shedrack222:


He is right there is -10^2 is equal to -100

Stop disgracing yourself -10^2 is +100. negative integers do not have square root. That is why the √-4 is not -2. If u argue that that -10^2 means -1(10^2) the its no longer a square. And difference of two squares will never apply.

The OP failed the following

1. He did not Obey BODMAS
2. He gave a negative integer a square root
3. He did not consider the for difference of two squares to apply, it must be btw a and b, not a and a or b and b.


a^2 - b^2 is equals (a-b) (a+b) but a^2 -a^2 is 0

livebullet:
.... if ur not a mathematician please keep ur peace. Remain silent.... dude did it logically right.

Very on point bro.

emekachimek:


The guy has succeeded in deceiving u too. -b^2 means -b x -b which will always give u a positive value. He ignored the sign before the 100 which is never done

. Guy stop this silly argument...you are wrong

Matilde1:
100-100 is equal to zero already. No need to move forward. Go and read math well please.

that's what you do if you go in to trigs in mathematics eg prove that sin²x+ cos²x = 1 going further is allowed.

omo this maths correct die... Op u na the best, u deserve nairaland award.....

THE NEXT TIME HE TRIES IT WIT HIS MATH TEACHER, HE WIL NT FIND IT FUNNY WIT HIM.

adewaletb3:
So_fucking wrong. Why would you prove like a goat

what's happening with Nigeian?? 100-100 = 0 Don't go anywhere again!!

MrJanuzaj:



Stop disgracing yourself -10^2 is +100. negative integers do not have square root. That is why the √-4 is not -2. If u argue that that -10^2 means -1(10^2) the its no longer a square. And difference of two squares will never apply.

The OP failed the following

1. He did not Obey BODMAS
2. He gave a negative integer a square root
3. He did not consider the for difference of two squares to apply, it must be btw a and b, not a and a or b and b.


a^2 - b^2 is equals (a-b) (a+b) but a^2 -a^2 is 0

As long as there's a knowledgeable few. God bless you bro.

This is part of the reasons why we will still record mass failures in mathematics in waec. I won't be surprised if most of those saying he's correct are actually graduates.

wonda26:

10^2 - 10^2 = (10 + 10)(10-10) is very correct.

In mathematics, it is called 'Difference of two squares'


If you doubt, try simplifying the right hand side of the equation

dude (x+x)(x-x) where did you see this?? x-x = 0 na. check this is what the formula said: (a+b)(a-b)

cupid1:
He started failing it from the point where he struck out 10 and -10,the 10 on top is supposed to equate to -1 when divided by -1 which when put into the equation, will give you 19/10.
And secondly, you cant stricke out numbers that way. They are in brackets in their own different equations i.e an equation in an equation.
So my point is, the person who provided this so called 'proof' is a dullard

He is mathematically correct jor, he divided (10-10) by itself and that gave 1

jonaji:
Very Creative I tell you.... So students in the house.... You can use it to challenge ur teachers

the question and the answer shows that the solver is a GOAL.

Matilde1:


what's happening with Nigeian?? 100-100 = 0 Don't go anywhere again!!

so many english teacher here frm the OP he is logically and mathematically correct but in other subjects like accounting, physics, english he is totally wrong. cos in real life application you cant get something from nothing

jonaji:
Very Creative I tell you.... So students in the house.... You can use it to challenge ur teachers

Scientifically zero divided by zero equal to zero u dnt need any mathematics for this only a common sense so d op is totally wrong

Any result outside this has made nonsense of d mathematics field

Chai! I swear I need to go back school

logica:
Oops. Sorry. 0 cannot divide (cancel out) 0. That is, (10-10) cannot divide (10-10).

. You got where the fallacy is....
Nice one

OP's proof of his hypothesis is sound. He applied appropriate mathematical theories and proved that the white man's principles should not always be trusted.

This thread is not for everyone. It is strictly for Scientists and Engineers with 1st class and high 2-1 or Art and Commercial students with A1 or A2 in their GSCE/WAEC.Every other person should shut up or exit.

