KnownUnknown:


Christians and Jews (inherently duplicitous) are so delusional. They can see all the atrocities in Islam and can open their mouths to criticize people like Boko Haram; BUT, the bloodlust and madness in their religion are glossed over and excused.
They will rightly criticize Boko Haram, but when the same behavior is pointed out in their scriptures, they twist themselves into pretzels trying to justify the same behavior.

If one isn’t delusional and read some of those so called scriptures, one would realize that the Hebrew god is a repulsive creature created by greedy people, Moses would be called a terrorist, and Jesus would be viewed, ACCURATELY, as nothing more than a cult leading charlatan.

All your shalaye means nothing. If U want to enter the arena, come with logical argument not ones coated with emotions.

Your friend adeniyi65 came here and claimed the bible tacitly supports the transatlantic slave trade and enslavement of black people.
I used the bible and historical evidence to destroy his argument and wound him off the ring. He's yet to recover.
I produce biblical evidence that showed kidnapping of people for slavery and forced enslavement of people is evil and all those who participate in such are bound for hell.

U can continue is rant, it's a free world. But truth remains the truth.
Simple.

SIRTee15:


All your shalaye means nothing. If U want to enter the arena, come with logical argument not ones coated with emotions.

Lmao, the bloody irony!! Person whose position is wholly based on irrational, illogical, blatant nonsense talking about a logical argument.

SIRTee15:



Yapping yapping yapping.
Tell me what God the bible said about the type of slavery the op is talking about- enforced slavery.

Did God approve of kidnapping people and forcing them into slavery.
Would God have approved of the trans Atlantic slave trade and the trans Sahara slave trade. This is the one the op brought up here.

Deut 20 is what?! Petting them as kings abi😃 All the people they destroyed their cities and took them hostage are what?! On the side how did they ever find out which women were virgins to take for spoils, if not through sexual assault, not even considering the rape. Abegi

KnownUnknown:


Lmao, the bloody irony!! Person whose position is wholly based on irrational, illogical, blatant nonsense talking about a logical argument.

Present your argument or shut up.
Don't waste anybody's time here.
Your friend brought a so called logical argument praising abolitionist for ending slavery but couldn't explain why the same abolitionists used the bible as motivation to end slavery.

Your other colleague jaephonix claimed it was king George that ended slavery but didn't know same person was the head of the church at his time and criticized those who used the bible to justify slavery.
To make things worse, he compared war against slavery to someone beating his wife.

Bunch of illogical jokers claiming atheist. Simple and basic research U won't do.

Una saving grace be internet. None of U can stand me for 5 minutes face to face in any theological argument.

This is the 3rd page of this debate but none of them could answer any of my 2 simple questions.

StillDtruth:


Of course. It is from an evil mind that wicked perversions come from.

And of course devils love changing Truths into a Lie, so.this is expected.

Really? So Yahweh allowed the devil, his own creation to lie in his book, thereby deceiving his people?
By the way, how do you know the lies and the truthful bibles, since there is no standard to compare to?
You see

StillDtruth:


Clearly you are describing what is happening to you because you have nothing reasonable to say after my response and you just reporting that you have gone mad because you see you have nothing to valid to say on this issue at all.

And the bottomline is that we see God establishing Labour Laws because man needs Labour as a factor of production, contract and employment.

So Yahweh established labor laws for people that have been kidnapped and made to work against their will?
You keep twisting and turning to escape the truth

SIRTee15:


Present your argument or shut up.
Don't waste anybody's time here.
Your friend brought a so called logical argument praising abolitionist for ending slavery but couldn't explain why the same abolitionists used the bible as motivation to end slavery.

Your other colleague jaephonix claimed it was king George that ended slavery but didn't know same person was the head of the church at his time and criticized those who used the bible to justify slavery.
To make things worse, he compared war against slavery to someone beating his wife.

Bunch of illogical jokers claiming atheist. Simple and basic research U won't do.

Una saving grace be internet. None of U can stand me for 5 minutes face to face in any theological argument.

This is the 3rd page of this debate but none of them could answer any of my 2 simple questions.

Why are you giving yourself agita?
The Bible was used to justify slavery and was also used to oppose slavery. There is probably more support for slavery in the book than opposition to it. There’s nothing to argue about unless you are the type of Christian who bends over backwards to deny the obvious. Even then your claims can be disregarded.

