Stats: 3,190,031 members, 7,939,160 topics. Date: Tuesday, 03 September 2024 at 07:29 PM |
Nairaland Forum / Nairaland / General / Religion / A Mad Female Scientist Expressed Her Mind (6539 Views)
Scientist Gerald Schroeder Demonstrates That God Has Been Proved By Science. / Man Steals From Oyedepo Runs Mad - Mikeangelonews.com / Lagos Pastor Heals Mad Man On The Street (Photos) (2) (3) (4)
(1) (2) (3) (4) (Reply) (Go Down)
A Mad Female Scientist Expressed Her Mind by urheme: 11:32pm On Jul 08, 2014 |
I came across this in course of my research on testamentary capacity and i thought i should share, with regard to how far science has gone with cloning. Strittmaters is a militant feminist who regarded men as a class with an insane hatred and, who looked forward to the day when women would bear children without the aid of men and all males would be put to death at birth. This is a very rich woman who willed all her legacy to a group of scientist to carry out her wish, APATHIEST, AMANFROMMARS, QSTAR, WEAH96, GENERALSHEPHERD ....etc Madam strittmaters has your name in her Will |
Re: A Mad Female Scientist Expressed Her Mind by Nobody: 9:06am On Nov 05, 2014 |
Tell me about your Testamentary Capacity..Go on... |
Re: A Mad Female Scientist Expressed Her Mind by urheme: 9:47am On Nov 05, 2014 |
Reyginus: testamentary capacity - adult and normal you are an atheist, if we abolish religion and keep science only, and with respect to cloning, madam strittmaters aims and aspiration has been partially fulfilled , women can bear children without the aid of men now. what's next? |
Re: A Mad Female Scientist Expressed Her Mind by Nobody: 10:08am On Nov 05, 2014 |
urheme:It doesn't sound reasonable to me. Or I am not being reasonable myself? I think thinking like her is a threat to human existence. Or is it thinking like I am doing the threat to human existence? What do you think? |
Re: A Mad Female Scientist Expressed Her Mind by urheme: 10:48am On Nov 05, 2014 |
Reyginus: her thinking is only a threat to men's existence. But her scientific mind is now a reality, so do you have problem with women bearing children with the aid of science only and not man? |
Re: A Mad Female Scientist Expressed Her Mind by Nobody: 11:11am On Nov 05, 2014 |
urheme:Before I answer your question I will bring out the meaning of your first sentence. Or you can, with my inefficient methods of revelation, if you can proof them so, show me the meaning. This is what I mean. The human race is made up of men and women An injury to one is an injury to the human race Therefore, an injury to man is an injury to the human race. If the above is true, you can show me it is not, then your first sentence is not true. To your question. Their certainly must be a reason why women would want to do that. If it is for her reason, then I think it is not good, and since it is not good, I don't support it. Or maybe you can help with another reason why women would want to do that. |
Re: A Mad Female Scientist Expressed Her Mind by urheme: 12:04pm On Nov 10, 2014 |
Reyginus: let me take you this way, there is a religious belief that God created man, this contradicts scientific findings which says man evolve, also the atheist views which says "God" does not exist. now if a person can be clone with the help of science, and a woman can have a baby without any contribution from their male counterpart then man is automatically useless to a woman, atheist who said there is no use for God, so like wise this militant feminist is assuming women don't need men if they can bear children without men, so kill all male. as it stands, of what good is a man to a woman? |
Re: A Mad Female Scientist Expressed Her Mind by Weah96: 5:39pm On Nov 10, 2014 |
The woman is angry, what can I say. Probably read too many books. I read a huge book as a child, the Plague, I believe it was called, at least 1200 pages. A mad Irish scientist created a virus or something which killed every female in Britain. I don't believe he was ever apprehended. Maybe she read the same book. 1 Like |
Re: A Mad Female Scientist Expressed Her Mind by urheme: 7:16pm On Nov 10, 2014 |
Weah96: The woman is not angry, she is just crazy about science and use all her wealth and passion to surport cloning which is now a reality, ![]() Will you still call her mad? My point, if you claim we don't need God, then women can as well claim they don't need men, She is saying eliminate them, why not ![]() |
Re: A Mad Female Scientist Expressed Her Mind by Nobody: 7:56pm On Nov 10, 2014 |
