Welcome, Guest: Register On Nairaland / LOGIN! / Trending / Recent / New
Stats: 3,199,761 members, 7,972,737 topics. Date: Friday, 11 October 2024 at 05:21 PM

10 Of The Deadliest Nuclear Weapons - Politics (2) - Nairaland

Nairaland Forum / Nairaland / General / Politics / 10 Of The Deadliest Nuclear Weapons (9482 Views)

Vandalism: Buhari Begs Militants, Says “they Use Hi-tech weapons” / An 19 year old igbo boy Declared The Deadliest Striker In EPL / Boko Haram Overtakes ISIS As World’s Deadliest Terror Organisation-IndependentUK (2) (3) (4)

(1) (2) (3) (Reply) (Go Down)

Re: 10 Of The Deadliest Nuclear Weapons by Princecalm(m): 11:31am On Aug 05, 2015
Ufranklin92:


Why are you lieing to yourself bro
on the real sense, the US won't allow us to get hold of such weapons.
Re: 10 Of The Deadliest Nuclear Weapons by Ufranklin92(m): 11:35am On Aug 05, 2015
Princecalm:
on the real sense, the US won't allow us to get hold of such weapons.

That's what you should said earlier,US will do everything not to allow such
Re: 10 Of The Deadliest Nuclear Weapons by Princecalm(m): 11:44am On Aug 05, 2015
Ufranklin92:


That's what you should said earlier,US will do everything not to allow such


and that is why I Said we are peaceful because we won't dare such countries
Re: 10 Of The Deadliest Nuclear Weapons by daveP(m): 11:51am On Aug 05, 2015
WorldWar3 loading.

Russian have more in numbers, USA have more in terms of sophistication. And an upgraded defence mechanism.


ICBM-Intercontinental Ballistic Missiles- this can be shot from russia or a country, fly into a continent, then maps out its target to destroy. They pass radars easily.


SAMs-Surface to Air Missiles: a short ranges, say country to country, state to state. Used to bring down other flying missiles or airplane, etc that penetrates their airspace. Its like history in warfare/kinda outdated. But the Isrealis have upgraded it to a height that its so effective and precise.


Waste of resources and life.

SLBM- hmm from sea to land ballistic. The one Mr Collins Powell did went wrong and the US reformed their law on this crappy, dangerous idea.


Overall. Thats why these countries are the most powerful. Powerful in evil intentions
Re: 10 Of The Deadliest Nuclear Weapons by daveP(m): 11:56am On Aug 05, 2015
Princecalm:



and that is why I Said we are peaceful because we won't dare such countries
either of two options: a country is loyal to one of the top five nuclear powers or against the other.


Security issues are created to bring about a turn to their direction for help and that way they buy loyalty from defence-less country. Usa and russia are good at this.

Nigeria tried to play both wayo and its stil backfiring till date.


