cococandy:
Senseless thread?

So this kind of topic can be senseless? Hehehehe

Yes now, no be woman matter?

LordReed:


Yes now, no be woman matter?

as in.
Don't you just love it when you throw people's logic in their faces exactly the way they presented it and it doesn't make sense anymore to them.

LordReed:


I tried to tell you not to take this too seriously as it is only meant to counter the "men are polygamous by nature" argument. If we simply relied on biological nature then many of our actions will be way different, which is what the point of this is.

So this thread was actually a joke from the beginning. Even the OP admits it, just a cheap opportunity to whip up sentiments

I feel u could have made a better argument though instead of this childish approach.

Look we didn't create ourselves, it's just the way the world is.

Put a man in a room with 5 ladies, there's a 100% probability he'll impregnate the lot and in a single day too. He has the sperm to spare.

Put a lady in a room with 5guys , No matter how hard she tries she's only going to get fertilized by one man bro, no matter how many men cum inside of her. That's biological imperative for you!

So, are women designed to be polygamous? The answer is simple. NO! And no amount t of sentimental crybabyism can change that simple biological fact!

Are men designed to be polygamous?

Look at the example up there
What do YOU think?

5minsmadness:


So this thread was actually a joke from the beginning. Even the OP admits it, just a cheap opportunity to whip up sentiments

I feel u could have made a better argument though instead of this childish approach.

Look we didn't create ourselves, it's just the way the world is.

Put a man in a room with 5 ladies, there's a 100% probability he'll impregnate the lot and in a single day too. He has the sperm to spare.

Put a lady in a room with 5guys , No matter how hard she tries she's only going to get fertilized by one man bro, no matter how many men cum inside of her. That's biological imperative for you!

So, are women designed to be polygamous? The answer is simple. NO! And no amount t of sentimental crybabyism can change that simple biological fact!

Are men designed to be polygamous?

Look at the example up there
What do YOU think?

There is a difference between conception and sex

Either a man/woman can sleep with as many partners as they deem fit

The woman can chose out of different sperms one to father her baby
The man can chose to plant his sperm in different women.

So maybe everyone was 'designed' to have/desire multiple sex partners.

I wonder who the designer is anyways.

5minsmadness:


So this thread was actually a joke from the beginning. Even the OP admits it, just a cheap opportunity to whip up sentiments

I feel u could have made a better argument though instead of this childish approach.

Look we didn't create ourselves, it's just the way the world is.

Put a man in a room with 5 ladies, there's a 100% probability he'll impregnate the lot and in a single day too. He has the sperm to spare.

Put a lady in a room with 5guys , No matter how hard she tries she's only going to get fertilized by one man bro, no matter how many men cum inside of her. That's biological imperative for you!

So, are women designed to be polygamous? The answer is simple. NO! And no amount t of sentimental crybabyism can change that simple biological fact!

Are men designed to be polygamous?

Look at the example up there
What do YOU think?

It's funny how the logic you are using to prove this polygamousness of men escapes you when turned around on you. Of the millions of sperm released by a man how many get to merge with one egg?

cococandy:
as in.
Don't you just love it when you throw people's logic in their faces exactly the way they presented it and it doesn't make sense anymore to them.

It's amazing. And 5minsmadness even comes up to prove it. Simply amazing.

LordReed:


Njokusboy is just circlejerking and really has nothing except to subtly show his contempt for the idea of polyandry. I am not arguing for or against polygamy of any form, I am arguing against the vilification of women with multiple partners in the light of people saying it is acceptable for men. Also I find it silly for someone to say biological function makes man polygamous by nature. Anything outside of this is ancillary.

Acceptable for men how?
Are u arguing based on relationships or marriage?
If relationships, nobody has justified a man having multiple girlfriends and even at that a lot of girls have strings of boyfriends as well.
If marriage, then njokusboy is very on point.
What exactly is your focus of discontent?

LordReed:


It's amazing. And 5minsmadness even comes up to prove it. Simply amazing.

Very soon they will start calling you a woman and picking on you. Brace yourself.

bukatyne:


There is a difference between conception and sex

Either a man/woman can sleep with as many partners as they deem fit

The woman can chose out of different sperms one to father her baby
The man can chose to plant his sperm in different women.

So maybe everyone was 'designed' to have/desire multiple sex partners.

I wonder who the designer is anyways.

@bolded ends the discussion!
A woman can conceive for only one man.
A man can cause the conception of many women!
QED!
Thread closed!

5minsmadness:

@bolded ends the discussion!
A woman can conceive for only one man.
A man can cause the conception of many women!
QED!
Thread closed!

Is polygamy as a result of conception or a result of sex?

The question now is was a man designed to pregnant several women?

From the creation?

LordReed:


It's funny how the logic you are using to prove this polygamousness of men escapes you when turned around on you. Of the millions of sperm released by a man how many get to merge with one egg?

Let's follow your logic then.
How many eggs are there to merge with?



This attempt to 'turn the logic on me' is stillborn at best

It's funny how people won't accept their shortcomings and say they are polygamous in nature instead of lumping everybody together with them.

I have no problem if anyone is polygamous in nature.
BOTTOM LINE; They are ashame of their way of life and probably being pricked by guilty consceince hence trying to make theirselves feel better.

LordReed:


So it is ok for a man to be caught cheating?

Why would I 'cheat' when I can just be polygamous? Anyway, if you choose to have extramarital affairs, it's very okay.

