bonechamberlain:
if there is anyone who is foolish or stupid it should be u. when an issue is raised u either debunk it by stating what u know or supporting it, not going round circles and raining insults. u should educate urself on behaving civil and observing decorum, that's if u want to be educated

illiad:

Awon tojumilo Nle yin larindi

Ode omo ode

Mcowubaba:

Oga u have no valid argument...
Pls quote me, where nd when I mentioned that I understand the quran eh
Islam is a violent regilion QED!!!!
Al shabab, Isil, taliban, Isis, Boko-haram e.t.c
Nd don't think I am shying from engaging u or ur colleague in a solid debate, he just brought out a single verse, nd generalised meaning into it , why didn't he bring out the entire Chapter, let's us both look @ it logically nd spiritually!!!!...
Not all muslims are terrorist, but most terrorist are Muslims!!!...
Hw do u explain, the continuous violence nd killing of non-muslims in d Northern part of the country...
The will mak mockery of Mohammed in france, ur disgruntled feeble-minded religious infidels will start killing Christian faithfuls in Nigeria ..Boko haram will bomb a mosque, ur muslim people will go nd burn a church nd if possible kill a pastor nd his whole family..
Oga abeggiii....let's call spade a spade!!!!
In terms of Atrocities u can't compare Christianity nd Islam..the difference is glaring!!! ISLAM is BAD, EVIL, VIOLENT!!!!

zionzoe:
Good Morning, my Friend Yakubu, Jesus Loves you and died to free you from sins,
1) First you said that the bible is not meant for aliens, I understand what you meant nAturally. Yakubu, do you know that you are made up of a)Spirit b)soul and c) you live in a body.
The real you is your spirit.
Now, every man born of woman since adam have sinned except one , Jesus Christ! I am sure u know that the conception of Jesus Christ is a Miracle. His blood is not the blood of that man called Joseph who married maryam.His blood is pure, which qualify him as a kind of Sacrificial lamb, the kind God wanted Father Abraham to offer, which some of u kill during Sallah. That lamb is symbolic, Jesus Died as that Lamb to Save u. At the instant of you accepting Jesus's sacrifice made on your behalf , ur spirit becomes recreated, (this is done by the Holy Spirit, who raised up Jesus from the Dead)any human born since adam carries a dead spirit-a spirit that cannot stand or commune with God. But when u identify with the sacrifice Jesus made on your behalf, he takes ur sin and gives you His righteousness. It is then your spirit comes alive! It is only then you can understand the Bible, it then becomes food to your spirit. That is the meaning of 1Corinth 2:14........those of us who are believers, truely are Aliens in this world, but we have a commonwhealth with Christ. But we don't shut d door on you as Heavens ambassadors, we love u as our foundation, Jesus said and demonstrated in His lifetime.

2) On the issue of respect, I think it is based on perspective. Respect is not a birthright , it must be earned. However respect does not change His-story( sorry I meant History).
If Mohammed(S.A.W) had placed his narrative on a Gallant Soldier, who killed and won battles, it would have been acceptable. But how can you have blood in your hands and still say you can save me? Why didn't he save those he killed?

You see, I cannt see white and because any damn person says I should call it black because God says so, then I will submit and call white black. What hunts his Religion is is History-in other words- his-story.
How can you explain this statements below?
ura 9:29– “Fight those who believe not in Allah nor the Last Day, nor hold that forbidden which hath been forbidden by Allah and His Messenger, nor acknowledge the religion of Truth, (even if they are) of the People of the Book, until they pay the Jizya with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued.”

Sura 9:5– “Then, when the sacred months have passed, slay the idolaters wherever ye find them, and take them (captive), and besiege them, and prepare for them each ambush. But if they repent and establish worship and pay the poor-due, then leave their way free. Lo! Allah is Forgiving, Merciful.”
This are not words a savior but a Millitant.......terrorizing and specialist in looting. Not a savoir. He who truely created does not destroy his creation. He loves it.
Again ...........let us think ooo

zionzoe:
My Dear Jacob, sorry I mean Yakubu, I am pleased calling your name because it is d name of one of our Patriachs.
The problem we are having today is not the 98% muslims or 2% muslims who practise what is written practically.the problems are the imams/d inciters who hide behind curtains shamefull telling followers to kill for God.....accross dis..........


World-renown Islamic university teaches it’s okay for Muslims to cannibalize Jews and Christians
Posted by StMA
Egypt Independent is the sister English-language publication of Al-Masry Al-Youm, Egypt’s flagship independent daily newspaper. Founded in 2009 as a news website, Egypt Independent launched a weekly print edition in 2011.

According to an article in Egypt Independent, April 14, 2015, religious jurisprudence textbooks at Al-Azhar University teach students that Muslims are allowed to eat the dead flesh of Jews and Christians.



_____________________

Note: Al-Azhar University is Egypt’s oldest degree-granting university, renowned as “Sunni Islam’s most prestigious university.” Founded in 970 or 972 as a center of Islamic learning, Al-Azhar was one of the first universities in the world and is today the chief centre of Arabic literature and Islamic learning in the world. Its mission is to propagate Islam and Islamic culture. To this end, the university’s Islamic scholars render edicts (fatwas) on disputes submitted to them from all over the Sunni Islamic world regarding proper conduct for Muslim individuals and societies. Al-Azhar also trains Egyptian government-appointed preachers in proselytization. As of 1996, over 4000 teaching institutes in Egypt were affiliated with the University.

_____________________

From the Egypt Independent article, “Al-Azhar textbook: Eating dead Jews,
Christians, infidels ‘halal’ if necessary“:

Religious jurisprudence textbooks for Al-Azhar students address, among other things, the issue of eating dead human beings, quoting Mansour bin Yunus al-Bahuti, a scholar of the Hanbali school of jurisprudence who died 500 years ago, as saying that eating dead Jews, Christians and non-believers is halal (permissible by Islam) if it is a necessity, but non-Muslims are not to eat dead Muslims, even out of necessity.

Another textbook quotes Imam al-Sherbini of the Shafi school of jurisprudence as saying that dead prophets of any religion should not be eaten. And when he was told that prophets do not die and that they lie alive praying in their graves according to the Hadith, he said that he meant if they were found dead before they were buried.

He also clarified that the meat of dead Jews, Christians and infidels should be eaten raw, not cooked or grilled.

Other Al-Azhar textbooks say that eating dead Jews, Christians and non-believers can be allowed not only out of necessity, but also as a punishment for heresy.

In the book “Persuasion in Resolving the Words of Abi Shoga” that takes after the Shafi school of jurisprudence, the author says a Muslim warrior may kill and eat infidel men, women and children if they were not warriors themselves. 

