Welcome, Guest: Register On Nairaland / LOGIN! / Trending / Recent / New
Stats: 3,208,810 members, 8,003,843 topics. Date: Friday, 15 November 2024 at 08:48 PM

Sanchez Vs Hazard; Who Is Better? - Sports (5) - Nairaland

Nairaland Forum / Entertainment / Sports / Sanchez Vs Hazard; Who Is Better? (23737 Views)

Sanchez Vs Hazard / Di Maria Vs Hazard: Who Is A Better Playmaker? / Di Maria Vs Hazard:who Is D Best (2) (3) (4)

(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (Reply) (Go Down)

Re: Sanchez Vs Hazard; Who Is Better? by thegoodjoehunt3(m): 4:39pm On Nov 12, 2014
Yustash001:
lampard won the 2nd world best player....2004 or 2005(not sure)....
What Arsene Wenger did with Thierry Henry and Anelka was amazing. You can not compare that to Mourinho's work on Lampard. Lampard was a top midfielder before Mourinho's arrival. Thierry Henry was a Juve flop and Anelka was a seventeen years old teenager who became the best young player in the World.
Re: Sanchez Vs Hazard; Who Is Better? by thegoodjoehunt3(m): 4:45pm On Nov 12, 2014
jobsat34:


dont mind @thegoodjoehunt3 jaree.. he is just too sentimental.. i have given him my piece though..
I am a Man City fan. I have no reason to be sentimental or bias.


I wrote this about Hazard a while ago:

Zizou is just making Bale feel good, so they can sign him. Zizou is a long die hard supporter of Hazard. I knew that long before I ever watched Hazard at Lille.

Bale had a wonderful season but Hazard was the better player.

Hazard kicking that Ball boy against Swansea in the Carling Cup is really what took the chance of Hazard winning the award.

Yet upon the kicking, he was still nominated. Think of it.
https://www.nairaland.com/1274746/barcelona-vs-bayern-munich-ucl/34

So do not think I am talking because I hare Hazard or I am an Arsenal fan.

Sanchez is better and time will tell.
Re: Sanchez Vs Hazard; Who Is Better? by jobsat34(m): 4:46pm On Nov 12, 2014
thegoodjoehunt3:
Thierry Henry was a flop at Juve. Coach Arsene Wenger signed him and coached him/utilised him to be one of the best in the world. Mourinho has not taken a player and groomed him to one of the best in the World.

Lampard was not flop before Mourinho took over Chelsea. Chelsea finished second in the league before the arrival of Mourinho. Terry and Lampard were already performing before Mourinho came.

As for Drogba, was never rated as the best player in the world.

CFC finished second before mou arrival, not due to lampard or terry influence but due to abrahamovic influence and signings...
no one rate those players then until mou turn things around..
who says drogba was never a world class player ??.. you need to think again...
Re: Sanchez Vs Hazard; Who Is Better? by jobsat34(m): 4:49pm On Nov 12, 2014
thegoodjoehunt3:
What Arsene Wenger did with Thierry Henry and Anelka was amazing. You can not compare that to Mourinho's work on Lampard. Lampard was a top midfielder before Mourinho's arrival. Thierry Henry was a Juve flop and Anelka was a seventeen years old teenager who became the best young player in the World.

i cant remember anelka or henry winning the best player award ooo... lampard was a top player before mou era??.. i beg to disagree...
Re: Sanchez Vs Hazard; Who Is Better? by jobsat34(m): 4:52pm On Nov 12, 2014
thegoodjoehunt3:
I am a Man City fan. I have no reason to be sentimental or bias.


I wrote this about Hazard a while ago:

Zizou is just making Bale feel good, so they can sign him. Zizou is a long die hard supporter of Hazard. I knew that long before I ever watched Hazard at Lille.

Bale had a wonderful season but Hazard was the better player.

Hazard kicking that Ball boy against Swansea in the Carling Cup is really what took the chance of Hazard winning the award.

Yet upon the kicking, he was still nominated. Think of it.
https://www.nairaland.com/1274746/barcelona-vs-bayern-munich-ucl/34

So do not think I am talking because I hare Hazard or I am an Arsenal fan.

