Welcome, Guest: Register On Nairaland / LOGIN! / Trending / Recent / NewStats: 3,208,033 members, 8,001,156 topics. Date: Wednesday, 13 November 2024 at 04:05 AM |
Nairaland Forum / Nairaland / General / Politics / ''This May Be Why Jonathan Couldn’t End Boko Haram Insurgency'' (46931 Views)
BBC Interview: Mrs Buhari Did What Mrs Jonathan Couldn’t Do -APC ‘spokesman’ / NAF Deploys Six Fighter Jets To End Boko Haram Insurgency / MTN Fueled Boko Haram Insurgency - President Buhari (2) (3) (4)
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (Reply) (Go Down)
Re: ''This May Be Why Jonathan Couldn’t End Boko Haram Insurgency'' by nwatch: 11:50am On Sep 07, 2015 |
Chinese investment in Nigeria During GEJ time was the sole reason the west turned its back. Now we go back to them for help and we no longer hear news of China in Nigeria. Well Buhari is wise, but Nigeria is too divided to go anywhere. |
Re: ''This May Be Why Jonathan Couldn’t End Boko Haram Insurgency'' by Nobody: 11:56am On Sep 07, 2015 |
Reyginus:Brilliant analysis. I absolutely agree with you. America is truly d real villain and has nva really helped any country 2da defeat terrorism. In Syria, for example 2da, let's luk at al-Nusra Front. U.S once supported dis group in toppling the Assad regime. 2da it is dubbed a terrorist organization, wen it went haywire. Assad has been killing his people for long enjoying Russian support, all U.S is doing nao is 2 bark at Assad nd Russia, perhaps maybe cos Syria lacks d resources existent in Libya nd Iraq DTS why dey av not intervened militarily. Let's even go back in history. Remember d story of Patrice Lumumba how the U.S was involved in his death tru d CIA, cos of his gravitation towards Russia, dere choice of Mobutu Sese Seko,who destroyed the entire country. D same goes for CAR, c ow Bedel Bokkassa tuk ova power nd ruined d country. There are so many instances. Today, luk at watz happened to Egypt...d truth z DT whereeva U.S intervenes DT place becomes worsted. |
Re: ''This May Be Why Jonathan Couldn’t End Boko Haram Insurgency'' by Nobody: 11:59am On Sep 07, 2015 |
nwatch:Dey expect us to go back to dem nd become d underdogs where dey begin to dictate to us ow to run our govt. Well lyk u said Buhari is wise. |
Re: ''This May Be Why Jonathan Couldn’t End Boko Haram Insurgency'' by Nobody: 12:03pm On Sep 07, 2015 |
Namady:Too many misconceptions. Wat most non northerners do not know z DT dere are so many ethnics groups in d north. Even more than we have in oda parts of the country. |
Re: ''This May Be Why Jonathan Couldn’t End Boko Haram Insurgency'' by mickey45: 12:06pm On Sep 07, 2015 |
Reyginus: It'll to me be a myopic thing to do if one expects the owner of a school to be able to teach all the subjects in that school efficiently, or that the V.C of a Uni. shd be so vast as to be able to teach all courses. Ditto for this |
Re: ''This May Be Why Jonathan Couldn’t End Boko Haram Insurgency'' by Nobody: 12:08pm On Sep 07, 2015 |
zenopee:True but most Nigerians don't know this. They will say it is because of corruption and you begin to wonder if they really follow events at all. Like it started under GEJ's regime. Some will tell you under his regime corruption became norm but when you look at our history you see the ignorance and/or hate laced with statements like that. I think the main reason Assad still stands today is Russia. And I'm happy, at times, that we have Russia. Assuming no opposing power America would have done worse. Syria is lucky to have Russia on their side. Ukraine would have been another play ground today for the Americans if the Russians had not exerted strong will. Though they are almost the same the good thing about Russia is that they don't hide their intentions from the outset. I can din with such an enemy. 1 Like |
Re: ''This May Be Why Jonathan Couldn’t End Boko Haram Insurgency'' by Nobody: 12:10pm On Sep 07, 2015 |
mickey45:Exactly. |
Re: ''This May Be Why Jonathan Couldn’t End Boko Haram Insurgency'' by Nobody: 12:13pm On Sep 07, 2015 |
Reyginus: My only concern about your position is the issue of Israel and Palestine. Israel has a right to protect themselves against terrorists who hide among civil populace to cause mayhem. If the civilians are not complicit in the arrangements, they should move away from areas occupied by militants. It's the same way it happens every place where terrorism and politics mix. |
Re: ''This May Be Why Jonathan Couldn’t End Boko Haram Insurgency'' by yayankainuwa: 12:17pm On Sep 07, 2015 |
yanabasee:sai baby factory child |
Re: ''This May Be Why Jonathan Couldn’t End Boko Haram Insurgency'' by mickey45: 12:17pm On Sep 07, 2015 |
