Hehehehehehehe! Goodnight gentlemen and ladies.

dapsy06:


Thanks but chosed is a perfect tense for chose. I know what I wrote.

Accept it whenever you are corrected.

Choose-Chose-Chosen

The word you referred to 'chosed' didn't scale even Thesaurus dictionary.

Pls accept n move on, we all make mistakes as humans.

Badema:


Accept it whenever you are corrected.

Choose-Chose-Chosen

The word you referred to 'chosed' didn't scale even Thesaurus dictionary.

Pls accept n move on, we all make mistakes as humans.

The Msc fella can't be corrected. Chosed is cool

Eruditor:


5. There were 3 solutions to the aforementioned problems. a) PSC b) Concessionaire Arrangement c) joint entity. B and C are beyond what is being discussed, so I would talk about only A.

6. PSC is a variant of the JV and it was introduced from 1991 FOR ALL NEW ACREAGES. The major disparity between it and a JV is that in the latter, FG takes 60% of the risk and expenses but in a PSC FG only comes in after the exploration exercise.

7. This implies that all the risks and expenses are shouldered by the MNC until commercial quantities of crude are discovered then FG signs a PSC with the MNC. Now you can see why that talk of 60:40 in ALL E and P activities is vacuous and false. No sensible company will give FG 60% in a PSC for example knowing that FG shouldered a lesser risk. On the flipside, no responsible FG will demand 60% in such an agreement as it would scare off investors.

8. Crude from a PSC are divided into 3 ways: i) cost oil ii) tax oil iii) profit oil.

i) is the cost the company incurred while prospecting and producing. FG lets them make their investment back.
ii) is the fraction from which the MNCs pay their taxes and royalties.
iii) is now the profit aspect of the crude and this is where FG can get a chunk, say 60% of the value.

Cummulatively, one can see that the OVERALL FGs stake cannot be 60%. Also, take note that not all MNCs or indigenous companies use a JV with NNPC. So it is very fallacious for anyone to claim that FG gets 60% of all crude produced.

Proving nothing upon nothing. Fed govt is to contribute a certain % and also share profit according to the % which the contribut, den of wat benefit is it to federal govt dat own the crude oil? A case study I will give u to read about is the otakikpo maginal oil field, find out if federal govt is contributing to that project and the % which lekoil who financing the project has in dat Field. U don't need to speak grammer to proof point

UGLYS:


The Msc fella can't be corrected. Chosed is cool

LOL!!! Age is not a sign of maturity and youthfulness is not a sign of innovation. We are humans ooo! I am not supernatural, perhaps the MSc fella is!

Badema:


Accept it whenever you are corrected.

Choose-Chose-Chosen

The word you referred to 'chosed' didn't scale even Thesaurus dictionary.

Pls accept n move on, we all make mistakes as humans.

My brother or is it sis, I'm very gracious in defeat and would gladly accept when I'm wrong. You just referred to the present, past and past participle of choose. Run down through your note on tenses and you would find what we call a perfect tense.

babacha:


Proving nothing upon nothing. Fed govt is to contribute a certain % and also share profit according to the % which the contribut, den of wat benefit is it to federal govt dat own the crude oil? A case study I will give u to read about is the otakikpo maginal oil field, find out if federal govt is contributing to that project and the % which lekoil who financing the project has in dat Field. U don't need to speak grammer to proof point

You conspicuously avoided as if suffering from myopia to see clearly that Hyson sees itself as a partner to NNPC even if you claim otherwise.

@ Badema, only God is supernatural. Not even in my biggest dreams will I claim to be one. I learn everyday and will not stop learning till I die. However, I know my equals and I also know my mentors so pls don't drag me into another issue.

dapsy06:


My brother or is it sis, I'm very gracious in defeat and would gladly accept when I'm wrong. You just referred to the present, past and past participle of choose. Run down through your note on tenses and you would find what we call a perfect tense.

Well said! By the way am Male.

On a quick one, weda indicative, subjunctive or conditional, there is not a perfect tense as 'chosed' weda as a future perfect tense, present perfect, continous perfect, imperfect or pluperfect tense.

