johnydon22:
In physics, time is a quantum dimension.
Time and speed are relative. . . Its a simple beautiful scientific discovery fully represented in the small but complex mathematical equation E=MC²
And it takes a very big intellectually deranged individual to think that there is a house in the sky where snow is stored.

Snows form in an atmosphere where the temperature drops to or below 0°C and the crystalline droplet accumulates water droplets from the atmosphere before dropping and hitting the ground.

You still holding on to the ancient belief that snow has a store house in the sky, actually you are completely disgrace the very intellect of 21st century homo sapiens. . . Tell us now who the fool is

Esdb3:


New world order is short for changing the way the world works by some group of people(if you don't know NWO is a group then you are a bozo)
You have the gay agenda as one of their main aims. The sane and moral world saw sex as sacred in the past, now NWO made sure it is no longer that they made y'all gullibles see sex as just a physical activity removing its spiritual consequence from New World Kids like you.

You couldn't dress and expose half your ass before now you can. Trampling on morality and filling the youths alas! The world with lust. Kids of 12 can now watch sex with just a click. Kids of fourteen now smoke weed before they go to school. So you have altered minds walking around.

Alcohol damages the body, the health system warns us against it, but why do you think alcohol hasn't been banned? Because then you'll not have one night stands anymore, no unwanted pregnancy, reduction in accidents, no wild parties, in summary reduction in sin.
Note that I included unwanted pregnancy. Unwanted pregnancy leads to abortions and reduction in population. Reduction in population is something they uphold because they believe the world will be better controlled if the population is 2 billion people. You'll get why further down.

Like it or not NWO are against the God you don't believe exists. Why do they make movies that ridicule Jesus and not hinduists or muhammed or horus or baphomet? And mind you it is not because christians are more in number hell no! Islam is the fastest growing religion in the world, most westerners just bear thomas and john most are libertines like yourself.



You sit there and say no 666? Lol! Who says they'll write 666 on your foreheads? Just ask yourself why will the chips be put on your foreheads and hand, why not any other place? Ask yourself why a chip will be inserted in you. Was technology for man or man for technology?


I can see you know of a bible prophesy. Good.


If you don't believe christianity or accept it do something to further make or mar your belief ----- google the prophesies and their explanations and read em yourselves. You can read the 70 weeks of Daniel and the end time prophesies of Jesus for a start and compare especially Jesus' if it doesn't seem so or if it does.

Weah96:


The universe is increasing in complexity. It's an inherent quality, nothing more.
https://sites.google.com/site/patrickmhmbs/home/mckenna

Esdb3:


Atleast DO the prophesy thing.

Weah96:


The universe is increasing in complexity. It's an inherent quality, nothing more.
https://sites.google.com/site/patrickmhmbs/home/mckenna

Esdb3:


Atleast DO the prophesy thing.

Well am now telling you that the NWO fuels this order or disorder that the dude was talking about.

Every human with conscience knows that morals are good and good is better than evil. But why is technology now destroying morals and we are here hailing and supporting it to do so while we trump on the ultimate source of morals God.


see am done talking abt atheism and shii.

My advice to you is that worshipping God doesn't stop you from practising science. Rubbishing God because of Science is making Science a religion. And atheists aren't sposd to be religious.

And finally stop taking pride and joy in the fact that your ideology fits in with some people called atheists. It is all just formality. There are two basic divisions; The Good and The Evil people. You have to choose sides.

Scan christianity if you are moralistic if it supports any heinous acts lemme know. But if you want to live wildly and not care about morals then you can continue on your path.

Don't think one is a fool for believing God because frankly he thinks you are fool for not then there will be a clash of opinions and conflict arises.

I am a christian and a scientific person. Noah worshipped God and constructed something scientific.

Science doesn't stop you from following God.

Don't let the NWO get to you.


Jesus loves you. Goodluck in your decisions.

Esdb3:


Lol! Who says there is a house in the sky?

Stop mixing science with spirituality.

Outside the earth is even space. The body doesn't go to heaven the spirit which you can't see goes there so why then will you describe heaven as a house in the sky that you can see.

Science is not Spiritualism or Christianity and Vice-versa! They are two different things. You can worship God and be a bad-ass science student.

The problem people with your mind set have is the ability to separate the two. The gui and the dos mode though alike are different.

Weah96:


We're being driven towards an inevitable outcome. Ted Kaczynski saw it 20 years ago and went mad trying to do something about it.

