shadrach77:

With due respect you lack wisdom sir. No court can void a law passed by the legislative arm of a state and signed into law by the state governor

casualobserver:
Kingship and traditional rulers are a state matter, Kings are not recognized under federal law. What is the business of the federal court?

Akpakomiza2:


I know the law more than you sir by far.sanusi should have respected himself and stayed away.

Fiscus105:



Go and educate yourself,what they call, exparte order, and interlocutory injuction and reason for issuing such order .

mushroomFarm:
Court can do nothing about something already decided by the legislature. It is the new law and the court must obey it

correctyourself:
What surprises me here is that, the judge gave an order late yesterday, and certified true copy was also ready that same day, so government officials are so fast with discharging their responsibility?

Since when did they become so effective? the officials that , once it's 3:30pm they're already outside office waiting for their staff?

Lordsonn:

You are correct. The supreme Court has ruled on this several times. No court has the power to stop any state assembly from performing it's oversight functions

casualobserver:


Federal courts have no jurisdiction over traditional/customary matters. They are not recognized under Federal law. You can only preside over something that is under your purview.

If you knew what you were talking about, I was expecting you to say the injunction was made based on violation of human rights which is a federal matter. But that was just legal skulduggery to obtain an injunction which will not hold water.

If you knew the law you would have mentioned the above.

Saao:
court can't stop the process of law making that went through due process and was completed

bixton:



You are really mistaken.
Do you really think a High Court Judge will assent to a matter that is not within the jurisdiction of the court. Do you really understand what that even means to any Judge who does that as a career public officer?

correctyourself:


See you think it's a child that is talking, when i sent money to wrong account and i got court order, the CTC was not ready within that week.

PepeXKermit:


How can court be going against something that is already law? Cruise nation🤣🤣

Akpakomiza2:


You are right which means they won't get to appeal or supreme court abi

Akpakomiza2:


It will affect the legitimacy of the emir,besides he will be easily sacked by a court soon.
Sanusi should not have returned and the Emirates should not have been dissolved.he should have just been made one of the emirs to avoid wahala

Fiscus105:



Just go and do what I told you, it's not only child that needs education, maybe I should also advice you to learn how to comment to post with unbiased mind.

casualobserver:


They won’t get anywhere.

SamuelAnyawu:


Kwankwaso and Ganduje

BigkokoRep:
Ndi Igbo Biko make una no chuck mouth. Na two Capone Asiwaju & Kwakwaso dey taste muscle. Allow Kwakwaso personally finish Asiwaju.

OfficialAPCNig:

When we say Tinugbu supporters are infected with BATeria, some ediots will start crying.

Look at what an adult typed.

The court will sack who? Court only operates with extant law and as of today, the provisions of repealed Kano Emirate law is the only law any ongoing judgement on Kano Emirate will be based on.

casualobserver:


Federal courts have no jurisdiction over traditional/customary matters. They are not recognized under Federal law. You can only preside over something that is under your purview.

If you knew what you were talking about, I was expecting you to say the injunction was made based on violation of human rights which is a federal matter. But that was just legal skulduggery to obtain an injunction which will not hold water.

If you knew the law you would have mentioned the above.

legallysly:


The Federal High Court is limited in its jurisdiction to the items enumerated under Section 251 of the 1999 Constitution.

I fail to see where Justice Liman derives jurisdiction (in a matter regarding the Kano State House of Assembly) from.

casualobserver:


Like I said, not only do you not know the law, you cannot read.

The injunction was made based on human rights. It was also an ex-parte order (I am sure you don’t know what that means)

It will be thrown out. No federal law or the constitution recognizes the existence of any King in Nigeria.

SavageResponse:


Kwakwanso is no match for Tinubu either in real life or in the dream

casualobserver:


He doesn’t, the matter presented before him was human rights. On that basis he granted ex parte injunction. Ofcourse ex-parte means the other party was not present. Ex parte injunction either expires or other party appears and states his case. At which point the case is thrown out because federal court has no jurisdiction over kingship matters and there is no rights violation.

Akpakomiza2:


Lol.shoukd I quote several traditional matters/chieftaincy matters that have been settled by the apex court sir? Are you aware of the Anthony Ani vs Obong of Calabar matter that was decided by the apex court last year?

correctyourself:
What surprises me here is that, the judge gave an order late yesterday, and certified true copy was also ready that same day, so government officials are so fast with discharging their responsibility?

Since when did they become so effective? the officials that , once it's 3:30pm they're already outside office waiting for their staff bus?

casualobserver:
Kingship and traditional rulers are a state matter, Kings are not recognized under federal law. What is the business of the federal court?

casualobserver:


But what was the path to the court of appeal? I am sure if you examine, there was no federal court involved. State court. to court of appeal to Supreme Court. No federal court involved. Federal high court has no business with kingship matters.

Akpakomiza2:


I thought you said the federal courts have no part to play here and that the matter won't go anywhere,that is it will end only at the high court.