Stats: 3,189,731 members, 7,938,274 topics. Date: Monday, 02 September 2024 at 09:08 PM |
Nairaland Forum / Nairaland / General / Religion / Islam for Muslims / Jihad - Is It Only For Defense? (1302 Views)
Aregbesola Backs Jihad & Opposes Boko Haram / Wahhabism, Jihad And Boko Haram / Come And See jihad For What It Is (2) (3) (4)
Jihad - Is It Only For Defense? by tartar9(m): 6:20pm On Nov 07, 2014 |
Bismillah ir-Rahman ir-Rahim. The phenomenon of the idea that Jihad is only defensive is rapidly being spread amongst Muslim circles. It is without doubt a relatively new idea that seems to have appeared since the demise of the 'uthamani Khilafah and tends to come from the rhetoric of apologists and modernists who seem to have a problem with many key aspects of traditional Islamic 'Aqeedah and Islamic Law. The ironic thing is, those who are calling for a reform to how we should approach the Shariah are also declarers of following 'Traditional Islam'. However, what seems to be more apparent is that they find no qualms in adhering to interpretations of traditional Islamic law in non controversial and non - 'ideological' matters, but when matters of contemporary issues arise, such as Jihad, apostasy, the Islamic penal code, interfaith relations etc, new interpretations are called for. This is a serious problem we are facing and a short article will never be able to address this issue accordingly. Before a Muslim steps into the battlefield, he has already fought a great battle within himself against Satan- against his own desires and ambitions, his personal interests and inclinations, the interests of his own family and of his nation; against anything which is not from Islam; against every obstacle which comes into the way of worshipping Allah and the implementation of the Divine authority on earth, returning this authority to Allah and taking it away from the rebellious usurpers. Those who say that Islamic Jihad was merely for the defense of the 'home land of Islam' diminish the greatness of the Islamic way of life and consider it less important than their 'homeland'. This is not the Islamic point of view, and their view is a creation of modern age and is completely alien to Islamic consciousness. What is acceptable to Islamic consciousness is its belief, the way of life which this belief prescribes, and the society which lives according to this way of life. The soil of the homeland has, in itself, no value or weight. From the Islamic point of view, the only value which the soil can achieve is because on that soil Allah's authority is established and Allah's guidance is followed; and thus it becomes a fortress for the belief, a place for its way of life to be entitled the 'homeland of Islam', a centre for the movement for the total freedom of man. Of course, in that case the defense of the 'homeland of Islam' is the defense of the Islamic beliefs, the Islamic way of life, and the Islamic community. However, it's defense is not the ultimate objective of the Islamic movement of Jihad but it is a mean of establishing the Divine authority within it so that it becomes the headquarters for the movement of Islam, which is then to be carried throughout the earth to the whole of mankind, as the object of this religion is all humanity and its sphere of action is the whole earth. As we have described earlier, there are many practical obstacles in the establishing Allah's rule on earth, such as the power of state, the social system and traditions and, in general, the whole human environment. Islam uses force only to remove these obstacles so that there may not remain any wall between Islam and individual human beings, and so that it may address their hearts and minds after releasing them from these material obstacles, and then leave them free to choose to accept or reject it. We ought not to be deceived or embarrassed by the attacks of the Orientalists on the origin of Jihad, nor lose self-confidence under the pressure of present conditions and the weight of the great powers of the world to such an extent that we try to find reasons for Islamic Jihad outside the nature of this religion, and try to show that it was a defensive measure under temporary conditions. The need for Jihad remains, and will continue to remain, whether these conditions exist or not! |
Re: Jihad - Is It Only For Defense? by usermane(m): 1:35pm On Nov 08, 2014 |
Alright, you just stated that Jihad transcend defence according to orthodox Islamic teachings. This has been my my criticism of orthodox Islam, but the apologists deny. Insha Allah, I will give my contribution on this tonight. |
Re: Jihad - Is It Only For Defense? by tartar9(m): 5:27pm On Nov 08, 2014 |
usermane:are you sunni muslim,this is what is generally agreed upon on what jihad is according to the Shariah. |
