Shegzdave:

If it’s the elemi lo ma last stuff, we have players capable of playing such football

We should be aiming for a win against them this time around. A draw will be a bad result.

mostob:
One player I have been mentioning frequently here is Alexandre Isak. When you compare the guy to Osimhen, you will understand my stance about Osimhen. What we need now is a one-man attack. Someone who is not just a striker but an outlet. On a counter, a player that have the ability to make something happen out of nothing. City have KDB and maybe Foden.Mbappe, Rashford(on-form) and Salah are other examples. Martinelli is the only one closer to this profile but we all know he is a Glo network. Ode is more like Benardo. Trossard is good but he sometimes fizzle out of games.
Osimhen is limited in this aspect. Is Osimhen not good enough? Of course not. Osimhen is a finisher, an end of a means. If Arteta really wants Osimhen, I don't think we would have gone for Sesko at the outset.
It is just my opinion. Nothing personal

cc blueraydick

The problem with all of this is that ur expectation is unrealistic. You need to wake up and see things for what they really are.

Arsenal is not man city; We do not have KDB and we do not have any player that has his exact skill set. As for Foden, we have Saka who is a match for Foden any day any time as far as getting us goals and assists are concerned playing from the right wing. I know Foden at times plays 10, but like I said Arsenal is not man city; we don't play the same style of football. Every player's role is well defined at Arsenal; Odegard is the one that orchestrates our attack from the middle.

What is missing in our team is a potent and direct number 9 which we have been missing for a while. I agree with you that Isak will be a very good fit for us, but I doubt Newcastle will even sell to us for 100m if we have that much to splash.

In the absence of Isak, Osimehn is a very good fit for us because he's not only very direct as a potent 9, but he can also work his way out of any yeye highline defence most EPL teams now adopt. He can also bulldoze himself out of tough defensive set-up and let us not forget how good he is with his head.

All those Salah and Mbappe are out of reach; while I would not touch Rashford with a long pole in form or out of form. It will just amount to wasting money on another false 9. Why will we have Gabriel Jesus on our books and still buy Rashford? Why?

mostob:

We should be aiming for a win against them this time around. A draw will be a bad result.

We should be winning all our games this season ooo, no draw is accepted

Omo this ucl go hard for some big clubs
Lfc opponents hot


ARSENAL play PSG (home), Inter Milan (away), Shakhtar Donetsk (home), Atalanta (away), Dinamo Zagreb (home), Sporting Lisbon (away), Monaco (home), Girona (away)

Arsenal fixtures

mostob:
One player I have been mentioning frequently here is Alexandre Isak. When you compare the guy to Osimhen, you will understand my stance about Osimhen. What we need now is a one-man attack. Someone who is not just a striker but an outlet. On a counter, a player that have the ability to make something happen out of nothing. City have KDB and maybe Foden.Mbappe, Rashford(on-form) and Salah are other examples. Martinelli is the only one closer to this profile but we all know he is a Glo network. Ode is more like Benardo. Trossard is good but he sometimes fizzle out of games.
Osimhen is limited in this aspect. Is Osimhen not good enough? Of course not. Osimhen is a finisher, an end of a means. If Arteta really wants Osimhen, I don't think we would have gone for Sesko at the outset.
It is just my opinion. Nothing personal

cc bluera.ydick

E be like say you don too read Ebl analysis.

As I see something like Odegaard is like Bernardo and Martinelli is somehow like that one man guy, I just know na mostly him signature talk be that

I just read blue.ray post and I agree strongly with him about getting Osimhen (if we can) cos we need someone who can bulldoze his way through defence. It's something I love about him. He never gives up at all and he'll never let defenders rest. Another thing is that he's not shot shy (something we lack with our Cf aside Trossard) and to think most of his goals isn't even PK is even commendable. He is someone that cannot lost in big match and he just needs that creativity to shine(which we have in abundance). Isak is my kind of ideal striker but I'll also take Osimhen without thinking twice. Na just injury be my ish with him.

Lastly, I see people deh say Odegaard is just like Bernardo (esp Ebl). I don't know why but man have been proving that he's our Kdb 24/7. Na only workrate him and Bernardo just dey similar, finish!!!

IZUKWU:
Arsenal fixtures

Omorr, this is interesting Sha

Everywhere hot.

If na like so e dey, I'm liking this format be that

Espanyol is holding them ransom
30m or no deal
Ikebe super sterling or king coman the panic buy begins
There's nothing wrong if we have gotten our preferred players before we start selling

Now tomorrow will be so chaotic and frustrating, na this one wan plan win league

Just one injury in attack we are in big trouble

BlueRayDick:


The problem with all of this is that ur expectation is unrealistic. You need to wake up and see things for what they really are.

