shrekandfiona:

In as much as I don't agree with the Op, i totally agree with this post. It's very balanced

FrancisTony:
Too bad, I don't quote rètards.
I'm not here to impress anyone and I stand with my ideology no matter the useless tag I receive.

damiso:


Yes the premise was that females tend to feel more at ease talking about their feelings,share (over share sef )their hurts,trials and issues with others (both on a personal and professional level) than men who feel they need to put up a 'tough macho ' front even though they are suffering inside. Women also generally tend to seek professional help with depression than men.


I know researches are not necessarily always the reflection of wider society or life or exhaustive.But think this one is kinda true.Personally I know more young men who have committed suicide than young women. I don't think a truly happy person will be suicidal so that's I said there was a tad bit of over generalisation in the OP.

coogar:


this comment is bereft of common sense.
someone posted a comment - at least do a rebuttal by presenting a superior argument instead of resorting to ad hominem sniping.

sheesh!

FrancisTony:
Too bad, I don't quote rètards.
I'm not here to impress anyone and I stand with my ideology no matter the useless tag I receive.

Ewuro4:
So lemme get this straight as I can't possibly quote the entire OP, and pls correct my short layman summary if I'm wrong ; So modern day woman's unhappiness nature was because they mumbojumbled men's "God's given duty" with theirs which is to only pop children and cook?

Is that what the 182 back & forth all about?

As a man, I'm guessing you do understand the sense of completeness and accomplishment of your hardwork but what I don't understand is why you want to deny another gender to feel same.

Marriage is not a competition. It's a simple concept of Two heads working TOGETHER. It doesn't matter who rakes the most revenue into the family pot.

I come back from work everyday and yell into thin air 'I Love my life'! , that's how happy I am. My role model is an Alpha male YET would disown me in a flash if I decide to warm couch all day in guise of packing lunchboxes and balancing spreadsheets. I detest it with every molecule in my anatomy. Tuah!

FrancisTony:

This is not the first time i'm arguing with him and don't expect me to be going back and forth.

No time.

lezz:
Of course,men are happy with a family and wife. In fact, the average wants a happy, stable family. Nowhere in my post did I say men do not want a family or aren't happy with one.


Men just aren't fulfilled with kids and family; that is, family and kids is more like the icing in the cake. Unlike the female he is an adventurer, a hunter driven by testosterone to dominate, conquer and to explore in the quest for glory, power and status. Therein lies his ultimate happiness and fulfilment.


In the same way, money, fame and status still give women the thrill but ultimately, she's very unlikely to be happily fulfilled without her kids and a nice home

Women do not spend all their time pursuing glory like so many men, they want to be home with their kids, look beautiful and soft. That's why even though men make much more money than women, women have more pairs of shoes and jewellery than men. Women also spend more shopping time than men.

When I say women, I mean the vast majority of NORMAL women. No one can claim to speak for every single members of the sexes
. After all, some are lesbians, feminists, She-men and subnormal having gender identity crisis

coogar:


and the only way to explain this is by saying you don't quote rëtards?

come on......

Not only are you bemedalled save-a-hoer, you are also fast becoming NL' Main "Fagtivist". Carry go, but you do know you've lost this one - given the array of mature and critically thinking people ranged against you - not to mention Gods truth !

coogar:


tell us what you agreed with in his post......



!

lezz:
Of course,men are happy with a family and wife. In fact, the average wants a happy, stable family.
Men just aren't fulfilled with kids and family; that is, family and kids is more like the icing in the cake. Unlike the female he is an adventurer, a hunter driven by testosterone to dominate, conquer and to explore in the quest for glory, power and status. Therein lies his ultimate happiness and fulfilment.

In the same way, money, fame and status still give women the thrill but ultimately, she's very unlikely to be happily fulfilled without her kids and a nice home
Women do not spend all their time pursuing glory like so many men, they want to be home with their kids,

When I say women, I mean the vast majority of NORMAL women.