Those peaceful countries are sympathetic to one of these nuclear powers. Or they have a co-secret program up their sleeves.
Re: 10 Of The Deadliest Nuclear Weapons by belloben: 12:01pm On Aug 05, 2015
IMPOUNDED VEHICLES FOR SALES AT CHEAPER AND AFFORDABLE
PRICE, INTERESTED BUYERS SHOULD PLEASE CONTACT OUR
MARKET ZONAL OFFICER COMPTROLLER BANKOLE SHEGUN ON
(08163140873) E.G. Golf2, 3, 4, 5, from N200, 000-N400,
000. Toyota Camry big. daddy=N450,000. Honda accord baby
boy=N400, 000. ToyotaMatrix=N500, 000 Toyota
Prado=N600,000 Toyota. hiaceBus=N450,000 Toyota
Avalon=N 400,000. ToyotaCorolla=N400,000 Mazda=N
450,000 AND MANY OTHER VEHICLES OF UR CHOICE....THE PRICES OF EACH VEHICLE
IS NEGOTIABLE AND PICTURES WILL BE SENT TO YOU FOR
YOUR VIEWING INSPECTIONS ALSO ALLOWED AND DELIVERY IS FREE TO ALL 36 STATE IN NIGERIA QND WE HAVE OTHER VEHICLES YOU CAN REQUEST FOR AND WE ARE GARANTEE YOU THAT YOUR DETAILS WILL BE REGISTER WITH THE VEHICLE YOU ARE BUYING FOR MORE INFORMATION CONTACT OFFICER IN-CHARGE MR BANKOLE SHEGUN ON THIS. (09032742184)
Re: 10 Of The Deadliest Nuclear Weapons by TruthisGOD: 12:25pm On Aug 05, 2015
Princecalm:
do you know the US will do everything they can so we will never have such weapons
i believe in indigenious technology. Thats what china did nd look at where the r nw after copying from US
Re: 10 Of The Deadliest Nuclear Weapons by Princecalm(m): 12:30pm On Aug 05, 2015
TruthisGOD:
i believe in indigenious technology. Thats what china did nd look at where the r nw after copying from US
yes, CHINA took a stand and that is to say the US knows that CHINA is now a competitor in the business, but that cannot be said of us who still depends on some of those countries
Re: 10 Of The Deadliest Nuclear Weapons by Nobody: 12:46pm On Aug 05, 2015
I knew Russia would be no1. I just wish WW3 could start right away.
Re: 10 Of The Deadliest Nuclear Weapons by Princecalm(m): 1:03pm On Aug 05, 2015
AdmiralDru:
I knew Russia would be no1. I just wish WW3 could start right away.
and you will be gone in no distant time
Re: 10 Of The Deadliest Nuclear Weapons by TruthisGOD: 1:24pm On Aug 05, 2015
Princecalm:
yes, CHINA took a stand and that is to say the US knows that CHINA is now a competitor in the business, but that cannot be said of us who still depends on some of those countries
If we cnt produce anytin on our own we shld as well stop goin 2 skul. I dont realy believe in western ally when it coms 2 tech. D world is nw a global village, al u need is ur brain nd information. Do u knw dat military weapons nd bomb were indigniously produced during the Nigeria civil war? We shld learn 2 do tins on our own dats is d begining of wisdom. By d way who taught US or d first country dat developed a nuclear weapon how 2 do it? Africa shld learn 2 stand on there feet and do tins on their own- Audacity of hope by obama.
Re: 10 Of The Deadliest Nuclear Weapons by makahlj2: 1:31pm On Aug 05, 2015
Dharniel:
when would nigeria ever build one?
And when will BH obtain one?
Re: 10 Of The Deadliest Nuclear Weapons by Nobody: 1:44pm On Aug 05, 2015
Dis list is d only possible Armageddon so far.
Re: 10 Of The Deadliest Nuclear Weapons by sinceraconcept(m): 1:47pm On Aug 05, 2015
Nigeria will get there someday,its all about time and good governance,the change is here and we the citizens need positive change in our lives.
anyway,patronize Sincera Concept for unique and outstanding services,you will never regret dealing with us
Re: 10 Of The Deadliest Nuclear Weapons by Jesusloveyou: 2:22pm On Aug 05, 2015
respect80:
Cashing cold shocked
whether u catch cold now, one day u will still die
Re: 10 Of The Deadliest Nuclear Weapons by honestmike(m): 2:22pm On Aug 05, 2015
Yikes!!!! if one of those was aimed at my tiny head that would be disintegrating
Re: 10 Of The Deadliest Nuclear Weapons by Nobody: 2:24pm On Aug 05, 2015
TruthisGOD:
This what our youths shld be disscussing, hw 2 make our country strong and formidable nt jambories and politics. Am facinated by technology, especialy war technology. Looking at US nd Russia, who wil dare strike them.


