Lawag3:


The name of the thread has the word DISCUSSION in it.

Gbadebo19:

It should be like this: Rather than tactically abandon an argument you are on the brink of loosing by making it a joke on Mr. Gbadebo, why not tell us if Hamas is the internationally recognized government of Palestine?
Thank you very much. I have been in courts and read legal provisions more than you. I have a better understanding of it more than just the English language sentences you take it to be? Have you ever attended court sittings? Do you know what is called interpretation of statutes.
It really isn't your fault, since Nigeria operates more on "who you know" rather than meritocracy, it is alright for people like you to feel offended and classify superior arguments as derogatory remarks. You can also soothe your sifia pains because your terrorist family members are getting slaughtered in Israel.
Does it even not strike a question in you?
1. Why are other surrounding Islamic nations not taking the so called innocent Palestinian women and children as refugees?
2. How much in aid has Saudi Arabia, UAE, Yemen, Russia and China donated to the Palestinian cause?
The day you give a justifiable answer to these questions is the day your redemption begins.

WrriterNg:
⚡Russia said Friday that it had repelled a night-time attack using 12 US-made missiles on the landmark Crimea bridge built on the orders of President Vladimir Putin after Moscow annexed the peninsula.

“Air defences were used last night to deflect a group strike by 12 ATACMS missiles made in the US on the Crimean bridge. All the missiles were destroyed,” the defence ministry said in a statement.

ulaeto:

Disscussing unrelated issues with nonsense back & forth.. is that it? just tell me we're in psychiatric thread let me get your perspective straight.

Gbadebo19:

Ah, please don't include idiot in your discussion with him oo. Or else, he will tell you to get out of Nigeria because 99% of the land of Nigeria belongs to his family members.

IMEI:


Let's talk lawyer to lawyer(as you claim to be)

1. Apart from the US, israel and very few of their allies, how many Countries in the world officially designate Hamas a terror organisation, for you to term them "Internationally recognised" as such?

2. David Cameron, the immediate past UK Foreign Secretary, during a hearing before a committee of the UK Foreign Office acknowledged that Palestine was under Occupation and that israel is an occupying power. Cameron accepted that israel had "the right to defend itself" but not the right to resist occupation inherent in International law and this points to the hypocrisy of the UK's terror designation, because Hamas' resistance as an occupied people is legitimate in International law, hence the hollowness of the designation

3. For cross reference, look up United Nations resolution no. 3103 of 1973, Resolution 2625 of 1970( Protocol I on the Declaration on Friendly Nations, the preamble to the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, Protocol I of the Geneva Conventions

4. You've argued that the PA is the Internationally recognised Palestinian Government. My response is that the PA is recognised as the official representatives of the Palestinians, Hamas is acknowledged and recognised by most as the defacto Government of Gaza. The PA doesn't exercise authority over Gaza, so that argument is weak

5. The International Criminal Court(ICC), which has jurisdiction over Palestinian territories, has charged israeli decision makers in the ongoing killings with; (1) The deliberate targeting of the civilian population, (2) The use of starvation as a weapon of war among others, over which it seeks their arrest warrants. You claim that International Humanitarian law only applies to Countries and not terrorist groups, but both entities are bound by it, i.e. whether as State or Non-State actors. See Article 1(4) and Article 96(3) of the Additional protocol I, Article 3 and Additional Protocol II, all of the Geneva Conventions and it's Additional Protocols

5. The UN Special rapporteur on Palestine, Francesca Albanese, who's an International Human Rights Lawyer and Specialist, has concluded in her report that israeli actions in both Gaza and the West Bank has reached the threshold of Genocide. She outlined all the elements in her special report: 'The Anatomy of a Genocide Report of the Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in the Palestinian territories occupied since 1967'. The Special Rapporteur is an independent expert commissioned by the UN to investigate israel and Palestine

6. The Highest Court in the world, the International Court of Justice (ICJ) has found that there's a 'plausible and probable case of genocide' by israel against the Palestinians and has allowed the application go to trial. The same ICJ has in a ruling in July, reiterated that israel is in Occupation of Palestine. From a legal perspective, this gives Palestinians legal justification for all acts of resistance 'in all its forms' , as provided for in International Law

From the points above, your arguments stand on no legal legs. Please If you're to respond, do so as a lawyer by citing legal authorities to back up your claims as i've done

sainttwist1:
too far.......