Too many gibberish being posted.

agrovick:

He is mathematically correct jor, he divided (10-10) by itself and that gave 1

my brother, i don't know if it's my eye, my phone or the weather, but what i'm seeing in the denominator is (0-10). That's probably what the people liking my first post are also seeing. I gave my hypothesis based on what i saw

Nah lie what happened to numerator should also happen to the denominator

According to BODMAS, u have to solve wat u have in bracket before division but you divided without solving wat u have in bracket. its only when we have unknown value like ''X or Y" dat is when we leave wat is in the bracket to divide d equation like dat

soe:
seth...stop being stubborn.

Check again.

There is nothing like (0-10)
Maybe you should go on your laptop...it is (10-10) at the denominator.

Aside that...what you are saying is not done in mathematics.
You cannot say
(10-10)/(-10) = 10 - (10/-10)
= 10+1
= 11
Accept you are wrong

bros i can swear on grandpa's grave that my phone is showing me (0-10) as the denominator there and what you put down there isn't what i was implying.
And lastly, how da fvck did you know my name ?

jonaji:
Very Creative I tell you.... So students in the house.... You can use it to challenge ur teachers

I think this is a mathematical proof that something can come out of nothing, thus the Big Bang!

He fails woefully frm d step where he started to cross divide. Have u gorgotten ur BODMAS rule. Open the Bracket 1st before Division

Error page return.

lofty900:
mathematically correct, scientifically wrong

It depends on how u look @ it.
zero divided by itself is infinity, so if d dude got 2 as an answer,he is probably correct.
like I said,it depends on how u look at it!
I can do my own and get 4...there is nothing genius any the maths. Oyibo don tell us tey tey say infinity na the answer.

a foolish question deserves an equally foolish answer

cupid1:
bros i can swear on grandpa's grave that my phone is showing me (0-10) as the denominator there and what you put down there isn't what i was implying.
And lastly, how da fvck did you know my name ?

try checking on your laptop. The guy never wrote anything like (0-10) anywhere in the paper .
And why did you use the word 'fvck'. Wasn't expecting such from you. Anyway...accept my fbk request whenever you can

cupid1:
Jeeze, of all the people countering my post, your own idea is the most ridiculous. How can he strike out only the brackets ? Who thought you that kinda math ?

. You don't know shit. When you have similar brackets in both numerator and denominator it strikes out. However, he is wrong cuz at that point we have a solution. So that is where the mathematical fallacy lies (10-10)=0 so no needing proceeding further.

cupid1:
my brother, i don't know if it's my eye, my phone or the weather, but what i'm seeing in the denominator is (0-10). That's probably what the people liking my first post are also seeing. I gave my hypothesis based on what i saw

check again, this time enlarge/zoom d screen...its (10-10) bro..#peace.

brunofarad:
Error page return.

I laugh at this. Bracket comes before division. Think of it this way. The bracket did come first. It was treated as a whole and used to cancel the whole bracket in the denominator.

Oya solve this 3(2+5)/(2+5). You can start expanding the brackets. Or you can easily cancel it out and get your answer as 3.

soe:
try checking on your laptop. The guy never wrote anything like (0-10) anywhere in the paper .
And why did you use the word 'fvck'. Wasn't expecting such from you. Anyway...accept my fbk request whenever you can

sorry bro, learnt a lot of that from dunder heads on Nairaland....gimme your mobile number. I need indepth info on how you know so much about me. I thought i had my backside covered

MrJanuzaj:



Stop disgracing yourself -10^2 is +100. negative integers do not have square root. That is why the √-4 is not -2. If u argue that that -10^2 means -1(10^2) the its no longer a square. And difference of two squares will never apply.

The OP failed the following

1. He did not Obey BODMAS
2. He gave a negative integer a square root
3. He did not consider the for difference of two squares to apply, it must be btw a and b, not a and a or b and b.


a^2 - b^2 is equals (a-b) (a+b) but a^2 -a^2 is 0

nobody said it better...
there is no argument here..
anybody that did elementary maths would know that the OP didn't get it right..
this is what Einstein calls "insanity"