This guy, i think i need to know u better let see if we can work together.
Re: 10 Of The Deadliest Nuclear Weapons by TruthisGOD: 4:03pm On Aug 05, 2015
DONBROTHER1:



This guy, i think i need to know u better let see if we can work together.
Wel, it depends on your proposal
Re: 10 Of The Deadliest Nuclear Weapons by larryUG(m): 4:53pm On Aug 05, 2015
INTROVERT:
Is it true that the combined nuclear capabilities of Russia and USA can obliterate the world as it is today
Russia has 7500 nukes, US has about 7100. do the math of what 1 nuke can do and then extra polate to over 14,000 nukes.
Re: 10 Of The Deadliest Nuclear Weapons by Nobody: 6:25pm On Aug 05, 2015
TruthisGOD:
Wel, it depends on your proposal


What kind of propopal, meaning i don't understand.
Re: 10 Of The Deadliest Nuclear Weapons by Nobody: 10:56pm On Aug 05, 2015
Toktee:
The one possesed by the americans is more deadly than them all,it carries decoy,can change direction mid air,damm,nija where are thou?

You are ignorantly right. Y did you think Putin said he could invade Poland, Romania & the Baltic States in 2 days if he wanted?

www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/russia/11106195/Putin-privately-threatened-to-invade-Poland-Romania-and-the-Baltic-states.html

My friend; The testicles of Caesar Putin are made of Brass. grin

You better warn those American cockroaches in Pentagon to back off Crimea if you do not want to watch in 7D, all the Russian underground hidden nukes sinking all the American major cities to the bottom of the ocean.

Here in Russia, my friend, we don't play. grin

1 Like

Re: 10 Of The Deadliest Nuclear Weapons by pazienza(m): 11:55pm On Aug 05, 2015
Well, those weapons are scarecrows, scaring away would be predators.

Economic prosperity without those weapons, is like a man who built a house, furnished it, but put no gates, no doors and no burglary proofs.

Enemies would simply invade and cart away his precious property.

Look at Libya, wealth without those weapons, France and NATO predators simply licked their lips and devoured Libya.
If Libya spent half of her wealth developing nuclear weapons, NATO wouldn't have dared step a foot there, considering how close Libya is to Europe,bombing Brussels and Paris into stone age would have been a potent possibility and fear that would have kept the predators at bay.

In a world where greed and injustice rules, where might makes right, where countries with no iota of natural resources would seek to control and own another country's resources directly ( as in the colonial days) and indirectly through local puppets and rubber stamps masquerading as leaders as we have now), those weapons are important, and until an independent black nation acquires such weapons, the story of the black race wouldn't change.

4 Likes

Re: 10 Of The Deadliest Nuclear Weapons by malele(m): 3:22am On Aug 06, 2015
Zoharariel:


You are ignorantly right. Y did you think Putin said he could invade Poland, Romania & the Baltic States in 2 days if he wanted?

www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/russia/11106195/Putin-privately-threatened-to-invade-Poland-Romania-and-the-Baltic-states.html

My friend; The testicles of Caesar Putin are made of Brass. grin

You better warn those American cockroaches in Pentagon to back off Crimea if you do not want to watch in 7D, all the Russian underground hidden nukes sinking all the American major cities to the bottom of the ocean.

Here in Russia, my friend, we don't play. grin

You are a fool.
What makes u think russia can invade the baltics.
What makes u think USA can't sink Russian cities to the bottom of ocean.
Apart from nukes do u think Russian military has what it takes to stand usa forces?

1 Like

Re: 10 Of The Deadliest Nuclear Weapons by Nobody: 12:15pm On Aug 06, 2015
malele:


You are a fool.
What makes u think russia can invade the baltics.
What makes u think USA can't sink Russian cities to the bottom of ocean.
Apart from nukes do u think Russian military has what it takes to stand usa forces?

And you had to call me a fool just to drive home your point you demented, harebrained lunatic with your pus filled-cranium.

Now; pay attention to this, toddler.

1.) All US defense systems [Anti-Ballistic Missile Interceptors, with their almighty Aegis Combat System] will be shut down with the Russian electronic warfare device called "Khibiny" before we commence active vaporization of every living & non living things in the US.

Read This Slowpoke:

What Frightened The USS Donald Cook So Much In The Black Sea.

The State Department acknowledged that the crew of the destroyer USS Donald Cook has been gravely demoralized ever since their vessel was flown over in the Black Sea by a Russian Sukhoi-24 (Su-24) fighter jet which carried neither bombs nor missiles but only an electronic warfare device.


This video shows the USS Donald Cook sailing into the Black Sea to position itself near Russia’s territorial waters.