Sanchez is better and time will tell.

i dont contest the fact that sanchez plays better on current form, but that he is overall a better player than hazard? no way...
Re: Sanchez Vs Hazard; Who Is Better? by thegoodjoehunt3(m): 4:54pm On Nov 12, 2014
jobsat34:


i cant remember anelka or henry winning the best player award ooo... lampard was a top player before mou era??.. i beg to disagree...
Chelsea finished second on the table before Mourinho took over. They finished above Manchester United. Chelsea was an amazing passing team. Lampard was already a big player in the squad.


As for Anelka, I said Arsene Wenger groomed a seventeen year old kid into the Best young player in the World. Anelka won the young player of the year. That was amazing.

As for Thierry Henry, he was clearly robbed in 2004 invincibles season. Ronaldinho went trophy less that season. Henry went on to win the EPL highest goal scorer three times consecutively. That was amazing for a player tagged a flop.

1 Like

Re: Sanchez Vs Hazard; Who Is Better? by thegoodjoehunt3(m): 4:57pm On Nov 12, 2014
jobsat34:


CFC finished second before mou arrival, not due to lampard or terry influence but due to abrahamovic influence and signings...
no one rate those players then until mou turn things around..
who says drogba was never a world class player ??.. you need to think again...
I bet you, you did not watch Chelsea then. Are you saying Man City did not do well because of Yaya's performance but Sheikh Mansour's signings?

What kind of talk is that?

Chelsea played an amazing brand of football under Coach Ranieri and Lampard was a big part of the team.
Re: Sanchez Vs Hazard; Who Is Better? by thegoodjoehunt3(m): 5:01pm On Nov 12, 2014
jobsat34:


i dont contest the fact that sanchez plays better on current form, but that he is overall a better player than hazard? no way...
How can Sanchez be overall better when Sanchez played amazing football with Falcao Garcia at River plate before Hazard became popular.

They both have strengths and weaknesses. However, Sanchez work rate puts him ahead of Hazard.


Most people only watch EPL games and judge. Are you saying you watched most of Sanchez games at Barca?

1 Like

Re: Sanchez Vs Hazard; Who Is Better? by thegoodjoehunt3(m): 5:08pm On Nov 12, 2014
jobsat34:


i cant remember anelka or henry winning the best player award ooo... lampard was a top player before mou era??.. i beg to disagree...
Lampard played over a hundred games for West Ham before joining Chelsea in 2001. He was nought to Chelsea as a star, not complete number.
Re: Sanchez Vs Hazard; Who Is Better? by Greatihex(m): 5:13pm On Nov 12, 2014
thegoodjoehunt3:
Lampard was already in the club performing under Ranieri before Mourinho came in.

Sanchez is having then form of his life so far.
you surely have nt done the research. Try and do it. It wl help u n ur football history.
Re: Sanchez Vs Hazard; Who Is Better? by thegoodjoehunt3(m): 5:18pm On Nov 12, 2014
Greatihex:
you surely have nt done the research. Try and do it. It wl help u n ur football history.
You who did research, tell me what is correct.

I repeat. Lampard was a top player before Mourinho's arrival.
Re: Sanchez Vs Hazard; Who Is Better? by Greatihex(m): 5:37pm On Nov 12, 2014
thegoodjoehunt3:
You who did research, tell me what is correct.

I repeat. Lampard was a top player before Mourinho's arrival.
so in 2006 wen lampard became the second best player in the world, mou was nt at chelsea?
Re: Sanchez Vs Hazard; Who Is Better? by thegoodjoehunt3(m): 5:42pm On Nov 12, 2014
Greatihex:
so in 2006 wen lampard became the second best player in the world, mou was nt at chelsea?
Did I say that? Ronaldinho was at Barcelona when he became one of the most dreaded players on the planet. Does that mean Rijkaard groomed him?

Ronaldinho was celebrated when he arrived Barca. His reception sold out. He was the most entertaining player on the planet before joining Barca.

Thierry Henry was a flop at Juventus. Coach Wenger put in work, changed his playing role from a crossing winger to an attacking winger. The vases are different.