But bin Abdel Salam recommends eating warrior adults and leaving warrior children for their economic value as slaves. 

[…] In the chapter about what is permissible to eat, the book “Al-Sharh al Saghir” for Ahmed Dardir, which explains the Maliki school of jurisprudence. […] says a Muslim may eat a dead human being out of necessity, but not eat pork or wild game that was hunted by a non-believer.

In the video below (beg. at the 1:26 mark mark), an Egyptian scholar is interviewed about the Al-Azhar textbooks that teach cannibalism and holds in his hands an example.


The scholar identifies the textbook as:

Al-Azhar al-Sharif (honorable al-Azhar), Azhari Colleges Section, Central Administration for Books, Libraries & Teaching Aide for 3rd year high-school.

The interviewer points out that it’s not just Jews and Christians who can be cannibalized; Muslims who don’t pray can also be killed and eaten:

The book that is being taught to general high-school students mentions that who doesn’t pray can be grilled and then eaten. Killing him, then grilling him, then eating him…. This means that this is fertile ground for the establishment of committees for Promotion of Virtue & Prevention of Vice that’ll carry out this stuff.

_____________________

Note: By “committees for Promotion of Virtue and Prevention of Vice,” the interviewer was referring to Islamic religious police. In Saudi Arabia, the Committee for the Promotion of Virtue and the Prevention of Vice (CPVPV), informally referred to as Haia, is a government agency of Mutaween (religious police) who enforces Sharia Law.

_____________________

The scholar adds, pointing to and reading from the textbook:

Also listen to this: “He can kill the married adulterer, the fighter, whoever gave up praying, and whoever has a punishment on him, even if the Imam did not give his permission for the killing.” Take note. Those are allowing people to go kill other people.

Walid and Theodore Shoebat point out that Egypt also has its CPVPV — “an Islamic mafia” who “roam the streets assaulting, or even killing, those whom they speculate to be apostates.”

_____________________

Note: Walid Shoebat, born in Bethlehem of an American mother and a Palestinian Arabic father, used to be a member of the PLA involved in terror activities, until he converted to Christianity (Catholicism) in 1994. In 1978, Shoebat’s parents sent him to the United States to study at Chicago’s Loop College where he was recruited for Jihad by the Islamic Association of Palestine. Theodore Shoebat is Walid’s son and a Christian activist.

_____________________

The Shoebats observe that not only is the CPVPV in Egypt’s new constitution, but that —

“the constitution also mandates that any Islamic edict coming from the government must first go through Al-Azhar university scholars. This means that the okay for cannibalism will be observed in Egypt…. While many people see Islam as a morally conservative religion, akin to Christianity and Judaism, they don’t understand that Islam is Satanic, and of no different spirit than any other pagan religion.”

In 2009, Al-Azhar University co-hosted President Barack Obama’s speech at Cairo University, “A New Beginning,” which empowered the Muslim Brotherhood.

mbolajide2010:
[color=#006600][/color]

Try to comprehend any post before you respond to it. I never claimed, that you said you understood the quran. You quoted a guy that he could not understand the bible since he is not a christian.

Then, i asked, "but you as a christian can understand the quran while muslims can not understand the bible?" It was a question bro. And i'm referring to you or any other christians.

Are you saying because some muslims act violently then Islam support violent? If your answer is yes.Then, let me ask you this can we say beacause some christians commit adultery then christianity supports adultery?

Thank you.

limamintruth:


2% you say?
And where the hell did you dig out your baseless figure mister
Every muslim is either outrightly a terrorist or a terrorist sympathiser: FACT!
And because I know you'l doubt the aforesaid notorious fact, permit me to remind you that your supposed prophet muhammed(the master-minder of several genocidal aggression on non-muslims & pagans during his era) was an outright terrorist himself.




Lols, truss me bro., you wont want to go down that lane with me

Even though I see no correlation between the allegations you keep popping up about the Holy Bible and the topic of this thread (but of which I'm not at all surprised cos that has always been the kind of derailing tactic you pathetic muslims like to employ anytime the truth about your despicable religion is being discussed ), nonetheless, I'l go ahead n indulge you same way I'v done to your fellow islamists on nairaland.

It is trite that he who asserts must prove. Hence, since you claim that the bible has been distorted from the aramaic version, why not show reasonable proof here to corroborate your allegation then?
I promise to respond to you accordingly after you corroborate your claim with fact.
Who knows, maybe you have the aramaic version with you to show the house sef.

And BTW when you say the original quran, are you referring to the haf's arabic version, warsh's arabic version e.t.c?




Lallai kam, I can now see that you are already confused sef. Or have you forgotten so soon that you were the one that quoted some biblical verses and sought explanation thereof

I believe even in your jihadic mosques, your imams do offer similar kind of explanations you term 'fabrication' but on quranic verses to their she.epish congregation as well.

However in the spirit of love as enshrined by our Lord & saviour Jesus christ, I'l still oblige you with a simple answer thus:

◄Romans 10:4 ►

New International Version (N.I.V)
Christ is the culmination of the law so that there may be righteousness for everyone who believes.
New Living Translation (N.L.T)
For Christ has already accomplished the purpose for which the law was given. As a result, all who believe in him are made right with God.

King James Bible (K.J.V)
For Christ is the end of the law for righteousness to every one that believeth.

Comprende'


(However if I may ask, how does your irrelevant argument change the story of this thread that confirms to us Boko Haram are muslims operating in the name of your allah as further (indirectly) corroborated by Gov. Shettima @yakubuA )

LastProphet:


Just as I predicted, 18th and 19th century examples, so mr man since Christianity is also as violent as islam you mean you cant find any recent evidence of where a particular biblical scripture was quoted before murdering anybody? ONLY 18th and 19th century? I am sure you should be very very disappointed in yourself by now. ALL MUSLIM EXAMPLES OF CHRISTIAN VIOLENCE ARE EITHER IN 13TH, 14TH, 15TH, 18TH OR 19TH CENTURY - THAT IS THE WAY IT IS BEEN TAUGHT IN ISLAMIC SCHOOLS ALL OVER THE WORLD. I have met many islamic scholars and this is the same pattern. Shame on you pretenders. The only muslims I respect are the terrorists who are real and have no pretences about their demonic religion.

You see you have nothing to say and just like I said you are a fake FAKE muslim, Shakau and ISIS are the real muslims and you know what am saying

United4lyf:
wow amazing,this just confirmed to us that christians in the 20th and 21st century don't follow and obeyed what was written in their scripture or you want to tell us that Jesus only started preaching christianity from the 20th century??or u meant those christians from the 14th to 19th centuries who murdered people quoting your scripture are not real christians?oh or maybe your religion undergone man made reforms and left the actual message of God...please enlighten us.

