Itsrm:


Has always been. Reminds me of Willian. Plays nonsense all game and uses activity to cover it up.

Unlimited22:

Did we have to concede the goals even as we didn't score?

Itsrm:


Has always been. Reminds me of Willian. Plays nonsense all game and uses activity to cover it up.

FBS:

You are speaking from only one side of the mouth.

Did you outscore your previous opponent?

Unlimited22:

I no gree

Because this thing go still cause argument

We have enough techy attackers to be up there challenging teams

See who we brought off the bench today.

We can't keep conceding useless goals and expect to challenge anybody
No matter how often we score.

BlewMahn:

You won't score plenty goals every time. That is where your defense comes in. If you don't address both, you will suffer the consequences.

Very easy sturv to understand.

NinjaMetahuman:
Man of the match hard to choose between palmer and madueke.

WhoDeyHause:

Well while the defense is absolutely wack, the midfield also has a tiny role to play too, we all know Enzo as a jogger for us though it's not a surprise but caicedo has been lukewarm too, see how he left kovacic for his goal in the last game, I was also saying it before my brief hiatus that we need at least two CBs especially one that's very experienced to replace Silva, only tosin is here and I don't know whether he'll be a world beater for us because if we are expecting magic from dem badiashile and disasi na long thing we go dey o, so as of now we just might have to look up to the attack saving us.

BlewMahn:

You won't score plenty goals every time. That is where your defense comes in. If you don't address both, you will suffer the consequences.

Very easy sturv to understand.

FBS:

Did we have to score at all? Why not just defend all game?

Unlimited22:

Would've fetched us at least a point vs the Champions

Alas we can't defend.

FBS:

Did we have to score at all? Why not just defend all game?

BlewMahn:

You won't score plenty goals every time. That is where your defense comes in. If you don't address both, you will suffer the consequences.

Very easy sturv to understand.

Unlimited22:

I wonder how this concept is so difficult to grasp.

Why are Arsenal not playing Mustafi and Jenkinson? Why did they go for Timber and Calafiori despite having Zinchenko?

Why do City have Días, Ake and Akanji instead of some scrubs?

Why do Liverpool keep playing VVD And Robertson since they have Salah and Diaz?

It's not so hard to grasp. On the off days where things don't go well, steel at the back will come up trumps.

It's a league season. Grinding out 1-0 wins will secure necessary points sometimes.

But when you are guaranteed to concede two every game, then...

Gucciboy:


This season at Chelsea is Airmark 101

No 1 rule: outscore your opponents and win

Unlimited22:

The attack still needs a better CF than Jackson in the box

But that defence is nightmarish

FBS:

No one is saying both should NOT be addressed and that ain't no theory.

What we are saying and this is a simple fact - To get maximum points, you need to outscore your opponent. Facts ONLY.

Now how you achieve that will vary from match to match. Also facts.

How is that difficult to understand?

Itsrm:


Has always been. Reminds me of Willian. Plays nonsense all game and uses activity to cover it up.

izzou:


Delete this comment. You're shooting your foot yourself

If we defended all game, we would have gotten 1 point?

Did we?

larride:


Technically you don't need to outscore your opponent all game to get maximum point.

You can score 1 and deny your opponent scoring.

EmmanuelScott1:
From now on, we have to outscore our opponents to win the game, because our defence nah otu.


Nice one boys

BlewMahn:
Santos scores for Strasbourg

larride:


Technically you don't need to outscore your opponent all game to get maximum point.

You can score 1 and deny your opponent scoring.

larride:


Technically you don't need to outscore your opponent all game to get maximum point.

You can score 1 and deny your opponent scoring.