On 10 April 2014, the USS Donald Cook entered the waters of the Black Sea and on 12 April a Russian Su-24 tactical bomber flew over the vessel triggering an incident that, according to several media reports, completely demoralized its crew, so much so that the Pentagon issued a protest [1].

The USS Donald Cook (DDG-75) is a 4th generation guided missile destroyer whose key weapons are Tomahawk cruise missiles with a range of up to 2,500 kilometers, and capable of carrying nuclear explosives. This ship carries 56 Tomahawk missiles in standard mode, and 96 missiles in attack mode.

The US destroyer is equipped with the most recent Aegis Combat System. It is an integrated naval weapons systems which can link together the missile defense systems of all vessels embedded within the same network, so as to ensure the detection, tracking and destruction of hundreds of targets at the same time. In addition, the USS Donald Cook is equipped with 4 large radars, whose power is comparable to that of several stations. For protection, it carries more than fifty anti-aircraft missiles of various types.

Meanwhile, the Russian Su-24 that buzzed the USS Donald Cook carried neither bombs nor missiles but only a basket mounted under the fuselage, which, according to the Russian newspaper Rossiyskaya Gazeta [2], contained a Russian electronic warfare device called Khibiny.

As the Russian jet approached the US vessel, the electronic device disabled all radars, control circuits, systems, information transmission, etc. on board the US destroyer. In other words, the all-powerful Aegis system, now hooked up - or about to be - with the defense systems installed on NATO’s most modern ships was shut down, as turning off the TV set with the remote control.

The Russian Su-24 then simulated a missile attack against the USS Donald Cook, which was left literally deaf and blind. As if carrying out a training exercise, the Russian aircraft - unarmed - repeated the same maneuver 12 times before flying away.

After that, the 4th generation destroyer immediately set sail towards a port in Romania.

Since that incident, which the Atlanticist media have carefully covered up despite the widespread reactions sparked among defense industry experts, no US ship has ever approached Russian territorial waters again.

According to some specialized media, 27 sailors from the USS Donald Cook requested to be relieved from active service.

Vladimir Balybine - director of the research center on electronic warfare and the evaluation of so-called "visibility reduction" techniques attached to the Russian Air Force Academy - made the following comment:

"The more a radio-electronic system is complex, the easier it is to disable it through the use of electronic warfare."

A video presentation of the US Aegis system. Currently installed on the most sophisticated US Navy warships and in the process of being set up throughout the entire range of NATO naval forces, this missile defense system was completely knocked out in the Black Sea by a Russian electronic warfare device.

Source: www.voltairenet.org/article185860.html

2.) The Russian A-135 Anti-Ballistic Missile System and the S400Triumf (SA-21 Growler) are capable of intercepting a multiple LRBMs/ICBMs attack with astounding accuracy.

Read this again slowpoke:

How Russia’s S-400 Makes The F-35 Obsolete

It’s not often that a relatively inexpensive air defence weapon is able to make a trillion dollar fighter programme obsolete. But the $500 million S-400 missile system has done precisely that to America’s brand new F-35 stealth fighter.

In November 2014 Moscow and Beijing inked a $3 billion agreement for the supply of six battalions of S-400 anti-aircraft/anti-missile systems that will significantly boost China’s air defence capability against the US and its allies in the Western Pacific.

With a tracking range of 600 km and the ability to hit targets 400 km away at a blistering speed of 17,000 km an hour – faster than any existing aircraft–the S-400 is a truly scary weapon if you are facing its business end.First deployed by Russia in 2010, each S-400 battalion has eight launchers, a control centre, radar and 16 missiles available as reloads.

S-400 air defence missile system defends the skies over Moscow

Unlike the overhyped US Patriot missile that turned out to be a dud in battle, the S-400 was designed to create the daddy of Iron Domes. “Given its extremely long range and effective electronic warfare capabilities, the S-400 is a game-changing system that challenges current military capabilities at the operational level of war,” Paul Giarra, president, Global Strategies and Transformation, told Defense News. The S-400 will have the “effect of turning a defensive system into an offensive system, and extend China’s A2/AD (anti-access/area-denial) umbrella over the territory of American allies and the high seas.”

