MaxInDHouse:
Tolu has caused a lot of trouble with this thread walahi talahi!

Emusan:


No! I don't.

Do you agree that without Jesus NOTHING was CREATED?

At least, it's settled that Micheal is a creature

Janosky:

Gbas gbos for real.

MaxInDHouse:

The funny thing here is how they keep on arguing yet there is no problem until they sight a JW all of them will pretend to agree as if only JW is not in agreement with them but just leave them for a minute and come back to see how they are bashing one another with insults and curses!

Janosky:

That creature is ALWAYS Jesus.
Nah you Emusan bring evidence that Jesus is the first born meaning that Jesus is a creature.
Emusan evidence:
"Jesus is the first born in the sense of being the first to be born or created.
He is the beginning of all creation. Everything was created through him".
According to Emusan evidence: Born or created, is a creature. Jesus is NOT the Creator.[/b]

Janosky:

In fact,you understand how these churchians reason.

Janosky:
That creature is ALWAYS Jesus.

Nah you Emusan bring evidence that Jesus is the first born meaning that Jesus is a creature.

Emusan evidence:
"Jesus is the first born in the sense of being the first to be born or created.
He is the beginning of all creation. Everything was created through him".


According to Emusan evidence: Born or created, is a creature. Jesus is NOT the Creator.

Emusan:


He can never be Jesus Christ because Jesus created ALL THINGS! He created both Michael and you.

Emusan:


Olofo...you still couldn't grab the meaning of that screenshot in since all this while.

O ma se oooo

That you are JaNosense is for a reason.

Read that screenshot again and see how it says Jesus is the SUPREME BEING OVER CREATURE.

Emusan:



Well, I don't expect you to understand that.

The screenshot says boldly "Jesus is the Creator and sustainer of all things"
[s][s]but as usual JaNosense will switch off his empty skull when getting to that part.[/s][/s]

Or can a creature be both CREATOR & SUSTAINER of ALL THINGS?

Janosky:


Emusan LYING miscreant, you know that Jesus is NOT Supreme Being nau.

Did Jesus teach Emusan that Jesus supreme to God his Father at John 14:28 ?
Did Paul converted by Jesus, teach Emusan LYING miscreant that Jesus is supreme @1 Corinthians 11:3 & Hebrew 6:13?

Emusan LYING miscreant, denying the holy scriptures please repent from your folly.

Emusan:


JaNosense is so pained that he has to quote my post thrice with evidence of severe pain.

Now, it's whether Jesus teach me anything not about the screenshot again
Your evidence is based on the screenshot but you want to change mouth, definitely your empty skull can't grab what you're using as evidence

Oponu JaNosense

Janosky:
Emusan LYING miscreant dubious attempt to divert attention.
His Trinity GIBBERISH straight to the dustbin wotowoto.

MaxInDHouse:
Why is Christ the angel of the Lord?

Because he was an angel back in heaven where God dwells with angels!

Emusan:


Can you imagine this JaNosense...

You claimed the screenshot supported your point but it's evident that you're the one shutting down your brain cells to cherry pick that simple sentences.

Reason why I do call you JaNosense.

The screenshot says Jesus is the Creator and SUSTAINER OF ALL THINGS, true or false?

No wonder those your gods in Warwick always using your head to do Tic-toe-tar

MaxInDHouse:
Why is Christ the angel of the Lord?

Because he was an angel back in heaven where God dwells with angels!

Gabrielshow24:

It doesn't differentiate whether the messenger is the word of God or a cherub, or a seraph or God the Father himself

Gabrielshow24:

This is fallacious!!!
He was an "angel" because he was on an errand from his Father!!!

Not that he was part of a set of beings also coincidentally called "angels"👀

Your false equivocation is just too much!!!
If you so claim he was an angel while not tell us whether he was a cherub!
Or Perhaps a seraph!!!

Gabrielshow24:

This is fallacious!!!
He was an "angel" because he was on an errand from his Father!!!

Not that he was part of a set of beings also coincidentally called "angels"👀

Your false equivocation is just too much!!!
If you so claim he was an angel while not tell us whether he was a cherub!
Or Perhaps a seraph!!!

Emusan:


You're the one bothering yourself by going round in cycle.

He can't provide where I disrespected his beliefs

He can't provide where I INSULTED & ABUSED

He wants to chicken out, I understand!

Emusan:


JaNosense is so pained that he has to quote my post thrice with evidence of severe pain.

Now, it's whether Jesus teach me anything not about the screenshot again

Your evidence is based on the screenshot but you want to change mouth, definitely your empty skull can't grab what you're using as evidence

Oponu JaNosense

Gabrielshow24:

Janonsense is an eternal fool.

Even if you reflect the truth into his eye, he will never see it!!!

Emusan:


Christ is not even the Angel of the Lord.

Even though some have tried to ascribe that to Him when considering how Yahweh works in the Old Testament in which it was term Theophany.

But in Matt 1:20 while Mary conceived Jesus it was recorded that the same ANGEL OF THE LORD appeared to Joseph.

If you ask the champion of this Angel of the Lord as Jesus, why was Jesus in the womb and the Angel of the Lord also in action?

They'll go silent because to them, Jesus is a complete human which means when Jesus was human nothing DIVINE in him.

Or was Matthew wrong to have mentioned Angel of the Lord while Jesus was still in the womb?

This even favoured the people who argue in support of Jesus being human and divine on earth but against anyone who believes Jesus was never Divine one earth.

They want to eat their cake and also have it.

The source of this “calm, low voice” may have been the same spirit who was used to deliver “Jehovah’s word” mentioned at 1 Kings 19:9. In verse 15, this spirit is referred to simply as “Jehovah.” We might be reminded of the spirit emissary whom Jehovah used to guide Israel in the wilderness and of whom God said: “My name is within him.” (Ex. 23:21) We cannot be dogmatic on this point, of course, but it is worth noting that in his prehuman existence, Jesus served as “the Word,” the special Spokesman to Jehovah’s servants.​—John 1:1.

achorladey:
In their publication titled imitate their faith...

Their lies and manipulations filled brains accepted the no get sense of Jesus served as the Word in their religious publications when the Bible they carry says Jesus is the Word not serving as the Word

Then the same Angel of the Lord they say and hammering is Jesus is equally Jehovah in their religious publications but they don't want to be dogmatic about it. You begin to wonder what is the basis of their fighting Jesus is angel of the lord

Emusan:

Well said!
Jesus has never SERVED as the word but He is THE WORD!

MaxInDHouse:

Only one angel is God's spokesman in heaven: Archangel Michael the word of God!

If you ask him intelligent question he will not respond but with his attitude he wants you to answer him as if you are into some kind of investigation.
That's why i keep teasing him to see what else he can do after all he's not here to learn but argue.

Emusan:

Despite the lie in this post
He's still looking for engagement by fire by force.
Continue to be restless!

MaxInDHouse:
Why is Christ the angel of the Lord?~OP

Emusan:

Christ is not the Angel of the Lord!
Do you believe that without Jesus NOTHING was CREATED?

MaxInDHouse:

Do you believe that without Michael the Archangel nothing was created?