ActivateKruger:


[s]Let's see... Nigeria was a British colony when South Africa wasn't.... your negro blood was in slavery for centuries. Your are today a hungry poor conflict zone....Nigerians are now refugees.

- Negros trading each other
- Negros under colonialism
- Negros killing each other.

Thats the Nigeria timeline[/s]

How does the gibberish above reconcile with the fact that you were invaded, bullied, vanquished and outshined by the minority white?

iconize:


Bwhahahaha!

Another m_oron!

Blek on blek

White on blek on blek soil


Show us where the Igbos were treated like this.

[img]http://actango.files./2010/11/mine_recruition-l.jpg?w=568&h=390[/img]


Now see modern day apartheid

South African advert showing white woman feeding black child like dog

... while the Igbo child starved like a dog

Msauza:



Whites feed Africa in general and to lesser extend SA. Your country (Nigeria) still receive grants from queen Elizabeth your master to feed your hungry children and to pay for their education. Today UNICEF does not even cease to work in northern Nigeria

Your dumbness might be genetic, honestly.

Who's talking about the grants, Africans receive?


We are talking about discrimination and bullying.


South African Advertising Standards Agency pulls campaign that shows white woman feeding black child like a dog after complaints of racism and poor taste

A television and YouTube advertisement that shows a wealthy white South African woman feeding a black child like a dog has sparked outrage and accusations of racism.

The advertisement, produced by global agency Ogilvy and Mather for the South African charity Feed A Child, shows a white woman eating breakfast in bed, baking a cake, eating it in the lounge, sitting at the dining table and watching a film with popcorn, all the time popping titbits into a waiting child's mouth.

The tag line at the end reads: "The average domestic dog eats better than millions of children."

One in ten children dies before the age of one because of hunger in South Africa, and one in five is malnourished.

But the emotive advertisement – which was shown during breaks on South African news channels – has been met with a storm of controversy and complaints to the Advertising Standards Agency, prompting it to be removed.

Commenters on Twitter suggested the advertisement was "hugely racist" and in "poor taste", and the charity had picked "the wrong way to get the message across".

Others defended it, saying desperate situations called for desperate measures, and Feed A Child was simply "pointing out the injustice of starving children".

Both Ogilvy and Mather and Feed A Child apologised for any offence caused by the advertisement.

Alza Rautenbach, Feed a Child's founder and spokesman, told South Africa's Times it was "unfortunate" that what the charity had intended to be a strong statement against a social ill had turned into "a racial issue".

"What if this advert changed a child's life? What if this advert changed 3.5 million children's lives? What if this was your child going to bed hungry tonight, and this advert can change that?" she said.

"The child was a character that the agency used. It wasn't chosen for any specific reason – and yes, the idea was to use multiracial people, just as our country is. It doesn't help to have an advert that is not representative."

iconize:


Boy, if you must quote me again then you've to acquire at least 00.2% IQ for a start.

Nigerians on Nigerians

White migrants on zulu lackeys

Contrast and compare.

First it was Negro on Negro, then it became White on Negro and now its back to Negro no Negro again.....

The Negro never gets rest.

Msauza:



I told you that Nigerian universities are of a low standard when it comes to the quality of teaching. Most universities in SA offer African History as one of the module which make up a course in international relation and diplomacy. African history is a module which also is studied by many students doing social studies and humanities. What kind of international relation and diplomacy graduate will you be if you do not know the history and cultures of the people in your continent, especially of countries which seem to be on the edge in Africa. My friend, I advice you to abandon your Nigeria based studies and rather study that course somewhere else, since Nigeria itself has never been an expect in that field. Thank you!!

infinite loops of stupidity, your questions have been answered in the comment you quoted but you still do not have the brain to deduct the answer. I did not study southafrican cultural history my man, there is a thin line between cultural history and political history, i gave you a brake down of the faults of the ancient bushmen in southafrica that led to the imperialist takeover first by DEIC and later to Britain in 1795 although Britain returned it to DEIC in 1803 and reclaimed it again when it realise that the dutch people were allied to napoleon. You do not expect students of strategic studies to sit down to be learning irrelevant cultural issues like how the zulu girls dance, how they nod their head or how they run around naked their mind being void of any form of humanly self esteem know to the civilised men of west, north and central Africa, men that built empires, cities and great culture, believe me my man even if any school is to impute the culture of African PCS ( precolonial societies ) nor their curriculum it wont be that of southafrica. What is good about your precolonial culture? Is it the fact that while westafrica empires where already acquiring guns from the Europeans your dear shaka was busy forming local champion with his Asegai(short stabbing spear). Or is the fact that while other African empires ( most especially north and west African empires) where busy trading with the Europeans and Asian via the trans Saharan caravan trade route your people were busy picking fruits in the bush, piercing themselves abnormally in the name of ornamentals, refusing to eat the meat of their cattles and other such disgusting feats. This is at a time when other African empires where far advancing with sophisticated urban centers like Benin, timbuktu, Cairo. Ve you heard about the malian empire and the civilization that they but for themselves that you re calling your culture " on the edge". Your people where busy running around naked wen other west African and north African empires were advancing in civilization. The truth still remains that Britain only needed the cape as its naval gateway to the east (the then Anglo-Indian trade was the economic sustenance of Britain) it never wanted to expend or commit itself to administering a colony in the cape as the people there where too disorganized, uncivilized and disunited with no form of central government. England knew that organizing this uncivilized people would demand a lot of resource so the British cape authority held this non commital stance till the discovery of Diamond in Kimberly a neutral territory. Oh boy! If not for the discovery of diamond in SA, i do not even want to think what would have happened, you south Africans would have been reared like park animals by the Boers, south Africa would have become a big " wild life park like the safari's in Kenya where Europeans would go to watch bushmen in their habitat. That is your history my man, now chew it up.