Why is there a new Samsung Galaxy every 6 months? What's the purpose of SnapChat when we already have Instagram and Facebook? Money. Or better yet, women. Women are responsible. We do everything for the ladies.

There is that fundamental chicken and egg question again. I don't think that men came first, I believe that the woman did. There was an Eve before there was ever an Adam.

Weah96:


We're being driven towards an inevitable outcome. Ted Kaczynski saw it 20 years ago and went mad trying to do something about it.

Why is there a new Samsung Galaxy every 6 months? What's the purpose of SnapChat when we already have Instagram and Facebook? Money. Or better yet, women. Women are responsible. We do everything for the ladies.

There is that fundamental chicken and egg question again. I don't think that men came first, I believe that the woman did. There was an Eve before there was ever an Adam.

Esdb3:


And the bible made it clear it was Adam before Eve. The importance of man on this planet argues that out itself.

Weah96:


Yea, but behind the scenes, EVERYTHING happening today is the result of the woman. The men are just the muscle. Shine your eye. When in doubt, follow the trail of the money.

The Hen was here first, not the boy egg. She's called mother nature.

Weah96:


Yea, but behind the scenes, EVERYTHING happening today is the result of the woman. The men are just the muscle. Shine your eye. When in doubt, follow the trail of the money.

The Hen was here first, not the boy egg. She's called mother nature.

Esdb3:


Women are nothing. The freemasons don't even allow them in.

And what money trail?

stephendamsoho:
10: The complete lack of solid evidence for God’s existence.

This is probably the best argument I have against God’s existence: There’s no evidence for it. No good evidence, anyway. No evidence that doesn’t just amount to opinion and tradition and confirmation bias and all the other stuff I’ve been talking about. No evidence that doesn’t fall apart upon close examination.

And in a perfect world, that should have been the only argument I needed. In a perfect world, I shouldn’t have had to spend a month and a half collating and summarizing the reasons I don’t believe in God, any more than I would have for Zeus or Quetzalcoatl or the Flying Spaghetti Monster. As thousands of atheists before me have pointed out: It is not up to us to prove that God does not exist. It is up to theists to prove that he does.

If there’s an argument for religion that’s convincing — actually convincing, convincing by means of something other than authority, tradition, personal intuition, confirmation bias, fear and intimidation, wishful thinking, or some combination of the above — wouldn’t we all know about it?
Wouldn’t it have spread like wildfire? Wouldn’t it be the Meme of All Memes? I mean, we all saw that Simon’s Cat video within about two weeks of it hitting the Internet. Don’t you think that the Truly Excellent Argument for God’s Existence would have spread even faster, and wider, than some silly cartoon cat video?

If the arguments for religion are so wonderful, why are they so unconvincing to anyone who doesn’t already believe?
And why does God need arguments, anyway? Why does God need people to make his arguments for him? Why can’t he just reveal his true self,

clearly and unequivocally, and settle the question once and for all? If God existed, why wouldn’t it just be obvious?

It is not up to atheists to prove that God does not exist. It is up to believers to prove that he does.

And in the absence of any good, solid evidence or arguments in favor of God’s existence — and in the presence of a whole lot of solid arguments against it — I will continue to be an atheist. God almost certainly does not exist, and it’s completely reasonable to act as if he doesn’t.

stephendamsoho:
"Does God exist?" is a valid and relevant question. Here are my top reasons why the answer is a resounding, "No."

“But just because religion has done some harm — that doesn’t mean it’s mistaken! Sure, people have done terrible things in God’s name. That doesn’t mean God doesn’t exist!”

Yup. If you’re arguing that — you’re absolutely right. And the question of whether religion is true or not is important. But “Does God exist?” is a valid and relevant question. Here are my Top Ten reasons why the answer is a resounding, “No.”

1: The consistent replacement of supernatural explanations of the world with natural ones.

When you look at the history of what we know about the world, you see a noticeable pattern. Natural explanations of things have been replacing supernatural explanations of them. Like a steamroller. Why the Sun rises and sets. Where thunder and lightning come from. Why people get sick. Why people look like their parents. How the complexity of life came into being. I could go on and on.
All these things were once explained by religion. But as we understood the world better, and learned to observe it more carefully, the explanations based on religion were replaced by ones based on physical cause and effect. Consistently. Thoroughly. Like a steamroller. The number of times that a supernatural explanation of a phenomenon has been replaced by a natural explanation? Thousands upon thousands upon thousands.