NNTR:
Constipated confused dot com

1 Corinthians 13:13
Three things will last forever
—faith, hope, and love
—and the greatest of these is love.

Your nescience caused you to type unwisely that slavery is forever

_{Personal text: Jesus is not a theologian. He is God who told stories.}

kobojunkie aka nntr, God says slavery is forever, and the Bible tells us this Isaiah 14:2. The first are becoming last very soon, and the last are becoming first. Lazarus will own the table; and the dry bones of Israel, currently curating in the sun of ham, shall rise again.

That place you quoted is for sons and not for future slaves.

KnownUnknown:


Why are you giving yourself agita?
The Bible was used to justify slavery and was also used to oppose slavery. There is probably more support for slavery in the book than opposition to it. There’s nothing to argue about unless you are the type of Christian who bends over backwards to deny the obvious. Even then your claims can be disregarded.

Ok he be like say U are more honest than your colleagues.
U admitted bible spoke against slavery but also spoke for it.
So then we can have a honest debate unlike your dishonest colleagues who tore off pages of the bible they don't like and only want to talk about passages that push their sinister agenda.
They are no different from American slave masters who also removed pages of the bible they dont like;(threatens their slave business)b4 handing it to slaves.

I'm a sincere and open person, a truth seeker. I'm very much open to alternative ideology even if it antagonize my belief. The issue it whoever presenting it must equally be open and sincere.
I didn't find it in adeniyi the monicker who started this thread.

Slavery was very much established in the constitution given to Israelites and very much rampant during early Christian ministry- almost 20% of the Roman population were slaves.
The question we should ask is why was it acceptable then and not now.
I will explain later.

SIRTee15:


Ok he be like say U are more honest than your colleagues.
U admitted bible spoke against slavery but also spoke for it.
So then we can have a honest debate unlike your dishonest colleagues who tore off pages of the bible they don't like and only want to talk about passages that push their sinister agenda.
They are no different from American slave masters who also removed pages of the bible they dont like;(threatens their slave business)b4 handing it to slaves.

I'm a sincere and open person, a truth seeker. I'm very much open to alternative ideology even if it antagonize my belief. The issue it whoever presenting it must equally be open and sincere.
I didn't find it in adeniyi the monicker who started this thread.

Slavery was very much established in the constitution given to Israelites and very much rampant during early Christian ministry- almost 20% of the Roman population were slaves.
The question we should ask is why was it acceptable then and not now.
I will explain later.

I have no colleagues.
Save your explanation. Not remotely interested in your musings.

StillDtruth:


No, it is not. God's mind and Law already shows that He does not want any evil done at all.

But since man loves doing evil and will always do it, then the best thing is for Him to reduce the amount of evil that an evil man would have done. man loves backbiting and fornication as well as many other sins which Bible strongly instructs men not to do. That's the fact.


For slavery comes out from the fact and natural need that man needs his fellow man to accomplish a thing which is why people employ people and will always need to employ people. What is called Labour and a big factor of of Production!

And you already know that there are good employers and their are evil employers, but no reasonable person would say it is right to wipe out employment because of evil employers.

So God issued what is now known today as Labour Laws to regulate the wickedness which employers can do without having to stop Lawful and good Labour and employment, as you see, employment is another necessary need of man equal to food, clothes and shelter

So this is you seeing God laying down Labour Laws!.

It's fact that civilization requires labor. Under laws that guide people; there will be people that would go against law, because of this is law created: to outlines peoples right and sanctions the aggressor. Therefore, either in slavery era or in today's world under labor law, we will always find good slave masters in the midst of bad slave masters. And bad employer in the midst of good employers.




You said labor is the necessity of time. Yes it is. And you said since man inherence is to do evil, God has nothing to do than to give them law that will guides it. With that submission of yours. As God has given law to guide slavery that is inherence of man, God supposed have given laws to guide other inherence sins of man as well instead of outrightly stopping them(e g fornication). But no, God in an emphasistic manner say we should stop other inherence sins of man and continue to give law to manage slavery alone. This is a clear evidence that God is hard on other inherence sins but so soft on slavery as gruesome as it is.


Labor is necessity of civilization that will continue forever, so is fornication as an example is an inherence sin of man that will continue till eternity. God should have known better to stop slavery and introduce legal labor market when he(God) was busy siding slave masters beating h_e_l_l out of slaves.

SIRTee15:

Since adeniyi65 and his advocate Lucifyre failed to answer my question, I will provide the answer.
Where did the abolitionist receive the inspiration to end slavery- THE BIBLE

The bible makes it clear SLAVE TRADE is evil and rightfully condemned it.


