The simple (biological) answer is yes.

If only the most viable sperm is to fertilise the ovum then it is ideal for the female to collect as many as possible to see which of the potential fathers sperm will win out. If for example 5 men all have deposited their sperm in the cervix the one who's sperm wins out must be the man of men, a true winner as he gets to have biological immortality. So maybe we should take all this male bragging of who is better to the sperm battle ground and allow the biological process to show who is who. Of course in the process the female has to consort with more than one male so please males keep your jealousy and anger in check, it's only natural.

www.nairaland.com/attachments/2691516_ok_jpeg4de7b3afd43fa39f8bed03b78dec1f12

Universal charger!

In fact, the average male will produce
roughly 525 billion sperm cells over a
lifetime and shed at least one billion of
them per month. A healthy adult male can
release between 40 million and 1.2 billion
sperm cells in a single ejaculation.

So my friend, they don't need multiply partners. They already have enough. #TakeYourBattleSomeWhereEsle

Tydies:
In fact, the average male will produce
roughly 525 billion sperm cells over a
lifetime and shed at least one billion of
them per month. A healthy adult male can
release between 40 million and 1.2 billion
sperm cells in a single ejaculation.

So my friend, they don't need multiply partners. They already have enough. #TakeYourBattleSomeWhereEsle

Maybe OP suffers from low sperm count.

Tydies:
In fact, the average male will produce
roughly 525 billion sperm cells over a
lifetime and shed at least one billion of
them per month. A healthy adult male can
release between 40 million and 1.2 billion
sperm cells in a single ejaculation.

So my friend, they don't need multiply partners. They already have enough. #TakeYourBattleSomeWhereEsle

Of those billions only one can fertilise an ovum per time so there is competition amongst the sperm for the most viable. Introducing another few billion sperm will increase the chances that only a top notch top quality sperm will succeed.

Brandnew2:

Maybe OP suffers from low sperm count.

Bring your sister or your wife let's prove it.

LordReed:


Bring your sister or your wife let's prove it.

lol

At topic
OP you want some people to eat your head? You're speaking the 'abominable'.

cococandy:
At topic
OP you want some people to eat your head? You're speaking the 'abominable'.

I know! Let them come, I dey wait.

YES they are! It helps in developing their SWEETNESS!

Funny. !!! !!!

The battle of zona pellucida.

LordReed:
The simple (biological) answer is yes.

If only the most viable sperm is to fertilise the ovum then it is ideal for the female to collect as many as possible to see which of the potential fathers sperm will win out. If for example 5 men all have deposited their sperm in the cervix the one who's sperm wins out must be the man of men, a true winner as he gets to have biological immortality. So maybe we should take all this male bragging of who is better to the sperm battle ground and allow the biological process to show who is who. Of course in the process the female has to consort with more than one male so please males keep your jealousy and anger in check, it's only natural.

LordReed:


Bring your sister or your wife let's prove it.

You stand no chance cuz you'll keep shooting blanks. No woman wants a total waste.

Yikes!

Brandnew2:

You stand no chance cuz you'll keep shooting blanks. No woman wants a total waste.

Bring them first let us test if it is blank or not.

LordReed:
The simple (biological) answer is yes.

I disagree. The patently obvious answer is no.

LordReed:
If only the most viable sperm is to fertilise the ovum then it is ideal for the female to collect as many as possible to see which of the potential fathers sperm will win out. If for example 5 men all have deposited their sperm in the cervix the one who's sperm wins out must be the man of men, a true winner as he gets to have biological immortality. So maybe we should take all this male bragging of who is better to the sperm battle ground and allow the biological process to show who is who. Of course in the process the female has to consort with more than one male so please males keep your jealousy and anger in check, it's only natural.

The whole basis of your premise is flawed.

1. They don't seek the most "viable sperm", they seek the man who appears more genetically endowed. And then they mate with him. Note the difference

2. The battle is not at the spermatozoic level, it's at the level of the owners of the spermatozoa. The sperm don't compete - the donors do. Hence the status & provision dynamic !

3. Further compounded by the fact that where paternity is not assured, or cannot even be assumed, the man will have no incentive to provide and protect.

"The men fight for the right". May the best man win. Ladies who attempt the above are in danger of being slut shamed .


TV

Hogwash

TV01:

I disagree. The patently obvious answer is no.


The whole basis of your premise is flawed.

1. They don't seek the most "viable sperm", they seek the man who appears more genetically endowed. And then they mate with him. Note the difference

2. The battle is not at the spermatozoic level, it's at the level of the owners of the spermatozoa. The sperm don't compete - the donors do. Hence the status & provision dynamic !

3. Further compounded by the fact that where paternity is not assured, or cannot even be assumed, the man will have no incentive to provide and protect.

"The men fight for the right". May the best man win. Ladies who attempt the above are in danger of being slut shamed .


TV

So I take it you don't accept the position that the millions of sperm a man produces confers on him a polygamous nature?

pickabeau1:
Hogwash

Ever read Sperm Wars?

OP yuh r right jor
aint no pucci better
dan community pucci
free 4 all!

better 2 buss a nutt in
deez females nd leave em
2 raise dose kidZ alone
since dey all wanna be
'miss independent'

TV01:

I disagree. The patently obvious answer is no.


The whole basis of your premise is flawed.

1. They don't seek the most "viable sperm", they seek the man who appears more genetically endowed. And then they mate with him. Note the difference

2. The battle is not at the spermatozoic level, it's at the level of the owners of the spermatozoa. The sperm don't compete - the donors do. Hence the status & provision dynamic !