Now. The number of times that a natural explanation of a phenomenon has been replaced by a supernatural one? The number of times humankind has said, “We used to think (X) was caused by physical cause and effect, but now we understand that it’s caused by God, or spirits, or demons, or the soul”?

Exactly zero.

Sure, people come up with new supernatural “explanations” for stuff all the time. But explanations with evidence? Replicable evidence? Carefully gathered, patiently tested, rigorously reviewed evidence? Internally consistent evidence? Large amounts of it, from many different sources?

Again — exactly zero.

Given that this is true, what are the chances that any given phenomenon for which we currently don’t have a thorough explanation — human consciousness, for instance, or the origin of the Universe — will be best explained by the supernatural?
Given this pattern, it’s clear that the chances of this are essentially zero. So close to zero that they might as well be zero. And the hypothesis of the supernatural is therefore a hypothesis we can discard. It is a hypothesis we came up with when we didn’t understand the world as well as we do now… but that, on more careful examination, has never once been shown to be correct.

If I see any solid evidence to support God, or any supernatural explanation of any phenomenon, I’ll reconsider my disbelief. Until then, I’ll assume that the mind-bogglingly consistent pattern of natural explanations replacing supernatural ones is almost certain to continue.
(Oh — for the sake of brevity, I’m generally going to say “God” in this chapter when I mean “God, or the soul, or metaphysical energy, or any sort of supernatural being or substance.” I don’t feel like getting into discussions about, “Well, I don’t believe in an old man in the clouds with a white beard, but I believe…” It’s not just the man in the white beard that I don’t believe in. I don’t believe in any sort of religion, any sort of soul or spirit or metaphysical guiding force, anything that isn’t the physical world and its vast and astonishing manifestations.

To be continued.....

Weah96:


Spoken like a true novice. Ha-ha-ha. You'll learn.

Why do humans need money or a form of currency? What's the purpose of the Corvette or the Bugatti? Why do humans construct large mansions?

Esdb3:



You are the novice here because you think Money is everything. When god-haters say worshipping God is not morality and they can be good without his existence, I wonder if they know what being good is.

Money is not to be chased. There is no money trail for those that follow God. There is this weird formula Christ gave in the bible he said "Seek ye first heaven and all other things shall be added unto you".

How many bugatti owners experience peace. It is like you don't know the turmoils of a rich home that has no christ in it.



Ok how does the money trail lead to women.

Weah96:


Mate selection. It's the real reason we use money. It's the reason African leaders remain in power past their time. It's the reason the Bugatti and iPhones were built. Consumerism is a form of mate selection.

Esdb3:

How does mate selection concern the terms african leaders stay in office.

So people can't get good women until they consume a lot of expensive goods? You've seen a lot of pornstars and instagram models and want them so bad but you feel you can't reach them cause your pocket aint handsome enough so you conclude money can only get you women. Money can get you any woman don't get me wrong but have you heard the saying that 'the woman you are spending money on, some other dude is fucking her for free?'

I'm sure it cost kanye a lot to bed kim. But ray J did it for free. Kim's bodyguard did it for free. Someone in her highschool who disvirgined her surely did it for free.

And the iphone was built because apple offers quality service and steve jobs wanted to be rich and steve wozniak was too talented not to make it. And iphones are only expensive here, they are not that expensive in America.

The bugatti was built, ok, to show off but also because someone wanted to satisfy the needs of those who love fast cars and luxury. I could go on.

Weah96:


You are a child. Have you heard of some guy called Sigmund Freud? He reached the same conclusion about human behavior and was obsessed with it.

Kanye didn't just bang Kim. They produced an offspring together. Ray Jay's offspring was either aborted or he was didn't make one.

Kanye is making the gamble that her facial symmetry would transfer over to the offspring and you know what that means. The offspring is found attractive by the ladies, or the males. It's really not rocket science.

Esdb3:


Kanye married Kim. Ray J didn't. While Kanye spends on their relationship. Ray J made money from it. Who told you Ray J cared about a baby with her. He just wanted to bang and go like I would if I get the chance. You are the child, to think anybody really cares about fathering a child with a bitch.

So kim is the only fine lady that can birth fine kids? He is dumb cause he has forgotten that the genetic traits of her LovePeddler-ness would transfer too.

Sigisimund freud; the thing about humans that formulates theories about human behaviour is that they forget they themselves are humans.