APOSTLE PAUL BANNED SLAVE TRADERS FROM THE CHURCH.

1 Timothy 1
9 We also know that the law is made not for the righteous but for lawbreakers and rebels, the ungodly and sinful, the unholy and irreligious, for those who kill their fathers or mothers, for murderers, 10 for the sexually immoral, for those practicing homosexuality, for slave traders and liars and perjurers—and for whatever else is contrary to the sound doctrine

yes. Law is supposed be made for all. But omini potence God that want all nations to worship him should give law to stop absurdities not to manage it. As he gives law to stop idolatry(his favorite), he supposed give law to stop slavery instead of managing slavery telling how people should treat their slaves. what is so hard in saying "DESIST FROM SLAVERY"

SIRTee15:


THE BOOK OF REVELATION REVEALS SLAVE TRADERS ARE BOUND FOR HELL.
Revelation 18
When the kings of the earth who committed adultery with her and shared her luxury see the smoke of her burning, they will weep and mourn over her. 10 Terrified at her torment, they will stand far off and cry:

“‘Woe! Woe to you, great city,
you mighty city of Babylon!
In one hour your doom has come!’

11 “The merchants of the earth will weep and mourn over her because no one buys their cargoes anymore— 12 cargoes of gold, silver, precious stones and pearls; fine linen, purple, silk and scarlet cloth; every sort of citron wood, and articles of every kind made of ivory, costly wood, bronze, iron and marble; 13 cargoes of cinnamon and spice, of incense, myrrh and frankincense, of wine and olive oil, of fine flour and wheat; cattle and sheep; horses and carriages; and human beings sold as slaves.

That is false. You quoted out of context to suit your need. Now take your reasoning cap and read from the beginning of that chapter to its end. It's only 24 verses but I will personally bring the important ones here. The chapter did not say that slave traders are bound for hell. The chapter explained the annihilation of the great city of Babylon through burning of fire. The question we should ask is why did God annihilated them? The answer is down in the last 2 verses. 23 "...By your(Babylon) magic spell all the nations were led astray.
24 In her(Babylon) was found the blood of prophets and of God’s holy people,
of all who have been slaughtered on the earth.” that's the reason while the city is pulled down.




To clear it further, the verse 11-13 you brought where slaves were mentioned was not singlehandedly outlined. It was listed with every other trades carried out in Babylon burning because of God annihilating the city. If you dodge in that verse, that means God is burning those that practice other legal trades as listed there too. Here is the verse 11- 13 again, “The merchants of the earth will weep and mourn over her because no one buys their cargoes anymore— 12 cargoes of gold, silver, precious stones and pearls; fine linen, purple, silk and scarlet cloth; every sort of citron wood, and articles of every kind made of ivory, costly wood, bronze, iron and marble; 13 cargoes of cinnamon and spice, of incense, myrrh and frankincense, of wine and olive oil, of fine flour and wheat; cattle and sheep; horses and carriages; and human beings sold as slaves. you see now that slave is not the subject there. every other trade practiced by Babylon is mentioned. Therefore the chapter has nothing to do with slave traders burning in hell. It's dedicated to babylonians for killing God's prophets, killing holy people, slaughtering people on earth and their magic spell which is leading all their neighboring nations astray.

SIRTee15




That Exodus21 is interesting. It's the chapter that gives power to slave owners on most barbaric act in slavery, which says slave masters can beat the h*ll out of their slaves as long as they dont die because they (slaves) are their properties. What is more gruesome than that. If you have refused to be logical, will you be happy if me and you are to go back into those days and I have your children as my slaves, will you be happy if I beat sh_i_t out of them because God allowed me to do so as long as I don't kill them for you? Don't be primitive in the name of religion bro.

SIRTee15:


This is the most idiotic analogy I have ever seen.
That's why I hate debating U.
Is beating your wife a good cause to start with.

Lol. Obviously the fact that I used the word analogy flew over your head. Maybe u can use the dictionary once in your life.
So check up the meaning and revert.
Okay, for peace to reign, lemme use the analogy of cooking a sweet soup.
A woman cooks sweet soup and tells you its because someone looked at her, thats why she was able to do it
Do you now understand?