LordReed:


It's amazing. And 5minsmadness even comes up to prove it. Simply amazing.

I appreciate a good banter. Really I do.
But your thread fell flat on its face from page 1.
I thought it was a joke last night till I took a second look this morning and saw u were actually being serious.

It's like comfort food for the some ladies here. It makes them feel good but in practicality can only be bad for their health

Anyways I try not to ba a spoilsport in comfort parties like these.
Have fun

5minsmadness:

Let's follow your logic then.
How many eggs are there to merge with?

This attempt to 'turn the logic on me' is stillborn at best

I am surprised that everyone failed to mention heteropaternal super fecundation which occurs when a woman has sexual intercourse with two men during the same menstrual cycle, having released two eggs. One egg is then fertilized by each man.

Just passing by.....

bukatyne:


Is polygamy as a result of conception or a result of sex?

The question now is was a man designed to pregnant several women?

From the creation?

@bolded. Answer it yourself. Be honest.

Was man designed to impregnate several women at once?

Was a woman designed to be Impregnated by several men at once?

Give an honest answer if u can pls.

5minsmadness:


Acceptable for men how?
Are u arguing based on relationships or marriage?
If relationships, nobody has justified a man having multiple girlfriends and even at that a lot of girls have strings of boyfriends as well.
If marriage, then njokusboy is very on point.
What exactly is your focus of discontent?

I thought I already made that clear to you? Folk like you with your double standards and hypocrisy is my discontent. When you were "proving" the polygamous nature of man did you specify that is marriage or relationship?

5minsmadness:

Let's follow your logic then.
How many eggs are there to merge with?



This attempt to 'turn the logic on me' is stillborn at best

Gosh you and njokusboy must have gone to the same school of circlejerkers. Read again the post you made this reply to.

edwife:


I am surprised that everyone failed to mention heteropaternal super fecundation which occurs when a woman has sexual intercourse with two men during the same menstrual cycle, having released two eggs. One egg is then fertilized by each man.

Just passing by.....

Chases her away with broom

A very rare occurrence anyway. Definitely an aberration of nature.

Now git! You'll spoil the fun

LordReed:


I thought I already made that clear to you? Folk like you with your double standards and hypocrisy is my discontent. When you were "proving" the polygamous nature of man did you specify that is marriage or relationship?

Have u eaten this morning

What is polygamy if not a subset of marriage

LordReed:


I thought I already made that clear to you? Folk like you with your double standards and hypocrisy is my discontent. When you were "proving" the polygamous nature of man did you specify that is marriage or relationship?

LOL, they majored mostly in males testosterone and its urge to react.

5minsmadness:


Chases her away with broom

A very rare occurrence anyway. Definitely an aberration of nature.

Now git! You'll spoil the fun

BoboYekini:
Why would I 'cheat' when I can just be polygamous? Anyway, if you choose to have extramarital affairs, it's very okay.

And it is exclusive to men right?

@LordReed

I now see why you are being so emotional...
Your past exercise at conception just yielded fruit

Congrats man.

LordReed:

And it is exclusive to men right?

In Africa and they claim to be morally better than America.

5minsmadness:

I appreciate a good banter. Really I do.
But your thread fell flat on its face from page 1.
I thought it was a joke last night till I took a second look this morning and saw u were actually being serious.

It's like comfort food for the some ladies here. It makes them feel good but in practicality can only be bad for their health

Anyways I try not to ba a spoilsport in comfort parties like these.
Have fun

It was designed to fall flat to show how weak the "polygamous nature by biology" is and in fact is only prop for your ego.

5minsmadness:
@LordReed

I now see why you are being so emotional...
Your past exercise at conception just yielded fruit

Congrats man.

Thanks

Going by your argument I should even be out there "sowing and reaping" given that I have "proved" myself not so?

cococandy:

Very soon they will start calling you a woman and picking on you. Brace yourself.

LoL! My darling daughter is bracing me

LordReed:


It was designed to fall flat to show how weak the "polygamous nature by biology" is and in fact is only prop for your ego.

But the arguments on both threads are not at par at all. You just strung a lot of illogical statements together backed up by little or no facts and presented it as a counter-offensive. A very bad one at that. Like someone said and like I thought previously one would think you were advocating for female promiscuity polyandry the way you went about it.

Better luck next time.

LordReed:


Thanks

Going by your argument I should even be out there "sowing and reaping" given that I have "proved" myself not so?

Why should you go out when you already have loving woman by your side? Or don't you have self control?

5minsmadness:

Have u eaten this morning

What is polygamy if not a subset of marriage

So marriage is natural not a social construct?

LordReed:
I am not arguing for or against polygamy of any form

Which is probably where I think you're slightly off-track. It's not quite clear that you are not arguing for polyandry/promiscuity, and in any event, I think your best tack would have been to argue against polygamy/promiscuity as a whole - for either sex.

LordReed:
I am arguing against the vilification of women with multiple partners in the light of people saying it is acceptable for men.

Thats's not what it sounds like - to me anyway. It appears you are arguing that women are functionally equally capable of polygamy/promiscuity. And this is further evidenced by your "arguing against the villification", not against the act they're being villified for.

If exposing "hypocrisy" was your aim, I think you'd have been best served adopting a different tack. Not least because, like I said, Njokusboy has presented what I feel is a tighter argument defending the thing you hate - even if not the hypocrisy of it - from your own position.

At least you've got the women all excited !


TV