njokusboy:
Lol...
I know where you are going with this, but your attempt is quite misguided, aside the simplicity of it.
Men are polygamous is used to mean that a man is capable of impregnating many women at the same time, nd not because of the amount of sperm cells one has... Indeed, our polygamous fathers did not even know what a sperm cell was, let alone the number...
However, your theory gives a better angle to the concept of equality and equal rights....
The opponents of polygamy do not want their rights to many husbands enforced to balance the equation... what they want is to abolish polygamy...
Your theory does their quest more harm than good, with this, they can legalise polyandry and leave polygamists the hell alone, afterall, they can collect as many sperm from different partners just as a man can knock off 10 women simultaneously... equal aint it .. I don't think polygamists should have a problem with this....
Women are polyandrous while men are polygamous... Everyone should therefore marry as much as he/she wants...

Case closed

If you have read my posts on this thread you'll know that I am not advocating for the legalisation of any form of polygamy. I am simply exposing the silliness of the idea that your biological functions confer on you more rights.

LordReed:
The simple (biological) answer is yes.

If only the most viable sperm is to fertilise the ovum then it is ideal for the female to collect as many as possible to see which of the potential fathers sperm will win out. If for example 5 men all have deposited their sperm in the cervix the one who's sperm wins out must be the man of men, a true winner as he gets to have biological immortality. So maybe we should take all this male bragging of who is better to the sperm battle ground and allow the biological process to show who is who. Of course in the process the female has to consort with more than one male so please males keep your jealousy and anger in check, it's only natural.

www.nairaland.com/attachments/2691516_ok_jpeg4de7b3afd43fa39f8bed03b78dec1f12

I concur!

A woman should allow as many men as possible sample her before she picks the one of her choice! Since this argument is on the ovarian level i.e sexual intercourse has aready taken place, then it stands to reason that a woman should be promiscous enough to allow as many men as possible insert thier dicks into her to as to allow their different sperm battle it out to find out who is the most superior! It is simply unfortunate that society has relegated the female to the background in terms of sexual prowess and the generation beforehand was erroneously taught that their honour was in being chaste and pure.

This archaeic line of thinking should be swept away forthwith. Thank the stars that we live in a modern era!


Ladies you have heard, kindly do the needful!

But men being polygamous is not archaic.

Rotfl

5minsmadness:



I concur!

A woman should allow as many men as possible sample her before she picks the one of her choice! Since this argument is on the ovarian level i.e sexual intercourse has aready taken place, then it stands to reason that a woman should be promiscous enough to allow as many men as possible insert thier dicks into her to as to allow their different sperm battle it out to find out who is the most superior! It is simply unfortunate that society has relegated the female to the background in terms of sexual prowess and the generation beforehand was erroneously taught that their honour was in being chaste and pure.

This archaeic line of thinking should be swept away forthwith. Thank the stars that we live in a modern era!


Ladies you have heard, kindly do the needful!

@bolded, should be applied to your religion as well

Some people dont understand simple english
This topic is spot-on!
It is archaic for women to stick to one man. Faithfullness is over-rated. As endorsed by this topic our ladies should open thier legs wide for multiple men to insert thier dicks! Enough of victorian sexual supression! Its not only men that should be polygamous! A woman needs to fvck as many men as possible to be able to choose the best sperm to fertilize her ovum. It's only fair after all!

5minsmadness:



I concur!

A woman should allow as many men as possible sample her before she picks the one of her choice! Since this argument is on the ovarian level i.e sexual intercourse has aready taken place, then it stands to reason that a woman should be promiscous enough to allow as many men as possible insert thier dicks into her to as to allow their different sperm battle it out to find out who is the most superior! It is simply unfortunate that society has relegated the female to the background in terms of sexual prowess and the generation beforehand was erroneously taught that their honour was in being chaste and pure.

This archaeic line of thinking should be swept away forthwith. Thank the stars that we live in a modern era!


Ladies you have heard, kindly do the needful!

