Giitheon:
x raise to power 4 is equal to 8X...find X..who can try

X=2

Sessyjee:

X=8

no.....its not correction

Giitheon:
no.....its not correction

X=2

Giitheon:
x raise to power 4 is equal to 8X...find X..who can try

x^4- 8x = 0
x( x^3 - 2^3 ) = 0
x=0, x = 2 , (x^2 + 2x + 8 )
.:. x=2

TryAces:


x^4- 8x = 0
x( x^3 - 8 ) = 0
x=0, x = 2 , (x^2 + 2x +
.:. x=2

wronge workings.....bt correct answer.....Hence u are wronge

Sessyjee:

X=2

show ur workings

SadwriTer:
'A' is the answer. (I look forward to) is different from (I'm looking forward to). They have their peculiar rules. You should always respect the rules to be flawless, yea, the rules, always the rules!
I look forward to 'SEEING' is a grammatical sin; it doesn't exist in the gargantuan bowels of english.
You can say thus:
I LOOK FORWARD TO (see) my lover.
Or
I'M LOOKING FORWARD TO (seeing) my lover.

I look forward to SEE you when we resume next semester, is the correct answer.

I dropped a question about connotation and denotation courtesy of Distinguished Freda.
I checked previous pages and saw myriad options that ridiculed the existence of the words; but it's allowed.
Now, according to Eko Umbarto, connotation outside stylistic notion is what may be referred to as contextual implication which could be seen as the remains of the content when denotation is deducted.
Let me explain; when you see a dead man in a scene, your plain deductions can be that that is a dead man: that's denotation.

But another person can scream, 'don't go there! That place is horror itself!': that is connotation because it defines how you express and conclude with what you see.

When a person who doesn't know me well sees me, he can say, look a quiet handsome man. This is denotation. The plain obvious.

But when those that know me better see me, they can say, look, the holy ghost has arrived! (if I was a pastor) this is connotation.

Connotation can indeed be esoteric in many subliminal phenomenons.
Thank you all.
I may not check in soon; I barely have time because work has resumed.

Robinz, take care of Freda.

I miss you all.

Nice one!
If u don't take care of her, who will?...dettol cool

fredalicious:
i can c dat robinhez,pukka,princecalm,tobiee..re hiding theirselves..

Ghost mode! Dem no dey see us

Giitheon:
show ur workings

Hehe.. Nice 1
x^4=8x
x^4- 8x = 0
x( x^3 - 8 ) = 0
x(x^3 - 2^3) = 0)
Substituting, you get
x(x - 2) =cube root of 0
x=0, x = 2 ,
.:. x=2

RobinHez:

Ghost mode! Dem no dey see us

i am not, was busx today.

fredalicious:
i can c dat robinhez,pukka,princecalm,tobiee..re hiding theirselves..

i was busy today.

Sessyjee:

Hehe.. Nice 1
x^4=8x
x^4- 8x = 0
x( x^3 - 8 ) = 0
x(x^3 - 2^3) = 0)
Substituting, you get
x(x - 2) =cube root of 0
x=0, x = 2 ,
.:. x=2

DIS IS THE CORRCT WORKING

I quite disagree with u on that one @ sadwriter
It is wrong to use an infinite verb(verb in its basic form) after a preposition.
The word 'to' here serves as a preposition.
For instance, u can't say; I look forward to take the exams instead u say, I look forward to taking the exams.
So I believe, the right answer is, I look forward to seeing u.
Hope ur work doesn't deprive u from reading?

Marvelchriz:
urgent!!!
please what are the subject combination for mass comm
someone should please reply me
thanks and God bless

U wanna switch to mass comm? From which course?

Godwin10:

You have to score high above 200 in jamb and above 50 in pume and you are good to go...

How high above 200? Is the PUme over 100?

Govt question from Uniben PaQ:
The Presidential Villa in Nigeria is called Aso Rock while the home of the Prime Minister of Great Britain is called.......
A. Capitol
B. White House
C. Don Dan House
D. 10 Downing Street

Sessyjee:
Govt question from Uniben PaQ:
The Presidential Villa in Nigeria is called Aso Rock while the home of the Prime Minister of Great Britain is called.......
A. Capitol
B. White House
C. Don Dan House
D. 10 Downing Street

D

lolzz.....tobiee...nd as 4 u robinz...i wil leave ure matter for pukka to handle..
cnt wait for ha to cum sef

ok..princecalm..
evenin u all..

