Stats: 3,189,868 members, 7,938,551 topics. Date: Tuesday, 03 September 2024 at 08:56 AM |
Nairaland Forum / Nairaland / General / Romance / Would Relationships Survive If "Sex" Was Removed (27362 Views)
If Sex Is World Cup In Nigeria / The Sex Was Great, Can't Leave Him I'm Confused / If Sex Was To ....... (2) (3) (4)
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (Reply) (Go Down)
Would Relationships Survive If "Sex" Was Removed by Nobody: 1:56pm On Mar 06, 2015 |
A lot of people would testify that sex is indeed a crucial catalyst for relationship growth. Both in budding relationships, courtship and marriages Its natures generous gift, which when opened releases pleasurable and ecstatic feelings, catapulting both participants to new realms of romance But what of if this act of love making wasn't in existence in the first place. Let forget about the past and bring this home to our current social setting. Its an obvious fact that in our present social society,sex is a very critical factor in the formation and breakdown of most relationships Women have left their lovers for others all in the name of sex. Most couples have ignored all negative behavioral traits exhibited by their partners just because of the rare sexual satisfaction they obtain when they indulge in intercourse. So to my question again. What if this precious element was erased form the table of "relationship" What if their was nothing like "'sex''? Would relationships still stand. Will couples still experience "love". Would the rate of celibacy increase? Would humans still decide to spend the rest of their lives with the opposite gender? As for me, I think the famous titanic disaster of that fateful April morning on the deep seas of cold Atlantic would be a mere fiasco, if compared to the rate at which most relationships and marriages would capsize So Nairalanders, what do you think? Would relationships and marriages still stand? Would you still love and continue with your partners? 5 Likes |
Re: Would Relationships Survive If "Sex" Was Removed by falconey(m): 1:58pm On Mar 06, 2015 |
Yes and money,What will be the fun then? #I dedicate this land to MARCH4BUHARI. #to all the strippers out there. #and to my lovely irresistable bilikisu. 43 Likes 2 Shares |
Re: Would Relationships Survive If "Sex" Was Removed by lirusehn(m): 1:58pm On Mar 06, 2015 |
AmALilgodSoDontQuoteMe: |
Re: Would Relationships Survive If "Sex" Was Removed by Sugardiva(f): 1:59pm On Mar 06, 2015 |
Mine would. 4 Likes |
Re: Would Relationships Survive If "Sex" Was Removed by Cutehector(m): 2:03pm On Mar 06, 2015 |
U guys mk sex look like smth one is priviliged to get. 3 Likes |
Re: Would Relationships Survive If "Sex" Was Removed by steppin: 2:04pm On Mar 06, 2015 |
If sex is not involved, something else would replace it. There must be something else. 28 Likes |
Re: Would Relationships Survive If "Sex" Was Removed by Nobody: 2:07pm On Mar 06, 2015 |
Will never be...cant live without....s*x is like a mobile...life is incomplete without it... 13 Likes |
Re: Would Relationships Survive If "Sex" Was Removed by Enegod(m): 2:07pm On Mar 06, 2015 |
![]() |
Re: Would Relationships Survive If "Sex" Was Removed by Nobody: 2:11pm On Mar 06, 2015 |
Enegod:Don't you ever make reasonable contributions instead of just using smileys? 14 Likes 2 Shares |
Re: Would Relationships Survive If "Sex" Was Removed by lirusehn(m): 2:13pm On Mar 06, 2015 |
7 Likes |
Re: Would Relationships Survive If "Sex" Was Removed by falconey(m): 2:13pm On Mar 06, 2015 |
missjenna:I think the smiley is reasonable LOL. 2 Likes |
Re: Would Relationships Survive If "Sex" Was Removed by Nobody: 2:14pm On Mar 06, 2015 |
yes with money and bj ![]() ![]() 1 Like |
Re: Would Relationships Survive If "Sex" Was Removed by Cutehector(m): 2:14pm On Mar 06, 2015 |
prettythicksme: ![]() 4 Likes |
Re: Would Relationships Survive If "Sex" Was Removed by Enegod(m): 2:16pm On Mar 06, 2015 |
missjenna:Why no sex at all? Did her mouth fall off? Is that reasonable enough? Now screw you!!! ![]() 7 Likes |
Re: Would Relationships Survive If "Sex" Was Removed by Nobody: 2:17pm On Mar 06, 2015 |