But first a bit of background. The S-400 was developed to defend Russian air space and a few hundred kilometers further against missiles and aircraft of all types, including stealth. Because it is a highly potent and accurate weapon that can tip the balance of power in any war theatre, Moscow has long resisted the temptation of exporting even its older iteration, the S-300, to troubled allies Syria and Iran.

An S-300 missile fired from, say, Damascus will blow away an aircraft over central Tel Aviv in about 107 seconds, giving the Israelis just enough time to say their prayers. It is precisely because the S-series missile systems can so dramatically upset the military balance that Israel has pressured Russia against introducing it into the Middle East tinderbox. Israel has also warned it would go after Syrian S-300 batteries with everything it’s got.
However, China’s case is different because the chances of another country daring to take a shot at the Chinese are next to zero. This development is really bad news for the F-35.

Russia and the US have traditionally adopted different military strategies. During the Cold War the US relied upon carrier-based aircraft to project power in the Western Pacific, and the strategy continues today. The Russians on the other hand decided these floating airfields were easy targets for their shore-based long-range aviation and anti-ship cruise missiles.

Source: m.in.rbth.com/blogs/2015/03/11/how_russias_s-400_makes_the_f-35_obsolete_41895.html

Conclusion: There won't even be any need for the Russian Anti-Ballistic Missile Systems after Khibiny must have rendered all American Offensive & Defensive Missile Systems impotent.

This is the reason Mother Russia's priority is geared towards ensuring that different ICBMs with different colours, capacity & flavours are dispersed like packs of candies to the various target locations in the United States & her allied Nations. grin

God Bless You Caesar Putin! grin

Pic 1: Russian SU-24Bomber shiting on the USS Donald Cook.

Pic 2: The Russian Almighty S-400 in Action.

Pic 3: Putin's Eye of The Tiger - I'll Kill Ya' grin

1 Like

Re: 10 Of The Deadliest Nuclear Weapons by IsraeliAIRFORCE: 12:29pm On Aug 06, 2015
SeverusSnape:

That of the US alone is enough to obliterated the earth.

It can only be a fact when it is tried and confirmed.


Nobody or country (countries) can obliterate the universe.

Universe has the capacity to counter-balance human activities including radioactive emissions and still recover losses within a time frame.

3 Likes

Re: 10 Of The Deadliest Nuclear Weapons by Nobody: 10:13pm On Aug 06, 2015
AdmiralDru:
I knew Russia would be no1. I just wish WW3 could start right away.

We are in the same spirit my brother. Anything that will bring down that Vampire Nation of America will give me 72hours non-stop e.rection. grin

2 Likes

Re: 10 Of The Deadliest Nuclear Weapons by malele(m): 2:14am On Aug 07, 2015
Zoharariel:


And you had to call me a fool just to drive home your point you demented, harebrained lunatic with your pus filled-cranium.

Now; pay attention to this, toddler.

1.) All US defense systems [Anti-Ballistic Missile Interceptors, with their almighty Aegis Combat System] will be shut down with the Russian electronic warfare device called "Khibiny" before we commence active vaporization of every living & non living things in the US.

Read This Slowpoke:

What Frightened The USS Donald Cook So Much In The Black Sea.

The State Department acknowledged that the crew of the destroyer USS Donald Cook has been gravely demoralized ever since their vessel was flown over in the Black Sea by a Russian Sukhoi-24 (Su-24) fighter jet which carried neither bombs nor missiles but only an electronic warfare device.


This video shows the USS Donald Cook sailing into the Black Sea to position itself near Russia’s territorial waters.

On 10 April 2014, the USS Donald Cook entered the waters of the Black Sea and on 12 April a Russian Su-24 tactical bomber flew over the vessel triggering an incident that, according to several media reports, completely demoralized its crew, so much so that the Pentagon issued a protest [1].

The USS Donald Cook (DDG-75) is a 4th generation guided missile destroyer whose key weapons are Tomahawk cruise missiles with a range of up to 2,500 kilometers, and capable of carrying nuclear explosives. This ship carries 56 Tomahawk missiles in standard mode, and 96 missiles in attack mode.

