..

patches689:


Thing is South Africa needs versatility when it comes to big ticket assets such as naval vessels

Our OPV's and IPV's need to be swing-platforms (multi-role) that have the ability to police our waters and those of our neighbors (what we need them for now) but also have the capacity to be outfitted for conventional operations (ASW and Minehunting mainly) which means at the very least they need to be able to defend themselves

The 87m Gowind is slow, and has range that is impressive but not outstanding (10 000km) and mediocre autonomy, lightly armed (since the Denel Dual Purpose 35mm gun is not deck penetrating it could be fitted - but that would be its sole significant weapon) and of limited use in ASW (it would have to have a towed sonar aray, which means that it cant deploy depth charges, and a lack of torpedo tubes means it cannot engage subs at all and would have to work in tandem with a Valour class) so that at most means that its "swing-role" would be a mine hunter, as the rear ramps could probably be easily adapted for the deployment of AUV's.

And i dont think i need to explain why an 87m 1500t vessel would not be a very good minesweep

That being said, the space for a complement of 35 marines and ease of deployment of boats (under 5min up to ss4) is very nifty and makes it (IMO) the best contender for as a pure law-enforcement asset, despite its slow speed. Its ability to house a 6t helo means that the Lynx will fit, which is another big bonus

Its gunna be super interesting to see what we get

You make a great point, but to be honest do we really need a combatant or an anti piracy ship with Good endurance and Range,As for the weapons systems, im sure we have the capability to Arm it as a small Frigate rather than an OPV, I mean look at our Valours, they are armed like ships twice their size, they really are unbelievably well armed for their size.

jl115:


I mean look at our Valours, they are armed like ships twice their size, they really are unbelievably well armed for their size.

Bwahahahaha

South African military experts prove you a liar and a fraud, South Africans hate the Valour frigates because the warships are poorly armed like if they are a missile fitted OPV....

Publication: The Star Issued: Date: 2007-02-24 Reporter: Michael Schmidt
Has SA Invested in Weak Ships?



Publication
The Star

Date
2007-02-24

Reporter

Michael Schmidt
Web Link

www.thestar.co.za



Serious questions have been raised over the strike capability of the expensive new ships of the South African Navy (SAN). A new independent study claims they are vulnerable to attack from submarines, aircraft and warships, and have little ability to perform the key role of gunboat diplomacy through offshore bombardment.

These critiques emerge from an unpublished and unauthorised manuscript on the South African National Defence Force, A Guide to the SANDF, by defence analyst Leon Engelbrecht. It is the first study of the armed forces in 16 years.

Engelbrecht argues that the four new Valour-class frigates and three new Type 209 submarines are too light in their weapons and defensive counter-measures departments. This is the part of South Africa's multibillion-rand arms deal currently proving most controversial - because of an alleged $3-million (R21-million) bribe paid by the frigate's builders, ThyssenKrupp Marine Systems, to former arms acquisition programme head Chippy Shaik.

But Helmoed-Römer Heitman, the Southern African correspondent for Jane's Defence Weekly and author of a similar study, South African Armed Forces (1990), said Engelbrecht had failed to take into account the significant upgrades planned for the naval weapons systems *2, the choices for which would become clear only as the new navy's role developed *3.

Rear Admiral Kevin Watson, the navy's project director for the acquisition of the vessels, confirmed that the bulk of the expenditure on the frigates (65%) had been on the ships, not their weapons systems. This, he admitted, was at odds with the international norm of a 70% ship/30% weapons split.

As a result, according to Engelbrecht, while the ships were top notch, there were significant weaknesses in the weapons, and the counter-measures the ships were able to deploy against enemy attack.

The frigates will be armed with eight Exocet missiles, 16 Umkhonto missiles, a single turreted Denel 76mm gun, Oerlikon 20mm cannons and a South African Denel/Reutech 35mm cannon.

According to Engelbrecht, the frigate's "current armament [was] suited only for limited, short-duration self-defence". Its "land-attack capability [was] limited to guns too light for the task" and it had "no land attack missiles". This inability to add muscle to incursions ashore is underlined by Engelbrecht's argument that "the [Valour] class deliberately lacks a land- attack cruise missile capability for political reasons: such weapons are seen by some as 'too aggressive' and out of keeping with the Valour-class's 'defensive posture' *5.

"However, like its peers, the SAN recognises the growing importance of fighting in the littoral battle-space and supporting land forces … As a result, a missile land-attack capability is likely to be added as funds become available and sensitivities are assuaged."

Heitman said that budgeting, not political shyness, had delayed the development of the navy's land-attack capacity. Still, in Engelbrecht's estimation, the frigates' existing weapons were not up to scratch:

The French anti-ship "Exocet missile was too slow to penetrate modern air defences and too short-ranged to allow the mothership adequate stand-off to evade detection and response … Some commentators have criticised the choice of the Exocet … because of its lack of land-attack ability … Others have hammered the system for its age (developed in 1967), its low relative speed and small warhead, compared with some more modern systems such as the Indo-Russian BrahMos *6," which was touted to the SAN at last year's Africa Aerospace and Defence show in Cape Town.

Heitman suspected the SAN had bought one Exocet and leased the rest *6, but would upgrade to the latest, longer-range (173km) model, which had land-attack capabilities. The SAN was also interested in the supersonic 300km-range BrahMos cruise missile.

The South African Denel Umkhonto-IR is a short-range (12km) anti-aircraft missile, which is still in its development stage, having been "tested only to a limited extent", while "several navies and air forces already have supersonic anti-ship missiles. How the Umkhonto will deal with these is not known." The frigates can have their capacity doubled to 32 Umkhontos, but will probably carry only eight missiles and so "can easily be swamped by saturation attack *7".

Also, after a missile has been fired, empty launch canisters have to be removed from their silos, but: "As far as can be determined, this cannot be done by the Valour-class at sea, [so] reloading will have to be done alongside [in port] or require a replenishment vessel, as a depot ship, in calm seas".

Heitman admitted the missiles might have difficulty intercepting supersonic assaults, but said the Finns' recent acquisition of the Umkhonto and Sweden's interest showed the missile was taken seriously. He added that no navy was able to reload its vertically launched anti-aircraft missiles at sea.

The Italian OTOBreda 76mm cannons were acquired for the Warrior-class strike-craft in 1977 and four reconditioned ones were fitted to the frigates as "an interim cost-saving measure. Senior naval officers are well aware the gun is too small to effectively support forces ashore."

Heitman agreed, but also echoed Engelbrecht in saying the SAN was looking to replace the 76 with a navalised 155mm gun, which could use Denel's world-class G5 and G6 ammunition. Such a long-rage gun, rather than missiles, would be able to bombard enemy air bases, gun emplacements and ports. But this, Heitman argued, would be relevant only once the SAN had acquired multi-role ships capable of landing troops to secure beachheads softened by such bombardment.

In addition, the frigates were not fitted with torpedoes (as they were capable of), and its anti-submarine warfare ability was very basic, Watson admitted. Heitman said "there's absolutely f*** all [the frigates] can do to a submarine except ram it *7".

But the frigates would all go through "a massive upgrade" of their weapons, counter-measure and weapons-control systems in the coming years, he said.

Watson said the frigates' helicopters would initially be used in a surveillance role because they increased the ships' line of sight from 37km to 555km *9.

Politics & Power is a new analytical weekly feature
With acknowledgements to Michael Schmidt and The Star.


*1 What about the $22 million (R156 million) payments paid by the frigate's builders, ThyssenKrupp Marine Systems, to other South African's via Monrovia, Liberia (the country with the slackest corporate law and regulations in the world).


*2 Heitman of course is correct in the fact. The Navy purchased an excellent platform with very weak combat system.

