Stats: 3,191,146 members, 7,943,114 topics. Date: Sunday, 08 September 2024 at 06:18 AM |
Nairaland Forum / Nairaland / General / Culture / Why Is It Only Africans That Have Tribes? (4154 Views)
Some Tribes And Their Weird Cultural Practices / Why Do Only Africans Especially Nigerians Hiss? Lol / Nigerian Tribes And Their States (2) (3) (4)
Why Is It Only Africans That Have Tribes? by Nobody: 9:13pm On Dec 18, 2014 |
I really dont understand why non Africans do not have tribes. For example, in Europe, we have the French, Germans, Spanish, Portugese etc, but they are not referred to as 'tribes' either by themselves or by outsiders. If we want to narrow it down to individual nations, we can take say, Britain. They have the English, the Scots, the Welsh, the Irish... each with a distinctive language and culture, but they do not identify as tribes. India must have hundreds of languages, but no tribes. Why is it that only Africans divide themselves into tribes? Just curious. Any theories anyone? |
Re: Why Is It Only Africans That Have Tribes? by SirHouloo(m): 9:45pm On Dec 18, 2014 |
India nko? 1 Like |
Re: Why Is It Only Africans That Have Tribes? by RandomAfricanAm: 1:47am On Dec 19, 2014 |
1 Like |
Re: Why Is It Only Africans That Have Tribes? by Funjosh(m): 9:06am On Dec 19, 2014 |
Go and Read about Mexico and Brazil. 1 Like |
Re: Why Is It Only Africans That Have Tribes? by PAGAN9JA(m): 10:49am On Dec 19, 2014 |
. |
Re: Why Is It Only Africans That Have Tribes? by PAGAN9JA(m): 10:51am On Dec 19, 2014 |
Stupi.d question. The whole world has tribes . West europe has lost hers due to forced intermarriage as ordained by the catholic church in the past and the oropagation of nuclear families to destroy Paganism some ppl like the Gulf Arabs and orthodox caste/tribal Hindus are extremely tribalistic 1 Like |
Re: Why Is It Only Africans That Have Tribes? by Nobody: 12:58pm On Dec 19, 2014 |
PAGAN9JA: I am not talking about your pagan religion here. I am talking about different ethnic groups only being divided along tribal lines in Africa. Gulf Arabs segregate according to their family lineages or Religion, not tribe. They all speak more or less the same language. Hindus are segregated based on the caste system; sort of like the osu caste system among the igbos, but more complex; not a tribal system. Only Africans are segregated according to tribes in modern times. Although, we do hear occasionally of some undiscovered primitive jungle tribe in the Amazon jungle etc., but there is no emphasis on tribalism in other continents. Perhaps delineation according to tribe in Africa, was a divide and rule tactic used by the colonialists. Sort of like the Hutu/ Tutsi divide encouraged by the Belgians. BTW, there is no evidence of the Catholic church enforcing inter-ethnic marriages anywhere. 1 Like |
Re: Why Is It Only Africans That Have Tribes? by Nobody: 1:37pm On Dec 19, 2014 |
Abuamam:Arabs too have tribes, Amerindians. Caucassians are equally tribal. Its just called racism, and they are also in denial about themselves. 1 Like |
Re: Why Is It Only Africans That Have Tribes? by RandomAfricanAm: 5:10pm On Dec 19, 2014 |
The ignorance(on multiple levels) of this entire question is maddening. That said I think the OP has something in mind but doesn't have the words to express it. I question if the mere existence of "tribes"(which isn't even an African word *like I said sad on multiple levels* ) is his concern it's just the only fraise he has to express it. |
Re: Why Is It Only Africans That Have Tribes? by Nobody: 5:36pm On Dec 19, 2014 |
RandomAfricanAm: Sorry sir. |
Re: Why Is It Only Africans That Have Tribes? by axum: 10:06pm On Dec 19, 2014 |
Somalis only have one Tribe. We are All Somali, but we have many clans. Clans make up a tribe. Since we are one tribe as Somalis, we don't really use the word tribe but rather just the word Somali. 1 Like |
Re: Why Is It Only Africans That Have Tribes? by odumchi: 11:01pm On Dec 19, 2014 |
It's because our peoples were called 'tribes' by our conquerors, who deemed us an inferior class of subhuman beings who (according to them) indulged in nothing more than unclothedness and human-sacrifice, all whilst dwelling in simple mud huts. Personally, that's what comes to mind when I hear the word 'tribe'. It's very unfortunate that we've lost this ideological war, as Africans even use it to describe themselves. It's a huge pity. 6 Likes |
Re: Why Is It Only Africans That Have Tribes? by RandomAfricanAm: 1:00am On Dec 20, 2014 |
odumchi: Exactly what I'm saying, that's why I'm not really having as big an issue with the OP as I might otherwise because I understand the conditions that would cause him to state it in that way(even though it's still "wrong" ). I've been fighting myself to go ahead and make a post on the foundational issue(to all the culture section) of **semantic & epistemological traps** that people so often fall in, as shown by this topic. It really hinders our ability to see & discuss the real issue when people fall into these common traps. 1 Like |