urheme:Yes, it would seem so. But it is not so because man's contribution to the sustenance of human existence does not lie only in procreation. Man covers the emotional needs of the woman. |
Re: A Mad Female Scientist Expressed Her Mind by urheme: 10:48pm On Nov 10, 2014 |
Reyginus: Am glad to inform you that science have replaced that area covered by man with BOB (battery operated boyfriend) and other emotional toys which is even more conveinent for woman and besides, haven't you heard that women are marrying and raising kids with their own kind. Don't need God, don,t need man too, Back to the question: of what good is man to a woman ![]() 1 Like |
Re: A Mad Female Scientist Expressed Her Mind by Nobody: 2:48pm On Nov 11, 2014 |
urheme:Actually, you didn't really follow my answer with your explanations. We are talking about a new method of delivery here where no man is involved. From all you indicated Strittmatters did not tackle the problem of the feminine emotions. As a militant feminist, she, as briefed by you, was only concerned about creating a model which will enable women to give birth without men. And both of us are discussing about the implications. Note that we are not on our own, or rather, you are not propounding a strategy for the elimination of men in the life of women but you are analysing solely the outcome of her proposal. This makes your BOB non feasible here. For it to be part of the argument it must be inculcated in Strittmatter's proposal. Is it? If yes, when didn't you say earlier? If no, do you want me to venture into other matters she didn't mention and thus take them as your own defense of the case? |
Re: A Mad Female Scientist Expressed Her Mind by Nobody: 2:48pm On Nov 11, 2014 |
urheme:Actually, you didn't really follow my answer with your explanations. We are talking about a new method of delivery here where no man is involved. From all you indicated Strittmatters did not tackle the problem of the feminine emotions. As a militant feminist, she, as briefed by you, was only concerned about creating a model which will enable women to give birth without men. And both of us are discussing about the implications. Note that we are not on our own, or rather, you are not propounding a strategy for the elimination of men in the life of women but you are analysing solely the outcome of her proposal. This makes your BOB non feasible here. For it to be part of the argument it must be inculcated in Strittmatter's proposal. Is it? If yes, when didn't you say earlier? If no, do you want me to venture into other matters she didn't mention and thus take them as your own defense of the case? Only, then can I answer you differently. |
Re: A Mad Female Scientist Expressed Her Mind by urheme: 3:30pm On Nov 11, 2014 |
Reyginus: She said all male be put to death at birth, becaue they are useless i surpose, she want to creat a generation without male. ![]() |
Re: A Mad Female Scientist Expressed Her Mind by Nobody: 3:37pm On Nov 11, 2014 |
urheme:Then how does she manage to deal with their need in the life of every woman? It doesn't end in childbirth. 1 Like |
Re: A Mad Female Scientist Expressed Her Mind by urheme: 3:49pm On Nov 11, 2014 |
Reyginus: Good question, Science, The same science that atheist have used to replace God will deffinately replace man, Infact, man is even a problem to a woman as far as science is concern, they occupy space, he only has a role in religion mythology. So if we remove religion and leave only science, of what good then is man to a woman ![]() Those proud atheist have cowardly refused to venture into this thread, am waiting for the female ones tho. |
Re: A Mad Female Scientist Expressed Her Mind by Nobody: 4:03pm On Nov 11, 2014 |
urheme:Honestly, I think she is both a sadist and a confused humanist hiding under the menace of men to project her ill-founded and evil agenda. She is not different from the very thing she tried to eliminate. Man is not good to a woman because of religion. Emotions existed before religion. Killing religion you have not killed emotion. 3 Likes |
Re: A Mad Female Scientist Expressed Her Mind by urheme: 4:26pm On Nov 11, 2014 |
Reyginus: "Man is not good to a woman because of religion" How? Pls explain |
Re: A Mad Female Scientist Expressed Her Mind by Weah96: 4:33pm On Nov 11, 2014 |
urheme: The love that a man has for his wife is not motivated by passages in scriptures. Her a)ss and tits maybe, but not scriptures. 2 Likes |
Re: A Mad Female Scientist Expressed Her Mind by urheme: 4:45pm On Nov 11, 2014 |
Weah96: You can say that to pastor oyedepo, You have just use religion to surport science yet again that man is really useless to a woman, then of what good is man to a woman ![]() |
