Minister of Power, Adebayo Adelabu, has said the hues and cries on the electricity tariff increase for Bnd A customers is from those who were not paying electricity bills in the past.

Adelabu, who spoke at the 8th Africa Energy Marketplace forum on Thursday in Abuja, said the new tariff has led to reduction in energy cost for consumers in the band by 30 to 40 percent.

He faulted the claim that the new tariff has increased the cost of production for manufacturers, leading to the high cost of goods and services.

“The electricity tariff was not targeted at improvising Nigerians or worsening the already bad economic situation of high inflation rate and naira losing value but targeted at resolving or reducing the hardship of the people.”

“Those on Band A, if they should do their arithmetic properly, to compare what they have been spending on energy provision from grid supply and energy generators put together, before the review of tariff, they have achieved nothing less than 30 to 40 percent reduction in their total cost. That is the truth.”

“We are also electricity consumers, so we can attest to this fact. It is true that if you are in Band A, your bill would have doubled if not more. But check out what you have been spending on your generator servicing, diesel and petroleum procurement, it would have down considerably.

“So the argument of this new tariff having the capacity of increasing the cost of production and raising the prices of goods and services is not logical.

“Manufacturers under Band A should have a lower Energy cost by now, thereby, reducing their cost of production. Except those that have not been paying for electricity in the past. We can also come together to compare notes with practical example. But how this new tariff regime will increase the cost of production is not valid because I am in that industry too.”

While stating that Nigeria should not be suffering from lack of electricity owing to abundance of sun, water and gas, he bemoaned the sector not getting it right since the past 60 years.

Speaking earlier, the Vice President, Power, Energy, Climate Change and Green Growth Complex of the African Development Bank (AFDB), Dr Kevin K. Kariuki, announced plans to support the Nigeria’s power sector with $1bn.

He said the support fund would be channeled through a policy-based operation (PBO) with significant energy component aimed at supporting the ongoing power sector reforms triggered by the new Electricity Act.

Kariuki added that the bank would finance the policy recommendations to actualize the expected outcomes from the National Integrated Electricity Policy and Strategic Implementation Plan.

Mynd44 Nlfpmod

AnambraPikinSel:
This adelabu is somehow loose, he doesn't know how to talk and I think Tinubu should relieve him of his post.

jmoore:
Band A was already having regular power supply before the tariff was increased. So why bringing in generator into the topic?

If a manufacturer was paying 66 naira per kw before and now pays 206 naira, common sense should tell anyone that the cost of production will increase.

lionshare:

What’s the cost of the alternative to paying the N206?

jmoore:

What they were paying before was the alternative, which is 66 naira.

lionshare:

Can you compare availability of power in new band A areas after the increment?

jmoore:

Which one is new band A? Band A is Band A. And Band A is not a new category that started this year.

lionshare:


What was it called before now? Was their rate same as N66?" For example, using Lagos, can you compare the coverage areas under the previous arrangement to what is currently obtainable?

jmoore:

Whatever you are trying to prove, you will end up indicting NERC and DISCOs for cheating Band A customers when they were paying 66 naira, if you are of the opinion that the current band a is way better than 'old' band a.

jmoore:

What they were paying before was the alternative, which is 66 naira.

ivandragon:



It is always refreshing to read comments (I refer to your comments taken together in relation to your discussion with the other chap) like yours. People who think, analyse & point out flaws or ask reasonable questions.

There have always been bands and electricity supply had always been supplied according to those bands (in reality, less than what it is supposed to be).

So the argument about reducing costs of production does not arise, rather, costs of production would definitely increase coupled with the increase in prices of alternate power supply options.

ivandragon:



It is always refreshing to read comments (I refer to your comments taken together in relation to your discussion with the other chap) like yours. People who think, analyse & point out flaws or ask reasonable questions.

There have always been bands and electricity supply had always been supplied according to those bands (in reality, less than what it is supposed to be).

So the argument about reducing costs of production does not arise, rather, costs of production would definitely increase coupled with the increase in prices of alternate power supply options.

ivandragon:



It is always refreshing to read comments (I refer to your comments taken together in relation to your discussion with the other chap) like yours. People who think, analyse & point out flaws or ask reasonable questions.

There have always been bands and electricity supply had always been supplied according to those bands (in reality, less than what it is supposed to be).

So the argument about reducing costs of production does not arise, rather, costs of production would definitely increase coupled with the increase in prices of alternate power supply options.

ivandragon:



It is always refreshing to read comments (I refer to your comments taken together in relation to your discussion with the other chap) like yours. People who think, analyse & point out flaws or ask reasonable questions.

There have always been bands and electricity supply had always been supplied according to those bands (in reality, less than what it is supposed to be).

So the argument about reducing costs of production does not arise, rather, costs of production would definitely increase coupled with the increase in prices of alternate power supply options.

ivandragon:



It is always refreshing to read comments (I refer to your comments taken together in relation to your discussion with the other chap) like yours. People who think, analyse & point out flaws or ask reasonable questions.

There have always been bands and electricity supply had always been supplied according to those bands (in reality, less than what it is supposed to be).

So the argument about reducing costs of production does not arise, rather, costs of production would definitely increase coupled with the increase in prices of alternate power supply options.

magoo10:
Not surprised
He is serving in an apc government .