Re: Jihad - Is It Only For Defense? by tbaba1234: 11:08pm On Nov 08, 2014 |
tartar9: Forget him, he is a Quranist... 1 Like |
Re: Jihad - Is It Only For Defense? by tbaba1234: 11:14pm On Nov 08, 2014 |
To the topic, Jihad can both be offensive and defensive depending on the conditions. I would say, a defensive Jihad is more practical and useful in today's world.Why? i. There are global treaties between countries which means there are little impediments to the spread of the message. ii. Weapons of mass destruction, which means the Islamic values of warfare can not be strictly adhered to. In terms of relevance at this point in time, defence is more relevant. |
Re: Jihad - Is It Only For Defense? by Question01(m): 1:45am On Nov 10, 2014 |
Peace. Jihad can be offensive?, well i guess that 's what ISIS is keeping to. |
Re: Jihad - Is It Only For Defense? by vedaxcool(m): 5:51pm On Nov 10, 2014 |
Interesting discourse, my 2 kobo, when talking about Jihad we should always remind people that it is not only limited to battles but about a general struggle to do what will be positive for humanity, like not partaking in corruption, charity, removing harmful things from the road, and greatest jihad is a word of justice said to an unjust leader, like say baghdadi, etc The mistake we keep making is allowing the kafirs, munafiqs, non muslims to box us in a corner, by limiting the discourse to always battles when in fact it battle is just one aspect of it, we need to keep educating them on what jihad broadly means not just limiting it to their already misconstrued understanding of the term! 1 Like |
Re: Jihad - Is It Only For Defense? by usermane(m): 4:06am On Nov 11, 2014 |
@tartar9 Your assertion that all land must fall under Sharia have been employed by Islamist insurgents for long. I am not shocked to hear this since i know it is covered in your religious text, although most orthodox Muslims continue deny it. Accordingly, orthodox Muslim sages divided the world into two parts; "Abode of Peace and Abode of War", the former being the Muslim land under sharia and the latter being the non-Muslim land to be fought to establish Sharia law. It is God 's will that the Muslim world now under the grip of fanatics lack the military and technological competence to mount an invasion or offensive Jihad. Otherwise, the very war crimes that US and Isreal are guilty of will be nothing compared to the slaughter & massacres by the Mujahidins and their Caliphs, in compliance with the following ahadith:::
|
Re: Jihad - Is It Only For Defense? by usermane(m): 4:10am On Nov 11, 2014 |
There isn't proof for this unjust doctrine from the Qur'an which no where sanction aggression but defense and resistance. The reason being that Offensive Jihad is a foreign doctrine introduced to serve the interest of power and wealth hungry Ummayad Caliphs. Because the Arabs will buy anything marketed as Islam, the Ummayad effected the fabrication of these ahadith to buy their full support, even though it was a secular state requiring no religious justification for decisions. |
Re: Jihad - Is It Only For Defense? by Empiree: 6:43pm On Feb 08, 2015 |
author=usermane post=27904853]The hadith you quoted up there, Sahih Bukhari Volume 1, Book 8, Number 387, is like quoting sura 9:5. Even though it appears to be 'standalone' should only be understood in the light of war context. That's just common sense for average Muslims. But people don't think anymore. If some crazy people exploit it, that's their cup of coffee. Why would you say it's a form of offensive and aggression?. What you doing is exactly what many non-Muslims are doing. When non-Muslims quote sura 9:5, you keep quiet. Why don't you defend it since you are Quran only believer?. This reminds me of 2010 or 2011 during Obama's state of the union address when he said "...we will not give them save haven. We will eradicate them wherever we find them". What would you think of Obama?. I thought you smarter than this. You of all people as you fondly say. Honestly you really need to get a life. [size=5pt]No offence intended[/size] |
Re: Jihad - Is It Only For Defense? by omaaidoko: 6:58am On Feb 21, 2015 |
ALLAH IS THE MOST GREATEST |
(1) (Reply)
Information On Arabic Schoool. / Abuzola, That Muslim Dude That Failed Bombing Attempt In U.s - What Do You Say? / A Question On Abortion
Viewing this topic: 1 guest(s)
(Go Up)
Sections: politics (1) business autos (1) jobs (1) career education (1) romance computers phones travel sports fashion health religion celebs tv-movies music-radio literature webmasters programming techmarket Links: (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) Nairaland - Copyright © 2005 - 2024 Oluwaseun Osewa. All rights reserved. See How To Advertise. 46 |