. After all, some are lesbians, feminists, She-men and subnormal having gender identity crisis

shrekandfiona:

everything especially the bolded

FrancisTony:
"Weaker Vessel"--An article from Mynd44's blog

https://outlanderspecies./2015/02/22/the-weaker-vessels/#more-110

coogar:


in other words, lesbians/feminists are not normal women?

crackhaus:

That article is a very poor attempt at sounding intellectual, very poor - the best way to misinterpret the scriptures is to try applying logic in its interpretation, and that is what the writer did.

Bro, there are too many things wrong with that article... I would have loved to tear it apart bit by bit, but my fingers ache right now.

^{...no need to tear this one apart bit by bit...the single swipe mauling you gi' am don reesh !}

bukatyne:


@bold true

I can't relate with a lot of these 'researches' jor.

Everyone should do whatever fits them.

shrekandfiona:

lol aiming for equal rights and trying to be equal with the opposite sex are two different things o.

Ewuro4:
So lemme get this straight as I can't possibly quote the entire OP, and pls correct my short layman summary if I'm wrong ; So modern day woman's unhappiness nature was because they mumbojumbled men's "God's given duty" with theirs which is to only pop children and cook?

Is that what the 182 back & forth all about?

As a man, I'm guessing you do understand the sense of completeness and accomplishment of your hardwork but what I don't understand is why you want to deny another gender to feel same.

Marriage is not a competition. It's a simple concept of Two heads working TOGETHER. It doesn't matter who rakes the most revenue into the family pot.

I come back from work everyday and yell into thin air 'I Love my life'! , that's how happy I am. My role model is an Alpha male YET would disown me in a flash if I decide to warm couch all day in guise of packing lunchboxes and balancing spreadsheets. I detest it with every molecule in my anatomy. Tuah!

pickabeau1:
excellent rebuttal crackhaus

Let me call the original writer to debate with you on this

Mynd44

FrancisTony:

You musn't invent bulb or electricity? At least, brag with what you invented not what other men invented. Stop stroking your ego with other people achievements.

^^^This is an argument between Eve and serpent.

^^^Here, he was putting blame on Eve.

damiso:



You are right.

But we need research to progress civilization sha. A lot of advancements that have been made in the world today is down to research.

Scientific and technological research is a bit more conclusive. The social sciences/arts is a bit more open ended. Some 'researches'( especially if funded by a certain lobby group) tend to support the ideology of those who commissioned it . If a liberal left wing group /a conservative right wing group carry out research on a certain topic more often than not the conclusion on the same issue is always vastly different. e.g. If the Daily W(M)ail carries out research on Immigration, it would say immigrants are a drain on UK infrastructure and if The Guardian Carries out a similar one they would say that Immigrants bring a net benefit to the Uk economy.

So sometimes I dey use one kain eye look at some research.

FrancisTony:

1) I'm not effiminate. You can believe whatever you want.

2) Why are homophobes so dumb? On a thread they tell you gays lacked motherly care on another, they would say they have domineering mothers.

Jeez! Stop thinking with your ass, i'm not gay but you can wish to label me anything. I don't care.

3) My grandma wasn't domineering. Not like I grew up with her. Just stayed with her during my primary school days.

4) Oh gawd! Another dumb and rétarded research.


What does it mean, then?


I was citing an example with your silly logic.


Do I need one?


Oh Lord! Who gave this dolt notion that i'm gay?


None of my business.

- Why did Woman has to be a source of our salvation?
- I'm a Catholic and Mary is "theotokos" meaning Mother of God. What position does that place her?


Only Eve was created from the rib of Adam. Other people both men and women of today, were formed from male sperm and female egg.
Meanwhile, Adam and Eve fell and shouldn't be used as an example here - Jesus is the new Adam and Mary is the new Eve.


God needed to know whether Adam would succumb.
Adam showed that he's not strong enough and woman deceived him.


Snake deceived Eve and Eve deceived Adam.
They were both dumb.

Meanwhile, bible has many irregularities, don't think I concur with all passage(s).
I'm more of a theist who believe in some portions of the bible and Jesus.



None of my business


Yahweh was a misogyny in the old testament.

By the way, You need to research about books that was removed from the bible by Emporor Costantine--it reveres women higher than men.

-Book of Mary Magdalene etc



Crass!!!

