all of them go get it and if all them has it, why come together then
When fighting a fight with group of people more in number than you, you wouldn't mind ending everything on this planet if you have the capabilities, and my friend, Russia's is one of the few if not the number 1 country on earth that can make that happen, they have the technology and means of delivering it so stop blabbing.

You should be sad for yourself.

Common knowledge the US has the strongest Armed forces in the World with a global reach, and the most advanced nuclear programme.

If this 30 vs 1 argument is how you console yourself, fine. Even the USSR was no match for the US, I wonder why you think Russia would be a match, if it isn't sentiment.

There is conventional warfare, and there is nuclear conflict, both exist. As well as there are rules of engagement.

The US would stomp on Russia anywhere in the world. If it was truly NATO vs Russia, Moscow would be in flames.

There was no part in your post you tried to be logical, just emotions. You should have kept this to yourself instead of posting here and sounding dumb. I wonder what kind of research you did that gave you this nonsense piece of info.

The only thing Putin threatens NATO with is nukes, nothing else, you think he doesn't realize the difference in strength?.

Crixus13:


Even at that my assertion is still correct, ukraine and georgia in 2008 were announced as potential intakes into the nato alliance despite all of russia’s protests

Bush offered Georgia NATO membership after Russia invaded them. Russia gave reasons for the invasion and it didn't mention NATO or about NATO. Pls find out and tell us😂😂😂😂😂.

🤡 🤡 🍁 🤡 🤡

Tiopii:


You should be sad for yourself.

Common knowledge the US has the strongest Armed forces in the World with a global reach, and the most advanced nuclear programme.

If this 30 vs 1 argument is how you console yourself, fine. Even the USSR was no match for the US, I wonder why you think Russia would be a match, if it isn't sentiment.

There is conventional warfare, and there is nuclear conflict, both exist. As well as there are rules of engagement.

The US would stomp on Russia anywhere in the world. If it was truly NATO vs Russia, Moscow would be in flames.

There was no part in your post you tried to be logical, just emotions. You should have kept this to yourself instead of posting here and sounding dumb. I wonder what kind of research you did that gave you this nonsense piece of info.

The only thing Putin threatens NATO with is nukes, nothing else, you think he doesn't realize the difference in strength?.

USSR was no match for USA? Your fooling has entered elephantine proportion.
Maybe Indians will lecture you better, on whose fastest submarines deterred USA and Britain from attacking India. Muppet!

😂 🤣 🤡 🤡 🇬🇧 🤡 🤡

Tiopii:


You should be sad for yourself.

Common knowledge the US has the strongest Armed forces in the World with a global reach, and the most advanced nuclear programme.

If this 30 vs 1 argument is how you console yourself, fine. Even the USSR was no match for the US, I wonder why you think Russia would be a match, if it isn't sentiment.

There is conventional warfare, and there is nuclear conflict, both exist. As well as there are rules of engagement.

The US would stomp on Russia anywhere in the world. If it was truly NATO vs Russia, Moscow would be in flames.

There was no part in your post you tried to be logical, just emotions. You should have kept this to yourself instead of posting here and sounding dumb. I wonder what kind of research you did that gave you this nonsense piece of info.

The only thing Putin threatens NATO with is nukes, nothing else, you think he doesn't realize the difference in strength?.

You have a brain of palm kernel really, little wonder you have it difficult to comprehend simple statements.. i was magnanimous enough to spare you serious shit but with this insult that most of you can't do without. I'll make it a point of commitment to tame that shit brains of yours that lacks simple common sense.

If Russia threatens nato with nukes i wonder why I'm responding to you in the first place.. this shows I'm conversing with a goat, a country you deemed to be inferior is threatening 30+ countries, you admit it's a threat and you're saying is powerless.. You're truly an idiot and too stupid to be speaking in public. Who even gave this child access to this thread??

Crixus13:


Do you actually hear yourself talk Sir?, i do and it’s without logic or common sense. Now take your 6 nuclear capable nations and add up their warheads, is it anything close to the number of warheads russia possesses? No sir. Now add the land mass of those same nations together and compare to that of Russia, does it come close? No Sir. So acre for acre, warhead for warhead pray tell how in your mind does russia come out worse hit?. How are they outmatched and outnumbered Nuclearly if i may use that term and i need you to think this time before you respond to me

😂😂😂😂😂😂😂.

The US has the most advanced Nuclear programme in the World. The kind of destruction that Russia would probably need 7 to do would probably be 1 or 2 for NATO.

As regard landmass, not all part of Russia is habitable, for most they are all cramped together which is easy target.

Outnumbered in the fact that there are more nations with Nukes Russia would be risking facing off with and can strike from different positions, from Land and the Seas, and Outmatched by the fact that the US and by extension NATO has the most advanced Nuclear programme in the World.

Russia would come out worst hit. Both sides would take significant damages nevertheless.

Dvdpity:

USSR was no match for USA? Your fooling has entered elephantine proportion.
Maybe Indians will lecture you better, on whose fastest submarines deterred USA and Britain from attacking India. Muppet!

😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂. Where is the USSR now and what led to their collapse? How are those "fastest submarines" helping Russia in Ukraine?

shoodboi2:


You keep jumping around. Your arguments are hard to follow. You keep talking like someone who has drank ogogoro or something worse.

Make an argument, stick to it, and stop contradicting yourself.

That's why I don't debate him. He just jump around the place.

Jovi10:




This must be a script for an Hollywood movie, or may be na call of duty modern warfare

A sick script for that matter.