Re: Why Is It Only Africans That Have Tribes? by RandomAfricanAm: 3:45am On Dec 20, 2014 |
@odumchi: This is also the reason people so often speak of the past. It's not some empty rhetoric, it's a useful means to clarify contemporary issues. If rainfall dries up for 10 years you can't properly recover from those years of drought and famine when the rains come back if you let someone manipulate you into thinking the issue is really about your people being lazy & not knowing how to farm instead of the real issue of drought. Yes we can talk about ways to mitigate the effects in the future but lets not be led astray from the primary issue. Claiming that someone cataloging the variety of food stuff, farming locations, water sources, etc as "living in the past" as opposed to praising them for noting what our collective ancestors left us to help in the current rebuilding/recovery effort is ridiculous but far to often is expressed by people who pat themselves on the back while thinking they are being "realistic" ![]() ![]() 1 Like |
Re: Why Is It Only Africans That Have Tribes? by Nobody: 5:02am On Dec 20, 2014 |
We have "tribes" in America. The Choctaw, Cherokee, Lumbee, Seminole Sioux, Cheyenne, Hopi, Apache and Eskimo are few of the Native American "tribes" that still exist today. They speak different languages and have different culture practices. I'm putting tribes in quotation marks because, as someone pointed out, it was the white people who started referring to these people as tribes. |
Re: Why Is It Only Africans That Have Tribes? by itstpia8: 5:39am On Dec 20, 2014 |
Tribes are used to refer to people who are colonized. Its not necessarily derogatory, but used more as an identifier to know which ethnicity, ideology or country they identify with more. |
Re: Why Is It Only Africans That Have Tribes? by RandomAfricanAm: 6:16am On Dec 20, 2014 |
itstpia8: Personally my issue isn't about the extent to which the term is derogatory or not, it's the extent to which it distorts the issue at hand. To piggyback off of axum... axum: Most African people were lineages who communicated with other lineages through family heads(representatives) and common trading markets. Europeans would say all these people who may ordinarily not be seen as "one people" as a tribe because they shared words & interacted together or had the same "material culture" some times even if they spoke different dialects. One lineage could also serve as the central nexus point for the other 8-12 lineages who again might not consider themselves "one people" but interact together for mutual benefit**politics**. Europeans would come down and say these people are all the "tribe" of that central nexus lineage reguardless of how they saw themselves. Sidenote: If those same Europeans come down and blowup the political balance that those lineages made for themselves, then calling that tribalism is missing the larger point. |
Re: Why Is It Only Africans That Have Tribes? by Nobody: 10:58am On Dec 20, 2014 |
axum: Perhaps the Italians who colonised Somaliland had less interest in the divide and rule tactic; if indeed it was such. In pre-colonial Rwanda, Hutus and Tutsis were delineated mostly on the basis of cattle ownership and hierarchy. It took the Belgians to differentiate them based on nose lengths and lip thickness... leading ultimately to a bloody genocide. odumchi: I guess yours is a better way of putting it. Africans are so fiercely tribalistic, it's mind boggling. Logically, a person's ancestory or location of birth, should not be a criterium for judging his/ her character. Yet, most Africans can't seem to shake the habit. It keeps us Africans backward. For example, in the UK, no one cares whether the UK prime minister is Scottish, Welsh or English. In Nigeria, for example, that is the first issue everyone looks at. |
Re: Why Is It Only Africans That Have Tribes? by Nobody: 11:35am On Dec 20, 2014 |
Asians and native american have tribes too... and the Samoans, Hawaiians... |
Re: Why Is It Only Africans That Have Tribes? by Nobody: 9:44am On Dec 21, 2014 |
AABeauty: Those groups qualify more as 'tribes' than African ethnic groups, some of whom number several tens of millions. Referring to say Yorubas, who number perhaps 50 million, as a 'tribe' is more a sign of ignorance and colonial conditioning than anything else. Likewise it's ludicrous to refer to ethnic groups like Igbos, Hausas etc as ''tribes''. It makes absolutely no sense. |
Re: Why Is It Only Africans That Have Tribes? by PAGAN9JA(m): 1:38pm On Dec 21, 2014 |
I would like the MODS to unban my post. |