IMEI:


Let's talk lawyer to lawyer(as you claim to be)

1. Apart from the US, israel and very few of their allies, how many Countries in the world officially designate Hamas a terror organisation, for you to term them "Internationally recognised" as such? Hamas isn't even listed by the UN as a terror group and neither by most countries of the world

2. David Cameron, the immediate past UK Foreign Secretary, during a hearing before a committee of the UK Foreign Office acknowledged that Palestine was under Occupation and that israel is an occupying power. Cameron accepted that israel had "the right to defend itself" but not the right to resist occupation inherent in International law and this points to the hypocrisy of the UK's terror designation, because Hamas' resistance as an occupied people is legitimate in International law, hence the hollowness of the designation

3. For cross reference, look up United Nations resolution no. 3103 of 1973, Resolution 2625 of 1970( Protocol I on the Declaration on Friendly Nations, the preamble to the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, Protocol I of the Geneva Conventions

4. You've argued that the PA is the Internationally recognised Palestinian Government. My response is that the PA is recognised as the official representatives of the Palestinians, Hamas is acknowledged and recognised by most as the defacto Government of Gaza. The PA doesn't exercise authority over Gaza, so that argument is weak

5. The International Criminal Court(ICC), which has jurisdiction over Palestinian territories, has charged israeli decision makers in the ongoing killings with; (1) The deliberate targeting of the civilian population, (2) The use of starvation as a weapon of war among others, over which it seeks their arrest warrants. You claim that International Humanitarian law only applies to Countries and not terrorist groups, but both entities are bound by it, i.e. whether as State or Non-State actors. See Article 1(4) and Article 96(3) of the Additional protocol I, Article 3 and Additional Protocol II, all of the Geneva Conventions and it's Additional Protocols

5. The UN Special rapporteur on Palestine, Francesca Albanese, who's an International Human Rights Lawyer and Specialist, has concluded in her report that israeli actions in both Gaza and the West Bank has reached the threshold of Genocide. She outlined all the elements in her special report: 'The Anatomy of a Genocide Report of the Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in the Palestinian territories occupied since 1967'. The Special Rapporteur is an independent expert commissioned by the UN to investigate israel and Palestine

6. The Highest Court in the world, the International Court of Justice (ICJ) has found that there's a 'plausible and probable case of genocide' by israel against the Palestinians and has allowed the application go to trial. The same ICJ has in a ruling in July, reiterated that israel is in Occupation of Palestine. From a legal perspective, this gives Palestinians legal justification for all acts of resistance 'in all its forms' , as provided for in International Law

From the points above, your arguments stand on no legal legs. Please If you're to respond, do so as a lawyer by citing legal authorities to back up your claims as i've done

Dream25:
I still don't know why we allow people from righteousness thread to destabilise this thread..
They're enjoying a picnic day on the other thread while they turn this thread into cesspit.

We're giving them a field day here and allow them to preserve their thread. They're taking this into our territory while they enjoy themselves on their territory..

Pls let learn to ignore this people instead of replying them every time..

BoldBrainz:


Your inability to comprehensively understand words and their implications doesn't render them "useless and unnecessary".

Any modestly intelligent reader will see the properness with which I have so far tailored my responses to address whatever miniscule points you have attempted to raise....

Gbadebo19:

Lethal weapon as used means any weapon capable of causing mass destruction. It could be chemical, biological or nuclear. In such a scenario, there is the exception to principle of proportionality and the military doctrine of necessity overrides the principle of proportionality. For a comprehensive understanding, you can check out Article 51 (5) (b) of Additional Protocol I of the Geneva conventions. Thanks

Lawag3:


Omo will you keep quiet evidence yapa from religion to history down to genetics. So what are you saying.


Was Palestine mentioned in the Quran no but israel was many times.


Was Jesus Palestinian or Jewish?

shoodboi2:


Did you realize he wrote that comment about the Geneva convention with AI?

That's why your comments sound intelligent while his just involves minor and irrelevant points.

If he can't write even with AI, then I wonder what he can do.

IMEI:


Let's talk lawyer to lawyer(as you claim to be)

1. Apart from the US, israel and very few of their allies, how many Countries in the world officially designate Hamas a terror organisation, for you to term them "Internationally recognised" as such? Hamas isn't even listed by the UN as a terror group and neither by most countries of the world

2. David Cameron, the immediate past UK Foreign Secretary, during a hearing before a committee of the UK Foreign Office acknowledged that Palestine was under Occupation and that israel is an occupying power. Cameron accepted that israel had "the right to defend itself" but not the right to resist occupation inherent in International law and this points to the hypocrisy of the UK's terror designation, because Hamas' resistance as an occupied people is legitimate in International law, hence the hollowness of the designation

3. For cross reference, look up United Nations resolution no. 3103 of 1973, Resolution 2625 of 1970( Protocol I on the Declaration on Friendly Nations, the preamble to the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, Protocol I of the Geneva Conventions

4. You've argued that the PA is the Internationally recognised Palestinian Government. My response is that the PA is recognised as the official representatives of the Palestinians, Hamas is acknowledged and recognised by most as the defacto Government of Gaza. The PA doesn't exercise authority over Gaza, so that argument is weak