I see no reason why you would be so mean! We meet to path as we can path to meet once more, it's just some guys sharing here! Dats all.

Badema:


You conspicuously avoided as if suffering from myopia to see clearly that Hyson sees itself as a partner to NNPC even if you claim otherwise.

Be smart bro, I didn't have to reply that. You don't need common sense to tell you that it's an nnpc interview, nnpc classifies them as a subsidiary. Therefore when faced with such a question, you list them as such. The day you go for hyson interview you can tell them they are partners with nnpc. Got the msg dumb?

[quote author=dapsy06 post=31627517]@ Badema, only God is supernatural. Not even in my biggest dreams will I claim to be one. I learn everyday and will not stop learning till I die. However, I know my equals and I also know my mentors so pls don't drag me into another issue.


OK.

dapsy06:


Be smart bro, I didn't have to reply that. You don't need common sense to tell you that it's an nnpc interview, nnpc classifies them as a subsidiary. Therefore when faced with such a question, you list them as such. The day you go for hyson interview you can tell them they are partners with nnpc. Got the msg dumb?

Wonderful, I guess you must be sleepy! That message again wasn't yours! Pls lets not make it rusty d cordial relationship we share here! I respect you and ur sense of humour. Goodnight

*throwing iceblocks at people dat need to chill*

Badema:


Well said! By the way am Male.

On a quick one, weda indicative, subjunctive or conditional, there is not a perfect tense as 'chosed' weda as a future perfect tense, present perfect, continous perfect, imperfect or pluperfect tense.

I see no reason why you would be so mean! We meet to path as we can path to meet once more, it's just some guys sharing here! Dats all.

Just a few examples to help u.


Katharina Mischer chosed an endangered Austrian fungi species and translated them into a limited design edition.

Fly Shelf with a Projection Screen Integrated
Labour have apparently chosed Chris Ostrowski to be their candidate in Norwich North.
Labour select Norwich North candidate

In a move that drew scant attention -- unlike the selection of Rick Warren to give the inaugural invocation -- Barack Obama has chosed Sharon Watkins, head of the Christian Church Disciples of Christ, to deliver the sermon at a national prayer service the day after the inauguration.
RELIGION Blog | dallasnews.com

As people mention the 18 million voters for Clinton, how about the rest of the voters who chosed the other candidate?
Clinton advisor blames strategy disagreements, money for loss


You can research for more online if you wish.

Badema:


Wonderful, I guess you must be sleepy! That message again wasn't yours! Pls lets not make it rusty d cordial relationship we share here! I respect you and ur sense of humour. Goodnight

I'm sorry if I hurt ur feelings but next time pls scrutinize your words especially when it concerns me. One love and I wish you the best in the forthcoming interview. Gudnyt.

dapsy06:


Just a few examples to help u.


Katharina Mischer chosed an endangered Austrian fungi species and translated them into a limited design edition.

Fly Shelf with a Projection Screen Integrated
Labour have apparently chosed Chris Ostrowski to be their candidate in Norwich North.
Labour select Norwich North candidate

In a move that drew scant attention -- unlike the selection of Rick Warren to give the inaugural invocation -- Barack Obama has chosed Sharon Watkins, head of the Christian Church Disciples of Christ, to deliver the sermon at a national prayer service the day after the inauguration.
RELIGION Blog | dallasnews.com

As people mention the 18 million voters for Clinton, how about the rest of the voters who chosed the other candidate?
Clinton advisor blames strategy disagreements, money for loss


You can research for more online if you wish.

Sorry don't feel offended but kindly extend ur research to a higher level, 'Chosed' is not in any form definitive. Even where you got those examples stated clearly 'chosed' is not in anyway a perfect tense for choose, chose or chosen.

Gudnyt bro!

softrise:
i dnt really believe in that zoning/quota system because there is no way they cn employ sb dat is nt qualified leaving-out the qualified one's in the name of quota system or wat hv u.

dapsy06:


You should prepare very hard to be the best in your state if you want to join NNPC. You've reached the stage where people are taken based on the quota for their state. Its now a race between you and other candidates from your state, so if it is 2 candidates per state, try to be amongst the 2. It's been like that for decades cos that's the only way some states won't feel marginalized. If you are from places like the north east, you stand a better chance. I would say you should pray for favour as well because just one person on that panel can be the difference between you getting the job and you coming back for information on this thread next year. I wish you the best.