Who is talking of sampling? This is serious business. If you insert your dick then you should be ready for the consequences. If you win the biological roulette... Congratulations you are now a proud father so you have to do the needful.

hahn:


@bolded, should be applied to your religion as well

Good evening sir!
i have something specially for you
[img]http://www..ng/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/BOTTY_NL1.jpg[/img]

You're welcome

5minsmadness:
Some people dont understand simple english
This topic is spot-on!
It is archaic for women to stick to one man. Faithfullness is over-rated. As endorsed by this topic our ladies should open thier legs wide for multiple men to insert thier dicks! Enough of victorian sexual supression! Its not only men that should be polygamous! A woman needs to fvck as many men as possible to be able to choose the best sperm to fertilize her ovum. It's only fair after all!

Why are you feeling scandalised now? When you were busy advocating the right of men to insert their dicks in every hole in sight you felt righteous didn't you? But put the shoe on the other foot and suddenly it's a scandal!

See the hypocrisy of the biological proponents? SMH

LordReed:


Who is talking of sampling? This is serious business. If you insert your dick then you should be ready for the consequences. If you win the biological roulette... Congratulations you are now a proud father so you have to do the needful.

Well, how do you know you have won the 'biological roulette'? How do you know its your sperm that won out? According to you its the female's responsibility to pick out the man most suitable so she should go ahead and do it

I like this your reasoning jare! and I'm glad the ladies are agreeing with you

5minsmadness:

Good evening sir!
i have something specially for you
[img]http://www..ng/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/BOTTY_NL1.jpg[/img]

You're welcome

Cool. My wife said you should use it as your dining table

LordReed:


Why are you feeling scandalised now? When you were busy advocating the right of men to insert their dicks in every hole in sight you felt righteous didn't you? But put the shoe on the other foot and suddenly it's a scandal!

See the hypocrisy of the biological proponents? SMH

Who is feeling scandalized
I said I AGREE with you!
Seriously, you made a lot of sense!

LordReed:


Why are you feeling scandalised now? When you were busy advocating the right of men to insert their dicks in every hole in sight you felt righteous didn't you? But put the shoe on the other foot and suddenly it's a scandal!

See the hypocrisy of the biological proponents? SMH

I no get power to laugh abeg.

hahn:


Cool. My wife said you should use it as your dining table

Hehehe, why thank ye very much sur!
I sure as heck am gonna enjoy eating off that rack
as soon as am through though I'll send her off to some other man to sample...
She has to pick the best sperm after all

5minsmadness:


Well, how do you know you have won the 'biological roulette'? How do you know its your sperm that won out? According to you its the female's responsibility to pick out the man most suitable so she should go ahead and do it

I like this your reasoning jare! and I'm glad the ladies are agreeing with you

I see, you'd rather deny females the right to choose. Just bundle them into the bedroom for your pleasue, well done o.

5minsmadness:


Hehehe, why thank ye very much sur!
I sure as heck am gonna enjoy eating off that rack
as soon as am through though I'll send her off to some other man to sample...
She has to pick the best sperm after all

Ensure to add two or three shots of your sperm so as to give it a competitive advantage. Boys are not smiling o

5minsmadness:

Who is feeling scandalized
I said I AGREE with you!
Seriously, you made a lot of sense!

You! Your first post captures it all too well

then it stands to reason that a woman should be promiscous enough to allow as many men as possible insert thier dicks into her

Was that not written by you? The woman is promiscuous while the men are exercising biological imperative. Double standard much?

LordReed:


Why are you feeling scandalised now? When you were busy advocating the right of men to insert their dicks in every hole in sight you felt righteous didn't you? But put the shoe on the other foot and suddenly it's a scandal!

See the hypocrisy of the biological proponents? SMH

OK, had to quote this

Hahahahahhahahahahahhaha!

NL sha!

I am 100% sure a number of peeps do not type their posts straight faced!.

So chastity exists?

