Pr0ton:


Naa Bro. I won't accept the bolded. Most of what we enjoy today originate from Science. Take the internet for example; your mobile phone; laptop? Video games?



Agreed. But bring it into the academic context; between art student and science student, which is more intelligent?

SagePerv:
True.
Arts students are just there to memorise.
That's why we are way more smarter.

As an art students before you were born , I will tell you categorically and factually that its a grammatical blunder to say 'more smarter'.. You cannot use two comparative adjectives ok? ' more' is comparative adjective and so is 'smarter'.. So the right grammar is ' smarter'' OK?
Now, who is smarter and more brilliant? Art or science students? That should blow your theory to hell...

bodeoni:
I don't think there is any level at which you can compare both fields. Art is more about expression and creation while science focuses on discovery and application. Some of the worlds smartest folks were/are in the arts e.g the likes of mozart, bethoven etc.
If I were to answer your question, I would say NO cos like I said earlier, the folks in art seek to create new stuff, while the science folks mostly discover what already exsists and then seek to modify it. I do not think that a science student would do better in arts tho, he/she will most likely perform worse. The art student on the other hand might just trump the science student if he/she ventures into science.

Pr0ton:


If they are both equally extra-ordinary committed... You think their IQ will still be the same?

Pr0ton:


Did I assert that?

Justfollowit:

In university, it is different

I think the sciences memorize more, their courses are straightforward. But the Arts have to actually think, analyze and memorize. The absence of these screams failure.


Regardless, we also end up administrating over you

Pr0ton:
This had been a long seemingly never-ending argument back then in secondary school. However, the surpassing notion was that if a science student resorted to being an art student he would be more intelligent than the-normal-art-student.

The reason we had was that it is arbitrary normal for science students to have higher IQ than art students, so the brain a science would be using for Art would definitely be more intellingently complex compared to the-normal-art-student.

What do you think?

Pr0ton:
This had been a long seemingly never-ending argument back then in secondary school. However, the surpassing notion was that if a science student resorted to being an art student he would be more intelligent than the-normal-art-student.

The reason we had was that it is arbitrary normal for science students to have higher IQ than art students, so the brain a science would be using for Art would definitely be more intellingently complex compared to the-normal-art-student.

What do you think?

Wefiak1414:
the senior lecturer is the house. I lectures every 6times a week. 3 times a day. Morning, afternoon and evening. I dealt severely with BPH, CHE, etc anything that has to do with school of sciences. Do u what it takes to fill a basket with water. Then counting sand one by one. Greatest science students.

Pr0ton:


If that
's your claim, know that those guys were actually doing science. And remember what science is before replying.



and just like I'm trying to say, bring it into the academic context. Art or Science student?

Justfollowit:

In university, it is different

I think the sciences memorize more, their courses are straightforward. But the Arts have to actually think, analyze and memorize. The absence of these screams failure.


Regardless, we also end up administrating over you

lordthree:

you're on point, infact your head details dia

I'd like to see a science student try doing political science or law by the time you have to analyze certain issues eh.
imagine when all your exams end with "discuss " or start with "critically examine" imagine when writing three pages during an exam gets you a B and you need Atleast 4 pages to smell A.

cassyrooy:
Viewing this topic: hardbody,
lovetterrison(m), ikes9(m),
mentorseries(m), valuka(m),
Goodnuel(m), kozykid(m),
peteruuu(m), walecho(m),
Humblebloke(m), meldeezyne(f),
teeboy2110(m), jnrremedy(m),
Iyanusele(m), yomijnr(m),
afolabisegun(m), dwightdoctore
(m), Idrismusty97(m), Bigjay2(m),
bmdflo(m), opex044,
princeduke2013, damdemi,
ahadewern, Nokialumia720,
seuncyber(m), wasokay,
udmydearest(f), sweetchi1011,
chinnael(m), jamesbawa(m),
floadesola, Deluxewize(m),
fridpalor, realypostit, Adela10,
Kolade9(m), Bishopking, vipa(m),
xtratagem(m), muhuseen05(m),
hassymo5(m), MrGuruMaraji(m),
fleexee, alimspaul, Alexpissu(m),
bidexmat(m), fine8160, Pebcak,
Fourmatic, LordEmperoris1(m),
chic2pimp(m), Realgana, taven
(m), cesareborgia(m), speeder
(m), Donsammi(m), 1bkaye(f),
elmessi(m), INDUSTRIALFAN(m),
Auxiliary(m), wilson61,
Adebammm(m), jamilunjida(m),
victors123, tommykiwi(m),
ArchEnemy, sunnexity(m),
lomomike(m), datguru,
kemiola89(f), trustedward(m),
hazardous(m), gikicharly(f),
Pr0ton(m), brightcay,
English94(m), may01(f), ukese,
Bonafide9gerian, desmondblaze
(m), HerexG(m), Nmaudu,
blublahd, SagePerv,
johncasey1(m), rajoys,
MISSCONGENIALITY(f),
publicenemy(m), Amefrica(m),
9jainform, joviegghead(m),
Thugnificent(m), ichidodo(m),
Amara25god(m), ednut1,
D9ty7(m) and 106 guest(s)

Wefiak1414:
the senior lecturer is the house. I lectures every 6times a week. 3 times a day. Morning, afternoon and evening. I dealt severely with BPH, CHE, etc anything that has to do with school of sciences. Do u what it takes to fill a basket with water. Then counting sand one by one. Greatest science students.

lordthree:

your use of English is appalling, it's a good thing you stuck with sciences.

Pr0ton:
This had been a long seemingly never-ending argument back then in secondary school. However, the surpassing notion was that if a science student resorted to being an art student he would be more intelligent than the-normal-art-student.

The reason we had was that it is arbitrary normal for science students to have higher IQ than art students, so the brain a science would be using for Art would definitely be more intellingently complex compared to the-normal-art-student.

What do you think?

lordthree:

you're on point, infact your head dey dia

I'd like to see a science student try doing political science or law by the time you have to analyze certain issues eh.
imagine when all your exams end with "discuss " or start with "critically examine" imagine when writing three pages during an exam gets you a B and you need Atleast 4 pages to smell A.

Elxandre:
Let's be honest

Which is easier between trying to understand Einsten's law or broad calculus and trying to understand government concepts for example? Let's not even go further on this.
Imagine adults writing CRK in JAMB.
The same CRK from the same bible we have been reading since infancy?

Even many of brightest of philosophers were scientists in some way.


Anyway, anybody can be intelligent, but the brightest people are most times found in the hardest of tasks.