The US destroyer is equipped with the most recent Aegis Combat System. It is an integrated naval weapons systems which can link together the missile defense systems of all vessels embedded within the same network, so as to ensure the detection, tracking and destruction of hundreds of targets at the same time. In addition, the USS Donald Cook is equipped with 4 large radars, whose power is comparable to that of several stations. For protection, it carries more than fifty anti-aircraft missiles of various types.

Meanwhile, the Russian Su-24 that buzzed the USS Donald Cook carried neither bombs nor missiles but only a basket mounted under the fuselage, which, according to the Russian newspaper Rossiyskaya Gazeta [2], contained a Russian electronic warfare device called Khibiny.

As the Russian jet approached the US vessel, the electronic device disabled all radars, control circuits, systems, information transmission, etc. on board the US destroyer. In other words, the all-powerful Aegis system, now hooked up - or about to be - with the defense systems installed on NATO’s most modern ships was shut down, as turning off the TV set with the remote control.

The Russian Su-24 then simulated a missile attack against the USS Donald Cook, which was left literally deaf and blind. As if carrying out a training exercise, the Russian aircraft - unarmed - repeated the same maneuver 12 times before flying away.

After that, the 4th generation destroyer immediately set sail towards a port in Romania.

Since that incident, which the Atlanticist media have carefully covered up despite the widespread reactions sparked among defense industry experts, no US ship has ever approached Russian territorial waters again.

According to some specialized media, 27 sailors from the USS Donald Cook requested to be relieved from active service.

Vladimir Balybine - director of the research center on electronic warfare and the evaluation of so-called "visibility reduction" techniques attached to the Russian Air Force Academy - made the following comment:

"The more a radio-electronic system is complex, the easier it is to disable it through the use of electronic warfare."

A video presentation of the US Aegis system. Currently installed on the most sophisticated US Navy warships and in the process of being set up throughout the entire range of NATO naval forces, this missile defense system was completely knocked out in the Black Sea by a Russian electronic warfare device.

Source: www.voltairenet.org/article185860.html

2.) The Russian A-135 Anti-Ballistic Missile System and the S400Triumf (SA-21 Growler) are capable of intercepting a multiple LRBMs/ICBMs attack with astounding accuracy.

Read this again slowpoke:

How Russia’s S-400 Makes The F-35 Obsolete

It’s not often that a relatively inexpensive air defence weapon is able to make a trillion dollar fighter programme obsolete. But the $500 million S-400 missile system has done precisely that to America’s brand new F-35 stealth fighter.

In November 2014 Moscow and Beijing inked a $3 billion agreement for the supply of six battalions of S-400 anti-aircraft/anti-missile systems that will significantly boost China’s air defence capability against the US and its allies in the Western Pacific.

With a tracking range of 600 km and the ability to hit targets 400 km away at a blistering speed of 17,000 km an hour – faster than any existing aircraft–the S-400 is a truly scary weapon if you are facing its business end.First deployed by Russia in 2010, each S-400 battalion has eight launchers, a control centre, radar and 16 missiles available as reloads.

S-400 air defence missile system defends the skies over Moscow

Unlike the overhyped US Patriot missile that turned out to be a dud in battle, the S-400 was designed to create the daddy of Iron Domes. “Given its extremely long range and effective electronic warfare capabilities, the S-400 is a game-changing system that challenges current military capabilities at the operational level of war,” Paul Giarra, president, Global Strategies and Transformation, told Defense News. The S-400 will have the “effect of turning a defensive system into an offensive system, and extend China’s A2/AD (anti-access/area-denial) umbrella over the territory of American allies and the high seas.”

But first a bit of background. The S-400 was developed to defend Russian air space and a few hundred kilometers further against missiles and aircraft of all types, including stealth. Because it is a highly potent and accurate weapon that can tip the balance of power in any war theatre, Moscow has long resisted the temptation of exporting even its older iteration, the S-300, to troubled allies Syria and Iran.