Weah96:


I ticked a nerve there, didn't I? Well, Abraham Maslow was correct with his hierarchy of human needs too. The old psychologists didn't have to worry about political correctness, you see, they weren't losing their jobs. After our metabolic requirements, shelter, and clothing, we want to F.uck. Life proceeds from there.

Esdb3:


Not everybody wants to go in that order. Some f..uck while they have neither. No man can put a order to man's want hence the saying 'one man's food, another's poison'. In america, 15 years old have sex. I don't like psychologists, they see themselves as elite and above and play god.

chinnyonwu:
OP dont be ridiculous. Lmao

Weah96:


If you're having sex, then you're not hungry. You would have eaten something in the last 4 days.

Your metabolic needs come first. We need air, water, and food otherwise our organic vehicles break apart. Everyone on Nairaland has access to air, water, and food. Otherwise, we would be out there trying to breathe, or find water and food.

Clothing, shelter, and sex can be interchanged. I've heard of two mad people sleeping together.

Stephendamsoho, According to the Law of logic, it is not reasonable to believe that there is God. However, if you say that He does not exist, if you then die and you finally discover that He exists, know that He will subject you to terrible judgment.

Take note and keep that in mind.

Esdb3:


One question does magick(I didn't misspell it) happen?

Esdb3:

You live your life on other people's opinions, you simply cannot think for yourself!

You live a drama everyday while people in high places design scripts for your type and you act it like dumb shits.

You claim intellectuals, thinkers but you don't even believe a common 'illuminati' exists. Everything is logical to you.

See if you can't text with sense let the seemingly reasonable folk I quoted answer my damn Questions!

stephendamsoho:
"Does God exist?" is a valid and relevant question. Here are my top reasons why the answer is a resounding, "No."

“But just because religion has done some harm — that doesn’t mean it’s mistaken! Sure, people have done terrible things in God’s name. That doesn’t mean God doesn’t exist!”

Yup. If you’re arguing that — you’re absolutely right. And the question of whether religion is true or not is important. But “Does God exist?” is a valid and relevant question. Here are my Top Ten reasons why the answer is a resounding, “No.”

1: The consistent replacement of supernatural explanations of the world with natural ones.

When you look at the history of what we know about the world, you see a noticeable pattern. Natural explanations of things have been replacing supernatural explanations of them. Like a steamroller. Why the Sun rises and sets. Where thunder and lightning come from. Why people get sick. Why people look like their parents. How the complexity of life came into being. I could go on and on.
All these things were once explained by religion. But as we understood the world better, and learned to observe it more carefully, the explanations based on religion were replaced by ones based on physical cause and effect. Consistently. Thoroughly. Like a steamroller. The number of times that a supernatural explanation of a phenomenon has been replaced by a natural explanation? Thousands upon thousands upon thousands.

Now. The number of times that a natural explanation of a phenomenon has been replaced by a supernatural one? The number of times humankind has said, “We used to think (X) was caused by physical cause and effect, but now we understand that it’s caused by God, or spirits, or demons, or the soul”?

Exactly zero.

Sure, people come up with new supernatural “explanations” for stuff all the time. But explanations with evidence? Replicable evidence? Carefully gathered, patiently tested, rigorously reviewed evidence? Internally consistent evidence? Large amounts of it, from many different sources?

Again — exactly zero.

Given that this is true, what are the chances that any given phenomenon for which we currently don’t have a thorough explanation — human consciousness, for instance, or the origin of the Universe — will be best explained by the supernatural?
Given this pattern, it’s clear that the chances of this are essentially zero. So close to zero that they might as well be zero. And the hypothesis of the supernatural is therefore a hypothesis we can discard. It is a hypothesis we came up with when we didn’t understand the world as well as we do now… but that, on more careful examination, has never once been shown to be correct.

If I see any solid evidence to support God, or any supernatural explanation of any phenomenon, I’ll reconsider my disbelief. Until then, I’ll assume that the mind-bogglingly consistent pattern of natural explanations replacing supernatural ones is almost certain to continue.
(Oh — for the sake of brevity, I’m generally going to say “God” in this chapter when I mean “God, or the soul, or metaphysical energy, or any sort of supernatural being or substance.” I don’t feel like getting into discussions about, “Well, I don’t believe in an old man in the clouds with a white beard, but I believe…” It’s not just the man in the white beard that I don’t believe in. I don’t believe in any sort of religion, any sort of soul or spirit or metaphysical guiding force, anything that isn’t the physical world and its vast and astonishing manifestations.

To be continued.....