ActivateKruger:



... while the Igbo child starved like a dog

My apartheid dog, does your brain run on petrol?

How can a sane person compare civil war and apartheid?

Now see the boers bullied and vanquished y'all with ordinary club sticks.

ActivateKruger:


First it was Negro on Negro, then it became White on Negro and now its back to Negro no Negro again.....

The Negro never gets rest.

Okay, show us white on negro.

Like minority white owning 90% of our ancestral lands.

iconize:


This is one heavenly dumb.

The whites bullied, discriminating and decimated zulu Africans in the fatherland. Even up till this moment.

While the Igbos fought a war.

Comparing these two speaks volume of your dumbness.

You are as backward as Nigeria

iconize:


How does the gibberish above reconcile with the fact that you were invaded, bullied, vanquished and outshined by the minority white?

So says a man who;

- Was sold to slavery like a dog
- Invaded by whites and made him bring the teapot
- Then is currently being killed like a dog by another negro

ActivateKruger:



... while the Igbo child starved like a dog

with all due respect i will prefer to starve like a dog in my own land than to be treated like a dog in my on land.

ActivateKruger:


So says a man who;

- Was sold to slavery like a dog
- Invaded by whites and made him bring the teapot
- Then is currently being killed like a dog by another negro

So that's all you can come up with?

Tell us more about those who were bullied and vanquished for over a century nonstop by white migrants.

Msauza:



You are as backward as Nigeria

Pained!

iconize:


Okay, show us white on negro.

Like minority white owning 90% of our ancestral lands.

You were sold to the highest bitter. The only Africans to have been ever known to be resistive to colonisations are black South Africans.


Your forebears are notorious of selling their brothers

lezz:
only 7% of your schools own libraries and only 15% blacks pass basic exams, i shouldn't really be surprised why you are intellectually deficient, you zulu, cave dwelling village boy. After all the rest of africa is 70 years ahead of you. You are just beginning to learn about life.

O look, more made up facts.

0/10

iconize:


Bwhahahahaha!

Did zulu Africans fight any war?

They were simply bullied and whipped with club sticks.

They fought harder against colonization (along with the other South African tribes) than any other African tribe

Nigerians just rolled over and took it from the brits

iconize:


Okay, show us white on negro.

Like minority white owning 90% of our ancestral lands.

iconize just read the historical analysis i wrote above and you will understand why there is nothing a south African should be proud of,
southafrica is what happened when a bunch of uncivilized bushmen refused to form a united front to save their territory from white settlers. South Africa is the biggest historical failure of Africa, no wonder other African states had to save their a55 when it got out of hand

iconize:


So that's all you can come up with?

Tell us more about those who were bullied and vanquished for over a century nonstop by white migrants.

ABACHA bullied you like nobody's business. You see your people do not have a head. They harass one of their own.

Msauza:



You were sold to the highest bitter. The only Africans to have been ever known to be resistive to colonisations are black South Africans.


Your forebears are notorious of selling their brothers

Resisted but later bullied, colonized and vanquished for over a century.

And still being outshined by migrants in their fatherland.

gottfried21:
Marines with the new camo

Is that the american CAPDAT cammo scheme?

iconize:


Dumbness!
Were those peeps invaded by white migrants?
They fought a war.

But blek south Africans didn't fight any war. They were invaded and decimated like cowardly ants.

Now see the bullying and superiority, and compare with the section of Nigerians that fought real war.


[img]http://actango.files./2010/11/mine_recruition-l.jpg?w=480&h=330[/img]

Nigerians never fought a war of liberation.

overhypedsteve:
iconize just read the historical analysis i wrote above and you will understand why there is nothing a south African should be proud of,
southafrica is what happened when a bunch of uncivilized bushmen refused to form a united front to save their territory from white settlers. South Africa is the biggest historical failure of Africa, no wonder other African states had to save their a55 when it got out of hand

The biggest historical failure of Africa is this.


Merchantile slavery

Msauza:



ABACHA bullied you like nobody's business. You see your people do not have a head. They harass one of their own.

Abacha bullied who?
Boy, Which institution produced you?

Abacha was a dictator not a boer.

Is Abacha white?

Okay, maybe he's white.

Did Abacha do such thing to bleks in their ancestral land?