Geography question from Uniben PaQ:
Which of the following rocks are wrongly paired after metamorphosis?
A. Limestones marble
B. Shale schist
C. Granite Gneisss
D. Quartzite Graphite

fredalicious:
lolzz.....tobiee...nd as 4 u robinz...i wil leave ure matter for pukka to handle..
cnt wait for ha to cum sef

**in my friend's oyinbo** what I do?!

fredalicious:
ok..princecalm..
evenin u all..

how was your day Freda?

Sessyjee:
Geography question from Uniben PaQ:
Which of the following rocks are wrongly paired after metamorphosis?
A. Limestones marble
B. Shale schist
C. Granite Gneisss
D. Quartzite Graphite

Ah!....e don tey wey I do geography o...

Robinz, people that know me well know that I'm not proud; but I won't stoop so low to spending so much time on this piece of 'agidi'. I was almost irritated when I read your post, jeez! If you have an English lecturer, take this matter to him. It's not challenging enough for me to waste time, or betterstill, when you come across such question, do otherwise.
'Cause I don't get it; are you telling me that I'm wrong or that you want more explanation?

If you follow the conventional strategies in english without making dynamic research; you are likely to be less-informed. Knowing the ethics of english should put you in a hall of it's inevitable dynamic modification. In the 17th century as speculated, 'nice' wasn't a compliment; but what is it today?

Or let me hit back with your bone of contention; normally, adjectives qualify nouns. But, do you know I can qualify a now with a noun thus, 'adjectiving' the qualifying noun without any vivid symphonic change, and yet, not commit a grammatical blunder?
If you get a part of speech to prove me wrong, I will open the part of speech and show you its skeleton, and then you will see that I'm right.

Damn! You are talking of an infinite verb, but you are fully neglecting the other features of the context.
Lemme explain this in a lay man way: See, (I want to 'look') (I want to 'looking') compare them. Or is 'to' no longer a preposition?. See, (I look) (I look forward) (I look forward to see). If you observe, there is no present continuous tense here right from the "I".

(I'm 'looking'), (I'm 'looking' forward), (I'm 'looking' forward to 'seeing') I believe you can see what is at stake here throughout. That "I'm" is effective here.

If the question that guy asked that question had started with, (I'm), everything wouldve changed. 'Look' wouldn't have followed subsequently. But it started with "I", so, "look" forward! Don't confuse yourself, Boss.
The right answer is, I LOOK FORWARD TO 'SEE'
............

(I look forward to 'seeing') is a huge crime that can irritate many.



Lol @ur dettol stuff. Take care of Freda jor.

RobinHez:
I quite disagree with u on that one @ sadwriter
It is wrong to use an infinite verb(verb in its basic form) after a preposition.
The word 'to' here serves as a preposition.
For instance, u can't say; I look forward to take the exams instead u say, I look forward to taking the exams.
So I believe, the right answer is, I look forward to seeing u.
Hope ur work doesn't deprive u from reading?

Robinz, people that know me well know that I'm not proud; but I won't stoop so low to spending so much time on this piece of 'agidi'. I was almost irritated when I read your post, jeez! If you have an English lecturer, take this matter to him. It's not challenging enough for me to waste time, or betterstill, when you come across such question, do otherwise.
'Cause I don't get it; are you telling me that I'm wrong or that you want more explanation?

If you follow the conventional strategies in english without making dynamic research; you are likely to be less-informed. Knowing the ethics of english should put you in a hall of it's inevitable dynamic modification. In the 17th century as speculated, 'nice' wasn't a compliment; but what is it today?

Or let me hit back with your bone of contention; normally, adjectives qualify nouns. But, do you know I can qualify a now with a noun thus, 'adjectiving' the qualifying noun without any vivid symphonic change, and yet, not commit a grammatical blunder?
If you get a part of speech to prove me wrong, I will open the part of speech and show you its skeleton, and then you will see that I'm right.

Damn! You are talking of an infinite verb, but you are fully neglecting the other features of the context.
Lemme explain this in a lay man way: See, (I want to 'look') (I want to 'looking') compare them. Or is 'to' no longer a preposition?. See, (I look) (I look forward) (I look forward to see). If you observe, there is no present continuous tense here right from the "I".

(I'm 'looking'), (I'm 'looking' forward), (I'm 'looking' forward to 'seeing') I believe you can see what is at stake here throughout. That "I'm" is effective here.

If the question that guy asked that question had started with, (I'm), everything wouldve changed. 'Look' wouldn't have followed subsequently. But it started with "I", so, "look" forward! Don't confuse yourself, Boss.
The right answer is, I LOOK FORWARD TO 'SEE'
............