YakubuA:

Anyway the 2% figure came from the fact that there are over 1.7billion Muslims in this world and those alleged to be involve in killing the innocent people are not up to 2% of 1.7 billion. This is a fact do the arithmetic yourself mister.

As for your claim on every Muslim, you are absolutely wrong because I am sure throughout your life up to now you have not met up to 10% of the Muslims. So how do you know their mind

YakubuA:

It is a known fact that the Roman Catholic bible is different from the protestant bible which is different from the Jehovah witness. The Jehovah witness magazine Awake of 8th September 1957 claimed that there are over 50,000 errors in the bible or are you not aware of this?

YakubuA:

....

YakubuA:

Quran is Quran and there is no difference between the Haf's and Warsh.

limamintruth:

You can deny all you want, but the fact still remains that muslims generally support islamic terrorism against non-muslims directly or indirectly.

We see how the Islamic State continues expanding with the aid of rich muslim countries & muslim individuals around the globe joining the terrorist group on a daily basis.

Inasmuch as the active jihadic terrorists are less in number than their teeming sympatizers, the millions of muslims such as:
- the millions of muslim minors/infants (who presently lack the capability to act for themselve but are already being groomed by the extremists adults for the future);
- the millions of physically&mentally challenged muslims(whose disabilities have made it near-impossible for them to actively participate in these jihads); &
- the millions of aged men who are presently too frail to participate in the extremism for a.llah; still subtly support the aggressive activities of their fellow islamists against non-musims.

If not, why is it that the reaction of muslims worldwide whenever any non-muslim acts in such a way that is percieved by them as insultive of their religion is always outrageously hostile(fatwas and all) than when their fellow muslim(s) taint the quran/prophet by asserting that the quran/prophet are their sole motivation for all the inhumane crimes they perpetrate


We never see 'the supposed millions of good muslims around the world' protesting whenever certain muslims "allegedely defame" the prophet by asserting that he instructed them to kill non-muslims in the most barbaric way; but we have always seen the same 'good muslims' protesting&attacking enmasse in countries all over the world whenever the prophet is cartoonized by a non-muslim. Hence why the bias in reaction by you muslims if I may ask?

Btw In this jet age, I really do not have to live with all the muslims on earth to know these facts mister.

First of all, contrary to the core belief upon which christianity is founded, J.W do not recognise Jesus as one with God.
Hence, the vast majority of christians do not regard J.W as christians to start with.


J.W do not speak for us neither do we even consider them as one of us.

But since you are so sure of J.W's assertion, you can as well identify these 50,000 errors or the distorted aramaic bible version for us then.
We will really appreciate it if you can do just that

And about the Catholic English Bible translation/version, my simple answer to you is this:

The catholic Bible is the same as every of other Bible English translation because these Holy Bible translations contain the 66canonized books that make up the Holy Bible.

It is trite that the Holy Bible is the most recognized religious book in the world & it is made up of only 66 universally accepted sacred books.

Thus, any manuscript that contains these 66 sacred books can be rightly deemed as 'Bible' (whether or not there are extra books or explanatory notes attached therein).

These extra non/sub-canonized books or explanatory notes do not alter the make up of the bible in anyway. Therefore, whether or not they are included, the bible remains the same complete word/message of God so long as the 66canonized books are present.

Well I have painstakingly explained the Bible verses you had cited & even provided another bible verse on your request.

The law I made reference to in my previous posts was the old covenant mosaic laws.
The old covenant came with its own laws, which were laws established by God for the nation of isreal (whom He then referred to as His chosen people).

The death&resurrection of Jesus has fulfilled these old laws and brought about a new covenant between God and all who believe(not just the jews).

I therefore advise that you go back and carefully re-read my previous posts again. Dont expect me to repeat myself over&over again.

And while at it, feel free to carefully digest these Bible verses as well

Galatians 3n.i.v)

So the law was put in charge to lead us to Christ that we might be justified by faith.
25 Now that faith has come, we are no longer under the supervision of the law.

Galatians 3n.i.v)
13 Christ redeemed us from the curse of the law by becoming a curse for us, for it is written: "Cursed is everyone who is hung on a tree."

Roman 6:14
14 For sin shall not be your master, because you are not under law, but under grace.

Oh really?
In addition to the fact that there are salient differences among the seven popular arabic versions(which includes the hafs & warsh:
E.g while some verses are stated in the plural form in one quran version, same verses are presented in the singular by the other version.
One example thus:
THE QUR'AN ACCORDING TO:-
(Hafs)... we give mercy ... 2:58
(Warsh)... he gives mercy ... 2:57

You will agree with me that the plurality of the first as against the second version above does give the similar verse different meaning.

Furthermore, there is no religious book in the world that has as much distorted history/origin as the quran. FACT!

We all know that the Qur’an we have today is descended from the Uthmanic codex.
And it is also known that not all Muslim scholars approve of the new Qur’an. Indeed, some of prophet muhammad's top teachers rejected Zaid’s version.

Muhammad once told his followers to “Learn the recitation of the Qur’an from four:
from Abdullah bin Masud—he started with him
—Salim, the freed slave of Abu Hudhaifa,
Mu’adh bin Jabal, and
Ubai bin Ka’b” (Sahih al-Bukhari 3808).

Interestingly, Ibn Masud (first on Muhammad’s list) held that the Qur’an should only have 111 chapters (today’s version has 114 chapters), and that chapters 1, 113, and 114 shouldn’t have been included in the Qur’an.
Because of this (along with hundreds of other textual differences), Ibn Masud went so far as to call the final edition of the Qur’an a deception!

“The people have been guilty of deceit in the reading of the Qur’an. I like it better to read according to the recitation of him [i.e. Muhammad] whom I love more than that of Zayd Ibn Thabit” (Ibn Sa’d,Kitab al-Tabaqat al-Kabir, Vol. 2, p. 444).
The question now is should Muslims submit to this “deceit”?
Not surprisingly, Ibn Masud advised Muslims to reject Zaid’s Qur’an and to keep their own versions—even to hide them so that they wouldn’t be confiscated by the government!

He said:
Jami at-Tirmidhi 3104—“O you Muslim people! Avoid copying the Mushaf and recitation of this man. By Allah! When I accepted Islam he was but in the loins of a disbelieving man”—meaning Zaid bin Thabit—and it was regarding this that Abdullah bin Mas’ud said: “O people of Al-Iraq! Keep the Musahif that are with you, and conceal them.”
But Ibn Masud wasn’t the only one of Muhammad’s trusted teachers who disagreed with Zaid’s Qur’an. Ubayy ibn Ka’b was Muhammad’s best reciter and one of the only Muslims to collect the materials of the Qur’an during Muhammad’s lifetime.