Mynd44:

I wish I had half the time to reply the so called rebuttal but considering whoever lifted that did it without permission and the genius who wrote the rebuttal did not see the sense (semi serious) nature of the article leaves much to imagination. So much for intelligence these days.

Arguing on NL these days have proven to be a waste of time and most people just don't get it.

*takes another drag of weed*

Mynd44:

I wish I had half the time to reply the so called rebuttal but considering whoever lifted that did it without permission and the genius who wrote the rebuttal did not see the sense (semi serious) nature of the article leaves much to imagination. So much for intelligence these days.

Arguing on NL these days have proven to be a waste of time and most people just don't get it.

*takes another drag of weed*

Mynd44:

I wish I had half the time to reply the so called rebuttal but considering whoever lifted that did it without permission and the genius who wrote the rebuttal did not see the sense (semi serious) nature of the article leaves much to imagination. So much for intelligence these days.

Arguing on NL these days have proven to be a waste of time and most people just don't get it.

*takes another drag of weed*

bukatyne:


I agree that some research bring about advancement especially scientific and technological.

Besides, the OP brought a research conducted in America (no size of the sample population, no measuring index, no period etc.) and brought it to Nigeria where a lot of people are grappling with unemployment and underemployment.

Exactly how we bring AA's problems and try relating it with Nigerian society.

Nigerian women might be 'sadder' than their counterparts 35yrs ago however I will find it extremely difficult that it is because they are climbing the corporate ladder...

The popular ones do not seem sadder as they climb higher

Each to his/her own anyways.

crackhaus:

Lmao... we are not fighting

So the article is semi-serious now, is it? Okay o..

FrancisTony seems to think it's gold


*abeg puff puff pass the weed gimme*

damiso:


Each to his own indeed.

However as I said in my intial post 'sadness' and 'happiness' are highly subjective and fluid states of mind/terms. There was one research that said Nigerians are the happiest people on earth but one week day in Idumota or Oshodi after having been harassed by car par touts and thoroughly insulted by the angry women who feels you disrupted her biscuit stall that was on the pavement that is meant for walking might leave you wondering where all the happy people are However go to a typical owambe on a Saturday and seeing people dance shoki like their lives depended on it would make you see the truth in that revelation .

FrancisTony:
Genesis 3 New International Version (NIV)

3 Now the serpent was more crafty than any of the wild animals the Lord God had made. He said to the woman, “Did God really say, ‘You must not eat from any tree in the garden’? ”

2 The woman said to the serpent, “We may eat fruit from the trees in the garden,

3. but God did say, ‘You must not eat fruit from the tree that is in the middle of the garden, and you must not touch it, or you will die.’”

4 “You will not certainly die,” the serpent said to the woman.

^^^This is an argument between Eve and serpent.

5 “For God knows that when you eat from it your eyes will be opened, and you will be like God, knowing good and evil.”

6 When the woman saw that the fruit of the tree was good for food and pleasing to the eye, and also desirable for gaining wisdom, she took some and ate it. She also gave some to her husband, who was with her, and he ate it.

7 Then the eyes of both of them were opened, and they realized they were naked; so they sewed fig leaves together and made coverings for themselves.

8 Then the man and his wife heard the sound of the Lord God as he was walking in the garden in the cool of the day, and they hid from the Lord God among the trees of the garden.

9 But the Lord God called to the man, “Where are you?”

10 He answered, “I heard you in the garden, and I was afraid because I was naked; so I hid.”

11 And he said, “Who told you that you were naked? Have you eaten from the tree that I commanded you not to eat from? ”

12 The man said, “The woman you put here with me —she gave me some fruit from the tree, and I ate it.”

^^^Here, he was putting blame on Eve.

13 Then the Lord God said to the woman, “What is this you have done?”
The woman said, “The serpent deceived me, and I ate.”

14 So the Lord God said to the serpent, “Because you have done this,
“Cursed are you above all livestock
and all wild animals!
You will crawl on your belly
and you will eat dust
all the days of your life.
15 And I will put enmity
between you and the woman,
and between your offspring [ a ] and hers;
he will crush [ b ] your head,
and you will strike his heel.”


Crackhaus, i'm ready to learn where in this bible verse that Adam fell because of love he had for Eve.

Thanks