You can not composer the Work Arsene Wenger put in Nasri, Van Persie, Ashley Cole, Anelka to Mourinho's work on Terry, Lampard and Essen.
Re: Sanchez Vs Hazard; Who Is Better? by Greatihex(m): 5:48pm On Nov 12, 2014
jobsat34:


dont mind @thegoodjoehunt3 jaree.. he is just too sentimental.. i have given him my piece though..
no mind am, wen hazard dn becum wetin em wan becum very soon, na dn hm go knw.
Re: Sanchez Vs Hazard; Who Is Better? by Greatihex(m): 6:00pm On Nov 12, 2014
Where were you wn didier was voted the third best player in the world.
thegoodjoehunt3:
Thierry Henry was a flop at Juve. Coach Arsene Wenger signed him and coached him/utilised him to be one of the best in the world. Mourinho has not taken a player and groomed him to one of the best in the World.

Lampard was not flop before Mourinho took over Chelsea. Chelsea finished second in the league before the arrival of Mourinho. Terry and Lampard were already performing before Mourinho came.

As for Drogba, was never rated as the best player in the world.
Re: Sanchez Vs Hazard; Who Is Better? by Greatihex(m): 6:08pm On Nov 12, 2014
jobsat34:


i dont contest the fact that sanchez plays better on current form, but that he is overall a better player than hazard? no way...
thank you
Re: Sanchez Vs Hazard; Who Is Better? by thegoodjoehunt3(m): 6:10pm On Nov 12, 2014
Greatihex:
Where were you wn didier was voted the third best player in the world.
Was it under Mourinho? What year was that?
Re: Sanchez Vs Hazard; Who Is Better? by Greatihex(m): 6:10pm On Nov 12, 2014
thegoodjoehunt3:
Did I say that? Ronaldinho was at Barcelona when he became one of the most dreaded players on the planet. Does that mean Rijkaard groomed him?

Ronaldinho was celebrated when he arrived Barca. His reception sold out. He was the most entertaining player on the planet before joining Barca.

Thierry Henry was a flop at Juventus. Coach Wenger put in work, changed his playing role from a crossing winger to an attacking winger. The vases are different.

You can not composer the Work Arsene Wenger put in Nasri, Van Persie, Ashley Cole, Anelka to Mourinho's work on Terry, Lampard and Essen.
were lampard nd co. Being celebrated at chelsea b4 mou's arrival?
Re: Sanchez Vs Hazard; Who Is Better? by thegoodjoehunt3(m): 6:14pm On Nov 12, 2014
Greatihex:
were lampard nd co. Being celebrated at chelsea b4 mou's arrival?
Yes they were. John Terry and Lampard were celebrated. Chelsea was a top team before Mourinho came.
Re: Sanchez Vs Hazard; Who Is Better? by Nobody: 6:47pm On Nov 12, 2014
So people are still comparing a 23 year old ballond'or nominee to a 'just good' player who is 3 years away from decline?
lol.
That was how some moronns years ago, argued with me that duff was a better player than robben at chelsea, all because a very young robben who was still developing his game had a poor conversion rate and end product.

1 Like

Re: Sanchez Vs Hazard; Who Is Better? by Yustash001(m): 7:59pm On Nov 12, 2014
thegoodjoehunt3:
What Arsene Wenger did with Thierry Henry and Anelka was amazing. You can not compare that to Mourinho's work on Lampard. Lampard was a top midfielder before Mourinho's arrival. Thierry Henry was a Juve flop and Anelka was a seventeen years old teenager who became the best young player in the World.
i disagree with you....thiery henry was never a floop....and what mourinho did to drogba nko...
Re: Sanchez Vs Hazard; Who Is Better? by Thegoalmac(m): 8:38pm On Nov 12, 2014
For me, they are Both on the same level, See PHOTOS Barca legend Ronaldinho's Baby Mama and Son and many more @
www.thegoalmac..com
Re: Sanchez Vs Hazard; Who Is Better? by jobsat34(m): 9:02pm On Nov 12, 2014
Greatihex:
no mind am, wen hazard dn becum wetin em wan becum very soon, na dn hm go knw.

we will have to wait till the end of the season, then we will judge them base on what they offered..
Re: Sanchez Vs Hazard; Who Is Better? by jobsat34(m): 9:04pm On Nov 12, 2014
F117AA:
So people are still comparing a 23 year old ballond'or nominee to a 'just good' player who is 3 years away from decline?
lol.
That was how some critics years ago, argued with me that duff was a better player than robben at chelsea, all because a very young robben who was still developing his game had a poor conversion rate and end product.

my broda, i tire ooo...
Re: Sanchez Vs Hazard; Who Is Better? by jobsat34(m): 9:08pm On Nov 12, 2014
Yustash001:
i disagree with you....thiery henry was never a floop....and what mourinho did to drogba nko...

yu too talk am??.. My goodfriend @thegoodjoehunt3 said drogba was never classified as world class oo...