But it was not meant to be that way. The SA Navy Combat Suite User Requirement Specification specifies a very powerful combat capability in respect of anti-surface offence, as well as anti-air and anti-submarine defence.

The only thing was that once Thabo Mbeki guaranteed Thomson-CSF and ADS the contract for the combat management system and sensors in 1997 (two years before the contract was signed), the DoD and Armscor were over a barrel. Suddenly and R1,9 billion fully-fledged combat suite went up to R3,9 billion (with Chippy Shaik gleefully rubbing his enrichment
lamp all the way). With a little hard bargaining, but mainly cutting the quantity and quality (quote, unquote) of the combat suite scope of supply, the project team brought the price down from R3,9 billion to some R2,9 billion. Then with a risk sharing approach, as well as the probably exclusion of the price of the anti-ship missiles, the price went down to R2,3 billion and was "in reach of the then price objective" of R2,1 billion. But Chippy pipes up with the affordability study indicating an [acceptable] price of R2,600 billion and so the negotiations ended forthwith and the price went up to and closed at R2,599 billion on the nose. The R300 million sounds more like the wonga splodged by Thomson-CSF in its excitement of getting such a windfall.


*3 This of course is nonsense.

During 1995 to 1997 the Defence Review was undertaken. This confirmed the SA Navy's documented Naval Staff Requirement (NSR) for a multi-role light frigate with the specified combat capability.

The only thing was that the Government's irregular and unlawful acquisition process lead to a situation where the specified capability and equipment were unaffordable in 1999 compared with the ceiling price of R6,001 determined in August 1998.

So the DoD had to embarked on a series of very stealthy (and unlawful) manouvres to get a frigate. First it chopped its organic maritime helicopter, then it added R872 million to it "ceiling" price, then it halved its equipment expectation, then it didn't purchase but leased its anti-ship missiles, then it purchased functionality shortfalls out of the SA Navy's running budget.

Now the DoD is again purchasing maritime helicopters, new anti-ship missiles, torpedoes and a decent naval gun (not a 40-year old 3" pop gun off the strike craft).

This is called fiscal stealth and makes the radar and thermal stealth of the MEKO 200AS look like child's play.


*4 Wrong - the international norm of a multi-role surface combatant is 30% platform / 70% weapons.

But the ship's stealthy acquirers will eventually get the requisite 30% platform / 70% weapons.

Here's what the taxpayer will pay :
Combat Suite = R2,599 billion = 30% (in 1998 Rands)
Combat Suite = 70% = R6,064 billion (in 1998 Rands) = R11,109 billion (in 2007 Rands)

*5 This is also nonsense. The land attack capability is purely a tactical one. The Exocet MM40 Block 2 has a range of some 70 km and a warhead of 165 kg. Even if it had a land attack capability the range and small warhead limit it to a tactical battlefield weapon.

Exocet MM40 Block 3 (or equivalent) has a land attack capability, but still has a range of about 150 km.

Seeing that the ship only has eight ASM launchers the entire naval arsenal is only 32 rounds and these beast cost about US$20 apiece, one couldn't just blast away into one's enemy's territory.

A politically sensitive land attack missile is one with a range of greater than 500 km and payload of greater than 300 kg. For example, one of Bat Boy's favourite early morning diversions is authorising the launch of the Tomahawk Land Attack Cruise Missile. This beastie has a range of 2 500 km and carries a warhead of some 500 kg. And they only cost US$0,5 million a pop - now that's a bargain.


*5 And the Chinese "Dragon's Teeth" series.

These all have ranges of 250 km up to 2 000 km, massive warheads from 250 kg up to 500 kg and supersonic speeds from 2,0 Mach to 2,8 Mach.

It's a nightmare.


*6 Quite how this fits into the boundaries of the Public Finance Management Act, heaven only knows.

But it gets worse. What Heitman is now saying in the open has been suspected since 2001.

On enquiry, the MoD has stated unequivocally (or is it actually equivocally) that the SDP corvette price included 17 Exocet MM40 Block 2 missile rounds in addition to launch tubes and launch controllers.

If it transpires that the MoD has been lying, it should be in big, big trouble with SCOPA.


*7 And saturation attack is just what the Chinese anti-ship tactic is all about - 4 to 6 missiles simultaneously engaging from all four quadrants plus the lovely zenith-diving one.

Should keep Reutech Radar Systems's Optronic Radar Tracker (ORT) and Mtek's Electro-Optic Tracker (EOT) quite busy for those 43,2 seconds from missile detect to who knows what.

As for Thomson-CSF's Threat Evaluation and Weapon Assignment (TEWA) function, let's just hope that this can converge in the saturated space of Mach 2,8 multiple incoming bogies, garlic, escargot, bribes to get the contract, bribes to cover up the investigation and a dose of charming gallic candour.


*8 Which is quite difficult when the submarine has dived to 10 m and launched two wire-guided heavyweight torpedoes with 300 kg high explosive payloads.


*9 With a line of sight of 37 km and using a previous Heitman literary gem, one might as well take the entire ship's crew behind the electronics complex in the Simon's Town Naval Base and put them out of their misery with a bullet in the back of the head.




http://www.armsdeal-vpo.co.za/articles10/weak_ships.html

NAF-F7 jet will sink your over-priced poorly armed Valour Frigate as if it is a fishing boat..... .

CONFIRMED BY SOUTH AFRICAN MILITARY EXPERTS

.

mzilakazi:


Yet, I hardly hear you critising few black people who live in Europe and America and still command lot of wealth to themselves. Really, you are suffering from obsessing about race. Anyway, I understand you are living in a country where whites have extinct like dinosaurs.

Lmao!

The few black peeps in European countries command their personal wealth.

They don't command and control the country's wealth and its entire affairs.

However, your assumption about whites being extinct in Nigeria is totally false. There are "many" white immigrants in Nigeria.

Nigeria grants citizenship to foreigners almost every time.

You're probably ignorant about this fact because the white immigrants in Nigeria are not ruling over the locals.

agaugust:


Bwahahahaha

South African military experts prove you a liar and a fraud, South Africans hate the Valour frigates because the warships are poorly armed like if they are a missile fitted OPV....

Publication: The Star Issued: Date: 2007-02-24 Reporter: Michael Schmidt
Has SA Invested in Weak Ships?



Publication
The Star

Date
2007-02-24

Reporter

Michael Schmidt
Web Link

www.thestar.co.za



Serious questions have been raised over the strike capability of the expensive new ships of the South African Navy (SAN). A new independent study claims they are vulnerable to attack from submarines, aircraft and warships, and have little ability to perform the key role of gunboat diplomacy through offshore bombardment.

These critiques emerge from an unpublished and unauthorised manuscript on the South African National Defence Force, A Guide to the SANDF, by defence analyst Leon Engelbrecht. It is the first study of the armed forces in 16 years.

Engelbrecht argues that the four new Valour-class frigates and three new Type 209 submarines are too light in their weapons and defensive counter-measures departments. This is the part of South Africa's multibillion-rand arms deal currently proving most controversial - because of an alleged $3-million (R21-million) bribe paid by the frigate's builders, ThyssenKrupp Marine Systems, to former arms acquisition programme head Chippy Shaik.

But Helmoed-Römer Heitman, the Southern African correspondent for Jane's Defence Weekly and author of a similar study, South African Armed Forces (1990), said Engelbrecht had failed to take into account the significant upgrades planned for the naval weapons systems *2, the choices for which would become clear only as the new navy's role developed *3.

Rear Admiral Kevin Watson, the navy's project director for the acquisition of the vessels, confirmed that the bulk of the expenditure on the frigates (65%) had been on the ships, not their weapons systems. This, he admitted, was at odds with the international norm of a 70% ship/30% weapons split.

As a result, according to Engelbrecht, while the ships were top notch, there were significant weaknesses in the weapons, and the counter-measures the ships were able to deploy against enemy attack.

