Circumcision had its early induction as far back
as thousands of years ago. Then, it was solely
for the men whose foreskin were removed.
This is being done at birth when the child is
considered not to have known pain. But with
women, it went beyond imagination and since
the woman’s private part is considered as an
opening, it could be seen as violation of
privacy.
Ladies who have been circumcised using any of
the classifications listed above believe they
cannot have sexual pleasure anymore. Their
psyche and self esteem has been reduced.
Below are some causes and possible solutions
as to why circumcised ladies do not enjoy sex.
1.Psychologically , these women believe they have
been robbed of the chance to feel pleasure.
They are less excited when it comes to sex,
thus the men would have to go extra miles to
work on their nerves and relax the pent up
tension that has gathered in the women’s
bodies. The men have to make them feel good
and work on their mental state of minds.
2.Being tensed often make women contract the
muscles around the vagina. A sexual partner
can reach out to women by helping them relax
in their company by touching them intimately
and handling sensitive parts of their bodies.
3.Emotionally, these women need to be
stabilised. They need men who are gentle,
loving and caring. With time they get
comfortable with these men and start to open
up to them. These men would help inspire them
as they journey towards their sexual discovery.
4.Masturbation as frowned upon by religious
critics is an important tool in science. It is a
self liberating key as women are encouraged to
touch themselves and with the help of a mirror
get to see what part gives them more pleasure.
It helps the women discover things about their
sexuality and with that they could guide their
trusted partners during intercourse. This is
important for their sexual arousal and orgasms.
Circumcision in women is also known as
Female Genital Mutation (FGM). And as
explained by the World Health Organisation
(WHO) is the partial or total removal of the
external female Instruments.

www.naij.com/519870-read-circumcised-ladies-not-enjoy-sex.html

Ok...

afolwalex20:
Ok...

People who want to deal with this issue should understand it is deeply rooted in cultural tradition dating back-- perhaps 10,000 or more years- that the term female genital mutilation is extremely inflammatory and it is the description first adopted by radical American feminists back in the 1970s and has since been adopted by many Western governments and activists as a propaganda and fund raising device. Social scientists and other more objective observers prefer the phrase female genital cutting- a much less inflammatory description

One of the current myths being perpetuated against the practice by both Islamophobes and radical Islamic clerics for substantially different reasons is that the practice is a tenet of Islamic faith. It's not. The practice predates Islam by thousands of years; it is not part of the cultural tradition in many Muslim territories outside of Africa. In Africa it's practice occurs fairly equally among Muslims, Roman Catholics, Protestant evangelicals, and indigenous religions. One area where there seems to be a substantial difference among the different faiths is among better educated and more affluent women. Among these women--Muslim women are much more likely to be circumcised. Among less educated and poor women there really isn't much difference between the different faiths

That radical Muslim clerics and better educated and more affluent Muslim women are embracing female circumcision and again not entirely for the same reasons may be explained as a reaction to Western attacks on Islam

I think the answer to this practice is increased education about the risks as well as the benefits (the risks are real-- the benefits mostly perceived What should be avoided is ethnocentrism and what should be embraced is a respect for self determination among the people of a community. If a community can be persuaded to and wants to ban cutting-- fine. If it wants to continue the practice then it should be made much safer then it currently is in most areas where it's practiced

All na to make the woman cum sha. Well that no be problem.

hvq229:


People who want to deal with this issue should understand it is deeply rooted in cultural tradition dating back-- perhaps 10,000 or more years- that the term female genital mutilation is extremely inflammatory and it is the description first adopted by radical American feminists back in the 1970s and has since been adopted by many Western governments and activists as a propaganda and fund raising device. Social scientists and other more objective observers prefer the phrase female genital cutting- a much less inflammatory description

One of the current myths being perpetuated against the practice by both Islamophobes and radical Islamic clerics for substantially different reasons is that the practice is a tenet of Islamic faith. It's not. The practice predates Islam by thousands of years; it is not part of the cultural tradition in many Muslim territories outside of Africa. In Africa it's practice occurs fairly equally among Muslims, Roman Catholics, Protestant evangelicals, and indigenous religions. One area where there seems to be a substantial difference among the different faiths is among better educated and more affluent women. Among these women--Muslim women are much more likely to be circumcised. Among less educated and poor women there really isn't much difference between the different faiths

That radical Muslim clerics and better educated and more affluent Muslim women are embracing female circumcision and again not entirely for the same reasons may be explained as a reaction to Western attacks on Islam

I think the answer to this practice is increased education about the risks as well as the benefits (the risks are real-- the benefits mostly perceived What should be avoided is ethnocentrism and what should be embraced is a respect for self determination among the people of a community. If a community can be persuaded to and wants to ban cutting-- fine. If it wants to continue the practice then it should be made much safer then it currently is in most areas where it's practiced

I support ur last statement