Abeg, sanchez abi satchet dey among the shortlisted for ballon dor ??
Re: Sanchez Vs Hazard; Who Is Better? by jobsat34(m): 9:18pm On Nov 12, 2014
thegoodjoehunt3:
How can Sanchez be overall better when Sanchez played amazing football with Falcao Garcia at River plate before Hazard became popular.

They both have strengths and weaknesses. However, Sanchez work rate puts him ahead of Hazard.


Most people only watch EPL games and judge. Are you saying you watched most of Sanchez games at Barca?

i watched sanchez played @ barca, i far as i am concern, he wasnt exceptional.. He even played better football @ udinese than @ barca..

If yu want to judge based on individual accolades in d past, hazard was 2 time lique 1 best player of the season.. I cant remember any for sanchez...
Re: Sanchez Vs Hazard; Who Is Better? by jobsat34(m): 9:20pm On Nov 12, 2014
thegoodjoehunt3:
Yes they were. John Terry and Lampard were celebrated. Chelsea was a top team before Mourinho came.

irregular top team yu mean?.. That last won a league title 50yrs back??.. Abeg bros, lets rest this case...
Re: Sanchez Vs Hazard; Who Is Better? by Yustash001(m): 9:30pm On Nov 12, 2014
jobsat34:


yu too talk am??.. My goodfriend @thegoodjoehunt3 said drogba was never classified as world class oo...

Abeg, sanchez abi satchet dey among the shortlisted for ballon dor ??
don't mind them jare.....wetin that sanchez play the season barca signed him.,..
Re: Sanchez Vs Hazard; Who Is Better? by Greatihex(m): 9:55pm On Nov 12, 2014
thegoodjoehunt3:
Yes they were. John Terry and Lampard were celebrated. Chelsea was a top team before Mourinho came.
yet no trophy since 50yrs?
Re: Sanchez Vs Hazard; Who Is Better? by thegoodjoehunt3(m): 10:02pm On Nov 12, 2014
Yustash001:
i disagree with you....thiery henry was never a floop....and what mourinho did to drogba nko...
What are you disagreeing. I am not talking based on research. I was a fan of Ikpeba's Monaco team with Giuly, Henry and Trezeguet. Coached by Jean Tigana.

Henry was a young player that held so much promise. Note Ikpeba, Trezeguet, Henry scored at France '98 World Cup. Henry was bought as a promising young kid and flopped. Arsene Wenger saved his career by signing him. Just as Arsene saved Kanu's career too.

Henry flopped at Juventus. This is a fact. Not guess.

2 Likes

Re: Sanchez Vs Hazard; Who Is Better? by thegoodjoehunt3(m): 10:05pm On Nov 12, 2014
Greatihex:
yet no trophy since 50yrs?
No English Premier League trophy. Not trophy. Not long before Mourinho came to Chelsea, they won the FA Cup and the European Cup Winners Cup and the Super Cup.
Re: Sanchez Vs Hazard; Who Is Better? by thegoodjoehunt3(m): 10:06pm On Nov 12, 2014
jobsat34:


irregular top team yu mean?.. That last won a league title 50yrs back??.. Abeg bros, lets rest this case...
Are you saying winning the FA Cup does not count? Haba.

(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (Reply)

Rohr’s Salary: NFF In Trouble As Sponsors Pull Out / Messi Re-elected Barcelona Captain / Egyptian FA Optimistic Over Salah’s World Cup Chances After Champions League

(Go Up)

Sections: politics (1) business autos (1) jobs (1) career education (1) romance computers phones travel sports fashion health
religion celebs tv-movies music-radio literature webmasters programming techmarket

Links: (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10)

Nairaland - Copyright © 2005 - 2024 Oluwaseun Osewa. All rights reserved. See How To Advertise. 52
Disclaimer: Every Nairaland member is solely responsible for anything that he/she posts or uploads on Nairaland.