The frigates will be armed with eight Exocet missiles, 16 Umkhonto missiles, a single turreted Denel 76mm gun, Oerlikon 20mm cannons and a South African Denel/Reutech 35mm cannon.

According to Engelbrecht, the frigate's "current armament [was] suited only for limited, short-duration self-defence". Its "land-attack capability [was] limited to guns too light for the task" and it had "no land attack missiles". This inability to add muscle to incursions ashore is underlined by Engelbrecht's argument that "the [Valour] class deliberately lacks a land- attack cruise missile capability for political reasons: such weapons are seen by some as 'too aggressive' and out of keeping with the Valour-class's 'defensive posture' *5.

"However, like its peers, the SAN recognises the growing importance of fighting in the littoral battle-space and supporting land forces … As a result, a missile land-attack capability is likely to be added as funds become available and sensitivities are assuaged."

Heitman said that budgeting, not political shyness, had delayed the development of the navy's land-attack capacity. Still, in Engelbrecht's estimation, the frigates' existing weapons were not up to scratch:

The French anti-ship "Exocet missile was too slow to penetrate modern air defences and too short-ranged to allow the mothership adequate stand-off to evade detection and response … Some commentators have criticised the choice of the Exocet … because of its lack of land-attack ability … Others have hammered the system for its age (developed in 1967), its low relative speed and small warhead, compared with some more modern systems such as the Indo-Russian BrahMos *6," which was touted to the SAN at last year's Africa Aerospace and Defence show in Cape Town.

Heitman suspected the SAN had bought one Exocet and leased the rest *6, but would upgrade to the latest, longer-range (173km) model, which had land-attack capabilities. The SAN was also interested in the supersonic 300km-range BrahMos cruise missile.

The South African Denel Umkhonto-IR is a short-range (12km) anti-aircraft missile, which is still in its development stage, having been "tested only to a limited extent", while "several navies and air forces already have supersonic anti-ship missiles. How the Umkhonto will deal with these is not known." The frigates can have their capacity doubled to 32 Umkhontos, but will probably carry only eight missiles and so "can easily be swamped by saturation attack *7".

Also, after a missile has been fired, empty launch canisters have to be removed from their silos, but: "As far as can be determined, this cannot be done by the Valour-class at sea, [so] reloading will have to be done alongside [in port] or require a replenishment vessel, as a depot ship, in calm seas".

Heitman admitted the missiles might have difficulty intercepting supersonic assaults, but said the Finns' recent acquisition of the Umkhonto and Sweden's interest showed the missile was taken seriously. He added that no navy was able to reload its vertically launched anti-aircraft missiles at sea.

The Italian OTOBreda 76mm cannons were acquired for the Warrior-class strike-craft in 1977 and four reconditioned ones were fitted to the frigates as "an interim cost-saving measure. Senior naval officers are well aware the gun is too small to effectively support forces ashore."

Heitman agreed, but also echoed Engelbrecht in saying the SAN was looking to replace the 76 with a navalised 155mm gun, which could use Denel's world-class G5 and G6 ammunition. Such a long-rage gun, rather than missiles, would be able to bombard enemy air bases, gun emplacements and ports. But this, Heitman argued, would be relevant only once the SAN had acquired multi-role ships capable of landing troops to secure beachheads softened by such bombardment.

In addition, the frigates were not fitted with torpedoes (as they were capable of), and its anti-submarine warfare ability was very basic, Watson admitted. Heitman said "there's absolutely f*** all [the frigates] can do to a submarine except ram it *7".

But the frigates would all go through "a massive upgrade" of their weapons, counter-measure and weapons-control systems in the coming years, he said.

Watson said the frigates' helicopters would initially be used in a surveillance role because they increased the ships' line of sight from 37km to 555km *9.

Politics & Power is a new analytical weekly feature
With acknowledgements to Michael Schmidt and The Star.


*1 What about the $22 million (R156 million) payments paid by the frigate's builders, ThyssenKrupp Marine Systems, to other South African's via Monrovia, Liberia (the country with the slackest corporate law and regulations in the world).


*2 Heitman of course is correct in the fact. The Navy purchased an excellent platform with very weak combat system.

But it was not meant to be that way. The SA Navy Combat Suite User Requirement Specification specifies a very powerful combat capability in respect of anti-surface offence, as well as anti-air and anti-submarine defence.

The only thing was that once Thabo Mbeki guaranteed Thomson-CSF and ADS the contract for the combat management system and sensors in 1997 (two years before the contract was signed), the DoD and Armscor were over a barrel. Suddenly and R1,9 billion fully-fledged combat suite went up to R3,9 billion (with Chippy Shaik gleefully rubbing his enrichment
lamp all the way). With a little hard bargaining, but mainly cutting the quantity and quality (quote, unquote) of the combat suite scope of supply, the project team brought the price down from R3,9 billion to some R2,9 billion. Then with a risk sharing approach, as well as the probably exclusion of the price of the anti-ship missiles, the price went down to R2,3 billion and was "in reach of the then price objective" of R2,1 billion. But Chippy pipes up with the affordability study indicating an [acceptable] price of R2,600 billion and so the negotiations ended forthwith and the price went up to and closed at R2,599 billion on the nose. The R300 million sounds more like the wonga splodged by Thomson-CSF in its excitement of getting such a windfall.


*3 This of course is nonsense.

During 1995 to 1997 the Defence Review was undertaken. This confirmed the SA Navy's documented Naval Staff Requirement (NSR) for a multi-role light frigate with the specified combat capability.

The only thing was that the Government's irregular and unlawful acquisition process lead to a situation where the specified capability and equipment were unaffordable in 1999 compared with the ceiling price of R6,001 determined in August 1998.

So the DoD had to embarked on a series of very stealthy (and unlawful) manouvres to get a frigate. First it chopped its organic maritime helicopter, then it added R872 million to it "ceiling" price, then it halved its equipment expectation, then it didn't purchase but leased its anti-ship missiles, then it purchased functionality shortfalls out of the SA Navy's running budget.

Now the DoD is again purchasing maritime helicopters, new anti-ship missiles, torpedoes and a decent naval gun (not a 40-year old 3" pop gun off the strike craft).

This is called fiscal stealth and makes the radar and thermal stealth of the MEKO 200AS look like child's play.


*4 Wrong - the international norm of a multi-role surface combatant is 30% platform / 70% weapons.

But the ship's stealthy acquirers will eventually get the requisite 30% platform / 70% weapons.

Here's what the taxpayer will pay :
Combat Suite = R2,599 billion = 30% (in 1998 Rands)
Combat Suite = 70% = R6,064 billion (in 1998 Rands) = R11,109 billion (in 2007 Rands)

*5 This is also nonsense. The land attack capability is purely a tactical one. The Exocet MM40 Block 2 has a range of some 70 km and a warhead of 165 kg. Even if it had a land attack capability the range and small warhead limit it to a tactical battlefield weapon.

Exocet MM40 Block 3 (or equivalent) has a land attack capability, but still has a range of about 150 km.

Seeing that the ship only has eight ASM launchers the entire naval arsenal is only 32 rounds and these beast cost about US$20 apiece, one couldn't just blast away into one's enemy's territory.

A politically sensitive land attack missile is one with a range of greater than 500 km and payload of greater than 300 kg. For example, one of Bat Boy's favourite early morning diversions is authorising the launch of the Tomahawk Land Attack Cruise Missile. This beastie has a range of 2 500 km and carries a warhead of some 500 kg. And they only cost US$0,5 million a pop - now that's a bargain.


*5 And the Chinese "Dragon's Teeth" series.

These all have ranges of 250 km up to 2 000 km, massive warheads from 250 kg up to 500 kg and supersonic speeds from 2,0 Mach to 2,8 Mach.