An S-300 missile fired from, say, Damascus will blow away an aircraft over central Tel Aviv in about 107 seconds, giving the Israelis just enough time to say their prayers. It is precisely because the S-series missile systems can so dramatically upset the military balance that Israel has pressured Russia against introducing it into the Middle East tinderbox. Israel has also warned it would go after Syrian S-300 batteries with everything it’s got.
However, China’s case is different because the chances of another country daring to take a shot at the Chinese are next to zero. This development is really bad news for the F-35.

Russia and the US have traditionally adopted different military strategies. During the Cold War the US relied upon carrier-based aircraft to project power in the Western Pacific, and the strategy continues today. The Russians on the other hand decided these floating airfields were easy targets for their shore-based long-range aviation and anti-ship cruise missiles.

Source: m.in.rbth.com/blogs/2015/03/11/how_russias_s-400_makes_the_f-35_obsolete_41895.html

Conclusion: There won't even be any need for the Russian Anti-Ballistic Missile Systems after Khibiny must have rendered all American Offensive & Defensive Missile Systems impotent.

This is the reason Mother Russia's priority is geared towards ensuring that different ICBMs with different colours, capacity & flavours are dispersed like packs of candies to the various target locations in the United States & her allied Nations. grin

God Bless You Caesar Putin! grin

Pic 1: Russian SU-24Bomber shiting on the USS Donald Cook.

Pic 2: The Russian Almighty S-400 in Action.

Pic 3: Putin's Eye of The Tiger - I'll Kill Ya' grin


This ur kinby or whatever does it stop submarines carrying nuclear weapons too?

F35 hasn't been flown into an area guarded by s400 so don't say things u don't know.
Re: 10 Of The Deadliest Nuclear Weapons by Tkester: 4:52am On Aug 07, 2015
malele:



This ur kinby or whatever does it stop submarines carrying nuclear weapons too?

F35 hasn't been flown into an area guarded by s400 so don't say things u don't know.

PURE LIE!!!
Re: 10 Of The Deadliest Nuclear Weapons by dayo23(f): 6:49am On Aug 07, 2015
malele:



This ur kinby or whatever does it stop submarines carrying nuclear weapons too?

F35 hasn't been flown into an area guarded by s400 so don't say things u don't know.
I belive this two countries knows each other than we do, most of this weapons are the once u see or know, US and Russia has a lot of sophisticated hidden weapons, especially US that are not even known to the world, and everyday they Develop new once.
Re: 10 Of The Deadliest Nuclear Weapons by revolt(m): 7:01am On Aug 07, 2015
Dharniel:
when would nigeria ever build one?
wen will the blackman strt buildn nyfin wen our presidents keep running to oyibos to buy small arms includn ak 47s.

Jeez.
Re: 10 Of The Deadliest Nuclear Weapons by malele(m): 7:33pm On Aug 09, 2015
Tkester:


PURE LIE!!!

Do know what an F35 is?
Pls I can't argue with u. Google is ur friend.
You will see that F35 is still undergoing test and has never seen combat.
Re: 10 Of The Deadliest Nuclear Weapons by Omololu007(m): 8:29pm On Aug 09, 2015
TruthisGOD:
This what our youths shld be disscussing, hw 2 make our country strong and formidable nt jambories and politics. Am facinated by technology, especialy war technology. Looking at US nd Russia, who wil dare strike them.
d only reason d USA won't want to go to war with d Rusia federation is becos of Russia Nuclear bomb

1 Like

(1) (2) (3) (Reply)

What Is The Different Between Dss And Sss / 2023: Tambuwal Meets Abuja PDP Delegates, Says There Should Be A Mayor For FCT / Olabisi Onabanjo University (OOU): Cult War

(Go Up)

Sections: politics (1) business autos (1) jobs (1) career education (1) romance computers phones travel sports fashion health
religion celebs tv-movies music-radio literature webmasters programming techmarket

Links: (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10)

Nairaland - Copyright © 2005 - 2024 Oluwaseun Osewa. All rights reserved. See How To Advertise. 98
Disclaimer: Every Nairaland member is solely responsible for anything that he/she posts or uploads on Nairaland.