Re: A Mad Female Scientist Expressed Her Mind by Ranchhoddas: 7:09pm On Nov 11, 2014 |
What did i just read? |
Re: A Mad Female Scientist Expressed Her Mind by urheme: 7:45pm On Nov 11, 2014 |
Re: A Mad Female Scientist Expressed Her Mind by Nobody: 7:18pm On Nov 13, 2014 |
urheme:My meaning is, emotions preexist religion. Before religion came to be emotions have been in existence. The point then is, women will not be free or better emotionally by ending religion. |
Re: A Mad Female Scientist Expressed Her Mind by urheme: 7:26pm On Nov 13, 2014 |
Reyginus: Which religion is that? In the beginning was the world, where was emotions? |
Re: A Mad Female Scientist Expressed Her Mind by Nobody: 7:33pm On Nov 13, 2014 |
urheme:Are you still following this thread at all? I could remember somebody suggesting an end to Religion as the way to end male dependency and achieve Mrs Strittmatters vision. To which I pointed out that the role of men in the life of women stretched to emotional support. And to your question, people felt sad, happy, troubled, etc., before they invented religion. |
Re: A Mad Female Scientist Expressed Her Mind by urheme: 8:02pm On Nov 13, 2014 |
Reyginus: Now we have religion and there is still sadness and trouble. science has done more good to humanity than religion I am saying science has provided solution to the emotional and procreational need of woman and as such don't need men, that man is only usefull to a woman within the ambit of religion, that if we remove religion and keep science alone, then man is not important to a woman What don't you not understand? |
Re: A Mad Female Scientist Expressed Her Mind by Nobody: 8:13pm On Nov 13, 2014 |
urheme:Science has not provided the solution to the emotional need of women nor men. That technology is yet to surface. Any attempt to cease the population of any of the two sexes without the aim of propagating the existence of better humas is immoral. There are so many things wrong with her vision. |
Re: A Mad Female Scientist Expressed Her Mind by UyiIredia(m): 8:18pm On Nov 13, 2014 |
urheme: @ bold: First religion birthed science. To deny this is to deny the historical fact that writing and even the first sciences were started within a religious framework. Two, science (more crucially scientific materialism) has brought its ills as well, death due to technological mishaps, a cheaper regard for life (at birth), and the undervaluing of familial ties given the rise of urban centres due to industrialization are the main ills of the enterprise not to mention the fact that in the final end science has done little or nothing to save man from the age-old vices of laziness, greed and lust but in many cases worsened them. 2 Likes |
Re: A Mad Female Scientist Expressed Her Mind by urheme: 8:27pm On Nov 13, 2014 |
Reyginus: Technology for emotional need of women is readily available and it is cheap, i mean for 7000, you can buy a durable one or more and they don't complain. You are talking about immorality when same sex marriages is been legalised everywhere. Her vision is now a reality ![]() ![]() Shakau is busy raising female killers that will kill men like him very soon, |
Re: A Mad Female Scientist Expressed Her Mind by Nobody: 8:36pm On Nov 13, 2014 |
urheme:The beauty of technology in the wrong hands. Confusing the mind with delusions of grandeur. 2 Likes |
Re: A Mad Female Scientist Expressed Her Mind by urheme: 8:47pm On Nov 13, 2014 |
You post is very contradictory, You said religion birthed science. You went further and condermed science. Religion gave birth to something that is bad to man, So religion is itself bad, your conclusion ![]() UyiIredia: My question to you is: now that the world women have embraced science which have provided solution for emotional and procreational need of women, they now fall inlove with robert and toys, of what good is a man to a woman? |
Re: A Mad Female Scientist Expressed Her Mind by urheme: 8:50pm On Nov 13, 2014 |
Reyginus: You don dey blow grammer ![]() |
Mother Theresa Or David Oyedepo: Who Inspires You? / Is It Okay For Christian To Eat Salah Meat? / Who Invented The Trinity?
(Go Up)
Sections: politics (1) business autos (1) jobs (1) career education (1) romance computers phones travel sports fashion health religion celebs tv-movies music-radio literature webmasters programming techmarket Links: (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) Nairaland - Copyright © 2005 - 2024 Oluwaseun Osewa. All rights reserved. See How To Advertise. 71 |