Thank you "Dapsy06" for helping me to explain to softrise the quota system disbelief.

dapsy06:


My brother or is it sis, I'm very gracious in defeat and would gladly accept when I'm wrong. You just referred to the present, past and past participle of choose. Run down through your note on tenses and you would find what we call a perfect tense.

Learn to accept corrections sir!

The way all of you are attacking dapsy06, I think I might have to take sides. He has actually given examples to buttress his point yet you're all proving to be stubborn. Dapsy06, ride on. They are nowhere near your level.

prelinctus:
The way all of you are attacking dapsy06, I think I might have to take sides. He has actually given examples to buttress his point yet you're all proving to be stubborn. Dapsy06, ride on. They are nowhere near your level.

Lol! Nothing like Chosed....
Type it in your phone and see Whether autoeditor Will not correct it..
Check all online dictionaries...

prelinctus:
The way all of you are attacking dapsy06, I think I might have to take sides. He has actually given examples to buttress his point yet you're all proving to be stubborn. Dapsy06, ride on. They are nowhere near your level.

This is epic! You speak fluent sarcasm.

Coldplay007:


Lol! Nothing like Chosed....
Type it in your phone and see Whether autoeditor Will not correct it..
Check all online dictionaries...

You didn't get him. He was being sarcastic.

babacha:


Proving nothing upon nothing. Fed govt is to contribute a certain % and also share profit according to the % which the contribut, den of wat benefit is it to federal govt dat own the crude oil? A case study I will give u to read about is the otakikpo maginal oil field, find out if federal govt is contributing to that project and the % which lekoil who financing the project has in dat Field. U don't need to speak grammer to proof point

All I do is cast pearls. I don't expect the Pigs to like it.

When someone else with some modicum of decorum asks me this question, I will gleefully oblige. Till then, stay ignorant.

DouglasHoc:
Let this thread rest until after the elections. So far so good; nothing learnt from the thread

Dude try the "Unfollow button" believe me, it works

Eruditor:

All I do is cast pearls. I don't expect the Pigs to like it.
When someone else with some modicum of decorum asks me this question, I will gleefully oblige. Till then, stay ignorant.

You are definitely Ramsay Snow... Oh! Forget that. You've proven yourself, you're a Bolton now. Ramsay Bolton

May God help us all. Amen

Barby101:


It's 'chose' though.

That was a near - flawless write - up. However, you chose to pick on the only error, inconsequential albeit. Na ur type dem dey call PhD (Pull Him Down ).

justkaycee1:


That was a near - flawless write - up. However, you chose to pick on the only error, inconsequential albeit. Na ur type dem dey call PhD (Pull Him Down ).

LOL. I have no words for you. But if you followed the thread before then, you would have noticed he was calling people out for grammatical errors. So I only did that to show that no one is perfect.

dapsy06:


You should prepare very hard to be the best in your state if you want to join NNPC. You've reached the stage where people are taken based on the quota for their state. Its now a race between you and other candidates from your state, so if it is 2 candidates per state, try to be amongst the 2. It's been like that for decades cos that's the only way some states won't feel marginalized. If you are from places like the north east, you stand a better chance. I would say you should pray for favour as well because just one person on that panel can be the difference between you getting the job and you coming back for information on this thread next year. I wish you the best.

alright i understand, but do you think the quota/zoning system will be used while inviting people for the interview, as in, 20 pple per each state as the case may be. After which they recruit 5 per each state? Secondly, dnt u think it might be by region. Take 4 example, 100 persons per region?

I passed the aptitude test but not interested in the job..
Any possibility of selling my interview slot?

justkaycee1:

That was a near - flawless write - up. However, you chose to pick on the only error, inconsequential albeit. Na ur type dem dey call PhD (Pull Him Down ).

So it is not 'chosed' and it was an error? I thought...Never mind

Coldplay007:
I passed the aptitude test but not interested in the job..
Any possibility of selling my interview slot?

Shut up.