See the harassment

[img]http://actango.files./2010/11/mine_recruition-l.jpg?w=568&h=390[/img]

The greatest African hero of all time.

overhypedsteve:
infinite loops of stupidity, your questions have been answered in the comment you quoted but you still do not have the brain to deduct the answer. I did not study southafrican cultural history my man, there is a thin line between cultural history and political history, i gave you a brake down of the faults of the ancient bushmen in southafrica that led to the imperialist takeover first by DEIC and later to Britain in 1795 although Britain returned it to DEIC in 1803 and reclaimed it again when it realise that the dutch people were allied to napoleon. You do not expect students of strategic studies to sit down to be learning irrelevant cultural issues like how the zulu girls dance, how they nod their head or how they run around naked their mind being void of any form of humanly self esteem know to the civilised men of west, north and central Africa, men that built empires, cities and great culture, believe me my man even if any school is to impute the culture of African PCS ( precolonial societies ) nor their curriculum it wont be that of southafrica. What is good about your precolonial culture? Is it the fact that while westafrica empires where already acquiring guns from the Europeans your dear shaka was busy forming local champion with his Asegai(short stabbing spear). Or is the fact that while other African empires ( most especially north and west African empires) where busy trading with the Europeans and Asian via the trans Saharan caravan trade route your people were busy picking fruits in the bush, piercing themselves abnormally in the name of ornamentals, refusing to eat the meat of their cattles and other such disgusting feats. This is at a time when other African empires where far advancing with sophisticated urban centers like Benin, timbuktu, Cairo. Ve you heard about the malian empire and the civilization that they but for themselves that you re calling your culture " on the edge". Your people where busy running around naked wen other west African and north African empires were advancing in civilization. The truth still remains that Britain only needed the cape as its naval gateway to the east (the then Anglo-Indian trade was the economic sustenance of Britain) it never wanted to expend or commit itself to administering a colony in the cape as the people there where too disorganized, uncivilized and disunited with no form of central government. England knew that organizing this uncivilized people would demand a lot of resource so the British cape authority held this non commital stance till the discovery of Diamond in Kimberly a neutral territory. Oh boy! If not for the discovery of diamond in SA, i do not even want to think what would have happened, you south Africans would have been reared like park animals by the Boers, south Africa would have become a big " wild life park like the safari's in Kenya where Europeans would go to watch bushmen in their habitat. That is your history my man, now chew it up.

This man talks of North African empires.

Yeah, we have one.

Shaka Zulu a.k.a "The Black Napoleon"

Furthermore, the Zulu's were the only native tribe, armed predominantly with spears and shields, to defeat the British Imperial Army in a set-piece battle.

Patchesagain:


Nigerians never fought a war of liberation.

Neither were they bullied by migrants for more than 100 years.

However, some ancient kingdoms in present day Nigeria fought the white colonialists.

iconize:

Abacha bullied who?
Boy, Which institution produced you?

Abacha was a dictator not a boer.

Is Abacha white?

Okay, maybe he's white.

Did Abacha do such thing to bleks in their ancestral land?

See the harassment

[img]http://actango.files./2010/11/mine_recruition-l.jpg?w=568&h=390[/img]

Abacha was even worse than Mugabe. He was the greatest dictator Africa had. He held the whole of Nigeria to the ground. Black on black

Msauza:



You were sold to the highest bitter. The only Africans to have been ever known to be resistive to colonisations are black South Africans.


Your forebears are notorious of selling their brothers

useless person, you don't even know about your history as a south African because if you do you wont vomit that nonsense, do you know the provisions of the 1809 and 1812 hottentort ordinance? Well the ordinance advocated to for forced servitude of the blacks to a white farmer and any black born in the plantation of the white farmer that is above the age of 8 will be forced into child labour under the white farmer. It is noteworthy that while slavery stopped in Britain and some other colonies in the year 1807 it was abolished partially in the cape in the year 1834 and even at that the Boers at the orange free state where still engraving the Bantu that where occupying the area before

Msauza:
The greatest African hero of all time.

But he was tagged a terrorist by his owners and imprisoned for over 25years.

Such a hero!

overhypedsteve:
with all due respect i will prefer to starve like a dog in my own land than to be treated like a dog in my on land.

Dude, you were treated like a dog by British Colonizers then starved to death by your black leaders...

Your ordeal is worst.

overhypedsteve:
useless person, you don't even know about your history as a south African because if you do you wont vomit that nonsense, do you know the provisions of the 1809 and 1812 hottentort ordinance? Well the ordinance advocated to for forced servitude of the blacks to a white farmer and any black born in the plantation of the white farmer that is above the age of 8 will be forced into child labour under the white farmer. It is noteworthy that while slavery stopped in Britain and some other colonies in the year 1807 it was abolished partially in the cape in the year 1834 and even at that the Boers at the orange free state where still engraving the Bantu that where occupying the area before

It doesn't matter you sold your brothers to harvest sugar in American farms and be treated as slaves.

Patchesagain:


They fought harder against colonization (along with the other South African tribes) than any other African tribe

Nigerians just rolled over and took it from the brits

You mean they protested? Or they terrorized the nation before Nigeria took a step?

Now I get why they Ghanaians on this site resort to arguing with insults, some of you are certifiable r3tards. No common sense whatsover.