It's a nightmare.


*6 Quite how this fits into the boundaries of the Public Finance Management Act, heaven only knows.

But it gets worse. What Heitman is now saying in the open has been suspected since 2001.

On enquiry, the MoD has stated unequivocally (or is it actually equivocally) that the SDP corvette price included 17 Exocet MM40 Block 2 missile rounds in addition to launch tubes and launch controllers.

If it transpires that the MoD has been lying, it should be in big, big trouble with SCOPA.


*7 And saturation attack is just what the Chinese anti-ship tactic is all about - 4 to 6 missiles simultaneously engaging from all four quadrants plus the lovely zenith-diving one.

Should keep Reutech Radar Systems's Optronic Radar Tracker (ORT) and Mtek's Electro-Optic Tracker (EOT) quite busy for those 43,2 seconds from missile detect to who knows what.

As for Thomson-CSF's Threat Evaluation and Weapon Assignment (TEWA) function, let's just hope that this can converge in the saturated space of Mach 2,8 multiple incoming bogies, garlic, escargot, bribes to get the contract, bribes to cover up the investigation and a dose of charming gallic candour.


*8 Which is quite difficult when the submarine has dived to 10 m and launched two wire-guided heavyweight torpedoes with 300 kg high explosive payloads.


*9 With a line of sight of 37 km and using a previous Heitman literary gem, one might as well take the entire ship's crew behind the electronics complex in the Simon's Town Naval Base and put them out of their misery with a bullet in the back of the head.




http://www.armsdeal-vpo.co.za/articles10/weak_ships.html

NAF-F7 jet will sink your over-priced poorly armed Valour Frigate as if it is a fishing boat..... .

CONFIRMED BY SOUTH AFRICAN MILITARY EXPERTS

.

Its not confirmed anywhere in that artical

Did you actually read what you just posted? I have.

Its outdated, full of incorrect information, and largely irrelevant now in the year 2014.

iconize:


Lmao!

The few black peeps in European countries command their personal wealth.

They don't command and control the country's wealth and its entire affairs.

However, your assumption about whites being extinct in Nigeria is totally false. There are "many" white immigrants in Nigeria.

Nigeria grants citizenship to foreigners almost every time.

You're probably ignorant about this fact because the white immigrants in Nigeria are not ruling over the locals.

white foreigners ruling over the locals in what sense?are you saying that the locals are ruling over the foreign businesses ?Nigerians always complain about exploitation and manipulation by businesses owned by foreigners...to follow your logic,it means foreigners are ruling over the Nigerians..

agaugust:


Bwahahahaha

South African military experts prove you a liar and a fraud, South Africans hate the Valour frigates because the warships are poorly armed like if they are a missile fitted OPV....

Publication: The Star Issued: Date: 2007-02-24 Reporter: Michael Schmidt
Has SA Invested in Weak Ships?



Publication
The Star

Date
2007-02-24

Reporter

Michael Schmidt
Web Link

www.thestar.co.za



Serious questions have been raised over the strike capability of the expensive new ships of the South African Navy (SAN). A new independent study claims they are vulnerable to attack from submarines, aircraft and warships, and have little ability to perform the key role of gunboat diplomacy through offshore bombardment.

These critiques emerge from an unpublished and unauthorised manuscript on the South African National Defence Force, A Guide to the SANDF, by defence analyst Leon Engelbrecht. It is the first study of the armed forces in 16 years.

Engelbrecht argues that the four new Valour-class frigates and three new Type 209 submarines are too light in their weapons and defensive counter-measures departments. This is the part of South Africa's multibillion-rand arms deal currently proving most controversial - because of an alleged $3-million (R21-million) bribe paid by the frigate's builders, ThyssenKrupp Marine Systems, to former arms acquisition programme head Chippy Shaik.

But Helmoed-Römer Heitman, the Southern African correspondent for Jane's Defence Weekly and author of a similar study, South African Armed Forces (1990), said Engelbrecht had failed to take into account the significant upgrades planned for the naval weapons systems *2, the choices for which would become clear only as the new navy's role developed *3.

Rear Admiral Kevin Watson, the navy's project director for the acquisition of the vessels, confirmed that the bulk of the expenditure on the frigates (65%) had been on the ships, not their weapons systems. This, he admitted, was at odds with the international norm of a 70% ship/30% weapons split.

As a result, according to Engelbrecht, while the ships were top notch, there were significant weaknesses in the weapons, and the counter-measures the ships were able to deploy against enemy attack.

The frigates will be armed with eight Exocet missiles, 16 Umkhonto missiles, a single turreted Denel 76mm gun, Oerlikon 20mm cannons and a South African Denel/Reutech 35mm cannon.

According to Engelbrecht, the frigate's "current armament [was] suited only for limited, short-duration self-defence". Its "land-attack capability [was] limited to guns too light for the task" and it had "no land attack missiles". This inability to add muscle to incursions ashore is underlined by Engelbrecht's argument that "the [Valour] class deliberately lacks a land- attack cruise missile capability for political reasons: such weapons are seen by some as 'too aggressive' and out of keeping with the Valour-class's 'defensive posture' *5.

"However, like its peers, the SAN recognises the growing importance of fighting in the littoral battle-space and supporting land forces … As a result, a missile land-attack capability is likely to be added as funds become available and sensitivities are assuaged."

Heitman said that budgeting, not political shyness, had delayed the development of the navy's land-attack capacity. Still, in Engelbrecht's estimation, the frigates' existing weapons were not up to scratch:

The French anti-ship "Exocet missile was too slow to penetrate modern air defences and too short-ranged to allow the mothership adequate stand-off to evade detection and response … Some commentators have criticised the choice of the Exocet … because of its lack of land-attack ability … Others have hammered the system for its age (developed in 1967), its low relative speed and small warhead, compared with some more modern systems such as the Indo-Russian BrahMos *6," which was touted to the SAN at last year's Africa Aerospace and Defence show in Cape Town.

Heitman suspected the SAN had bought one Exocet and leased the rest *6, but would upgrade to the latest, longer-range (173km) model, which had land-attack capabilities. The SAN was also interested in the supersonic 300km-range BrahMos cruise missile.

The South African Denel Umkhonto-IR is a short-range (12km) anti-aircraft missile, which is still in its development stage, having been "tested only to a limited extent", while "several navies and air forces already have supersonic anti-ship missiles. How the Umkhonto will deal with these is not known." The frigates can have their capacity doubled to 32 Umkhontos, but will probably carry only eight missiles and so "can easily be swamped by saturation attack *7".

Also, after a missile has been fired, empty launch canisters have to be removed from their silos, but: "As far as can be determined, this cannot be done by the Valour-class at sea, [so] reloading will have to be done alongside [in port] or require a replenishment vessel, as a depot ship, in calm seas".

Heitman admitted the missiles might have difficulty intercepting supersonic assaults, but said the Finns' recent acquisition of the Umkhonto and Sweden's interest showed the missile was taken seriously. He added that no navy was able to reload its vertically launched anti-aircraft missiles at sea.

The Italian OTOBreda 76mm cannons were acquired for the Warrior-class strike-craft in 1977 and four reconditioned ones were fitted to the frigates as "an interim cost-saving measure. Senior naval officers are well aware the gun is too small to effectively support forces ashore."

Heitman agreed, but also echoed Engelbrecht in saying the SAN was looking to replace the 76 with a navalised 155mm gun, which could use Denel's world-class G5 and G6 ammunition. Such a long-rage gun, rather than missiles, would be able to bombard enemy air bases, gun emplacements and ports. But this, Heitman argued, would be relevant only once the SAN had acquired multi-role ships capable of landing troops to secure beachheads softened by such bombardment.

