Welcome, Guest: Register On Nairaland / LOGIN! / Trending / Recent / NewStats: 3,207,687 members, 7,999,956 topics. Date: Monday, 11 November 2024 at 05:36 PM |
Nairaland Forum / Entertainment / Sports / Opinion: Why Mayweather Vs Pacquiao Isn't The Biggest Fight Of All-time (1045 Views)
Nigerian AnthonyJoshua vs Wladimir Klitschko Might Be The Biggest Fight Of 2017 / Floyd Mayweather Vs Manny Pacquiao - Boxing / Mayweather-Manny: The Biggest Fight In Boxing History Is Set For May 2 (2) (3) (4)
Opinion: Why Mayweather Vs Pacquiao Isn't The Biggest Fight Of All-time by SuperSuave(m): 10:30am On May 02, 2015 |
Floyd Mayweather vs. Manny Pacquiao is going to be a tremendous sporting event, accompanied with as much hype as anything we’ll see this year outside of the Super Bowl. It’ll be a reason to get together with your buddies, drink some beers, smoke some cigars and maybe place a wager or two. But don’t buy into the hype that’s surrounding this bout: Mayweather-Pacquiao isn’t the biggest fight of all time. Frankly, it’s not even close. In 1971, Muhammad Ali fought Joe Frazier in what was justifiably called “The Fight of the Century.” Ali had been stripped of his title during his three-year suspension for his refusal to serve in the military. In that time, a Philadelphia bruiser named Joe Frazier took over the belt, waiting for Ali’s suspension to be lifted so he could prove that he wasn’t some unjust usurper of the title, but a worthy holder of the belt. Once Ali was allowed to fight again, the bout was set. Ali fought two warm-up fights against tomato cans in late-1970 before meeting Frazier at Madison Square Garden. It was just your average fight between two undefeated heavyweight champions, one with the belt, the other with the rightful claim to the belt. There was the air of racial politics hanging over the proceedings and pre-bout trash talk that hit at the core of the black and white divide in America. Ali had called Frazier an “Uncle Tom,” a phony distinction and declaration of mental warfare that Frazier would resent until his dying day. Both men were under 30 years old and in their prime. They’d be fighting at the most hallowed arena of all, Madison Square Garden. Sports had never seen anything like it and never will again. For all the love shown toward Ali today, he was as polarizing a figure back then as there’s ever been. How you felt about his decision to forego the draft and join the Nation of Islam was a political statement of your own. Did you call him Cassius or Muhammad? Was he a criminal or a hero? The country was divided. In March of 1971, there was no middle ground. You had to take a side. This was a fight that transcended sport. It took place in front of a circus-like crowd that included dozens of Hollywood stars and Frank Sinatra taking pictures for Life magazine. To this day, sportswriters in attendance say it was the most electric atmosphere in sports. The hype didn’t match the action however as Frazier, a 2/1 favorite, won an anticlimactic decision. Three years later they would fight again, with no title on the line but with just as much hype. Ali won that fight and the right to face the new heavyweight champion, George Foreman. The argument could be made that the buildup for the Rumble In The Jungle was even bigger than for Ali-Frazier. I, given the African location, the massive outdoor stadium, the 4 a.m. ET start time, the month-long delay in the fight after a Foreman injury and the fact that almost no one was giving the 32-year-old Ali a chance to beat the younger, harder-hitting Foreman. But it’s hard to judge the hype, because this fight exceeded it, with Ali employing the rope-a-dope as thousands of Zairians yelled “Ali bomaye” (“Ali, kill him”). Ali, of course, pulled the upset to regain the title. The rubber match with Frazier (the Thrilla in Manila) also exceeded any sort of hype you’ll see today and ended with the referee stopping the fight before the final round due to Frazier’s condition, with rumors abounding that Ali had told his trainers to cut off his gloves because of his own struggles. He would later say he was close to dying. So remember that when you’re shelling out $99.95 on Saturday night to watch two men who delayed fighting for years due to bickering over money and drug testing and only came together in the name of that universal language: cash. Remember those final minutes of the Thrilla in Manila when Mayweather and Pacquiao clutch each other for 12 rounds. Keep it in the back of your mind that Ali was banned for three years because of his stance as a conscientious objector, making the nonsense that held up Mayweather-Pacquiao completely trivial. Oh sure, you’ll hear the numbers to back up the specious claim that Saturday’s fight is the biggest, with the purse, pay-per view buys and ticket price used as supporting evidence. And while it’s true this fight will be the biggest grossing fight in boxing history, that information is next to worthless. This is about way more than numbers. It’s about the sport itself, which is a shell of its former self and carries none of the relevance it had 25 years ago, not to mention 50 years ago when it only trailed baseball and maybe horse racing as America’s sport. Most of the people buying the fight on Saturday will have a single interaction with boxing all year, the same way they’ll have one interaction with horse racing, which just so happens to be earlier in the day with the Kentucky Derby. These are both dead sports. Events that occasionally cause them to come up grasping for air can’t change that. The tremendous, Oscar-winning documentary about Ali and Foreman’s Rumble in the Jungle is titled When We Were Kings. There are no kings anymore in boxing, simply jesters and old men desperate enough to put aside their petty differences in search of a payday. [url]ftw.usatoday.com/2015/05/floyd-mayweather-manny-pacquiao-biggest-fight-ever-all-time-muhammad-ali-joe-frazier-jungle-manilla-not-close[/url]
|
Re: Opinion: Why Mayweather Vs Pacquiao Isn't The Biggest Fight Of All-time by donbenie(m): 4:52pm On May 02, 2015 |
Nobody is saying it's the greatest fight of all time,at least it hasn't been fought yet,but it is acknowledged as the Biggest(RICHEST) of all time,that in concrete monetary terms is a fact nobody can wish away.. |
Re: Opinion: Why Mayweather Vs Pacquiao Isn't The Biggest Fight Of All-time by SuperSuave(m): 6:51pm On May 02, 2015 |
donbenie:hmmm |
Re: Opinion: Why Mayweather Vs Pacquiao Isn't The Biggest Fight Of All-time by aboyaji(m): 10:03pm On May 02, 2015 |
You mean am? After all the unkept copy and paste?
|
(1) (Reply)
BABAYARO BEGS NFF: Strip Enyeama Of Captaincy / Alex Iwobi's Father On Son's Rapid Rise /
(Go Up)
Sections: politics (1) business autos (1) jobs (1) career education (1) romance computers phones travel sports fashion health religion celebs tv-movies music-radio literature webmasters programming techmarket Links: (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) Nairaland - Copyright © 2005 - 2024 Oluwaseun Osewa. All rights reserved. See How To Advertise. 20 |