okotv: You're faceless here Mr. You'll simply be doing your ultimate duty if you chose to enlighten everyone's jaundiced opinions and ignorantly-generated comments if you tell us what really happened based on first hand intel. So people on both sides know what they're supporting. Btw, your opinion is relative to your experience, I've met a front-line force personnel who listed all the progresses they've made that the new regime suddenly reversed. So pray tell, na wetin happen? 1 Like |
Re: ''This May Be Why Jonathan Couldn’t End Boko Haram Insurgency'' by mickey45: 12:19pm On Sep 07, 2015 |
WhiteTechnology: BTW, what do you mean, "remember what happened in Ivory Coast" |
Re: ''This May Be Why Jonathan Couldn’t End Boko Haram Insurgency'' by kaziblake(f): 12:23pm On Sep 07, 2015 |
WailingWailer00:na u sabi |
Re: ''This May Be Why Jonathan Couldn’t End Boko Haram Insurgency'' by Nobody: 12:25pm On Sep 07, 2015 |
Reyginus:True. I really enjoy ur analysis for you have been abl to encapsulate current events at d global level brilliantly. Russia is truly a reliable enemy at least. America has really turned the world into a chess board, and without countries lyk Russia, it wudnt av been funny. And funny enof, wen u luk at Syria 2da, it was U.S DT armed d belligerent groups against Assad cos he was enjoying Russian support 2da dis groups av gone out of hand. U remember also how d same U.S supported the Taliban in d 80s to ouster Russia frm Afghanistan wat later hapnd? Dey fell out. 2da it is an entirely diff story. U.S is d major harbinger of trouble nd for any nation to stand its sanity it must not give up all its options to d U.S |
Re: ''This May Be Why Jonathan Couldn’t End Boko Haram Insurgency'' by Nobody: 12:27pm On Sep 07, 2015 |
mykl01:Consider this: 1. The civilians live in fear from an oppressor within. The terrorist group political party in control of the state, Hamas, has tortured them psychologically, mentally, emotionally, and physically. 2. Then there is an oppressor from without inflicting graver injuries with better weapons and more ruthless in approach. Taking both land, child and freedom. In the above two, the only logical thing to do is to ally with the enemy with the lower force, in this case the Hama's government. It is not like the Palestinians like the Hamas. No. But then when you take ones land forcefully, disrespecting UN resolutions; their life, irrespective of your claim of moral supremacy; their right to express and shatter their psyche, you don't expect them not to ally with an enemy within who have the guts to retaliate. Besides what I'm talking about here, I mean in that first post, is the hypocrisy of America's Leah Law. What's worth doing ought be worth doing well. Corruption is not merely to steal money. Before you even steal money you're corrupt already. Corruption of the soul and being is at the base of all forms corruption. |
Re: ''This May Be Why Jonathan Couldn’t End Boko Haram Insurgency'' by azeeza(f): 12:32pm On Sep 07, 2015 |
Wailing wailer! Go and die. yanabasee: |
Re: ''This May Be Why Jonathan Couldn’t End Boko Haram Insurgency'' by azeeza(f): 12:32pm On Sep 07, 2015 |
Arrant nonsense. yanabasee: 1 Like |
Re: ''This May Be Why Jonathan Couldn’t End Boko Haram Insurgency'' by 400billionman: 12:34pm On Sep 07, 2015 |
Seun: Expatiate vividly. To me America likes body language. At least OBJ latter told the world where he fell out with GEJ but America has not told us where they fell out with GEJ.. |
Re: ''This May Be Why Jonathan Couldn’t End Boko Haram Insurgency'' by Nobody: 12:37pm On Sep 07, 2015 |
zenopee:Unfortunately that's how our world power want to remain number one forever. Fear. Fear makes you attack a harmless and weak man because he displays some flashes of intelligence. 1 Like |
Re: ''This May Be Why Jonathan Couldn’t End Boko Haram Insurgency'' by Nobody: 12:38pm On Sep 07, 2015 |
Reyginus: Forget Leah's nonsense law. I'm sorry I don't share a lot of your ideas with you because I have first hand experience of how terrorists and their civil collaborators work. Until you see these Palestinians fighting for their freedom from terrorists, I don't expect the state of Israel to fold it's hand and await annihilation. The politics and propaganda of PLO, Hamas, Israel and Iran is not a Nairaland matter. |
Re: ''This May Be Why Jonathan Couldn’t End Boko Haram Insurgency'' by Nobody: 12:40pm On Sep 07, 2015 |
mickey45:Before he responds to you, explain this part: 'all the progresses they've made that the new regime suddenly reversed'. By example. Lol |