Yet Ibn Ka’b believed that Zaid’s Qur’an was missing two chapters! Later, Muslims were therefore forced to reject some of Ibn Ka’b’s recitation:
Sahih al-Bukhari 5005—Umar said, “Ubayy was the best of us in the recitation (of the Qur’an), yet we leave some of what he recites.” Ubayy says, “I have taken it from the mouth of Allah’s Messenger and will not leave it for anything whatever.”

Due to these disputes among Muhammad’s hand-picked reciters, you muslims are now faced with a dilemma because if you say that the Qur’an we have today has been perfectly preserved, then you are indirectly admitting that Muhammad was horrible at choosing scholars, since he selected men who disagreed with today’s text.
If on the other hand, you Muslims accept that Caliph Uthman was wrong to have disregarded several important recitation of the (supposed) prophecy, that automatically amounts to an admittance that the Quran we have today is flawed! Whichever way, the content of the quran still remains questionable.

YakubuA:

YakubuA:


What about these?

YakubuA:

Yes the JW also do not recognise the vast majority of you as Christians as well.

YakubuA:

The first two verses (galatians 3 13 and 25) are neither the word of God nor the word of Jesus so I will not comment on them. I am sure you will understand what I mean when you read the English (Third party). So on whose authorityNo confirmation from God.
As for Roman 6:14 above what we see in reality is the opposite because you guys are swimming in sins. The greatest sin in the sight of God is associating partner with Him. You have made Jesus (human) to be God. This is the highest level of sin which is even worse than killing.

YakubuA:

Islam has ruled this world as a super power for over 1300 years and if your assertion is true all the non-Muslims would have been killed.

YakubuA:

Anyway the difference between the two is the motive behind their actions. While the Non-Muslims deliberately insult the Prophet and the Muslims with the intention to incite the Muslims the fellow Muslims only misunderstood the message.
So we Muslims protest against the insult thrown to us by the non-Muslims because it was deliberate while we try to call the attention of the fellow Muslims who misunderstood the message since their intention is not to insult Islam or the Prophet.

YakubuA:

..Allah knows what has lead to the addition of the words “in the reading of Qur’an” in the translation given by missionaries. See the actual Arabic text below and decide for yourself;
فَغَلَّوُا الْمَصَاحِفَ. فَلأَنْ أَقْرَأَ عَلَى قِرَاءَةِ مَنْ أُحِبُّ أَحَبَّ إِلَيَّ مِنْ أَنْ أَقْرَأَ عَلَى قِرَاءَةِ زَيْدِ بْنِ ثابت. فو الذي لا إِلَهَ غَيْرُهُ لَقَدْ أَخَذْتُ مِنْ فِيِّ رَسُولِ اللَّهِ - صَلَّى اللَّهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ - بِضْعًا وَسَبْعِينَ سُورَةً. وَزَيْدُ بْنُ ثَابِتٍ غُلامٌ لَهُ ذُؤَابَتَانِ يَلْعَبُ مَعَ الْغِلْمَانِ
So the translation given by missionaries makes “ghalla” to mean “deceit” while the basic meaning of the word and the one intended here is “to hide/conceal.” Following are my evidences for this.
1- In the similar report in Jami’ Tirmidhi wording is;
قَالَ عَبْدُ اللَّهِ بْنُ مَسْعُودٍ: " يَا أَهْلَ العِرَاقِ اكْتُمُوا المَصَاحِفَ الَّتِي عِنْدَكُمْ وَغُلُّوهَا فَإِنَّ اللَّهَ يَقُولُ: {وَمَنْ يَغْلُلْ يَأْتِ بِمَا غَلَّ يَوْمَ القِيَامَةِ} فَالقُوا اللَّهَ بِالمَصَاحِفِ
Abdullah bin Mas'ud said: 'O people of Al-Iraq! Keep the Musahif that are with you, and conceal them. For indeed Allah said: And whoever conceals something, he shall come with what he concealed on the Day of Judgement. So meet Allah with the Musahif.'" (Jami’ Tirmidhi, Hadith 3104)..

zionzoe:
Hello Adbulhakeem, I think you need to be schooled so that you can stop emmiting hatred and Frustration. I understand your frustration and it truely grieves me! I cannot imagine how I will feel if suddenly it is proven that what I took as sacred is now profane.
I wish dat we all had d opportunity to chose the Savior we would follow based on. Their Character while they walked on this planet Earth. It is difficult defending what is personal in terms of Character. If you truely believe in Jesus narative and proven Character and integrity the way d new testament puts it then u have struck life and it will not be taken from you but if you hold onto that Incorrect narrative that he never ressurected.........den u never really accepted his substitution for your sins, then you keep on striving to please GoD and can even kill , if it will please God but yet he is not pleased.Go to Jerusalem and you will see that the tomb where Jesus was buried is empty.
CaLl on God to show you who Jesus truely is............I tell u he will reveal His love to you and you Quest to please God mechanically, ceases. God now becomes pleased with u in this world and in d new world that will come soon. U are very close to the truth!