In addition, the frigates were not fitted with torpedoes (as they were capable of), and its anti-submarine warfare ability was very basic, Watson admitted. Heitman said "there's absolutely f*** all [the frigates] can do to a submarine except ram it *7".

But the frigates would all go through "a massive upgrade" of their weapons, counter-measure and weapons-control systems in the coming years, he said.

Watson said the frigates' helicopters would initially be used in a surveillance role because they increased the ships' line of sight from 37km to 555km *9.

Politics & Power is a new analytical weekly feature
With acknowledgements to Michael Schmidt and The Star.


*1 What about the $22 million (R156 million) payments paid by the frigate's builders, ThyssenKrupp Marine Systems, to other South African's via Monrovia, Liberia (the country with the slackest corporate law and regulations in the world).


*2 Heitman of course is correct in the fact. The Navy purchased an excellent platform with very weak combat system.

But it was not meant to be that way. The SA Navy Combat Suite User Requirement Specification specifies a very powerful combat capability in respect of anti-surface offence, as well as anti-air and anti-submarine defence.

The only thing was that once Thabo Mbeki guaranteed Thomson-CSF and ADS the contract for the combat management system and sensors in 1997 (two years before the contract was signed), the DoD and Armscor were over a barrel. Suddenly and R1,9 billion fully-fledged combat suite went up to R3,9 billion (with Chippy Shaik gleefully rubbing his enrichment
lamp all the way). With a little hard bargaining, but mainly cutting the quantity and quality (quote, unquote) of the combat suite scope of supply, the project team brought the price down from R3,9 billion to some R2,9 billion. Then with a risk sharing approach, as well as the probably exclusion of the price of the anti-ship missiles, the price went down to R2,3 billion and was "in reach of the then price objective" of R2,1 billion. But Chippy pipes up with the affordability study indicating an [acceptable] price of R2,600 billion and so the negotiations ended forthwith and the price went up to and closed at R2,599 billion on the nose. The R300 million sounds more like the wonga splodged by Thomson-CSF in its excitement of getting such a windfall.


*3 This of course is nonsense.

During 1995 to 1997 the Defence Review was undertaken. This confirmed the SA Navy's documented Naval Staff Requirement (NSR) for a multi-role light frigate with the specified combat capability.

The only thing was that the Government's irregular and unlawful acquisition process lead to a situation where the specified capability and equipment were unaffordable in 1999 compared with the ceiling price of R6,001 determined in August 1998.

So the DoD had to embarked on a series of very stealthy (and unlawful) manouvres to get a frigate. First it chopped its organic maritime helicopter, then it added R872 million to it "ceiling" price, then it halved its equipment expectation, then it didn't purchase but leased its anti-ship missiles, then it purchased functionality shortfalls out of the SA Navy's running budget.

Now the DoD is again purchasing maritime helicopters, new anti-ship missiles, torpedoes and a decent naval gun (not a 40-year old 3" pop gun off the strike craft).

This is called fiscal stealth and makes the radar and thermal stealth of the MEKO 200AS look like child's play.


*4 Wrong - the international norm of a multi-role surface combatant is 30% platform / 70% weapons.

But the ship's stealthy acquirers will eventually get the requisite 30% platform / 70% weapons.

Here's what the taxpayer will pay :
Combat Suite = R2,599 billion = 30% (in 1998 Rands)
Combat Suite = 70% = R6,064 billion (in 1998 Rands) = R11,109 billion (in 2007 Rands)

*5 This is also nonsense. The land attack capability is purely a tactical one. The Exocet MM40 Block 2 has a range of some 70 km and a warhead of 165 kg. Even if it had a land attack capability the range and small warhead limit it to a tactical battlefield weapon.

Exocet MM40 Block 3 (or equivalent) has a land attack capability, but still has a range of about 150 km.

Seeing that the ship only has eight ASM launchers the entire naval arsenal is only 32 rounds and these beast cost about US$20 apiece, one couldn't just blast away into one's enemy's territory.

A politically sensitive land attack missile is one with a range of greater than 500 km and payload of greater than 300 kg. For example, one of Bat Boy's favourite early morning diversions is authorising the launch of the Tomahawk Land Attack Cruise Missile. This beastie has a range of 2 500 km and carries a warhead of some 500 kg. And they only cost US$0,5 million a pop - now that's a bargain.


*5 And the Chinese "Dragon's Teeth" series.

These all have ranges of 250 km up to 2 000 km, massive warheads from 250 kg up to 500 kg and supersonic speeds from 2,0 Mach to 2,8 Mach.

It's a nightmare.


*6 Quite how this fits into the boundaries of the Public Finance Management Act, heaven only knows.

But it gets worse. What Heitman is now saying in the open has been suspected since 2001.

On enquiry, the MoD has stated unequivocally (or is it actually equivocally) that the SDP corvette price included 17 Exocet MM40 Block 2 missile rounds in addition to launch tubes and launch controllers.

If it transpires that the MoD has been lying, it should be in big, big trouble with SCOPA.


*7 And saturation attack is just what the Chinese anti-ship tactic is all about - 4 to 6 missiles simultaneously engaging from all four quadrants plus the lovely zenith-diving one.

Should keep Reutech Radar Systems's Optronic Radar Tracker (ORT) and Mtek's Electro-Optic Tracker (EOT) quite busy for those 43,2 seconds from missile detect to who knows what.

As for Thomson-CSF's Threat Evaluation and Weapon Assignment (TEWA) function, let's just hope that this can converge in the saturated space of Mach 2,8 multiple incoming bogies, garlic, escargot, bribes to get the contract, bribes to cover up the investigation and a dose of charming gallic candour.


*8 Which is quite difficult when the submarine has dived to 10 m and launched two wire-guided heavyweight torpedoes with 300 kg high explosive payloads.


*9 With a line of sight of 37 km and using a previous Heitman literary gem, one might as well take the entire ship's crew behind the electronics complex in the Simon's Town Naval Base and put them out of their misery with a bullet in the back of the head.




http://www.armsdeal-vpo.co.za/articles10/weak_ships.html

NAF-F7 jet will sink your over-priced poorly armed Valour Frigate as if it is a fishing boat..... .

CONFIRMED BY SOUTH AFRICAN MILITARY EXPERTS

.

In your dreams. Bwahahaha.... The scrappy F7 cannot stand a chance

iconize:


Lmao!

The few black peeps in European countries command their personal wealth.

They don't command and control the country's wealth and its entire affairs.

However, your assumption about whites being extinct in Nigeria is totally false. There are "many" white immigrants in Nigeria.

Nigeria grants citizenship to foreigners almost every time.

You're probably ignorant about this fact because the white immigrants in Nigeria are not ruling over the locals.

Nigeria's own white people have disappeared into a complete extinction. So, you are now trying to emulate SA by trying to have a white population from attracting white citizens, bwahahahahaha.... SA white people are not immigrants, they are bona fide citizen of SA by birth. They know not other country other than SA. They even call themselves Africans because many of them have never been to another country other than Mzansi. They are born and bred of the rainbow nation.

You can never have white population, those who will leave their country for Nigeria would be very desperate indeed. Here in SA we do not look around for white faces, we see them everywhere we go. We drink, kiss and caress with them. I even wonder when was the last time you ever kissed a white girl or even to see her. Shame!! to a 100% black country.


Hamba.... Mzansi.. Hamba!!

agaugust:


Bwahahahaha

South African military experts prove you a liar and a fraud, South Africans hate the Valour frigates because the warships are poorly armed like if they are a missile fitted OPV....

Publication: The Star Issued: Date: 2007-02-24 Reporter: Michael Schmidt
Has SA Invested in Weak Ships?



Publication
The Star

Date
2007-02-24

Reporter

Michael Schmidt
Web Link

www.thestar.co.za



Serious questions have been raised over the strike capability of the expensive new ships of the South African Navy (SAN). A new independent study claims they are vulnerable to attack from submarines, aircraft and warships, and have little ability to perform the key role of gunboat diplomacy through offshore bombardment.