Re: ''This May Be Why Jonathan Couldn’t End Boko Haram Insurgency'' by largehead: 12:44pm On Sep 07, 2015 |
Seun:.i was about insulting u, bt as I saw u r d president of Nairaland, I jst kept d bashing... bt honestly, I never expected such from u.... |
Re: ''This May Be Why Jonathan Couldn’t End Boko Haram Insurgency'' by 400billionman: 12:44pm On Sep 07, 2015 |
WhiteTechnology: okay, sir. I am in Daura right now.. |
Re: ''This May Be Why Jonathan Couldn’t End Boko Haram Insurgency'' by Nobody: 12:45pm On Sep 07, 2015 |
mykl01:Of course I know. I know what Israel is doing now is the way to survive as a nation surrounded by enemies. The Holocaust is still fresh. There are some immutable tactics of Victory. I understand that. My argument there was the moral angle. They can employ any means to self preservation but you don't come tell me that the past government's corruption was the real reason for not selling us arms. That's what I'm trying to show. 1 Like |
Re: ''This May Be Why Jonathan Couldn’t End Boko Haram Insurgency'' by 400billionman: 12:47pm On Sep 07, 2015 |
WhiteTechnology: And Nairaland CEO believed it. 1 Like |
Re: ''This May Be Why Jonathan Couldn’t End Boko Haram Insurgency'' by malikisah: 12:53pm On Sep 07, 2015 |
WailingWailer00:ha ha ha ha ha. He he he he he, ho ho ho ho ho ho! |
Re: ''This May Be Why Jonathan Couldn’t End Boko Haram Insurgency'' by malikisah: 12:57pm On Sep 07, 2015 |
lomprico:don't waste your time with these people o jare |
Re: ''This May Be Why Jonathan Couldn’t End Boko Haram Insurgency'' by GENERAL7(m): 1:04pm On Sep 07, 2015 |
See Gej however u like but I know that realities like serving n retired army chiefs,crooked trado rulers ,d owners of those oil blocks n rugged minded Islamic leaders ,always see Gej as little chap who coincidentally finds himself at d helm of national affairs thereby thwarting all his good efforts[color=#006600][/color] bestest001: |
Re: ''This May Be Why Jonathan Couldn’t End Boko Haram Insurgency'' by porka: 1:06pm On Sep 07, 2015 |
Seun: [size=13pt]Have human rights violations ended now under a 'Muslim president'?[/size] |
Re: ''This May Be Why Jonathan Couldn’t End Boko Haram Insurgency'' by omolami: 1:07pm On Sep 07, 2015 |
The whole thing was a collaboration between Obama of US who already postulated the break up of Nigeria, Buhari and APC. The aim was to frustrate the fight against bokoharam, thus painting Gej's administration as incompetent. Aim was achieved .Now that GEJ is out the US is supporting Buhari in the fight ,selling weapons and even planning to buy Nigeria's crude which the US stopped buying during Gej's regime. Buhari equally confirmed this in his statement when he visited Obama, he said 'God helped him to win the election and USA helped him the most . You can see the extent Buhari and his party went at destroying Nigerians and Nigeria because of Power. Nigeria could have truly disintegrated if GEJ had not conceded defeat despite obvious rigging and Inec manipulations of election results in favour of Buhari. Another president would have annulled the election in the face of all the negativities and Nigeria could have broken up. GEJ our hero chose otherwise because of the love for Nigeria that APC sold out with millions of deaths. 1 Like |
Re: ''This May Be Why Jonathan Couldn’t End Boko Haram Insurgency'' by porka: 1:12pm On Sep 07, 2015 |
Reyginus: [size=13pt]Even without being in the military, what is the logic or tactic behind dismantling the military checkpoints that have prevented the bastards from moving freely in Nigerian highways?[/size] |
Re: ''This May Be Why Jonathan Couldn’t End Boko Haram Insurgency'' by wexyee: 1:12pm On Sep 07, 2015 |
yanabasee:wat u hate is dat this man will rule u for 8 yrs |
Re: ''This May Be Why Jonathan Couldn’t End Boko Haram Insurgency'' by wexyee: 1:15pm On Sep 07, 2015 |
legendboy:because islam is the largest religion not only in Africa but also in nigeria.. go nd make research dummy |
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (Reply)
Omojuwa Mocks Fayose For Travelling To China(photos) / Misau: IG Of Police N10Billion Monthly Bribe Allegation Debated On Channels TV / Innoson Vehicle Motors Presented To The Nigerian Police
Viewing this topic: 1 guest(s)
(Go Up)
Sections: politics (1) business autos (1) jobs (1) career education (1) romance computers phones travel sports fashion health religion celebs tv-movies music-radio literature webmasters programming techmarket Links: (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) Nairaland - Copyright © 2005 - 2024 Oluwaseun Osewa. All rights reserved. See How To Advertise. 84 |