(I look forward to 'seeing') is a huge crime that can irritate many.



Lol @ur dettol stuff. Take care of Freda jor.

Princecalm:
how was your day Freda?

we thnk God..hope urz wasnt bad

fredalicious:

we thnk God..hope urz wasnt bad

not at all, ended it playing futbol.

lolz..den hu re u gonna tek care of @ tobiee....pukka sheyy

SadwriTer:
Robinz, people that know me well know that I'm not proud; but I won't stoop so low to spending so much time on this piece of 'agidi'. I was almost irritated when I read your post, jeez! If you have an English lecturer, take this matter to him. It's not challenging enough for me to waste time, or betterstill, when you come across such question, do otherwise.
'Cause I don't get it; are you telling me that I'm wrong or that you want more explanation?

If you follow the conventional strategies in english without making dynamic research; you are likely to be less-informed. Knowing the ethics of english should put you in a hall of it's inevitable dynamic modification. In the 17th century as speculated, 'nice' wasn't a compliment; but what is it today?

Or let me hit back with your bone of contention; normally, adjectives qualify nouns. But, do you know I can qualify a now with a noun thus, 'adjectiving' the qualifying noun without any vivid symphonic change, and yet, not commit a grammatical blunder?
If you get a part of speech to prove me wrong, I will open the part of speech and show you its skeleton, and then you will see that I'm right.

Damn! You are talking of an infinite verb, but you are fully neglecting the other features of the context.
Lemme explain this in a lay man way: See, (I want to 'look') (I want to 'looking') compare them. Or is 'to' no longer a preposition?. See, (I look) (I look forward) (I look forward to see). If you observe, there is no present continuous tense here right from the "I".

(I'm 'looking'), (I'm 'looking' forward), (I'm 'looking' forward to 'seeing') I believe you can see what is at stake here throughout. That "I'm" is effective here.

If the question that guy asked that question had started with, (I'm), everything wouldve changed. 'Look' wouldn't have followed subsequently. But it started with "I", so, "look" forward! Don't confuse yourself, Boss.
The right answer is, I LOOK FORWARD TO 'SEE'
............

(I look forward to 'seeing') is a huge crime that can irritate many.



Lol @ur dettol stuff. Take care of Freda jor.Robinz, people that know me well know that I'm not proud; but I won't stoop so low to spending so much time on this piece of 'agidi'. I was almost irritated when I read your post, jeez! If you have an English lecturer, take this matter to him. It's not challenging enough for me to waste time, or betterstill, when you come across such question, do otherwise.
'Cause I don't get it; are you telling me that I'm wrong or that you want more explanation?

If you follow the conventional strategies in english without making dynamic research; you are likely to be less-informed. Knowing the ethics of english should put you in a hall of it's inevitable dynamic modification. In the 17th century as speculated, 'nice' wasn't a compliment; but what is it today?

Or let me hit back with your bone of contention; normally, adjectives qualify nouns. But, do you know I can qualify a now with a noun thus, 'adjectiving' the qualifying noun without any vivid symphonic change, and yet, not commit a grammatical blunder?
If you get a part of speech to prove me wrong, I will open the part of speech and show you its skeleton, and then you will see that I'm right.

Damn! You are talking of an infinite verb, but you are fully neglecting the other features of the context.
Lemme explain this in a lay man way: See, (I want to 'look') (I want to 'looking') compare them. Or is 'to' no longer a preposition?. See, (I look) (I look forward) (I look forward to see). If you observe, there is no present continuous tense here right from the "I".

(I'm 'looking'), (I'm 'looking' forward), (I'm 'looking' forward to 'seeing') I believe you can see what is at stake here throughout. That "I'm" is effective here.

If the question that guy asked that question had started with, (I'm), everything wouldve changed. 'Look' wouldn't have followed subsequently. But it started with "I", so, "look" forward! Don't confuse yourself, Boss.
The right answer is, I LOOK FORWARD TO 'SEE'
............

(I look forward to 'seeing') is a huge crime that can irritate many.



Lol @ur dettol stuff. Take care of Freda jor.

Ok...u're the boss sha.

*sighs*

Princecalm:
not at all, ended it playing futbol.

Ah! Boss! E don tey wey I play ball o...u na striker?

RobinHez:

Ah! Boss! E don tey wey I play ball o...u na striker?

me na versatile player. Started with striking line but now cooling off with right back.

tobiee..ure rily gud in engling lang oh...
i dnt c any reason why u shud change ure course.
jus stick wit law..use english lang to hype ure score..cus eng carries higher marks.nd more quest