5. The International Criminal Court(ICC), which has jurisdiction over Palestinian territories, has charged israeli decision makers in the ongoing killings with; (1) The deliberate targeting of the civilian population, (2) The use of starvation as a weapon of war among others, over which it seeks their arrest warrants. You claim that International Humanitarian law only applies to Countries and not terrorist groups, but both entities are bound by it, i.e. whether as State or Non-State actors. See Article 1(4) and Article 96(3) of the Additional protocol I, Article 3 and Additional Protocol II, all of the Geneva Conventions and it's Additional Protocols

5. The UN Special rapporteur on Palestine, Francesca Albanese, who's an International Human Rights Lawyer and Specialist, has concluded in her report that israeli actions in both Gaza and the West Bank has reached the threshold of Genocide. She outlined all the elements in her special report: 'The Anatomy of a Genocide Report of the Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in the Palestinian territories occupied since 1967'. The Special Rapporteur is an independent expert commissioned by the UN to investigate israel and Palestine

6. The Highest Court in the world, the International Court of Justice (ICJ) has found that there's a 'plausible and probable case of genocide' by israel against the Palestinians and has allowed the application go to trial. The same ICJ has in a ruling in July, reiterated that israel is in Occupation of Palestine. From a legal perspective, this gives Palestinians legal justification for all acts of resistance 'in all its forms' , as provided for in International Law

From the points above, your arguments stand on no legal legs. Please If you're to respond, do so as a lawyer by citing legal authorities to back up your claims as i've done

Gbadebo19:

Now to your number 4. You said the PA is merely the official representative of the Palestinians and that the PA doesn't exercise authority over Gaza. We shouldn't even argue this cos how would Hamas, who merely won legislative seats in 2006 or was it 2007 oust the PA from power. It is without logic to oust someone from power if they do not exercise authority before. What are you now ousting and from what are you ousting them. If PA was not exercising authority over Gaza, then there would be no reason to oust them since they didn't have that authority before. To Hamas being recognized by most as the defacto government, I don't know what you mean by most. If it is the Palestinians, then we need to talk about legitimacy in government. If the military suddenly seize power in Nigeria and the citizens do not do anything probably out of a lack of will or manpower, it doesn't make them legitimate.

Gbadebo19:

Those idiotic dumb heads who have never read a single book in the last 2 years and have never seen anything like this will see this and conclude that I am radical. As if I was the one who wrote the Geneva conventions.

shoodboi2:


I will soon enter you. You read books yet you are writing with AI. You read books yet you couldn't go to law school. There appears to be something wrong with your head.

Make another snide remark at me and find out. I will soon enter you now.

Ska333ko:
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 olodo wey no know how himars operates come dey post another thing wey e no shabi

Palestinians are more ancient Hebrew than Zionist genetically

WrriterNg:
🇨🇳

Gbadebo19:

Omoh, my writing ability even wowed this dumbhead to the point he believed it as AI. Oh my God....... Your dumbness sucks

shoodboi2:


AI writing is actually substandard. It lacks flow and sounds like it was written by a sleepy person.

Appleyard:


I love the way the Russians simply focused on their quest in the Kharkov and Nicholaiev directions, refusing to pull troops from the south to attack the Ukrainian Kursk suicide mission grouping currently running amok over there. What they thought or expected to be a distraction for the Russians, is now slowly turning to be a blessing in disguise because the Ukrainian sham offensive in Kursk means less men to defend from the Russian attacks on most of the fronts. The Russians are now taking territories at much easier speed compared to the square meters they were taking before the Ukronazi Kursk suicide mission.

Now, it's making more sense. One Russian artillery man told a news source that the Russian authorities got wind of the planned Ukrainian Kursk incursion before it happened. The fact that they still allowed it to happen speaks volume. And when you consider how they're responding to it (tacitly instead of frantically), one tend to believe what the artillery man said. But, what is the Russian end game in this? Is it to lure Ukro troops from their defense lines and make the Russian objectives of taking targeted territories more attainable? Or to form another meat grinder deep inside Russia, which would be easier than Bahkmuth because the Ukros would have huge problem supplying their units in Kursk once the Russians turned around to face them squarely? Or is Russia purposely encouraging this Kursk incursion to drain Ukraine of its remaining best fighting force and then open another front? Russia still has a huge force sitting in Belarus and another in the Zaporozhia direction. Whatever the endgame might be, one thing is certain, Ukraine will never come out of Kursk in good shape.

Procashtips:


This struck my attention.

Are these not floating tanks?

Like tanks like boats?

shoodboi2:


Did you realize he wrote that comment about the Geneva convention with AI?

That's why your comments sound intelligent while his just involves minor and irrelevant points.

If he can't write even with AI, then I wonder what he can do.

BoldBrainz:

😂😂