usmanpogo:


Bro, just a few countries trading in their local currencies would change nothing, the US dollar is gonna remain the dominant currency for at least another century or two. One thing I admire about the US is how they protect their interest. I'm certain they are working behind the scenes to counter all these moves.

I have always wondered what currency is used when the EU trades with the US.

Vic2023:
a century? Does any world currency spent up to that?
Check the link below, from international monetary fund ,it will change your orientation
https://www.imf.org/en/Blogs/Articles/2022/06/01/blog-dollar-dominance-and-the-rise-of-nontraditional-reserve-currencies

usmanpogo:


Bro, I think you'll make a fine lawyer lol

Every resolution is very definitive and lucid as it should be, the resolution in question is defensive, let's all assume the administration was targeting civilians then we can unambiguously say that the change in dynamics of the campaign by the interventionist was shrouded with ulterior motives, apparently using this instance as subtext for a failed change in regime.

If you say the Russians are wrong, you might as well say NATO bombing of another sovereign nation was wrong.

Lawag3:



What's the population of Gaza before the genocide and after the genocide.

Vic2023:
I hope this pledge was on your visa "to serve USA with all your strength"
Why ranting up and down on the thing wey you no sabi, are you the spokesperson of USA?bcs you said only thing USA can do is to provide Taiwan with missile, but USA said it is going to put boots on ground
Abeg don't reply oooooo

obedience4:
First of all technically the US have no offical diplomatic relations with Taiwan, the US as many other countries have adopted the one China policy making the PRC the only legitimate government.,how will the USA signed a defence Treaty with a Taiwan nation, when the same US recognises the communist government of the peoples Republic of China as the only one government in both China and Taiwan, the only thing the US can do which it has done well is enabling the Taiwanese making sure they possess the technology and tools it requires to defend itself.

Like I pointed out, the Ukraine has always been on under the influence of Russia, and it was only after the revolution that brought a pro western government, thus there wasn't enough ground work to bring Ukraine into a US defense pact

Cuba is a Russia ally, we all know how the US reacted the last time the Soviet Union tried to use Cuba to counter US influence in North America, how many defence pacts dose Russia have with countries that are anti US,?

When I see your nuclear rants on this thread, i just laughed, it shows how shallow your thinking is, and it seems you are missing some neurons in that your underdeveloped brain of yours. Pakistan is the country known to have the least stockpiles of Nukes yet Pakistan has enough nukes to destroy the entire world ten times over, and you are F00lishly threatening a USA who currently have one of the largest stockpiles of nukes, A country who has indeed used one, a nation who currently has over 7 nuclear armed subs lurking in the oceans ready at a moment notice to bring down hell, you are the most dullest fellow I have seen, stick to copy and paste propaganda .Bro/Sir. You know things, am not saying you're simply versed in international relations. You're f*****g intelligent,guys like you don't come quite often.

obedience4:



Gaddafi wasn't a Saint, the US would have wanted to take him out, he provided Osama bin laden and its group safe haven in Libya, and also he was also fingered in the Lockerbie plane bombing and the main sponsor of the terror attack, so I believe the US took that opportunity to take him out

The difference is the US had a legal backing to intervene in Libya, Russia didn't


PS It also seems that you were right that US troops did deployed around oil field's in Syria, but there is no evidence of US taking the oil for themselves.

obedience4:



First of all, president Biden even though he is POTUS has no power to bring the US into a military intervention, he has no power to declare war on any nation that's the exclusive job of the US Congress

What president Biden said is "subjective" it dosent hold any legal power or obligation to defend Taiwan
President and leaders say many things on air not considering the consequences of their actions, trump, putin, macron have said things they simply lack the legal obligations and power to do, France president said he would consider putting boots in Ukraine, that's itself is not feasible, the France parliament will never put France on a war path when it is not directly attacked

As long as The US is still observing the ONE CHINA POLICY, it has no legal or obligation to defend Taiwan

Below is the reaction of the Whitehouse after Biden made dose statement, they had to clarify that the US have not departed from the one China policy

WritterNg:
⚡The AI still doesn't get fingers right and doesn't know the Russian letter "У" which is different from English letter "Y".

An awful attempt from Ukrops.

Vic2023:
guy I swear I no pray make I born your type
1pic: you said Taiwan doesn't sign any defense treaty with Taiwan
2 pic you failed woefully

obedience4:



First of all, president Biden even though he is POTUS has no power to bring the US into a military intervention, he has no power to declare war on any nation that's the exclusive job of the US Congress

What president Biden said is "subjective" it dosent hold any legal power or obligation to defend Taiwan
President and leaders say many things on air not considering the consequences of their actions, trump, putin, macron have said things they simply lack the legal obligations and power to do, France president said he would consider putting boots in Ukraine, that's itself is not feasible, the France parliament will never put France on a war path when it is not directly attacked

As long as The US is still observing the ONE CHINA POLICY, it has no legal or obligation to defend Taiwan

Below is the reaction of the Whitehouse after Biden made dose statement, they had to clarify that the US have not departed from the one China policy

usmanpogo:


Finally, we both unravel the pretext about the US sole intentions to take out Gaddafi.
I still think you should consider a career as a lawyer, you'll do great.

Cheers bro.

Vic2023:
to your first paragraph 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
You shifted the goal post from Biden to Congress

The same Congress were also in support of Biden decision
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

Kingsnairaland:
Nato so scared that I heard they want to accept Ukraine into nato even when Ukraine is at war

And not activate the article five when Ukraine enters nato lol

WritterNg:
⚡CIA Director William Burns landed in Bosnia earlier today.

He is scheduled to meet with Agency Executive Almir Džuvo of the Bosnian Intelligence-Security Agency and members of the Presidency of Bosnia-Hercegovina.

Watcharena:
what ever you think of Libya is upto youv,now explain to us which law authorise US to occupy syria even against their wish

obedience4:



Am sorry sir but you are one of the dullest person on this forum, I talked about the one China policy
There was a time most countries including the US actually recognised Taiwan ROC as the legitimate government In whole of china, this changed when the PRC china became more powerful and popular thus the shift from ROC know as Taiwan to PRC known as china

Can't you even read the picture you posted can't you see the Treaty has ended in 1979 this was whem the US still had official diplomatic relationship woth Taiwan now the US Government currently has no formal/offical diplomatic relations with Taiwan, infact only 11 nations have diplomatic relationship with Taiwan

Stop mentioning me, you are delusional beyond redemption.

obedience4:



First of all, president Biden even though he is POTUS has no power to bring the US into a military intervention, he has no power to declare war on any nation that's the exclusive job of the US Congress

What president Biden said is "subjective" it dosent hold any legal power or obligation to defend Taiwan
President and leaders say many things on air not considering the consequences of their actions, trump, putin, macron have said things they simply lack the legal obligations and power to do, France president said he would consider putting boots in Ukraine, that's itself is not feasible, the France parliament will never put France on a war path when it is not directly attacked

As long as The US is still observing the ONE CHINA POLICY, it has no legal or obligation to defend Taiwan

Below is the reaction of the Whitehouse after Biden made dose statement, they had to clarify that the US have not departed from the one China policy

Vic2023:
The USA said they invaded Iraq because it possesses nuclear weapons. You are here under the pretense of defending a visa, but say otherwise. Na slave you be!

Lawag3:



What's the population of Gaza before the genocide and after the genocide.