Arsenal is not man city; We do not have KDB and we do not have any player that has his exact skill set. As for Foden, we have Saka who is a match for Foden any day any time as far as getting us goals and assists are concerned playing from the right wing. I know Foden at times plays 10, but like I said Arsenal is not man city; we don't play the same style of football. Every player's role is well defined at Arsenal; Odegard is the one that orchestrates our attack from the middle.

What is missing in our team is a potent and direct number 9 which we have been missing for a while. I agree with you that Isak will be a very good fit for us, but I doubt Newcastle will even sell to us for 100m if we have that much to splash.

In the absence of Isak, Osimehn is a very good fit for us because he's not only very direct as a potent 9, but he can also work his way out of any yeye highline defence most EPL teams now adopt. He can also bulldoze himself out of tough defensive set-up and let us not forget how good he is with his head.

All those Salah and Mbappe are out of reach; while I would not touch Rashford with a long pole in form or out of form. It will just amount to wasting money on another false 9. Why will we have Gabriel Jesus on our books and still buy Rashford? Why?

City comparison is due to the fact that we both play in a similar way. Your last paragraph shows you did not read to understand. No wonder, it seems unrealistic to you. None of the players I mentioned are false 9 so I wonder what you are talking about.
All this your Osimhen talk would have been realistic assuming we don't have Havertz in the team. Infact, if you truly follow Arsenal transfers, you will know your stance is flawed already. 60m will get Osimhen now that Napoli are desperate to offload him.

The new format prioritizes attackers and creators


You have to outscore your other rivals

If city beat Dinamo 11-0 and madrid win 12-1 and Arsenal won 8-0, that means city be 1st and madrid 2nd and arsenal 3rd.

No more pass ball around because you feel you have qualified already. You need a top spot for a better r16 fixture.

So goals all the way to be in top 8 automatic qualifications.

We all know what that entails.

This means the 8 opponents we face, we must outscore and beat them by large margins simply because of the other top teams that have a better probability of outscoring us.

Are we ready or we wan still dey Havertize?

iamoyindamola:
Omo this ucl go hard for some big clubs
Lfc opponents hot


ARSENAL play PSG (home), Inter Milan (away), Shakhtar Donetsk (home), Atalanta (away), Dinamo Zagreb (home), Sporting Lisbon (away), Monaco (home), Girona (away)

This our fixture strong ooo

Jodera:

E be like say you don too read Ebl analysis.

As I see something like Odegaard is like Bernardo and Martinelli is somehow like that one man guy, I just know na mostly him signature talk be that

I just read blue.ray post and I agree strongly with him about getting Osimhen (if we can) cos we need someone who can bulldoze his way through defence. It's something I love about him. He never gives up at all and he'll never let defenders rest. Another thing is that he's not shot shy (something we lack with our Cf aside Trossard) and to think most of his goals isn't even PK is even commendable. He is someone that cannot lost in big match and he just needs that creativity to shine(which we have in abundance). Isak is my kind of ideal striker but I'll also take Osimhen without thinking twice. Na just injury be my ish with him.

Lastly, I see people deh say Odegaard is just like Bernardo (esp Ebl). I don't know why but man have been proving that he's our Kdb 24/7. Na only workrate him and Bernardo just dey similar, finish!!!

You followed the guy too? That means you would have known earlier if I was using his ideology to butress my argument but I did not. There is a pattern when you consider the calibre of strikers we are being linked with.
We don't need someone to bulldoze please. And let me ask you, why is Osimhen still in the transfer market with all these qualities you mentioned?

I don't know where you read it from o but odegaard and KDB are two different players. They are not similar at all. Like it is even funny reading that line. He is similar to Benardo in every aspect.

Shegzdave:

This our fixture strong ooo

Not like lfc or paris

mostob:
City comparison is due to the fact that we both play in a similar way. Your last paragraph shows you did not read to understand. No wonder, it seems unrealistic to you. None of the players I mentioned are false 9 so I wonder what you are talking about.
All this your Osimhen talk would have been realistic assuming we don't have Havertz in the team. Infact, if you truly follow Arsenal transfers, you will know your stance is flawed already. 60m will get Osimhen now that Napoli are desperate to offload him.

Everything u’ve written here shows u actually don’t understand my post . Maybe I will just leave it to Jodera to explain it to u better .

I’m tired already.

