popizaino:


Man united fans that year they enter viewing centre 2nd half because of too much pride believing first half is for their opponent,while the 2nd half is for them.

That's true. Dey go win anyhow in second half.

popizaino:



Na you know that one oooo.

History has shown us that when Ferguson came back for Mourinho, he dashed with his tails btw his legs. Even flogged him in the UCL with inter Milan.

Pep guardiola would shake Ferguson but not winning 6 in 7. Impossible.

When was Mou sacked, Was it not the next season after doing the double?

While I admit that yeah, he came for him the next season but would a rejuvenated Mou agree Man U to do 3-peat?

Omorr I doubt.

The only worthy person after Mou left was Wenger but any small injury to key player(s), season agbasa and to a little extent Benitez

And I'm talking Mou here ooo

Imagine if it's Pep. E sure me, Fergie wouldn't have done 3peat.

Jodera:

What the 87 and 86 points means is that both sets were winning games CONSISTENTLY. Even with the bum cleverly and Evans and welbeck

And it still means that they're still fallible especially for them not to even reach 90points means they both lost at least 4 matches with some series of draws.
Yet they came out tops.

And these are the people you want to compare with Pep team that takes 90+ points consistently like ice water??

Lol

Bros - all these semantics doesn't change the fact that the "points system" could be misleading and I have given you a clear example.

As I stated earlier, that 2008 Man UTD side is one of the best sides in world football in the last 15-20 years.

You cannot compare that team with the one that had the likes of Cleverly and Evans all in the name of "points similarity"..

FYI, spurs that placed second in 2015/2016 season amassed 86 points.

By your logic............

AdisaOwala:


As if "Cuntay" didn't win league at Pep's expense.

Why Cuntay come run comot for the league?

popizaino:


Arsenal was not useless in those years.

Arsenal wey everyone dey beat for fun including John Carew Valencia

raumdeuter:


Why Cuntay come run comot for the league?

When Cuntay won league, which position did Pep finish?

I noticed you have been avoiding this question

popizaino:
Let Sarri win the league like Mancini abi is it forbidden for him to win league?

If Sarri sef stay long for the league like Mancini

AdisaOwala:


When Cuntay won league, which position did Pep finish?

I noticed you have been avoiding this question

Pep finished 3rd, the following season Pep got 100points Cuntay finished 5th

popizaino:


That shows how tough it is to wrestle the league from Fergie. It took Mancini the last day,it took Ancelotti the last day. What does that tells you about Fergie who usually starts the league poorly?

Mourinho won it from him in the first season. Mancini also won the league. So how hard was it? Because Wenger useless na him make dem dey overrate Ferguson

Pep go so beat Ferguson he will have paralysis

raumdeuter:


Pep finished 3rd, the following season Pep got 100points Cuntay finished 5th

In the Era of them Fergie, Benitez, Ancelotti etc, naso e for dey finish 3rd

popizaino:


A worser Conte won it were this Pep dey.

Pep won with 100points when Cuntay was finishing 5th

AdisaOwala:


In the Era of them Fergie, Benitez, Ancelotti etc, naso e for dey finish 3rd

Which of these wan stop Pep for League? when did Benitez win a league title last? Ancelotti has just won about 5 or 6 leagues despite starting to coach more than a decade before Pep

AdisaOwala:


Bros - all these semantics doesn't change the fact that the "points system" could be misleading and I have given you a clear example.

As I stated earlier, that 2008 Man UTD side is one of the best sides in world football in the last 15-20 years.

You cannot compare that team with the one that had the likes of Cleverly and Evans all in the name of "points similarity"..

FYI, spurs that placed second in 2015/2016 season amassed 86 points.

By your logic............

Lol, I will use point cos that tells me the strength of the team .

Garnering 86 and 87 points means you've been CONSISTENT FOR MONTHS. Yes, strength of each sets matters but that doesn't mean both teams weren't consistent in winning for months

Even by my logic, the spurs that placed 2nd season was a very very good side In the league but I doubt it's the 15/16 season which Leicester won cos they didn't even near that Spurs point.

And that validate my points because the league was so poor then, Leicester who was losing points upadan begining of league that Ranieri have to promise them pizza if they stop conceding goals later came first and won the league (imagine!). That's how bad the league was and if you check, the point winner reflects that

popizaino:


If the teams behind you is breathing down your neck, you will be encouraged to do better and that's the pep guardiola is all about.

When Mourinho dey make 90points why was Ferguson not matching those 90points?

Jodera:

Lol...
8 matches to go, Fergie was leading the league (Man City specifically) by 7points yet dropped points for Mancini to catch up with him and las las win it.
On so many seasons(occasions), Man u have dropped points second half of the season and still won league.


And you think Pep would give you that leeway??

Pep wey win league with 100pts and 98 points o

Go and look at Man u title winning points and you'll find out that most of them would stand no chance where Pep dey

Imagine say Pep give you 5points gap with 8matches to go?

Ask Liverpool and Arsenal. Immediately Pep went ahead after Arsenal dropped points vs Villa everyone know say its over

Pep wey go do 15 to 19 games winning run like its normal

City has won 9 games straight now to win the league and 23matches unbeaten just casually. The last game they lost in all competition was in December 6

raumdeuter:


When Mourinho dey make 90points why was Ferguson not matching those 90points?

That's exactly what I asked

Mou made 90+ points consecutive yet Fergie no even near am sef not to talk of matching it. And that's prime Man U ooo.