Re: Why Is It Only Africans That Have Tribes? by Nobody: 2:04am On Dec 22, 2014 |
ROSSIKE: I completely agree. I personally never use the word tribe regardless of an ethnic group's place of origin. |
Re: Why Is It Only Africans That Have Tribes? by itstpia100: 6:10am On Dec 22, 2014 |
ROSSIKE: tribes are not defined by numbers but rather by the fact of colonization. it is futile to take offence at a depiction when you know the reality remains what it is. |
Re: Why Is It Only Africans That Have Tribes? by RandomAfricanAm: 8:42am On Dec 22, 2014 |
itstpia100: Oh this going to be real good....! 1.So, what is this reality that is? 2.Defined by whom? 3.Why should anyone here abide by this defined reality? 4.In the event that anyone refuses to abide by this "definition" who's going to enforce their abdication? |
Re: Why Is It Only Africans That Have Tribes? by axum: 12:43pm On Dec 22, 2014 |
Abuamam: The presence of Europeans in Somalia was for only a couple of decades, and that the was spent fighting them, so they never really had an opportunity to govern Somalis, as we had the longest colonial war with europeans in Africa, to the point that we were the first African City (tale) to be bombed by planes. Somali culture is very intolerant of outsiders, thus the reason why our national language is Somali, and we still have our customs and culture, despite being in the horn of Africa, a very strategic locations, and we have been trading with foreigners for thousands of years. We still speak our own language and have our customs and culture. As for the divide and conquer, thats impossible in Somalia for outsiders to do, as we are all ethnically Somali and look the same, have the same religion, language. each clan controls their own land, clans make up the Somali ethnicity. |
Re: Why Is It Only Africans That Have Tribes? by Nobody: 9:56pm On Dec 22, 2014 |
RandomAfricanAm:I do not see any problem with "tribe." The word was in use well before colonization of Africa. Iignore the very recent oxford definition. There are indegenous African names in refference to tribe. I have a tribe, we all share a commmon ancestry. The tribe is further divided into clans, again, based on lineage, and the divisions go further down till the family unit. Pre-colonial, we were a political, social and economic unit. We often vote on tribal lines and oh, we are phenotypically the same, we are related after all. I love my tribe(we're over 10 mil). |
Re: Why Is It Only Africans That Have Tribes? by Nobody: 11:54pm On Dec 22, 2014 |
^ I'm having difficulties understanding what you meant when you said the word 'tribe' was used in Africa in pre-colonial times. In any case, every modern anthropologist knows the word 'tribe' is an imprecise, loaded term Europeans applied to societies they encountered in the Americas, Africa and Asia, whom they considered to be primitive. 'Tribe' connotes 'small group', 'savage', 'simple', 'unadvanced'. Modern scholarship has revealed how complex these so-called primitive societies were, and as a result, the word tribe has fallen into disuse in scholarly circles. 'Ethnicity' or 'ethnic group' is used instead. Some of us haven't gotten it yet and continue to refer to ourselves as 'tribes' and 'tribesmen'. I belong to a group that is over 30 million strong, speak a multiplicity of dialects some of which are not mutually intelligible with mine, practise a multiplicity of customs some of which are foreign to my own immediate community within that group. Two cities within that 'tribal' homeland number over 1 million people; several other towns number over 100,000 people. That is not a tribe. (Tribe, in the sense meant by European writers from about the 18th century on, being a small homogenous/simple group with an unsophisticated social structure.) |
Re: Why Is It Only Africans That Have Tribes? by Nobody: 12:28am On Dec 23, 2014 |
@Radoillo My point is that "tribe," though ill intended, was a reference to a pre-existing, very real social structure that we do not need to deny. There is reference to tribes in old books like the bible. In pre-colonial Africa, reference to such communities was by specific names like "people of **" refering to their custom or lineage. |
Re: Why Is It Only Africans That Have Tribes? by ArtanK(m): 2:15am On Dec 23, 2014 |
Abuamam: It's not that they didn't have any interest in dividing the Somali clans, it was because they couldn't. The Italians, French and the British were allowed to roam the vast Somali territories in the horn by the Somali clans. In Djibouti, the French were granted naval bases by the Somali Issa clan and the Afars. In British and Italian Somaliland, the British signed treaties with the coastal clans and they never entered the mainland. People in south Somalia made sure that the Italians knew that if a Somali person were to get whipped or mistreated, an Italian soldier would pay the price. 1 Like 1 Share |