Thank God Joseph was male

LordReed:


You! Your first post captures it all too well

then it stands to reason that a woman should be promiscous enough to allow as many men as possible insert thier dicks into her

Was that not written by you? The woman is promiscuous while the men are exercising biological imperative. Double standard much?

A man is a man na!

LordReed:


You! Your first post captures it all too well

then it stands to reason that a woman should be promiscous enough to allow as many men as possible insert thier dicks into her

Was that not written by you? The woman is promiscuous while the men are exercising biological imperative. Double standard much?

You got that right. The woman is a whoree for doing that but the man is only exhibiting his natural flair. Upholding the 'laws of nature' as stated by none other than....you gat it. Man.

hahn:


Ensure to add two or three shots of your sperm so as to give it a competitive advantage. Boys are not smiling o

Forgot to do that...
Will have another go at it then...

LordReed:


You! Your first post captures it all too well

then it stands to reason that a woman should be promiscous enough to allow as many men as possible insert thier dicks into her

Was that not written by you? The woman is promiscuous while the men are exercising biological imperative. Double standard much?

Bwahahahahaha , you're just reading what you want to believe sha

5minsmadness:



I concur!

A woman should allow as many men as possible sample her before she picks the one of her choice! Since this argument is on the ovarian level i.e sexual intercourse has aready taken place, then it stands to reason that a woman should be promiscous enough to allow as many men as possible insert thier dicks into her to as to allow their different sperm battle it out to find out who is the most superior! It is simply unfortunate that society has relegated the female to the background in terms of sexual prowess and the generation beforehand was erroneously taught that their honour was in being chaste and pure.

This archaeic line of thinking should be swept away forthwith. Thank the stars that we live in a modern era!


Ladies you have heard, kindly do the needful!

This was my first post
In which statement did I appear scandalized?
Or is seeking multiple partners not promiscuity
Or do you feel offended cos I used that word?

@bolded is an assertion of the point you made. The topic is "Are women designed to seek multiple partners?" The bolded is an agreement to your emphatic "Yes" response! I AGREE! You won me over! Bravo sir!

LordReed:


I see, you'd rather deny females the right to choose. Just bundle them into the bedroom for your pleasue, well done o.

Shou. see me see wahala. Abi I should be the one to choose for her again? After I'm through with her she should go and choose the next person na or would she require I escort her? I'm not denying her of anything o, far from it.

LordReed:


If you have read my posts on this thread you'll know that I am not advocating for the legalisation of any form of polygamy. I am simply exposing the silliness of the idea that your biological functions confer on you more rights.

what rights are you referring to here, polygamous people have never advocated for exclusive enjoyment of the priviledge to marry as much as they want, by all means, any woman can marry any number of man she desires going by your theory.. the only silly thing is trying to suppress such priviledges rather than advocate for the right to do the same.... if the essence of this thread is to expose what you wrote up there, then you failed woefully as you have only attempted to prove why women should be polyandrous and not why the polygamous argument is silly. i dont see the sense in your post.

LordReed:


Why are you feeling scandalised now? When you were busy advocating the right of men to insert their dicks in every hole in sight you felt righteous didn't you? But put the shoe on the other foot and suddenly it's a scandal!

See the hypocrisy of the biological proponents? SMH

Wait o, was this thread created in response to my "Are men naturally polygamous thread"?

Was this thread created specifically for me?

5minsmadness:


Bwahahahahaha , you're just reading what you want to believe sha

This was my first post
In which statement did I appear scandalized?
Or is seeking multiple partners not promiscuity
Or do you feel offended cos I used that word?

@bolded is an assertion of the point you made. The topic is "Are women designed to seek multiple partners?" The bolded is an agreement to your emphatic "Yes" response! I AGREE! You will on me over! Bravo sir!

Tell me did you use the word promiscous in that thread of yours advocating the biological imperative of men? Did you call men who seek multiple women promiscuous? No you didn't but you come here and state that women are promiscous for seeking the same thing. Use sarcasm to cover your double standards all you want but your hypocrisy is very evident.