Abdulhakeem7:
WHY I CONVERTED TO ISLAM- Emmanuel Adebayo, All time Togolese best footballer.
I GOT 13 VALID REASONS WHY AND HOW MUSLIMS ARE LIKE JESUS (PBUH) AND TRUER FOLLOWERS OF JESUS THAN MOST CHRISTIANS BELIEVE:
1. Jesus (pbuh) taught that there is only One God and Only God should be worshipped as taught in Deut 6:4, Mark 12:29.
Muslims also believe this as taught in the Qur'an verse 4:171.
2. Jesus (pbuh) didn't eat pork as taught in Leviticus 11:7, and neither do Muslims as taught in the Qur'an verse 6:145.
3. Jesus (pbuh) greeted with the words "As-salaam alaikum" (Peace be with you), in John 20:21. Muslims also greet each other this way.
4. Jesus (pbuh) always said "God Willing" (inshallah), Muslims say this too before doing anything as taught in the Qur'an verses 18:23-24.
5. Jesus (pbuh) washed his face, hands, and feet before praying. The Muslims do the same.
6. Jesus (pbuh) and other prophets of the Bible prayed with their head to the ground see (Matthew26:39).
Muslims do too as taught in the Qur'an verse 3:43.
7. Jesus (pbuh) had a beard and wore a throbe. It is Sunnah for Muslim men to do the same.
8. Jesus (pbuh) followed the law and believed in all the prophets, see (Matthew 5:17).
Muslims do too as taught in the Qur'an verses 3:84, and 2:285.
9. Jesus' mother Maryam (pbuh) dressed modestly by fully covering her body and wearing a headscarf (hijab) as found in 1 Timothy 2:9, Genesis 24:64-65, and Corinthians 11:6.
Muslim women modestly dress the same as taught in the Qur'an verse 33:59.
10. Jesus (pbuh) and other prophets of the Bible fasted up to 40 days see (Exodus 34:28, Daniel 10:2-6, 1Kings 19:8, and Matthew 4:1.
Muslims do so also during the month of Ramadan.
Muslims are required to fast the full obligatory 30 days (see Qur'an 2:183), and others take it a step further by fasting an additional 6 days to increase their rewards.
11. Jesus (pbuh) taught to say "Peace to this house" when entering it see (Luke 10:5), and to also greet the people in the house with "peace be unto you". Muslims do exactly what Jesus did and taught. When we enter our homes and the
homes of others we say "Bismillah" and also greet with "as salaamu alaikum" (peace be upon you) as taught in the Qur'an verse 24:61.
12. Jesus (pbuh) was circumcised. Circumcision is 1 of the 5 fitrah in Islam, so Muslim men are required to be circumcised.
According to the Bible in Luke 2:21, Jesus was eight days old when he was circumcised. In the Torah, Allah/God stated to the Prophet Abraham (pbuh) that it is an "Everlasting covenant" (see Genesis 17:13). In the Qur'an verse 16:123 Muslims are required to follow the religion of Abraham. The Prophet
Muhammad (saws) said, "The Prophet Abraham
circumcised himself when he was eighty years
old." (see Sahih hadith Bukhari, Muslim, and
Ahmad).
13. Jesus (pbuh) spoke aramaic and called
God "Elah", which is pronounced the same as
"Allah".
Aramaic is an ancient, Biblical language. It is one of the Semitic languages that also include Hebrew, Arabic, Ethiopic and the ancient Assyrian and Babylonian language of Akkadian.
The Aramaic "Elah" and the Arabic "Allah" are the
same.
The Aramaic "Elah" is derived from the Arabic "Allah", and it means "GOD".
"Allah" in Arabic also means "GOD", the Supreme GOD
Almighty.
You can easily see the similarity in their pronunciation so this concludes that the God of Jesus is also the God of the Muslims, of all mankind, and all that exist.
Now tell me who is the real follower of Jesus (pbuh)? Obviously Muslims.
Now I believe am a true follower of Jesus PBUH.
-Emmanuel Adebayo

BERNIMOORE:


[size=14pt]#Coded (PostA)[/size]

[size=14pt]My Statements of reply to your response to my Statement of Claims in pg (4)[/size] https://www.nairaland.com/2480272/why-islamic-scholars-silent-boko/4
For clarity purposes i have tagged each paragraphs containing every claims in your response to my Statement of Claims as (A1 to A16) Below, however;

# You YakubuA erred in (A1 below) as you have fabricated and concorted your own version of Deuteronomy17:12 by removing 'isreal from the context of the verse' so as to give another meaning to the verse to equal it with quaran's verses that directly urges all the muslems believers' to fight, click http://quran.com/9/123 word for word here;

9:123
(Sahih International Translation)
- سورة التوبة O you who have believed, fight those adjacent to you of the disbelievers and let them find in you harshness. And know that Allah is with the righteous.

This DIRECT URGE to Muslim Believers cannot equally be said about christians in all A1-16 of your response below;



A1...... YakubuA post.1. Anyone arrogant enough to reject the verdict of the [holy man] who represents God must be put to death. Such evil must be purged.......Deuteronomy17:12

Authentic verse Deuteronomy17:12 reads

"12 Anyone arrogant enough to reject the verdict of the judge or of the priest who represents the Lord your God must die. In this way you will purge the evil [size=14pt]from Israel[/size]............................. Deuteronomy17:12 Click to verify http://biblehub.com/deuteronomy/17-12.htm

can you please quote the bible version you used in your post above that ommited 'isreal in its context? pls bring it on in your reply, because it is a 'criminal exclusion. i want to belive that you are innocent until you fail to provide the bible version,(confirm the quaran version i quoted if its authentic (Sahih International Translation)

A2...... YakubuA post .2. I will fill your mountains with the dead. Your hills, your valleys, and your streams will be filled with people slaughtered by the sword. I will make you desolate forever. Your cities will never be rebuilt. Then you will know that I am God. Ezekiel 35:7-9 verse 5 that clearly specify that those concerned are not christians but isreal 5 “Because you have had an ancient hatred, and have shed the blood of the children of Israel by the power of the sword at the time of their calamity click https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Ezekiel+35%3A5-9&version=NKJV

A3........ YakubuA post.3. Think not that I am come to send peace on earth: I came not to send peace, but a sword. For I am come to set a man at variance against his father, and the daughter against her mother, and the daughter in law against her mother-in-law. And a man's foes shall be they of his own household. Matthew 10:34-35 reconcile same verse with what jesus said again about his sword..
Revelation 2:16
16 Repent, or else I will come to you quickly and will fight against them with the sword of My mouth.
[/color]

A4......... YakubuA post.4. Make ready to slaughter [the infidel’s] sons for the guilt of their fathers; Lest they rise and posses the earth, and fill the breadth of the world with tyrants. Isaiah 14:21 Verses 1;2 of same isaiah 14 was specific about who are concerned, they are enemies of isreal, and so christians are not involved ........isaiah 14:1, [size=14pt] 2 Then people will take them and bring them to their place, and the house of Israel will possess them for servants and maids in the land of the Lord; they will take them captive whose captives they were, and rule over their oppressors [/size]. https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Isaiah+14%3A1-21&version=NKJV

A5........YakubuA post.5. Then I heard God say to the other men, "Follow him through the city and kill everyone whose forehead is not marked. Show no mercy; have no pity! Kill them all – old and young, girls and women and little children.” Ezekiel 9:5 VERSE 3 preceeding 5 shows that it was isreal that was concerned and Not christians Ezekiel 9:3 Now the glory of the God of [size=14pt]Israel[/size] had gone up from the cherub, where it had been, to the threshold of the temple.[a] And He called to the man clothed with linen, who had the writer’s inkhorn at his side; 4 and the Lord said to him, “Go through the midst of the city, through the midst of Jerusalem, and put a mark on the foreheads of the men who sigh and cry over all the abominations that are done within it.”