These critiques emerge from an unpublished and unauthorised manuscript on the South African National Defence Force, A Guide to the SANDF, by defence analyst Leon Engelbrecht. It is the first study of the armed forces in 16 years.

Engelbrecht argues that the four new Valour-class frigates and three new Type 209 submarines are too light in their weapons and defensive counter-measures departments. This is the part of South Africa's multibillion-rand arms deal currently proving most controversial - because of an alleged $3-million (R21-million) bribe paid by the frigate's builders, ThyssenKrupp Marine Systems, to former arms acquisition programme head Chippy Shaik.

But Helmoed-Römer Heitman, the Southern African correspondent for Jane's Defence Weekly and author of a similar study, South African Armed Forces (1990), said Engelbrecht had failed to take into account the significant upgrades planned for the naval weapons systems *2, the choices for which would become clear only as the new navy's role developed *3.

Rear Admiral Kevin Watson, the navy's project director for the acquisition of the vessels, confirmed that the bulk of the expenditure on the frigates (65%) had been on the ships, not their weapons systems. This, he admitted, was at odds with the international norm of a 70% ship/30% weapons split.

As a result, according to Engelbrecht, while the ships were top notch, there were significant weaknesses in the weapons, and the counter-measures the ships were able to deploy against enemy attack.

The frigates will be armed with eight Exocet missiles, 16 Umkhonto missiles, a single turreted Denel 76mm gun, Oerlikon 20mm cannons and a South African Denel/Reutech 35mm cannon.

According to Engelbrecht, the frigate's "current armament [was] suited only for limited, short-duration self-defence". Its "land-attack capability [was] limited to guns too light for the task" and it had "no land attack missiles". This inability to add muscle to incursions ashore is underlined by Engelbrecht's argument that "the [Valour] class deliberately lacks a land- attack cruise missile capability for political reasons: such weapons are seen by some as 'too aggressive' and out of keeping with the Valour-class's 'defensive posture' *5.

"However, like its peers, the SAN recognises the growing importance of fighting in the littoral battle-space and supporting land forces … As a result, a missile land-attack capability is likely to be added as funds become available and sensitivities are assuaged."

Heitman said that budgeting, not political shyness, had delayed the development of the navy's land-attack capacity. Still, in Engelbrecht's estimation, the frigates' existing weapons were not up to scratch:

The French anti-ship "Exocet missile was too slow to penetrate modern air defences and too short-ranged to allow the mothership adequate stand-off to evade detection and response … Some commentators have criticised the choice of the Exocet … because of its lack of land-attack ability … Others have hammered the system for its age (developed in 1967), its low relative speed and small warhead, compared with some more modern systems such as the Indo-Russian BrahMos *6," which was touted to the SAN at last year's Africa Aerospace and Defence show in Cape Town.

Heitman suspected the SAN had bought one Exocet and leased the rest *6, but would upgrade to the latest, longer-range (173km) model, which had land-attack capabilities. The SAN was also interested in the supersonic 300km-range BrahMos cruise missile.

The South African Denel Umkhonto-IR is a short-range (12km) anti-aircraft missile, which is still in its development stage, having been "tested only to a limited extent", while "several navies and air forces already have supersonic anti-ship missiles. How the Umkhonto will deal with these is not known." The frigates can have their capacity doubled to 32 Umkhontos, but will probably carry only eight missiles and so "can easily be swamped by saturation attack *7".

Also, after a missile has been fired, empty launch canisters have to be removed from their silos, but: "As far as can be determined, this cannot be done by the Valour-class at sea, [so] reloading will have to be done alongside [in port] or require a replenishment vessel, as a depot ship, in calm seas".

Heitman admitted the missiles might have difficulty intercepting supersonic assaults, but said the Finns' recent acquisition of the Umkhonto and Sweden's interest showed the missile was taken seriously. He added that no navy was able to reload its vertically launched anti-aircraft missiles at sea.

The Italian OTOBreda 76mm cannons were acquired for the Warrior-class strike-craft in 1977 and four reconditioned ones were fitted to the frigates as "an interim cost-saving measure. Senior naval officers are well aware the gun is too small to effectively support forces ashore."

Heitman agreed, but also echoed Engelbrecht in saying the SAN was looking to replace the 76 with a navalised 155mm gun, which could use Denel's world-class G5 and G6 ammunition. Such a long-rage gun, rather than missiles, would be able to bombard enemy air bases, gun emplacements and ports. But this, Heitman argued, would be relevant only once the SAN had acquired multi-role ships capable of landing troops to secure beachheads softened by such bombardment.

In addition, the frigates were not fitted with torpedoes (as they were capable of), and its anti-submarine warfare ability was very basic, Watson admitted. Heitman said "there's absolutely f*** all [the frigates] can do to a submarine except ram it *7".

But the frigates would all go through "a massive upgrade" of their weapons, counter-measure and weapons-control systems in the coming years, he said.

Watson said the frigates' helicopters would initially be used in a surveillance role because they increased the ships' line of sight from 37km to 555km *9.

Politics & Power is a new analytical weekly feature
With acknowledgements to Michael Schmidt and The Star.


*1 What about the $22 million (R156 million) payments paid by the frigate's builders, ThyssenKrupp Marine Systems, to other South African's via Monrovia, Liberia (the country with the slackest corporate law and regulations in the world).


*2 Heitman of course is correct in the fact. The Navy purchased an excellent platform with very weak combat system.

But it was not meant to be that way. The SA Navy Combat Suite User Requirement Specification specifies a very powerful combat capability in respect of anti-surface offence, as well as anti-air and anti-submarine defence.

The only thing was that once Thabo Mbeki guaranteed Thomson-CSF and ADS the contract for the combat management system and sensors in 1997 (two years before the contract was signed), the DoD and Armscor were over a barrel. Suddenly and R1,9 billion fully-fledged combat suite went up to R3,9 billion (with Chippy Shaik gleefully rubbing his enrichment
lamp all the way). With a little hard bargaining, but mainly cutting the quantity and quality (quote, unquote) of the combat suite scope of supply, the project team brought the price down from R3,9 billion to some R2,9 billion. Then with a risk sharing approach, as well as the probably exclusion of the price of the anti-ship missiles, the price went down to R2,3 billion and was "in reach of the then price objective" of R2,1 billion. But Chippy pipes up with the affordability study indicating an [acceptable] price of R2,600 billion and so the negotiations ended forthwith and the price went up to and closed at R2,599 billion on the nose. The R300 million sounds more like the wonga splodged by Thomson-CSF in its excitement of getting such a windfall.


*3 This of course is nonsense.

During 1995 to 1997 the Defence Review was undertaken. This confirmed the SA Navy's documented Naval Staff Requirement (NSR) for a multi-role light frigate with the specified combat capability.

The only thing was that the Government's irregular and unlawful acquisition process lead to a situation where the specified capability and equipment were unaffordable in 1999 compared with the ceiling price of R6,001 determined in August 1998.

So the DoD had to embarked on a series of very stealthy (and unlawful) manouvres to get a frigate. First it chopped its organic maritime helicopter, then it added R872 million to it "ceiling" price, then it halved its equipment expectation, then it didn't purchase but leased its anti-ship missiles, then it purchased functionality shortfalls out of the SA Navy's running budget.

Now the DoD is again purchasing maritime helicopters, new anti-ship missiles, torpedoes and a decent naval gun (not a 40-year old 3" pop gun off the strike craft).

This is called fiscal stealth and makes the radar and thermal stealth of the MEKO 200AS look like child's play.


*4 Wrong - the international norm of a multi-role surface combatant is 30% platform / 70% weapons.

But the ship's stealthy acquirers will eventually get the requisite 30% platform / 70% weapons.