This thread still dey run?

adeniyi65:
SIRTee15




That Exodus21 is interesting. It's the chapter that gives power to slave owners on most barbaric act in slavery, which says slave masters can beat the h*ll out of their slaves as long as they dont die because they (slaves) are their properties. What is more gruesome than that. If you have refused to be logical, will you be happy if me and you are to go back into those days and I have your children as my slaves, will you be happy if I beat sh_i_t out of them because God allowed me to do so as long as I don't kill them for you? Don't be primitive in the name of religion bro.

It's still me Adeniyi dear SIRTee15
I could have replied you once but I have setback with uploading now through that adeniyi65 account. cc:seun the bug should be fix pls. I haven't break any rule of this platform. So, to the last part of that your argument

---

SIRTee15:

GOD INSTRUCTED TO PUT DEATH ANY SLAVE KIDNAPPER OR WHOEVER FORCEFULLY ENSLAVE SOMEONE.
Exodus 21
16 “Anyone who kidnaps someone is to be put to death, whether the victim has been sold or is still in the kidnapper’s possession.

From the above its pretty clear the whole atlantic slave trade and the transaharan slave trade was evil IN THE EYES OF GOD and all those who partook in it are bound for hell.
100% of slaves taken out of Africa were kidnapped, forcefully enslaved, beaten to submission and traded in open market as cargoes.

BIBLE CONDEMNED IT AND MAKES IT CLEAR ABOVE IS NOT A CHRISTIAN DOCTRINE. THE ABOLITIONIST WERE THUS RIGHT TO USE THE BIBLE TO JUSTIFY THE END TO SLAVE TRADE.

adeniyi and Lucifyre, this is the answer u fail to provide.

Now that we know enforced slavery is wrong, what about voluntary slavery- people who choose to be slaves. This is where the issue of bondservant comes in. I will explain later, time to go to work.

The chapter that gives you orgasm still goes further to give us law on how to buy/own slaves,(verse 2-7) and how to own more slaves by getting a wife for our slave so that their children can multiply our slaves. So pathetic, manual for capitalism of slavery .
An upright person should be ashamed of this law from their God. you should be ashamed of such book as your guide through the navigation of your world.

Now, down to verse 16 that you hold tight to.
16 “Anyone who kidnaps someone is to be put to death, whether the victim has been sold or is still in the kidnapper’s possession. I will boldly stand to say that it clearly contradict verse 2,3,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,20 and 21 of the same chapter. That raises another topic of the discrepancies, contradictions and historical error of the Bible which is not for here.[/i]


[b]If anyone is to be sincere to himself at this juncture, we would know that Verse 16 clearly instruct us not to have anything to do with slavery(as those kidnapped are meant for slave trade). And if people are to follow that verse, there wouldn't be need to give law on how to buy, multiply and beat slaves. There shouldn't be non ending list of how to acquire slaves, trade slaves, multiply slaves, abuse girl slaves narrated/commanded in all other verses. That's clear contradiction That's one of the clear contradiction of doctrine in the Bible.I say again and anyone who takes that kind of book as holy is a big time joker.

If you use that Exodus21:16 as what inspired abolitionists to resist slavery(because they mentioned some verses that is soft on slavery in their respective books), Bible said they are liars because He(God) is the one that has laid down to humanity(law on) how to thrive and be successful in slavery industry so for abolitionists to say no to slavery is the action that came from their mind not a book on how to multiply slaves.


, there is infinite number of verses that support the same slavery. If Bible chooses to be contradictory and you choose to take what pleases your doctrine out of it. It doesn't leave the book from supporting what you refused not to choose because they are still there. I still remain on my position. God ordains Slavery, and Abolitionists where driven by their reasoning not Bible.

[

adeniyi65:

It's fact that civilization ..s. As God has given law to guide slavery that is inherence of man, God supposed have given laws to guide other inherence sins of man as well instead of outrightly stopping them(e g fornication). .

The topic is Labour/slavery and you have admitted that Labour is a neccessity and because of Labour, slavery is carried out by wicked people, so this topic is settled.

For the other things you complain about, threads have been raised addressing them and every reasonable person can see that they are entirely disposable and life will be very good eg on fornication, people today would not be having the fear that they are marrying whorres and whorechasers.

jaephoenix:

So Yahweh established labor laws for people that have been kidnapped and made to work against their will?
You keep twisting and turning to escape the truth

See proof you are mad! See how you are just desperately repeating yourself and twisting like a mad person because you see you do not have any reasonable thing to say again..

jaephoenix:

Really? So Yahweh allowed the devil, his own creation to lie in his book, thereby deceiving his people?
By the way, how do you know the lies and the truthful bibles, since there is no standard to compare to?
You see

I believe this is your madness talking for i clearly those bibles are clearly written by devils which every normal and reasonable person knows that it means devils rewrote the bible according to their evil minds but a expectedly a mad person like you will definitely not understand what reasonable people know.

