Balogunodua:


You implying wrong, in any war scenario between NK and SK...SK wi be on the high table of the most bleeped.



If you think US and NATO will be so stupid to attack NK because of SK then you can believe anything.

Alamkir:
Nawao.... This thread must be very addictive! Someone came to this thread to take a quick look and got hooked for months now. Now I wonder if they've quit their job (if they had one) to focus on this thread and defend the West

Obedience40:



They practice a constitutional monarchy system of government

Military dictatorship is not a type of government.

WriteerNg:
⚡Russia's Alabuga plant plans to produce 6,000 Shahed kamikaze UAVs a year, WSJ reports.

Russia is recruiting female students from all over Africa to make UAVs.

At the end of April, the plant already delivered the promised 4,500 Shaheds.

Tiopii:


😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂. If NK attacks SK, nobody would come to their rescue, not Putin, not Xi. Nobody. except they are acting on orders and those that can give the orders are more conscious bout their own territory.

Tiopii:

The best they would get would be public ouutcry maybe in parts of China and Russia.

Tiopii:

NK would be pounded. SK would take significant hits too but everyone knows who would recover faster and be back stronger.

WriteerNg:
⚡RUSSIA TO REMOVE TALIBAN FROM TERRORIST LIST AFTER THREE YEARS IN POWER

Lavrov said the move follows Kazakhstan’s recent decision and aims to recognize “realities on the ground.”

“They are the real power. We are not indifferent to Afghanistan. And above all our allies in Central Asia are not indifferent," Lavrov says.

Obedience40:

The USA would defend SK,
It not about foolishness, the USA is mandated to defend south Korea, it is in the defence Pact they signed.

Obedience40:

That was the reason the USA defended south Korea during the korean war.

Obedience40:

The USA also have such mutual defence Pact with Japan.

Obedience40:

Also the you should Google the south Korea military, they have one of the most technological advance military in Asia,
What they lack in manpower they make up for good tech and equipments.

Tonididdyx:


There are 2 americas
America and Russia.... Period!

Tiopii:


Slowly but surely.

Russia has lost control of the war, the West would be a major factor in how and when the war ends.

Imagine how fatal it would be Russia if the West allowed Ukraine strike Russia. After 2 years with limited range, Ukraine is still in it.

Slava Ukraini

WritterNg:
⚡EU MINISTERS TO DISCUSS UKRAINE'S PLAN TO ATTACK RUSSIA:

A discussion is being held today by EU defence Ministers to explore the "risks of escalation" surrounding Ukraine's plans to carry out strikes on military assets on Russian soil.

The meeting comes after NATO's chief gave Ukraine the green light last week to do whatever it pleases to Russian territory in the name of self-defence.

Germany and Italy formally opposed the idea after Russia warned the West about severe consequences should Ukraine attempt to realize the agenda.

Balogunodua:

Nah!!! The USA so called treaties has never been used against a nuclear nation before...perhaps we will get to see how foolish a possible USA govt will be willing to sacrifice one of it cities to defend SK

I repeat defense pact is meant for weak nations not a nuclear armed state.


Remind me what year was it and what was the state of NK military asernal.



Against world power Japan will be on their own.



Technology advanced weapons will be determined by it performance on the battlefield not paper as we have seen with over hyped Abram tank

Obedience40:


Have two nuclear Nations ever fought a war before
You are asking if the USA is willing to sacrifice any of its cities for SK,
The question you should be asking is this will any nation be willing to engage a nation under the USA "nuclear umbrella"

Do you know what a nuclear umbrella means??
Why do you think they are USA nukes scattered around Europe
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_umbrella

Before you write something off you should research the USA navy seventh fleet is headquarters in yokosuka in Japan
The USA marines over 35k strong are permanently station in Japan, you think they are there for mere joke,
The Japanese military are not allowed to have offensive weapons because of the Pact they signed they basically handed over there security to the USA


Treaty of Mutual Cooperation and Security between the United States and Japan

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Treaty_of_Mutual_Cooperation_and_Security_between_the_United_States_and_Japan



Now that you know what the USA nuclear umbrella means to countries like Japan and south Korea

The question you should be asking is, is Russia or China or NK willing to turn their cities into radioactive waste land attacking a japan housing USA military personnel whose security Pact enables the USA to use nukes on their behalf?

That's the question you should be asking ??


For the USA Military tech, the USA weapons are tech are battle tested. Let's not go there

BentizilL0:

It's a two way stuff, hope you also know Russia subs are station in the Pacific and can turn US into a wasteland..

You talk as if those guy will look on and allow a nuclear attack without retaliation..

Obedience40:


Have two nuclear Nations ever fought a war before
You are asking if the USA is willing to sacrifice any of its cities for SK,
The question you should be asking is this will any nation be willing to engage a nation under the USA "nuclear umbrella"

Obedience40:


Do you know what a nuclear umbrella means??
Why do you think they are USA nukes scattered around Europe
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_umbrella

Obedience40:


Before you write something off you should research the USA navy seventh fleet is headquarters in yokosuka in Japan
The USA marines over 35k strong are permanently station in Japan, you think they are there for mere joke,
The Japanese military are not allowed to have offensive weapons because of the Pact they signed they basically handed over there security to the USA

Obedience40:


Treaty of Mutual Cooperation and Security between the United States and Japan

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Treaty_of_Mutual_Cooperation_and_Security_between_the_United_States_and_Japan

Obedience40:


Now that you know what the USA nuclear umbrella means to countries like Japan and south Korea

The question you should be asking is, is Russia or China or NK willing to turn their cities into radioactive waste land attacking a japan housing USA military personnel whose security Pact enables the USA to use nukes on their behalf?

That's the question you should be asking ??

Obedience40:


For the USA Military tech, the USA weapons are tech are battle tested. Let's not go there

WritterNg:
⚡Georgia parliament overrides presidential veto, adopts ‘foreign influence’ law