But u would seriously have the team sign Rashford instead of Osimehn. Na wa o; I now for u o.

Isak over Oshimen.... Na wa ohhhhh.

Define see finish again abeg.

johnjunior39:
Isak over Oshimen.... Na wa ohhhhh.

Define see finish again abeg.

That see finish is the problem exactly

A player that won seria a highest goal scorer and has dropped a decent number since ver the years is not prolific, then they move over to his attitude like we didn’t have Xhaka before he became loved by the fans.

We don too see the guy finish as per our brother

@mostob
I remember you saying you’d accept RashFord sometime ago when we were linked to him, but you wouldn’t accept Osihmen who is miles ahead of daku-daji RashFord

You sef reason am if no be see finish cause this thing

iamoyindamola:

Not like lfc or paris

That psg fixture is one of the hardest if not the hardest sef

BlueRayDick:


Everything u’ve written here shows u actually don’t understand my post . Maybe I will just leave it to Jodera to explain it to u better .

I’m tired already.

But u would seriously have the team sign Rashford instead of Osimehn. Na wa o; I now for u o.

Haaaa ... Jodera o, na you I quote o. Confirm the bolded please. Me sef don tire.

Shegzdave:
@mostob
I remember you saying you’d accept RashFord sometime ago when we were linked to him, but you wouldn’t accept Osihmen who is miles ahead of daku-daji RashFord

You sef reason am if no be see finish cause this thing

False. Bring proof.

mostob:
False. Bring proof.

I might’ve wrong in saying we were linked to him but you were already fantasizing about him adorning our No 10jersey even when Smith was still with us.

At the end of the day, if we didn't sign Osimhen, na to enter Emirates to protest. E no hard.

mostob:
At the end of the day, if we didn't sign Osimhen, na to enter Emirates to protest. E no hard.

Nobody is saying we must sign Osihmen but your point against his signature is looking like you have an hidden agenda against the man

Shegzdave:

Nobody is saying we must sign Osihmen but your point against his signature is looking like you have an hidden agenda against the man

if u like sign oshimen, ronaldo, mbappe to your club
U no fit smell EPL,talkless of you touching it

mostob:
Haaaa ... Jodera o, na you I quote o. Confirm the bolded please. Me sef don tire.

Ur post is still up there in which u were talking about the kind of player we need : “ on form Rashford “ SMH 🤦‍♂️.

U ate still asking for proof again. Shegzdave has even further dropped receipt of u fantasizing about Rashford even before today. Na wa to u o.

Even man utd wey get Rashford want him out of their door like we want Nelson out of ours .

Shegzdave:

Nobody is saying we must sign Osihmen but your point against his signature is looking like you have an hidden agenda against the man

I don’t even know why he’s doubling down on it and not just owning it with his full chest that he doesn’t like Osimehn. At least nobody can beat anybody here over their preference for a player .

BlueRayDick:


I don’t even know why he’s doubling down on it and not just owning it with his full chest that he doesn’t like Osimehn. At least nobody can beat anybody here over their preference for a player .

Exactly
His points are more agenda driven than fact

See that part he said Arteta can tame RashFord but e reach Osihmen turn, story change

mostob:
Eni to ba bimo oran lo n pon. Hope you understand Yoruba? If Arteta sign him, he will find a way to deal with his ego.

This our squad needs a transitional threat...an outlet. Rashford fits the description. Remember he tried to sign Mudryk too. Also we have been linked with Pedro Neto of wolves. These three players are very good during transition.

Shegzdave this was what brought the Rashford talk. And I was right, we were linked to him after I made that statement.
So show me where I said I would take Rashford over Osimhen.

Shegzdave:

Nobody is saying we must sign Osihmen but your point against his signature is looking like you have an hidden agenda against the man

Now I see that comprehension is the issue. I was against his signing and I gave my reasons. Where is the agenda? Even those countering me also agreed to one of my reasons.

mostob:
Now I see that comprehension is the issue. I was against his signing and I gave my reasons. Where is the agenda? Even those countering me also agreed to one of my reasons.

You don’t have to be insulting
Have a nice century

Shegzdave:

I might’ve wrong in saying we were linked to him but you were already fantasizing about him adorning our No 10jersey even when Smith was still with us.

Rashford once had 40G/A in a season before. What was out of place if I mentioned him? Moreso, you were here when Arsenal was later linked to him which means my reason for mentioning him then is still valid. And guess who was rumoured to be going the other way? Smith!!!

Shegzdave:

You don’t have to be insulting
Have a nice century

That is not an insult. Unless you can table the said agenda.