3. Further compounded by the fact that where paternity is not assured, or cannot even be assumed, the man will have no incentive to provide and protect.

"The men fight for the right". May the best man win. Ladies who attempt the above are in danger of being slut shamed .


TV

what an argument against the said topic. Hmm

The thread is so ewwwwww. This looks like a fun thread.

TV01

I don't think the premise is totally flawed. Why?

Se.x is for procreation, and our mating choices is evolutionary dependent on who is more likely to bear offspring.

The endpoint of the female mating selection is to determine the male who is more viable to reproduce.

Primitively, the metrics to determine this endpoint is through the outward appearance of the male, his physical strength, etc. Likewise in the male psyche, a generous amount of hips translates in his mind that the female is fertile and able to reproduce.

However, today we know that is not automatically the case. Big hips do not necessarily translate to fertility, neither does physical strength. Today we do not rely on mere physical attributes to determine who is fertile and who isn't. Science and technology have made it possible for us to go to the cellular level to determine who is more fertile. So since we are inherently programmed to procreate, the battle has now been reduced to the spermatozoan level. May the best man win.

LordReed:


Ever read Sperm Wars?

From the comments of the females which you seem to be enjoying, it seems you are trolling

But lets humour you

No I have not yet read it though I have it somewhere as an ebook....

See précis below

Sperm Wars is a primarily nonfiction book by evolutionary biologist Robin Baker.[2][3] Originally published in English in 1996, it has since appeared in 25 languages[4] and in 2006 a 10th anniversary edition[2] was published in the United States. Through a series of short fictional stories and discussion following them, Baker proposes evolutionary functions for sexual habits, mostly on the principle of competition between sperm of different men for a prized egg.[2] The "sperm wars" include both literal battles between sperm inside a woman's reproductive tract, as well as figurative battles between men competing for the chance to mate.

And what is the relation to your assertion

Stillfire:
The thread is so ewwwwww. This looks like a fun thread.

TV01

I don't think the premise is totally flawed. Why?

Se.x is for procreation, and our mating choices is evolutionary dependent on who is more likely to bear offspring.

The endpoint of the female mating selection is to determine the male who is more viable to reproduce.

Primitively, the metrics to determine this endpoint is through the outward appearance of the male, his physical strength, etc. Likewise in the male psyche, a generous amount of hips translates in his mind that the female is fertile and able to reproduce.

However, today we know that is not automatically the case. Big hips do not necessarily translate to fertility, neither does physical strength. Today we do not rely on mere physical attributes to determine who is fertile and who isn't. Science and technology have made it possible for us to go to the cellular level to determine who is more fertile. So since we are inherently programmed to procreate, the battle has now been reduced to the spermatozoan level. May the best man win.

So how do u know the best spamzoan

Brandnew2:

Maybe OP suffers from low sperm count.

pickabeau1:


From the comments of the females which you seem to be enjoying, it seems you are trolling

But lets humour you

No I have not yet read it though I have it somewhere as an ebook....

See précis below

And what is the relation to your assertion

How can you not see the relation? Sperm battling inside the womb? It's even worse than I thought! Women need more sperm to do battle so that the true Victor will be undeniable!

Stillfire:


May the best man sperm win.

FTFY

pickabeau1:


So how do u know the best spamzoan

More like the most viable ie fastest and strongest plus more opportune. BTW your do know how the process works right?

LordReed:


How can you not see the relation? Sperm battling inside the womb? It's even worse than I thought! Women need more sperm to do battle so that the true Victor will be undeniable!

So how will the victor spam be identified

Anyway how do you divorce the fittest spam from the owners of the spam

The best spam may belong to the lowest provider... gerrit

TV01:

I disagree. The patently obvious answer is no.


The whole basis of your premise is flawed.

1. They don't seek the most "viable sperm", they seek the man who appears more genetically endowed. And then they mate with him. Note the difference

2. The battle is not at the spermatozoic level, it's at the level of the owners of the spermatozoa. The sperm don't compete - the donors do. Hence the status & provision dynamic !

3. Further compounded by the fact that where paternity is not assured, or cannot even be assumed, the man will have no incentive to provide and protect.

"The men fight for the right". May the best man win. Ladies who attempt the above are in danger of being slut shamed .

TV

My oga, you are indeed very wrong.

It is now known that we evolved for competition at the, quoting you, "spermatozoic level".

There are even tons of books on the subject: Sperm Wars - by Robin Baker, and Sex At Dawn: The Prehistoric Origins of Modern Sexuality are examples.

You mentioned 'high status' and 'provider', but remember, they don't need to come from the same person.

The provider blissfully provides, while she goes behind to get inseminated by caveman Chad, who has optimum seed.

pickabeau1:


So how will the victor spam be identified

Anyway how do you divorce the fittest spam from the owners of the spam

The best spam may belong to the lowest provider[/b]... gerrit

Remember, sperm competition itself is merely a battle in a war.

For example, there's mate-guarding behaviour on the males side to minimize the chances of the woman getting fertilized by some Chad guy (jealousy is not by accident). There's being a good provider, etc.

However, being a good provider, and having high status are social and not biological.

One could be cripple, mentally deficient or sickly...and still have high status or be a fantastic provisioner - for some random reason. Birth, chance, etc.

So now that the social component is taken care of, her best strategy for her kids is to go get the healthiest seed.

How is the victor sperm identified?

The same way a team wins the Champions League.