StillDtruth:


I believe this is your madness talking for i clearly those bibles are clearly written by devils which every normal and reasonable person knows that it means devils rewrote the bible according to their evil minds but a expectedly a mad person like you will definitely not understand what reasonable people know.

Blah blah blah
See a shrink!

SIRTee15:


Present your argument or shut up.
Don't waste anybody's time here.
Your friend brought a so called logical argument praising abolitionist for ending slavery but couldn't explain why the same abolitionists used the bible as motivation to end slavery.

Your other colleague jaephonix claimed it was king George that ended slavery but didn't know same person was the head of the church at his time and criticized those who used the bible to justify slavery.
To make things worse, he compared war against slavery to someone beating his wife.

Bunch of illogical jokers claiming atheist. Simple and basic research U won't do.

Una saving grace be internet. None of U can stand me for 5 minutes face to face in any theological argument.

This is the 3rd page of this debate but none of them could answer any of my 2 simple questions.

Its nice when you decide to have tunnel vision and ignore all the glaring evidence in the form of copious Bible verses we have shown you. And you say you can argue in a theological argument? I hope the audience laugh you out of the argument seeing as you keep on dodging evidence that is weighed in against you.
Now u r even using my analogy. When its clearly an analogy, and I doubt u even know what an analogy is, yet u r here vomiting rubbish that u can debate
Empty headed dunderville

jaephoenix:

Blah blah blah
See a shrink!

Says the Mad person!

SIRTee15:


Ok he be like say U are more honest than your colleagues.
U admitted bible spoke against slavery but also spoke for it.
So then we can have a honest debate unlike your dishonest colleagues who tore off pages of the bible they don't like and only want to talk about passages that push their sinister agenda.
They are no different from American slave masters who also removed pages of the bible they dont like;(threatens their slave business)b4 handing it to slaves.

I'm a sincere and open person, a truth seeker. I'm very much open to alternative ideology even if it antagonize my belief. The issue it whoever presenting it must equally be open and sincere.
I didn't find it in adeniyi the monicker who started this thread.

Slavery was very much established in the constitution given to Israelites and very much rampant during early Christian ministry- almost 20% of the Roman population were slaves.
The question we should ask is why was it acceptable then and not now.
I will explain later.

Who gave that constitution?

adeniyi65:



That is false. You quoted out of context to suit your need. Now take your reasoning cap and read from the beginning of that chapter to its end. It's only 24 verses but I will personally bring the important ones here. The chapter did not say that slave traders are bound for hell. The chapter explained the annihilation of the great city of Babylon through burning of fire. The question we should ask is why did God annihilated them? The answer is down in the last 2 verses. 23 "...By your(Babylon) magic spell all the nations were led astray.
24 In her(Babylon) was found the blood of prophets and of God’s holy people,
of all who have been slaughtered on the earth.” that's the reason while the city is pulled down.




To clear it further, the verse 11-13 you brought where slaves were mentioned was not singlehandedly outlined. It was listed with every other trades carried out in Babylon burning because of God annihilating the city. If you dodge in that verse, that means God is burning those that practice other legal trades as listed there too. Here is the verse 11- 13 again, “The merchants of the earth will weep and mourn over her because no one buys their cargoes anymore— 12 cargoes of gold, silver, precious stones and pearls; fine linen, purple, silk and scarlet cloth; every sort of citron wood, and articles of every kind made of ivory, costly wood, bronze, iron and marble; 13 cargoes of cinnamon and spice, of incense, myrrh and frankincense, of wine and olive oil, of fine flour and wheat; cattle and sheep; horses and carriages; and human beings sold as slaves. you see now that slave is not the subject there. every other trade practiced by Babylon is mentioned. Therefore the chapter has nothing to do with slave traders burning in hell. It's dedicated to babylonians for killing God's prophets, killing holy people, slaughtering people on earth and their magic spell which is leading all their neighboring nations astray.