Cutehector:werin happen ![]() |
Re: Would Relationships Survive If "Sex" Was Removed by ronald4lif(m): 2:19pm On Mar 06, 2015 |
Relationship without sex won't make any sense, totally useless. ![]() 5 Likes |
Re: Would Relationships Survive If "Sex" Was Removed by Cutehector(m): 2:21pm On Mar 06, 2015 |
prettythicksme:lol divorce ur husband and marry me ![]() |
Re: Would Relationships Survive If "Sex" Was Removed by Nobody: 2:22pm On Mar 06, 2015 |
Enegod: Why is he angry again? ![]() 3 Likes |
Re: Would Relationships Survive If "Sex" Was Removed by tosyne2much(m): 2:23pm On Mar 06, 2015 |
It won't make sense at all.. Talking outside religion, I think many of our ladies don't totally submit especially when they are in NO sex relationships mainly because there's no sexual attachment Sex is the only restriction between friends, so when sex is taken out of relationships you are not in any way different from ordinary friends To each his own opinion ![]() 25 Likes |
Re: Would Relationships Survive If "Sex" Was Removed by stillchris: 2:24pm On Mar 06, 2015 |
The thing is that if you are to remove sex, you will also remove romance/intimacy because romance/intimacy is what eruots the temptation of sexual desire for partner. meaning... no kissing, smooshing... nothing. just talk. what's a relationship without intimacy? me no fit bear am o. i'd rather just be friends with you then propose when i'm sure it's you than go through all that ish no matter how much i feel about you. imagine going through all that with a girl who's not that into you... omo mehn, dat na long tin o. 4 Likes |
Re: Would Relationships Survive If "Sex" Was Removed by Nobody: 2:25pm On Mar 06, 2015 |
Cutehector:money cant buy the love i have for him,his part of me already and i wont want him missing in my life ![]() 2 Likes |
Re: Would Relationships Survive If "Sex" Was Removed by Cutehector(m): 2:30pm On Mar 06, 2015 |
prettythicksme:eya. Awww. If only so many wives could be like you. |
Re: Would Relationships Survive If "Sex" Was Removed by Enegod(m): 2:33pm On Mar 06, 2015 |
rubey:why won't she mind her business? ![]() Oh!! I thought it was a rhetorical question. I was rhetorically adding to it. ![]() 6 Likes |
Re: Would Relationships Survive If "Sex" Was Removed by deskossy(m): 2:37pm On Mar 06, 2015 |
1 Like |
Re: Would Relationships Survive If "Sex" Was Removed by Nobody: 2:37pm On Mar 06, 2015 |
Enegod: Talk to the fingers! ![]() 2 Likes |
Re: Would Relationships Survive If "Sex" Was Removed by henribj(m): 2:38pm On Mar 06, 2015 |
could you stop talking about that which can not be changed? and rather talk about that which can be changed. imagine spending/wasting time on the impossible. 1 Like |
Re: Would Relationships Survive If "Sex" Was Removed by Fatalveli(m): 2:38pm On Mar 06, 2015 |
Cutehector:Privilege 1 Like |
Re: Would Relationships Survive If "Sex" Was Removed by Enegod(m): 2:44pm On Mar 06, 2015 |
rubey:take it! ![]() 6 Likes
|
Re: Would Relationships Survive If "Sex" Was Removed by Nobody: 2:44pm On Mar 06, 2015 |
deskossy:nah just say my mind ![]() |
Re: Would Relationships Survive If "Sex" Was Removed by Qualer: 2:45pm On Mar 06, 2015 |
KashyBaby: mmmmmhhhhhhh! *stroking goatee - slowly*. you just aroused my keen interest... |
Re: Would Relationships Survive If "Sex" Was Removed by Nobody: 2:46pm On Mar 06, 2015 |
Re: Would Relationships Survive If "Sex" Was Removed by Psalmwise(m): 2:47pm On Mar 06, 2015 |
Fatalveli ![]() Anyways have you updated ![]() #Platonic relationship... Any bae here |
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (Reply)
28-Year-Old Japanese Man Marries A Pillow! / True Meaning Of "Bae" And "Boo"(research) / Girls Can Call Themselves Pet Names But Guys Cant?
(Go Up)
Sections: politics (1) business autos (1) jobs (1) career education (1) romance computers phones travel sports fashion health religion celebs tv-movies music-radio literature webmasters programming techmarket Links: (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) Nairaland - Copyright © 2005 - 2024 Oluwaseun Osewa. All rights reserved. See How To Advertise. 26 |