5minsmadness:

Wait o, was this thread created in response to my "Are men naturally polygamous thread"?
Was this thread created specifically for me?

And yes this thread is a satirical slant on your one dick for many holes thread.

njokusboy:


what rights are you referring to here, polygamous people have never advocated for exclusive enjoyment of the priviledge to marry as much as they want, by all means, any woman can marry any number of man she desires going by your theory.. the only silly thing is trying to suppress such priviledges rather than advocate for the right to do the same.... if the essence of this thread is to expose what you wrote up there, then you failed woefully as you have only attempted to prove why women should be polyandrous and not why the polygamous argument is silly. i dont see the sense in your post.

Don't tell me you so naive as to believe that society will look/looks favourably on a woman seeking multiple partners.

Let me state clearly for you again. I am not advocating polyandry or any form of polygamy. And yes whatever sense you don't see here is same way you shouldn't see any sense in proving polygny by biology.

LordReed:


Tell me did you use the word promiscous in that thread of yours advocating the biological imperative of men? Did you call men who seek multiple women promiscuous? No you didn't but you come here and state that women are promiscous for seeking the same thing. Use sarcasm to cover your double standards all you want but your hypocrisy is very evident.

So the word 'promiscuity' is your problem?



It was the best term to use since you were advocating for women to have multiple sexual partners.
ok sorry. What can I replace it with?

And yes this thread is a satirical slant on your one dick for many holes thread.

Why thanks sir, I'm honoured!

LordReed:


Don't tell me you so naive as to believe that society will look/looks favourably on a woman seeking multiple partners.

Let me state clearly for you again. I am not advocating polyandry or any form of polygamy. And yes whatever sense you don't see here is same way you shouldn't see any sense in proving polygny by biology.

my friend stop grasping at straws, since when did it become about what society thinks, i thought the basis for this argument was "rights".. women have been crying that men enjoy this priviledge, wouldnt the rational thing be to allow them enjoy same for the sake of balance? who gives a fvck about what society thinks, society would get used to it eventually as they did to seeing two grown men fvck each other in the arse... for your education, the greatest set back women would face is getting husbands that are ready to live with them and not this nonsense about what society thinks... siddon there make pant dey wear you

njokusboy:


my friend stop grasping at straws, since when did it become about what society thinks, i thought the basis for this argument was "rights".. women have been crying that men enjoy this priviledge, wouldnt the rational thing be to allow them enjoy same for the sake of balance? who gives a fvck about what society thinks, society would get used to it eventually as they did to seeing two grown men fvck each other in the arse... for your education, the greatest set back women would face is getting husbands that are ready to live with them and not this nonsense about what society thinks... siddon there make pant dey wear you

njokusboy:


my friend stop grasping at straws, since when did it become about what society thinks, i thought the basis for this argument was "rights".. women have been crying that men enjoy this priviledge, wouldnt the rational thing be to allow them enjoy same for the sake of balance? who gives a fvck about what society thinks, society would get used to it eventually as they did to seeing two grown men fvck each other in the arse... for your education, the greatest set back women would face is getting husbands that are ready to live with them and not this nonsense about what society thinks... siddon there make pant dey wear you

Do you even read what you post? Is society a different creature from the people that are part of it? If society is accepting of polyandry why would women find it hard to get multiple partners? Or is your sense of reasoning underdeveloped?

5minsmadness:

So the word 'promiscuity' is your problem?



It was the best term to use since you were advocating for women to have multiple sexual partners.
ok sorry. What can I replace it with?

Replace with a brain free of hypocrisy.

Why thanks sir, I'm honoured!

You are welcome.

Women with multiple partners= promiscuity.
Men with multiple partners= good and natural.

Is it hypocrisy? No it is not.
Why? Because some men said so?
Why should we take that instead of a valid reason? Nothing just take their words for it because they said so with all the 'biological proof'

I've summarized it for you Lordreed.