Here's what the taxpayer will pay :
Combat Suite = R2,599 billion = 30% (in 1998 Rands)
Combat Suite = 70% = R6,064 billion (in 1998 Rands) = R11,109 billion (in 2007 Rands)

*5 This is also nonsense. The land attack capability is purely a tactical one. The Exocet MM40 Block 2 has a range of some 70 km and a warhead of 165 kg. Even if it had a land attack capability the range and small warhead limit it to a tactical battlefield weapon.

Exocet MM40 Block 3 (or equivalent) has a land attack capability, but still has a range of about 150 km.

Seeing that the ship only has eight ASM launchers the entire naval arsenal is only 32 rounds and these beast cost about US$20 apiece, one couldn't just blast away into one's enemy's territory.

A politically sensitive land attack missile is one with a range of greater than 500 km and payload of greater than 300 kg. For example, one of Bat Boy's favourite early morning diversions is authorising the launch of the Tomahawk Land Attack Cruise Missile. This beastie has a range of 2 500 km and carries a warhead of some 500 kg. And they only cost US$0,5 million a pop - now that's a bargain.


*5 And the Chinese "Dragon's Teeth" series.

These all have ranges of 250 km up to 2 000 km, massive warheads from 250 kg up to 500 kg and supersonic speeds from 2,0 Mach to 2,8 Mach.

It's a nightmare.


*6 Quite how this fits into the boundaries of the Public Finance Management Act, heaven only knows.

But it gets worse. What Heitman is now saying in the open has been suspected since 2001.

On enquiry, the MoD has stated unequivocally (or is it actually equivocally) that the SDP corvette price included 17 Exocet MM40 Block 2 missile rounds in addition to launch tubes and launch controllers.

If it transpires that the MoD has been lying, it should be in big, big trouble with SCOPA.


*7 And saturation attack is just what the Chinese anti-ship tactic is all about - 4 to 6 missiles simultaneously engaging from all four quadrants plus the lovely zenith-diving one.

Should keep Reutech Radar Systems's Optronic Radar Tracker (ORT) and Mtek's Electro-Optic Tracker (EOT) quite busy for those 43,2 seconds from missile detect to who knows what.

As for Thomson-CSF's Threat Evaluation and Weapon Assignment (TEWA) function, let's just hope that this can converge in the saturated space of Mach 2,8 multiple incoming bogies, garlic, escargot, bribes to get the contract, bribes to cover up the investigation and a dose of charming gallic candour.


*8 Which is quite difficult when the submarine has dived to 10 m and launched two wire-guided heavyweight torpedoes with 300 kg high explosive payloads.


*9 With a line of sight of 37 km and using a previous Heitman literary gem, one might as well take the entire ship's crew behind the electronics complex in the Simon's Town Naval Base and put them out of their misery with a bullet in the back of the head.




http://www.armsdeal-vpo.co.za/articles10/weak_ships.html

NAF-F7 jet will sink your over-priced poorly armed Valour Frigate as if it is a fishing boat..... .

CONFIRMED BY SOUTH AFRICAN MILITARY EXPERTS

.

First, look at the date 2007, all our Frigates have been refitted since then, the Ukkhonto R will be in service in the very near future,Secondly our Frigates can be fitted with 32 Umkhonto missiles if the need arises,the 76mm Gun is also just an interim Gun and will be replaced by a 155mm Gun which uses the same ammunition as the G5 and G6,
our Valours are also fitted with ASW Four (2 twin) 324mm torpedo tubes

""But the frigates would all go through "a massive upgrade" of their weapons, counter-measure and weapons-control systems in the coming
years, he said."" and they are as we speak.

"Heitman of course is correct in the fact. The Navy purchased an excellent platform", thus the Platform is there to add a lot of weapon systems, which is currently being done.

A must read for @agaugust.


http://www.pilotspost.com/arn0000089

Yes people, where did we stop with the a$s whooping of South-africans.

Patches689, Mikeczar, I see nothing has changed, you guys are still telling lies.

Jl115, I see you brother, I think it's time you stop hallucinating and daydreaming. It's a new day already.

Mzilakazi, still embarrassing black south-africans as usual, take a look at your last post. I'm embarrassed.

MudaZA, still posting off topics, when are you going to make a military related post on this thread?

The rest of the South-African bandwagon, another day of shedding mzanzo tears.

mzilakazi:
A must read for @agaugust.


http://www.pilotspost.com/arn0000089

Dummy, i've read that post, the writer didn't provide any evidence to refute the fact you only have 8 qualified Gripen pilots.

He only reminded us your Airforce lack Aviation fuel, and you do not have enough pilots to fly the Gripens.

patches689:


Augustus you are wasting everyones time

No you are the time waster, until I used photo screenshots to draw 3 arrows and open your cataract blinded eyes to see that the Nigerian photo contains two separate knee mortars, one attached to a tripod stand and the other standing alone on the tiny base plate leaning on the other mortar, you didn't use your blocked head to think out what the picture shows.

It took almost 24 hours to teach you Domingos a very simple principle of knee mortars and their use on battle field in real war, SANDF knee mortar photos are Hollywood demos, Nigerian knee mortars are in use in war zone and when the metal gets hot due to sustained fire, Nigeria has attachable and collapsible mini tripod stand to hold the mortar and keep firing while South Africa has to stop firing their own.

SANDF is inferior to Nigerian army. We have many new weapons that the photos have not even come to public view yet
.

Henry120:
Yes people, where did we stop with the a$s whooping of South-africans.

Patches689, Mikeczar, I see nothing has changed, you guys are still telling lies.

Jl115, I see you brother, I think it's time you stop hallucinating and daydreaming. It's a new day already.

Mzilakazi, still embarrassing black south-africans as usual, take a look at your last post. I'm embarrassed.

MudaZA, still posting off topics, when are you going to make a military related post on this thread?

The rest of the South-African bandwagon, another day of shedding mzanzo tears.

Facts are always hard to bear. There is no discrepancies in what I have said. Nigeria has no white people of their own, so, leave our white people alone and be cured from your colour sickness.

agaugust:


No you are the time waster, until I used photo screenshots to draw 3 arrows and open your cataract blinded eyes to see that the Nigerian photo contains two separate knee mortars, one attached to a tripod stand and the other standing alone on the tiny base plate leaning on the other mortar, you didn't use your blocked head to think out what the picture shows.

It took almost 24 hours to teach you Domingos a very simple principle of knee mortars and their use on battle field in real war, SANDF knee mortar photos are Hollywood demos, Nigerian knee mortars are in use in war zone and when the metal gets hot due to sustained fire, Nigeria has attachable and collapsible mini tripod stand to hold the mortar and keep firing while South Africa has to stop firing their own.

SANDF is inferior to Nigerian army. We have many new weapons that the photos have not even come to public view yet
.

Nigeria has zero knee mortars. Knee mortars are not adjusted by tripods. Don't confuse knee mortars with lightweight mortars.

jl115:
Paramount offering a whole new type of Gowind class OPV:
www.paramountgroup.biz/PDF/Naval-Systems/87m_gowind_leaflet.pdf

France offered Gowind OPV to Nigeria last year asking us to buy one and build the second one domestically in Nigeria with full technology transfer, Nigerian navy may not accept the offer, we are asking to build up to 8 more units of stealth P18N NNS Centenary
.

Henry120:
Yes people, where did we stop with the a$s whooping of South-africans.

Patches689, Mikeczar, I see nothing has changed, you guys are still telling lies.

Jl115, I see you brother, I think it's time you stop hallucinating and daydreaming. It's a new day already.

Mzilakazi, still embarrassing black south-africans as usual, take a look at your last post. I'm embarrassed.

MudaZA, still posting off topics, when are you going to make a military related post on this thread?