A6.....YakubuA post.6. Keep [my holiday], for it is holy. Anyone who desecrates it must die. Exodus 31:12-15, was Directed to Isreal in the context and Not Christians

A7......YakubuA post.7. If a man commits adultery with another man's wife, both the man and the woman must be put to death. Leviticus 20:10 ........was Directed to Isreal in the context and Not Christians

A8.......YakubuA post.8. Now therefore kill every male among the little ones, and kill every woman that hath known man by lying with him. But all the women children, that have not known a man by lying with him, keep alive for yourselves. Numbers 31: 17-18...... ........was Directed to Isreal in the context and Not Christians

A9....... YakubuA post. 9. A [holy man’s] daughter who loses her honor by committing fornication and thereby dishonors her father also, shall be burned to death. Leviticus 21:9 .......was Directed to Isreal in the context and Not Christians

A10..... YakubuA post.10. Everyone who would not seek God was to be put to death, whether small or great, whether man or woman. 2 Chronicles 15:12-13 was Directed to Isreal in the context and Not Christians

A11..... YakubuA post.11. But if [a girl wasn't a virgin on her wedding night] and evidence of the girl's virginity is not found, they shall bring the girl to the entrance of her father’s house and there her townsman shall stone her to death, because she committed a crime against God’s people by her unchasteness in her father's house. Thus shall you purge the evil from your midst. Deuteronomy 22:20-21 was Directed to Isreal in the context and Not Christians

A12.... YakubuA post. 12. If your own full brother, or your son or daughter, or your beloved wife, or you intimate friend, entices you secretly to serve other gods, whom you and your fathers have not known, gods of any other nations, near at hand or far away, from one end of the earth to the other: do not yield to him or listen to him, nor look with pity upon him, to spare or shield him, but kill him. Your hand shall be the first raised to slay him; the rest of the people shall join in with you. Deuteronomy 13:7-12 was Directed to Isreal in the context and Not Christians

A13.... YakubuA post.13. Cursed be he who does God’s work remissly, cursed he who holds back his sword from blood. Jeremiah 48:10 go back to verse 9 preceeding 10 .......

Jeremiah 48:9 “Give wings to [size=14pt]Moab(enemies of isreal),[/size]
That she may flee and get away;
For her cities shall be desolate,
Without any to dwell in them. was Directed to Isreal's Enemy in the context and Not Christians

A14....YakubuA post .14. Anyone who blasphemes God’s name must be stoned to death by the whole community of [believers]. Leviticus 24:16 was Directed to Isreal in the context and Not Christians

A15.......YakubuA post.15. Anyone else who goes too near the [Holy Place] will be executed. Numbers 1: 51 was Directed to Isreal in the context and Not Christians

i am expecting your reply to each and every paragraphs in A1-16 above, then Bring on more bible quotes and we shall consider them alongside quaran so as to see where problem was. Thanks

YakubuA:


The point is that all these verses are in the bible.

BERNIMOORE'S reply........You were silent on the 'Quoted' verse you chose to in your own volition to 'concort and fabricate, another version of the bible to exclude the word 'isreal' in Deuteronomy 17:12 so as to drag the bible/holy scripture into a pre-meditated assertion of yours'....'criminal exclusion at its best from you is mischievious' pls stop it.

YakubuA

Of course everything in the Bible was directed to Israel

BERNIMOORE'S reply ....... [size=14pt]really![/size] i will prove you wrong.

YakubuA .... Jesus himself was an Israeli and the Bible never mention Christians or Christianity.

Tell us where bible mentioned that jesus was an isreali

YakubuA Even Jesus said: Mathew

15:24 But He answered and said, "I was sent only to the lost sheep of the house of Israel."

YakubuA:
And we know that Christians are not Israelis (as you truly recognise on all your comments above) and this implies that Jesus was not send to the Christians but to the Israelis..

YakubuA:
what is your connection with Jesus

YakubuA:
So as a Christian who are you following? who is your God? and which scripture you are using?

My Further response to your reply to my Coded post Tagged (A) A1 TO A16

Here is your reply




BERNIMOORE'S reply great quote i cant laugh much o, but you just gave a bible verse that nailed you big time lets see in the same context of mathew 15 that you quoted ; [size=14pt]woman of Canaan is NOT an isreali! ok? cannannites are enemies of isreal and are NON isreali, so we can conclude peacefully in jesus own word about the cannanite woman to his disciples that 'jesus was sent to 'NON isrealis'[/size] confirm that first below;

Matthew 15:22

22 And behold, [size=14pt]a woman of Canaan came from that region and cried out to Him (jesus)[/size], saying,


Matthew 15:24

24 But He answered and said,[size=14pt] “I was not sent except to the lost sheep of the house of Israel.”

[/size]


Matthew 15:28New King James Version (NKJV)

28 Then [size=14pt]Jesus answered and said to her[b], “O woman, great is your faith[/b]! Let it be to you as you desire.[/size]” And her daughter was healed from that very hour.

Is this really difficult to comprehend

Another concorted statement of yours

[b]And we know that Christians are not Israelis (as you truly recognise on all your comments above) and this implies that Jesus was not send to the Christians but to the Israelis.. this assertion of yours gave me a rib-crack laughter but not for ridicle purpose,
the phrase; "a woman of Canaan" nullifies all your applications to the christ followers as all your assertions fell flate preceeding verse below;

Matthew 15:22

22 And behold, [size=14pt] a woman of Canaan came from that region and cried out to Him (jesus)[/size], saying............

[/b]

Now that we know Jesus was an Israeli and was sent to Israelis and the verses of the bible are directed to Israelis so what is your connection with Jesus

the first 3 connections are:

BERNIMOORE'S reply[/b]1) apart from Matthew 15:22 above that testifies that jesus was sent to non jews including me exercising faith in christ; we have

2)..[b]john 9:4

....... Then the woman of Samaria said to Him(jesus), “How is it that You, being a Jew, ask a drink from me, a Samaritan woman?” For Jews have no dealings with Samaritans.
[b]
and lastly no 3

mathew 21:43

"Therefore say I unto you, The kingdom of God shall be taken from you(jews isrealis), and given to a nation bringing forth the fruits thereof"

So as a Christian who are you following? who is your God? and which scripture you are using?

1, i am following GOD through christ! 2. My God is the Almighty One God! 3,i use the sacred 66 books of the sacred scriptures!