Very apt explanations
Sirtee15 is dishonest in removing the context of that passage. That's his modus operandi

Lucifyre:


Deut 20 is what?! Petting them as kings abi😃 All the people they destroyed their city and took them hostage are what. On a side how did they ever find out which women were virgins to take for spoils, if not true sexual assault, not even considering the rape. Abegi

Deuteronomy 20 is The Law of Just War, every reasonable person knows that but of course devils like you would rather have a people defenceless but that they should lie down and be inslaved, raped and plundered where you would still say tha how can God do nothing and yet His people are being killed and inslaved.

So, this is a case of if God did nothing, you would abuse Him and now He did something and inpowered His people to destroy enemies and yet again you devils still speak rubbish.

So, clearly its better His people keep pounding enemies like they are doing to palestine Hamas, till God Comes to finish this world, while you make stupid noises till your own destruction comes.

jaephoenix:

Very apt explanations
Sirtee15 is dishonest in removing the context of that passage. That's his modus operandi

The point is that they practiced slave trade in addition to the usual trade which is normally what evil people do and they were destroyed by God for all their evils including slave trading.

So, its a point and that is why the bible told us.

KnownUnknown:


Why are you giving yourself agita?
The Bible was used to justify slavery and was also used to oppose slavery. There is probably more support for slavery in the book than opposition to it. There’s nothing to argue about unless you are the type of Christian who bends over backwards to deny the obvious. Even then your claims can be disregarded.

The question is the justification valid?

And the answer is "NO".

Because slavery is intertwined with Employment and Labour which are Lawfull and Necessary therefore leaving the only reasonable option of pursuing and prosecuting those who are in violation of human rights and Labour Rights and Contract.

So in the end all who say the bible permitted slavery speak foolishly and ignorantly.

SIRTee15:

Slavery was very much established in the constitution given to Israelites and very much rampant during early Christian ministry- almost 20% of the Roman population were slaves.
The question we should ask is why was it acceptable then and not now.
I will explain later.

Slavery is not in the bible (constitution of Isreal) it is Human Rights, Law of war, Labour Law, Law of Contract etc that is there.

That is why everyone is attacking you because you are not perfectly right.

StillDtruth:


Deuteronomy 20 is The Law of Just War, every reasonable person knows that but of course devils like you would rather have a people defenceless but that they should lie down and be inslaved, raped and plundered where you would still say tha how can God do nothing and yet His people are being killed and inslaved.

So, this is a case of if God did nothing, you would abuse Him and now He did something and inpowered His people to destroy enemies and yet again you devils still speak rubbish.

So, clearly its better His people keep pounding enemies like they are doing to palestine Hamas, till God Comes to finish this world, while you make stupid noises till your own destruction comes.

Resident m.oron. Are u done suckling on you mother's saggy tits?! So daft not to even realise the silent treatment, spelling u a fool.

StillDtruth:


The question is the justification valid?

And the answer is "NO".

Because slavery is intertwined with Employment and Labour which are Lawfull and Necessary therefore leaving the only reasonable option of pursuing and prosecuting those who are in violation of human rights and Labour Rights and Contract.

So in the end all who say the bible permitted slavery speak foolishly and ignorantly.



Slavery is not in the bible (constitution of Isreal) it is Human Rights, Law of war, Labour Law, Law of Contract etc that is there.

That is why everyone is attacking you because you are not perfectly right.

Whatever terminology U want to use, the word slavery is very much visible in the laws Moses gave to Israelites. We can't deny it.
I think U should do more reading on the modality of slavery as described in the old testament.
That's what causing the trouble here. People are extrapolating the definition of modern day slavery to ancient times.
Anyway I will write on that later in the day.

If everyone is attacking me, maybe I'm the one giving them hard time on the propaganda they trying to push here
I already made the 3 bible antagonist here admit that bible spoke against slavery, something they all initially denied.
The issue is now what about about verses for slavery.

We already made it clear kidnapping people and selling them in slave market is immoral. So the trans Atlantic slave trade was evil.

I will write on slavery by choice and war victims in the Torah later on.

Kobojunkie:
Nonsense! You are here quoting from the Constitutional Law of the Nation of Israel set up by Moses in the Land of Canaan, a nation which ceased to exist almost 2000 years ago, as the reason for slavery among other evils carried out by African Nations and European nations afterward? You need help.

A better suggestion would be suggesting an all-out ban on religion at that level and inclusion of critical thinking & SEL courses in the curriculum to ensure that when finally exposed to such material, students are better able to process what is written as written.

Can you quote any verse in the Bible where it says the god condemned slavery.