The rest of the South-African bandwagon, another day of shedding mzanzo tears.

You are the one daydreaming mate, ive posted sources to support all my claims, unlike you, who make emotional post without any sources to back them up.

agaugust:


France offered Gowind OPV to Nigeria last year asking us to buy one and build the second one domestically in Nigeria with full technology transfer, Nigerian navy may not accept the offer, we are asking to build up to 8 more units of stealth P18N NNS Centenary
.

And SAN plans to build 10 more Valour class frigates!!!!!

agaugust:


France offered Gowind OPV to Nigeria last year asking us to buy one and build the second one domestically in Nigeria with full technology transfer, Nigerian navy may not accept the offer, we are asking to build up to 8 more units of stealth P18N NNS Centenary
.

That was a good tales.

MikeCZAR:
In Nigeria nothing is removed.

That's because they have money to support and maintain them this isn't the case with Nigeria. Your missiles expired during the sanctions era, as you couldn't maintain them.

Wrong, Venezuela suffers more sanctions than Nigeria, they are enemy to America and NATO has been punishing Venezuela with sanctions, reason why they now want to buy JF-17 Thunder for Venezuelan air force.

Nigeria's sanctions era ended 1999 and NNS Aradu was upgraded around 2005 by Nigeria and America joint venture.

Come to Lagos with a Valour frigate and kiss my Otomat missile, it out-ranges your 73km Exocet of which you have only 13 units while Nigeria has 40 Otomats.

Let your P.u.ssy Cat visit our Lion's den, we need free breakfast
.

MduZA:


white foreigners ruling over the locals in what sense?are you saying that the locals are ruling over the foreign businesses ?Nigerians always complain about exploitation and manipulation by businesses owned by foreigners...to follow your logic,it means foreigners are ruling over the Nigerians..

The white minority are ruling over blek south Africans in every "sense".

White immigrants in Nigeria don't own over 75% of the lands neither do they control the economy.

However, the Nigeria complaining about foreigners dominating the markets are the lazy and
non-competitive ones.

mzilakazi:


Nigeria's own white people have disappeared into a complete extinction. So, you are now trying to emulate SA by trying to have a white population from attracting white citizens, bwahahahahaha.... SA white people are not immigrants, they are bona fide citizen of SA by birth. They know not other country other than SA. They even call themselves Africans because many of them have never been to another country other than Mzansi. They are born and bred of the rainbow nation.

You can never have white population, those who will leave their country for Nigeria would be very desperate indeed. Here in SA we do not look around for white faces, we see them everywhere we go. We drink, kiss and caress with them. I even wonder when was the last time you ever kissed a white girl or even to see her. Shame!! to a 100% black country.


Hamba.... Mzansi.. Hamba!!

Fam, boasting
about having white immigrants in south Africa shows you're a victim of inferiority complex.

Again, you're saying the whites in Nigeria have gone into complete extinction - simply because you don't hear about them controlling 80% of the country's economy.

Now, to feel good - you said the whites seeking citizenship in Nigeria are desperate, lol!

However, it's evident in your comment that you're a slave to the whites.

So, in your moronic and inferior world, kissing a white chic is an achievement to brag about?

When will you start bragging about wiping white men's butts after they use the toilet?

You blek south Africans are indeed the UN certified clowns of Africa.

Who knows, you might have rapedd a white chic just to brag about tasting a white pussi.

agaugust:


Nope, sanctions era ended 1999 and NNS Aradu was upgraded around 2005 by Nigeria and America joint venture.

Come to Lagos with a Valour frigate and kiss my Otomat missile, it out-ranges your 73km Exocet of which you have only 13 units while Nigeria has 40 Otomats.

Let your P.u.ssy Cat visit our Lion's den, we need free breakfast
.

All your Otomat will be destroyed by the valours CIWS system from a distance of 3km and dissolve into thin Air. Bwahahahaha..... The valour is not a weak warship. It is protected in all areas.

MikeCZAR:
Back to your 15 years claim?

SAAF pilots are well trained. What was the kill ratio during Lion effort?

You keep asking this retarrded question, how would I know this exactly?

Only 8 of them have so far been trained.

mzilakazi:


Yet, you failed to take note of 25 fighter pilots on training. They qualified on 2009, done the training on the hawks and now few of them made it to the gripen.

Until you can prove you have more, you only got 8 qualified Gripen pilots.

Henry120:


Mzilakazi, still embarrassing black south-africans as usual, take a look at your last post. I'm embarrassed.

That dude is not mentally stable.

patches689:


false

Despite seeing clearly a photo of a single soldier carrying one, you still chose this retarrded answer.

patches689:


correct

one is a commando mortar

one is a lightweight mortar

They are both light enough for a single soldier to carry comfortably.

MikeCZAR:
Your missiles are expired.


Show us how often Nigeria issues contracts for the manufacture to maintain any of your missiles.

Show me where Venezuela issued contract for manufacturer to maintain there own.

I also need you to show me documents issued by South Africa for manufacturers to maintain all your Milan missiles and Exocet missiles in the last decade
.

mzilakazi:


Yet, you failed to take note of 25 fighter pilots on training. They qualified on 2009, done the training on the hawks and now few of them made it to the gripen.

Jet pilot qualification is a yearly ritual, you may qualify last year with minimum required flying hours, and you become disqualified this year if your hours of flying drops below minimum for this year.

Mister Ignoramus
.

iconize:


The white minority are ruling over blek south Africans in every "sense".

White immigrants in Nigeria don't own over 75% of the lands neither do they control the economy.

However, the Nigeria complaining about foreigners dominating the markets are the lazy and
non-competitive ones.




Fam, boast about having white immigrants in south Africa shows you're a victim of inferiority complex.

Again, you're saying the whites in Nigeria have gone into complete extinction - simply because you don't hear about them controlling 80% of the country's economy.

Now, to feel good - you said the whites seeking citizenship in Nigeria are desperate, lol!

However, it's evident in your comment that you're a slave to the whites.

So, in your moronic and inferior world, kissing a white chic is an achievement to brag about?

When will you start bragging about wiping white men's butts after they use the toilet?

You blek south Africans are indeed the UN certified clowns of Africa.

Who knows, you might have rapedd a white chic just to brag about tasting a white pussi.

I am not a slave to white masters. I am a born free generation from a multiracial country where different cultures and races came together to live as one. I am not from a 100% black country where I see black everywhere I go and become a victim of race obsession and stereotyping. I have learnt to accept that SA is for us all to live together as one. I do not think like a Nigerian when it comes to race, rather, I think like an American or European whose countries population is composed as similar to my own country.


Hamba.... Mzansi...... Hamba.......

agaugust:


Wrong, Venezuela suffers more sanctions than Nigeria, they are enemy to America and NATO has been punishing Venezuela with sanctions, reason why they now want to buy JF-17 Thunder for Venezuelan air force.

Nigeria's sanctions era ended 1999 and NNS Aradu was upgraded around 2005 by Nigeria and America joint venture.

Come to Lagos with a Valour frigate and kiss my Otomat missile, it out-ranges your 73km Exocet of which you have only 13 units while Nigeria has 40 Otomats.

Let your P.u.ssy Cat visit our Lion's den, we need free breakfast
.

By the Time we have our new OPVs we will have the 300km range BrahMos cruise missle for our Valours.
"Several countries including Vietnam,South Africa, Egypt, Oman, and Brunei have expressed interest in the missile"
http://capsindia.org/files/documents/CAPS_Infocus_RS_2.pdf

agaugust:


Jet pilot qualification is a yearly ritual, you may qualify last year with minimum required flying hours, and you become disqualified this year if your hours of flying drops below minimum for this year.

Mister Ignoramus
.

Bwahahahahaha.... stop fooling yourself. Flying hours does not work like that, stupppid!!