BERNIMOORE:
@yakubuA. [size=28pt]سورة التوبة [/size]
[size=14pt]quaran 9:29[/size]
Sahih International
[size=14pt] Fight those who do not believe in Allah or in the Last Day and who do not consider unlawful what Allah and His Messenger have made unlawful and who do not adopt the religion of truth from those who were given the Scripture - [fight] until they give the jizyah willingly while they are humbled. [/size] [size=16pt]compare pls [/size]
Matthew 5:43-48 king James version
43 “You have heard that it was said (in law) that, ‘You shall love your neighbor and hate your enemy.’ 44 But I(jesus) say to you, love your enemies, bless those who curse you, do good to those who hate you, and pray for those who spitefully use you and persecute you

Let us see if you are correct by quoting all the verses verbatim:

22And a Canaanite woman from that region came out and began to cry out, saying, "Have mercy on me, Lord, Son of David; my daughter is cruelly demon-possessed." [size=18pt]23But He did not answer her a word[/size]. And His disciples came and implored Him, saying, "Send her away, because she keeps shouting at us." 24But He answered and said, "I was sent only to the lost sheep of the house of Israel."

YakubuA Jesus told her clearly that he was not sent to her but only to the lost of the Israelites. This is plain English

BERNIMOORE:
[size=18pt]Post (B*). [/size] YakubuA. verses 24 bolded above, Jesus 'did not answer her 'A WORD'
You seem to tell lies on jesus now you erred again by wrongly saying that; answer this pls tagged ([size=14pt]B2)was Jesus addressing the Canaanite woman on "the issue of lost sheep or Jesus was addressing the issue of lost sheep to only his disciples after the disciples urged jesus to send her away and jesus refusing to answer her a word on the lost sheep[/size] I can't laugh o Jesus was only responding initially only to the disciples on the lost sheep issue and not the woman. Then when the woman passed a test Jesus now talk to her later

limamintruth:

True.
The same way Ahmadi muslims do not consider you lots as true muslims right?

So how can we(the non-muslims) now verify who between you two is the true muslim, since neither Muhammad nor Uthman are alive today to clear our doubts?

Mister Yaks, I cannot compel you to accept any verse in the Bible since you are not even a christian to start with and I am not an adherent of the jihadic religion that compel others to accept their beliefs or face death.

Unlike you muslims that ascribe more importance to language&poetic literature of the quran than the actual message itself, We christians value the message as contained in the Bible than anything else. Hence, whether the bible message is translated in hausa, english, french, arabic e.t.c is irrelevant to us, so long as the word of God therein can be easily understood by the reader.
To you, the english quran is inferior to the arabic quran; but to us christians, the Bible in greek, latin, english or even yoruba are all the same. Therefore we dont have to 'sing' our bible verses so that it can make sense like you muslims do.

And hope you know that the book of Mathew was written by apostle Mathew(a mortal like you and I) and not Jesus christ Himself? So why then do you seem to agree with the contents/verses of the bible book of Mathews (whose author is also neither God or Jesus Himself), while you reject the book of Galatians

Also, how do we then verify whether the message your prophet muhammad allegedly recieved from a.llah/god was indeed from God and not just concocted by him?
Calling a peadophile, murderer & robber prophet of God is also a great sin against God.

Next time, always think well before you type (no insult intended).
And remember, you have no moral right to judge others cos you are not a perfect entity yourself. Why not first remove the giant log of wood in your eye mister sinless.



Point of correction, Islam ruled some parts of the world not the world entirely.

And we see how more than 90% of those places hard hit by islamic jihad are presently majorly muslims. FACT!

Nations like Spain and some others in asia had to fight back and reclaim their territories from the jihadists. That is why these territories are not under the grip of islam today.

As at the time of Muhammad's death, most of the middle east and other regions around the world were non-muslims.
Islamic terror jihads brought about the rapid spread of islam all over the middle-east, asia & some african regions. If not for these islamic terrorism, islam wont have been widespread as it is today. FACT.
Do more research if you dont know.

We are well aware of the despicable genocide of armenian christians as perpetrated by Muslim Turks (who were part of the famous Ottoman empire).

These muslim Turks slaughtered millions of Armenians in Cold Blood in the ten centuries that they tyrannized Armenia from the year 1071 till 1920.
In that year the Seljuk Turks had defeated the Byzantines at the battle of Manzikert and overrun the Armenian provinces of the Byzantine Empire.
It was all through this period that the muslims carried out the Armenian Genocide.




Lol, so your fellow muslims that refer to muhammad as a foremost supporter of terrorism against infidels/non-muslims are only 'innocently' misunderstanding the prophet right?

So because the non-muslims hold a contrary view about your prophet, you see their views as 'insulting' & not an 'innocent misunderstanding' right?

We christians regard Jesus Christ as one with God, while you refer to Him as a mere human being. Does that mean we should consider that as an insult on our religion or God
You muslims absolutely have no regard for our apostle paul. Should we also consider that as an insult as well?

You just dont have a point & have confirmed to me that you all are sympathetic towards isis et al because you consider them your brethren in islam. And since non-muslims are not your brethren in islam, you are always quick to ask for their heads whenever they innocently express what they truly think of your religion (the same way you express what you think of other religions too). That to me is clear-cut double standards.




To be honest, you have neither countered my points nor made any sense with all the epistle you posted above.
Its obvious you are the one who is doing copy & paste here without properly sourcing the right information that corresponds to my question.
Rather, you even corroborated all that I said about the doubts cast by Masud & Ibn Ka'b about Zaid's quran compilation.

Personally I detaste quoting anything from your supposedly authentic hadith cos that book has even more contradictions than the quran sef.
One striking example is the following:

Narrated Qatada:" I asked Anas bin Malik: Who collected the Qur'an at the time of the Prophet? He replied, Four, all of whom were from the Ansar,Ubai bin Ka'b, Muadh bin Jabal, Zaid bin Thabit and Abu Zaid."
Sahih Bukhari 6:61:525
Narrated Anas bin Malik:"When the Prophet died, none had collected the Qur'an but four persons:Abu Ad Darda, Mu'adh bin Jabal, Zaid bin Thabit and Abu Zaid. We were the inheritor (of Abu Zaid) as he had no offspring."
Sahih Bukhari 6:61:526

Furthermore, saying that Muhammad treated non-muslims in his territory good is a blatant lie.
During the first hijra, the muslims testified of how the Christian King of Abyssinia showed them so much kindness. We were never told that the Christians prevented the muslims from freely practising their religion while they stayed there, neither did we hear that they were subjected to any special tax/levy simply for being non-christians.

Unfortunately same cannot be said of your beloved prophet who restricted the non-muslims in his territory from freely practising their religion and went ahead to impose special tax on the non-muslims.
And this is the same ill-treatment being meted upon non-muslims living in most of the modern day islamic republics in existence today. Yet, you insist islam is a religion of love&peace my foot!

