fredalicious:
i guess i no why pukka isnt onlyn..suncription problem..
gnyt..princecalm.robinhez.tobiee.dharay.scourflex.nd inviscible pukka.

RobinHez:

Goodnight! Remember to tell ur Heavenly Father goodnight also b4 u sleep.

MhizEnkay:
How high above 200? Is the PUme over 100?

Princecalm:
me na versatile player. Started with striking line but now cooling off with right back.

Princecalm:
all right, i pray that God holds you tight and Angel keeps you in sight.

RobinHez:

Na u o!...I'm more of a defensive winger myself. But I doubt if I can still kick a ball because e don tey.

RobinHez:

u're quoting d wrong person bro...

SadwriTer:
In my next life, I will be a bandit 'cause I stole your heart which was the greatest thing I had.....
Waking up on your b.reasts each morning was always the preamble of a flawless day...
These are memories that linger in my broken world.

My past has been taken from me. True loneliness is when you have no past.

Gone too soon...

SadwriTer:
Robinz, people that know me well know that I'm not proud; but I won't stoop so low to spending so much time on this piece of 'agidi'. I was almost irritated when I read your post, jeez! If you have an English lecturer, take this matter to him. It's not challenging enough for me to waste time, or betterstill, when you come across such question, do otherwise.
'Cause I don't get it; are you telling me that I'm wrong or that you want more explanation?

If you follow the conventional strategies in english without making dynamic research; you are likely to be less-informed. Knowing the ethics of english should put you in a hall of it's inevitable dynamic modification. In the 17th century as speculated, 'nice' wasn't a compliment; but what is it today?

Or let me hit back with your bone of contention; normally, adjectives qualify nouns. But, do you know I can qualify a now with a noun thus, 'adjectiving' the qualifying noun without any vivid symphonic change, and yet, not commit a grammatical blunder?
If you get a part of speech to prove me wrong, I will open the part of speech and show you its skeleton, and then you will see that I'm right.

Damn! You are talking of an infinite verb, but you are fully neglecting the other features of the context.
Lemme explain this in a lay man way: See, (I want to 'look') (I want to 'looking') compare them. Or is 'to' no longer a preposition?. See, (I look) (I look forward) (I look forward to see). If you observe, there is no present continuous tense here right from the "I".

(I'm 'looking'), (I'm 'looking' forward), (I'm 'looking' forward to 'seeing') I believe you can see what is at stake here throughout. That "I'm" is effective here.

If the question that guy asked that question had started with, (I'm), everything wouldve changed. 'Look' wouldn't have followed subsequently. But it started with "I", so, "look" forward! Don't confuse yourself, Boss.
The right answer is, I LOOK FORWARD TO 'SEE'
............

(I look forward to 'seeing') is a huge crime that can irritate many.



Lol @ur dettol stuff. Take care of Freda jor.Robinz, people that know me well know that I'm not proud; but I won't stoop so low to spending so much time on this piece of 'agidi'. I was almost irritated when I read your post, jeez! If you have an English lecturer, take this matter to him. It's not challenging enough for me to waste time, or betterstill, when you come across such question, do otherwise.
'Cause I don't get it; are you telling me that I'm wrong or that you want more explanation?

If you follow the conventional strategies in english without making dynamic research; you are likely to be less-informed. Knowing the ethics of english should put you in a hall of it's inevitable dynamic modification. In the 17th century as speculated, 'nice' wasn't a compliment; but what is it today?

Or let me hit back with your bone of contention; normally, adjectives qualify nouns. But, do you know I can qualify a now with a noun thus, 'adjectiving' the qualifying noun without any vivid symphonic change, and yet, not commit a grammatical blunder?
If you get a part of speech to prove me wrong, I will open the part of speech and show you its skeleton, and then you will see that I'm right.

Damn! You are talking of an infinite verb, but you are fully neglecting the other features of the context.
Lemme explain this in a lay man way: See, (I want to 'look') (I want to 'looking') compare them. Or is 'to' no longer a preposition?. See, (I look) (I look forward) (I look forward to see). If you observe, there is no present continuous tense here right from the "I".

(I'm 'looking'), (I'm 'looking' forward), (I'm 'looking' forward to 'seeing') I believe you can see what is at stake here throughout. That "I'm" is effective here.

If the question that guy asked that question had started with, (I'm), everything wouldve changed. 'Look' wouldn't have followed subsequently. But it started with "I", so, "look" forward! Don't confuse yourself, Boss.
The right answer is, I LOOK FORWARD TO 'SEE'
............

(I look forward to 'seeing') is a huge crime that can irritate many.



Lol @ur dettol stuff. Take care of Freda jor.

dats it, I hate long note despite hw interesting ds myt b,

I ain't reading ds...too lazy to & not in a gud state of matter.

Princecalm:
so what made you stopped?

Pukka36:
Good morning people.

dharay99:

dats it, I hate long note despite hw interesting ds myt b,
I ain't reading ds...too lazy to & not in a gud state of matter.

dharay99:


dats it, I hate long note despite hw interesting ds myt b,

I ain't reading ds...too lazy to & not in a gud state of matter.

RobinHez:

No opportunities...I became involved in other things that took my time.

fredalicious:
lolzz.....tobiee...nd as 4 u robinz...i wil leave ure matter for pukka to handle..
cnt wait for ha to cum sef

Drdonzeez:
hahaha... How can she CUM. lol.

Princecalm:
that is left for you.

you don't needa telme dat.

SadwriTer:
Hehe... You reserve the right to skip it, man. I Was merely teaching with an elaborate explanation. Albeit, nairaland doubled the wording.

Toyorsih:
whats the jamb cut off mark this year!??

dharay99:


you don't needa telme dat.

Princecalm:
as much as you don't need to say that.

much more as u needa mind ya biz next tym cus i didn't quote u nor tag u in dat post.

dharay99:


much more as u needa mind ya biz next tym cus i didn't quote u nor tag u in dat post.

Princecalm:
you forgot so quickly that you were not quoted i n the long piece you complained of.