Re: Why Is It Only Africans That Have Tribes? by axum: 4:10am On Dec 23, 2014 |
ArtanK: Gerald Hanley is an old Colonial hand who lived with Somalis. This is from his book Warriors: Life and Death Among the Somalis "A Somali always felt himself to be twice as good as any white man, or any other kind of man at all, and still does, even when he is wrong. Islam does wonders for the self respect of non-white people and Christianity is right to worry about the spread of Islam in Africa, and must honestly face the question of why it has happened - " "Of all the desiccated, bitter, cruel, sunbeaten wildernesses which starve and thirst beyond the edges of Africa's luscious, jungled centre, there cannot be one more Christless than the one which begins at the northern foot of Mount Kenya and stretches to the foothills of Abyssinia, and from there to the dried-out glittering tip of Cape Gardafui where the hot karif winds blow in from where the long sharks race under the thin blue skin of the ocean. You can never think of those wildernesses without thinking of daggers and spears, rolling fierce eyes under mops of dusty black crinkly hair, of mad stubborn camels, rocks too hot to touch, and blood feuds whose origins cannot be remembered, only honoured in the stabbing. But of all the races of Africa there cannot be one better to live among than the most difficult, the proudest, the bravest, the vainest, the most merciless, the friendliest; the Somalis." "I knew an Italian priest who had spent over thirty years among the Somalis and he made two converts, and it amazed me that he got even those two. The Prophet has no more fervent, and ignorant, followers, but that is not their fault that they are ignorant.Their natural intelligence is second to none and when the education factories start work among them they should surprise Africa, and themselves." "I never saw a Somali who showed any fear of death, which, impressive though it sounds, carries within it the chill of pitilessness and ferocity as well. If you have no fear of death you have none for anybody else's either, but that fearlessness has always been essential to the Somalis who have had to try and survive hunger, disease and thirst while prepared to fight and die against their enemies, their fellow Somalis for pleasure in the blood feud, or the Ethiopians who would like to rule them, or the white men who got in the way for a while." "Everytime a Somali got whipped, an Italian soldier was killed" "Wandering in The Shag (desert) were Somalis with some of the sharpest intelligences in the continent, nomads who had been forced into being parasites of the camel, for centuries, and could anyone ever find a way of using all that courage and intelligence?" "There is no one alive as tough as the Somali nomad. No one. An askari wounded in a fight in the Haud country walked 14 miles holding his guts in his hand, was sewn up and lived to soldier again. And the women are as spiritually strong as their men." "....You get into that way of thinking in the Somali waste. You think that way because the Somalis bitterly resent the white man, and struggle continually, and admirably, by lies and intrigue, to fight off his influence which spells the end of their peculiar world. You cannot beat them. They have no inferiority complexes, no wide-eyed worship of the white man's ways, and no fear of him, of his guns or of his official anger. They are a race to be admired, if hard to love." 2 Likes |
Re: Why Is It Only Africans That Have Tribes? by Nobody: 5:14am On Dec 23, 2014 |
Somalis are actually a peculiar people, having been exposed to them a bit. I believe that strengh derives from the fact that Somali family structures remain unscathed by both colonialism and urbanisation. There is a Somali social, economic system that works for the Somalis independent of the Western market. The rest of Africa should learn this independence and break free of the indirect control by the West through its imposed systems. Somalis do not care so much for government or anybody for that matter. Trust the Black Hawk down to happen in Somalia. I think the movie was the CIA trying to save face by the way. 4 Likes |
The Full History, Belief, And, Culture Of Ekpo Festival In Annang, Akwa Ibom Sta / Hacked Netflix Available.!✨✨ / Ownership Of Lagos: Between Distortion And Obvious Facts.
Viewing this topic: 1 guest(s)
(Go Up)
Sections: politics (1) business autos (1) jobs (1) career education (1) romance computers phones travel sports fashion health religion celebs tv-movies music-radio literature webmasters programming techmarket Links: (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) Nairaland - Copyright © 2005 - 2024 Oluwaseun Osewa. All rights reserved. See How To Advertise. 95 |