jonaji:
Very Creative I tell you.... So students in the house.... You can use it to challenge ur teachers

10²-10² IS NOT = (10+10)(10-10)


na there u miss road mr mathematican

This is bullshit and very wrong.

wonda26:

10^2 - 10^2 = (10 + 10)(10-10) is very correct.

In mathematics, it is called 'Difference of two squares'


If you doubt, try simplifying the right hand side of the equation

You guys are right.....the OP is creative.
Because, basically, a^2 - b^2 = [ a + b ][ a - b ]

Why must he use 100 - 100? If 5-5, will the answer be same?
The whole thing is absolutely wrong.

Against logic... Against sense.... Against morality.... Against APC

The OP failed the rule of bodmas by diving (10-10) by (10-10). You re expected to treat items in brackets first before division

That Mathematician had better be on psychiatric evaluation.

You keep saying he used difference of two squares but you still can't see his error.
a^2~b^2 but look at his equation.a and b are not two different entities.what you have is a=b because 10=10.
So he applied the ''difference of two squares" wrongly.

Boy I am so enjoying this thread. Cant remember enjoying one this much in a looong time

quickly:



10²-10² IS NOT = (10+10)(10-10)


na there u miss road mr mathematican

You are the one that doesn't know basic algebra.
a^2 - b^2 = [ a + b ] [ a - b ]

where a^2 - b^2 is '' a squared minus b squared.''
So, expand the brackets and solve.

wonda26:
10^2 - 10^2 = (10 + 10)(10-10) is very correct.
In mathematics, it is called 'Difference of two squares'

If you doubt, try simplifying the right hand side of the equation

kudos 2 u jare,

soe:
i understand your problrm. Thats why you are a dullard

and you are a waste of time...

btw...whats the meaning of dullard..

THUNDER FIRE YOUR WHITE-MIND....

i dont understand mathematics...the only thing i know from history is,our ancestors believe that 0 is a number too...

jonaji:
Very Creative I tell you.... So students in the house.... You can use it to challenge ur teachers

10^2-10^2 is not = (10+10)(10-10)
the 1st =100-100 and 2nd=200-200

(am talkin'bout da 3rd and 4th step)

op,we gonna sue u,oo

I'm no mathematician but even me can attest that this is wrong. OP pls stop misleading our already dull students

cupid1:
He started failing it from the point where he struck out 10 and -10,the 10 on top is supposed to equate to -1 when divided by -1 which when put into the equation, will give you 19/10.
And secondly, you cant stricke out numbers that way. They are in brackets in their own different equations i.e an equation in an equation.
So my point is, the person who provided this so called 'proof' is a dullard

You need to go back and learn. You don't understand what you are talking about at all

To God i no understand maths to save my life

jonaji:
Very Creative I tell you.... So students in the house.... You can use it to challenge ur teachers

Mathematically correct! But can also be proved to be equal 1 or 1/2

emekachimek:


The guy has succeeded in deceiving u too. -b^2 means -b x -b which will always give u a positive value. He ignored the sign before the 100 which is never done

are you alright??

-b^2 means -b x -b ? Like seriously

Gush i don't even know what to say again.

Listen

(-b)^2 is different from -b^2

(-b)^2. Means -b x -b
While
-b^2 means -1 x b x b. Meaning. -(b^2)

Sad for u

lagbaja:
The OP failed the rule of bodmas by diving (10-10) by (10-10). You re expected to treat items in brackets first before division

d rule he/she observed there is more dominant ova bodmas rule

emekachimek:
Referring to the numerator, -10 x 10 is not equal to -10^2 as written by the Mathematician. Instead, -10 x 10 = -100 while -10^2 = +100. The numerator says 100-100 not 100+100. Therefore the so called Mathematician is so wrong that he needs to get this off before small children see it and get confused

You know next to nothing in Mathematics. Check the above thoroughly and agree to it.

Simply admit it!

theunusualmoon:
You keep saying he used difference of two squares but you still can't see his error.
a^2~b^2 but look at his equation.a and b are not two different entities.what you have is a=b because 10=10.
So he applied the ''difference of two squares" wrongly.

So, what if a = 10 and b = 10 ?

It is called "Thinking outside the box".Mathematics is an important tool for engineering designs. An innovator can use simple mathematically models to design anything he or she wants and one mathematical model can solve many design problems.

His solution is scientifically and mathematically correct.

cupid1:
He started failing it from the point where he struck out 10 and -10,the 10 on top is supposed to equate to -1 when divided by -1 which when put into the equation, will give you 19/10.
And secondly, you cant stricke out numbers that way. They are in brackets in their own different equations i.e an equation in an equation.
So my point is, the person who provided this so called 'proof' is a dullard

did you do maths at all? he is so correct. (a+b)(a-b) = a2 + b2 is a law in maths and i can prove the law is correct

Oops. Sorry. 0 cannot divide (cancel out) 0. That is, (10-10) cannot divide (10-10).

The expansion spoilt everything... This is jst like PWc report on NNPC audit

nationwide1:
Why must he use 100 - 100? If 5-5, will the answer be same?

The whole thing is absolutely wrong.

That's why we are saying that scientifically, the proof is wrong...but MATHEMATICALLY, its correct.

obstead200:
I'm no mathematician but even me can attest that this is wrong. OP pls stop misleading our already dull students

You have admitted you do not know mathematics. So don't judge. @Op has correctly applied mathematical principles.

@Op, we could push this beyond here if you know what I mean

@all mathematicians, I hope we know how 0! = 1?

adewaletb3:
So_fucking wrong. Why would you prove like a goat

he is so correct! i was shocked at his proof. i have cross checked it, he is damn so right

Now It's not only in political science that someone will just wake up and start analysis . they've entered mathematics

godofOrijin:
Creative but wrong.

I could arrive @ 1 by doing the following...
(10+10)(10-10) / (10+10)(10-10)
=1

This approach is wrong bro, bodmas comes to mind.

he must be high on some cheap drugs

.... if ur not a mathematician please keep ur peace. Remain silent.... dude did it logically right.