You muslims better start accepting the truth because it is only the truth that will set you free & the vampires you created to annihilate the infidels are beginning to turn around and attack your offsprings.
You lots are always at war with non-muslims everywhere you go, fighting against budhists, christians, hindus e.t.c in the name of a.llah.
It doesnt even stop there still, you go ahead to fight against your selves (shiites, sunnis, ahmadiyyas, yazidis e.t.c).
Remember actions speak louder than mere words, hence, you can keep chanting all you want that islam is peace but so long as you fail to match your words with action, you will only be considered as hypocrites who only claim to be peaceful by words of mouth, while your actions are the direct opposite of what you say.

BTW since you earlier quoted from the telegraph news media, here are some interesting reports from your reliable telegraph news media as well:

- Islamist extremists in syria, libya and other middle-eastern countries are being funded by Qatar.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/middleeast/qatar/11110931/How-Qatar-is-funding-the-rise-of-Islamist-extremists.html

- Iran's devastating persecution of the Baha'is
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/comment/personal-view/4979875/Irans-persecution-of-Bahais-devastating.html

- How can we remain silent while Christians are being persecuted?
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/middleeast/8973118/How-can-we-remain-silent-while-Christians-are-being-persecuted.html

- Christians persecuted throughout the world.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/religion/9640825/Christians-persecuted-throughout-the-world.html

With all these and many more, will you still blame us for regarding islam & its ideology with contempt?
And this is even more worrisome when we realize that there is nothing like equal rights or equality in several islamic countries, who openly oppress the non-muslims in their midst and deny them their fundamental human rights to freely practise their religion.

So kindly desist from mentioning me further if you have nothing cogent to say.

YakubuA:


No lie here dude. Jesus answer was very clear. I have only been sent to the lost sheep of the house of Israel meant I am only sent to the Israelites. There is no any other meaning to this. And [size=14pt]this was the reason why he did not answer her[/size].

YakiubuA:

Yes we know clearly the woman was Canaanite not Israeli and she came to seek help for her daughter to be heeled. [size=14pt]Jesus told her clearly that he was not sent to her but only to the lost of the Israelites[/size]. This is plain English.

YakubuA:


In the Islamic system of govt the Muslims are obliged to pay Zakat or Alms to the state taken from the rich and given to the poor. The non-Muslims are not obliged to pay Zakat or Alms.
Jizyah is the state tax, levied to non-Muslim men (women and children excluded) who can afford it, under the Islamic system of government. Of course anyone who does not pay the state tax the state fight and humbled him. This is not only in the Islamic government but in any system of government. I don't know where you live but wherever you are try not to pay your state tax and see if the govt will not fight and humiliate you. [size=14pt]So what is your point here?[/size]

BERNIMOORE:
post (B3*)

YakubuA your post is now getting messier Flip, Flop

[size=18pt]FLIP[/size] " this was the reason why he did not answer her"


[size=18pt]FLOP[/size] Jesus told her clearly that he was not sent to her but only to the lost of the Israelites yet jesus did not answer her! can you be taken seriously?


I cant just stoplaughing at this expose

BERNIMOORE:


my point here is that you again fail big time! as you did not address the quaran verse;

here is the verse again;

@yakubuA. [size=28pt]سورة التوبة [/size]
[size=14pt]quaran 9:29[/size]
Sahih International
[size=14pt] Fight those who do not believe in Allah or in the Last Day and who do not consider unlawful what Allah and His Messenger have made unlawful and who do not adopt the religion of truth from those who were given the Scripture - [fight] until they give the jizyah [b]willingly while they are humbled.[/b] [/size]

Fight those who do not 'Adopt Islam' or believe in Allah or in the Last Day or a named so called religion of truth and fighting those who do not belive in Alah does Not relate in anyway with paying of taxes, forcefull conversion of non muslims [/b]was the issue you are running from diverting from topic

YakubuA:


limamin falsehood since you could not comprehend my response I will summarise it for you here:

Ibn Masud accepted the chapeters 1, 113 and 114 as part of the Quran and the evidences are as shown in my post. I post the Arabic only for you to verify, if you wish, that the translation was correct.

The translators of the Quran do not call their translations Quran but rather The translation of the meaning of the Quran and this is the reason why we don't call the translations Quran. Quran is only one and only and it is in Arabic Text.

The Quran also laid down the criteria for us so based on those criteria we know who is a Muslim and who is not despite their claims.

By the way Mister Yaks is not my name but I think it fit someone like you who throw abuse everywhere simply because one does not agree with your claims.

All your accusations are false and baseless but you can continue deluding yourself at the end you will only be disappointed for all your lies, end up disgraced in this world and cast into hellfire in the hereafter, unless if you repent.

By the way this is the opinion of one of your Christian brothers regarding violence in the bible:

[b]
Defense Vs. Total Annihilation

"Much to my surprise, the Islamic scriptures in the Quran were actually far less bloody and less violent than those in the Bible," Jenkins says.

Jenkins is a professor at Penn State University and author of two books dealing with the issue: the recently published Jesus Wars, and Dark Passages , which has not been published but is already drawing controversy.

Much to my surprise, the Islamic scriptures in the Quran were actually far less bloody and less violent than those in the Bible.

Philip Jenkins, author of 'Jesus Wars'

Violence in the Quran, he and others say, is largely a defense against attack.

"By the standards of the time, which is the 7th century A.D., the laws of war that are laid down by the Quran are actually reasonably humane," he says. "Then we turn to the Bible, and we actually find something that is for many people a real surprise. There is a specific kind of warfare laid down in the Bible which we can only call genocide."

It is called herem, and it means total annihilation. Consider the Book of 1 Samuel, when God instructs King Saul to attack the Amalekites: "And utterly destroy all that they have, and do not spare them," God says through the prophet Samuel. "But kill both man and woman, infant and nursing child, ox and sheep, camel and donkey."

When Saul failed to do that, God took away his kingdom.

"In other words," Jenkins says, "Saul has committed a dreadful sin by failing to complete genocide. And that passage echoes through Christian history. It is often used, for example, in American stories of the confrontation with Indians — not just is it legitimate to kill Indians, but you are violating God's law if you do not."

Jenkins notes that the history of Christianity is strewn with herem. During the Crusades in the Middle Ages, the Catholic popes declared the Muslims Amalekites. In the great religious wars in the 16th, 17th and 19th centuries, Protestants and Catholics each believed the other side were the Amalekites and should be utterly destroyed. [/b]

Finally I think I have to remind you here that you were the one who quoted me first and since you cannot comprehend what I am saying then I suggest you desist from quoting me.