Then imagine if it's Pep that Fergie ought to be doing it CONSISTENTLY to have a chance

raumdeuter:


Arsenal wey everyone dey beat for fun including John Carew Valencia

Maybe John Carew Valencia wasn't so weak the night.

BlueMann:
Thiago Silva

I will miss this legend.

No Bayern fan, no Lyon fan, no Salernitana fan said this to Raumdeuter's calamitous Boathand.

raumdeuter:


If Sarri sef stay long for the league like Mancini

Sarri has been in the Italian league for long now,what his stopping him from winning the league like Mancini did with inter milan.

raumdeuter:


Pep won with 100points when Cuntay was finishing 5th

Fact is Conte won the league with Pep guardiola in the league.

raumdeuter:


Imagine say Pep give you 5points gap with 8matches to go?

Ask Liverpool and Arsenal. Immediately Pep went ahead after Arsenal dropped points vs Villa everyone know say its over

Pep wey go do 15 to 19 games winning run like its normal

City has won 9 games straight now to win the league and 23matches unbeaten just casually. The last game they lost in all competition was in December 6

Exactly what I said earlier this month on our thread. And even the points Pep dropped was against its fellow contenders sef(Liverpool and arsenal). The rest na decimation.
Everybody says arsenal fvcked up against Aston Villa even though we won ALL our matches.

To put it in perspective, Man City dropped point against arsenal(non-league top 4 contender like Villa) during that 8 matches to go in 2011/12 yet same Man City still won the league under Fergie nose.

Yet na Fergie go dey pose problem for pep consistently for league?

Omorr, I laugh

Jodera:

Lol, I will use point cos that tells me the strength of the team .

Garnering 86 and 87 points means you've been CONSISTENT FOR MONTHS. Yes, strength of each sets matters but that doesn't mean both teams weren't consistent in winning for months

What that tells you is that the 2007/2008 Man UTD, despite being in the discussion for best team in the world in the last 20-25years, amassed almost the same points with Bum Spurs during different regimes.

Consistency abi?

I can also say yeah, Spurs were consistently beating rubbish teams while the aforementioned man UTD team consistently beat tougher teams

Jodera:


Even by my logic, the spurs that placed 2nd season was a very very good side In the league but I doubt it's the 15/16 season which Leicester won cos they didn't even near that Spurs point.

Yeah, it was the season after that


By your logic, the spurs team was comparable to the United team all because of your supposed consistency?

Common!!

popizaino:



Fact is Conte won the league with Pep guardiola in the league.

Fact is Pep won the league with 100points with Cuntay finishing 5th

raumdeuter:


When did they stop being serious?

Pep come and prove yourself in EPL in the mud

And 115 charges in the air.

popizaino:


The standard of 2018 to 2023 is the weakest of all standards in football. Guess which team made the ucl finals in those periods?

Tottenham fucking hotspur.

Me self dey shame when I see funny names representing epl in UCL. Whaaaaat!!!! Aston Villa go UCL!!!!?

Jodera:

Exactly what I said earlier this month on our thread. And even the points Pep dropped was against its fellow contenders sef(Liverpool and arsenal). The rest na decimation.
Everybody says arsenal fvcked up against Aston Villa even though we won ALL our matches.

To put it in perspective, Man City dropped point against arsenal(non-league top 4 contender like Villa) during that 8 matches to go in 2011/12 yet same Man City still won the league under Fergie nose.

Yet na Fergie go dey pose problem for pep consistently for league?

Omorr, I laugh

One season Liverpool won 13 straight games to end the season yet Pep matched him and won 13 straight

Liverpool get 97, Pep got 98

Ferguson with his meager 80points where he wan stand?

pep has really suffered ....at every time he achieves something great,their are many people who is out there to discredit his wins.....even feg knows that he does not stand a chance against pep.that man is the goat of all coaches.

TLona1:


Anything Airmark touches turns mid.

Haaland turned mid immediately I touched him at Salzburg.

airmark:


And 115 charges in the air.

How many FFP charges dem carry give Chelsea

airmark:


Haaland turned mid immediately I touched him at Salzburg.

Wetin Decline Rice win this season?

How far with Kane breaking Bundesliga record

AdisaOwala:


What that tells you is that the Man UTD, despite being the discussion best team in the world in the last 20-25years, amassed almost the same points with Bum Spurs during different regimes.

Consistency abi?

I can also say yeah, Spurs were consistently beating rubbish teams while the aforementioned man UTD team consistently beat tougher teams



Yeah, it was the season after that


By your logic, the spurs team was comparable to the United team all because of your supposed consistency?

Common!!

I never said they were comparable neither did my posts imply so.

I said points shows the strength of the team to show that they're not only strong but consistent in winning.

The 2007/08 was a strong team than the 2012/13 but that doesn't mean the latter set are bum that season the way you're making it out to be.

Geez!!! I just did a quick check and I found out the 2012/13 team was on 89points and not 86 you erroneously said.

Common guy, 89point team bum??

Lmaooo. Nobody is buying that lamba anywhere

AdisaOwala:


In 2008 CL when Man UTD played Chelsea in the final, look at how both teams were neck on neck in the league.

Similar occurrence in 2009 when Man UTD made the final and Chelsea lost our under "dubious" circumstances to Barca in the Semis.

Around this same period, English teams were defeating Fellow English teams in the CL semis to make the finals - offhand, I remember Chelsea beating Liverpool in 2008 CL semis while Man UTD Beat Arsenal to qualify for the 2009 Final - numerous scenarios where 3 PL teams were in the semis

Arh the traditional top 4

Proper footballing era ..miss those days