Nihilist:


Errrr...No

Aareonakakanfo:

I knew you were going to talk about quintero but i won't elaborate on that so as not to digress. The emboldened part means you're intentionally downplaying him not because you actually think januzaj is better than him

Aareonakakanfo:

i won't elaborate on that so as not to digress.

coogar:


errrr, yes!
the only thing hazard contributed were humongous number of minutes and awoof penalties. hazard came short in every relevant attacking stats.

Nihilist:


Because he scored against PSV? Negrito please...

SIRcumalot:

The club brugge playoff games.
I see your response already
You don't choose your opponent you can only beat whatever team fate choose for you.

Chelseafan1:


Sanchez was the closest, so ruminate on these and stop these stats-less argument

Nihilist:


But the same website gave it to Hazard on TOTAL SCORE.

Try again bro...

dopeJemi:


Chelsea fans are a living proof that surely, man can live without a brain

coogar:


number of minutes played has a role to play. who cares about total score. costa scored more goals than hazard, cesc assisted more goals than hazard......those are the 2 relevant stats to be considered. dribblings don't win games, goals/assists do.

you try again.....

coogar:


seriously - stop showing me articles from brain dead pundits. if hazard played more minutes than sanchez then logic dictates hazard would have more in sheer numbers and this is why the rate is a key factor.

so if player A scores 7 goals in 1400 minutes and player B scores 6 goals in 300 minutes. you would be stüpid enough to say player A is more prolific than player B cos 7 is more than 6? come on - engage your brain box.

dopeJemi:


..

dopeJemi:
Rooney really impressed in the second half, [size=18pt]depay is a half baked nitwit that should rot in the bench till he reaches 35... Bastard [/size]

Chelseafan1:

How you would rate a player who couldn't win the league for his team and didn't feature in all the games over a player who was consistent all thru the season is just disturbing.

I'm done with this argument.
Hazard was better and deservedly won it last season, ur opinion doesn't count when we are to weigh it with seasoned professionals.

Nihilist:


Club Brugge

The same club that consensus view on this thread holds is not even as good as PSV?

Try again bro...

coogar:



only a sêmen slurping zombie would put hazard ahead of sanchez last season.

SIRcumalot:

I could say the same for your 4-0 drubbing of tel aviv. thought you lot turned a corner with that win.

Nihilist:


Come at me bro...

Nihilist:


Jemi that line was aiite...but this was the real dope bar



You dont even want him on the bench...you want him to rot INside the bench like a dead mouse trapped in the sofa. Well Amen to that

Jemi too dope. Trapstar.

coogar:


so if hazard was playing for arsenal in sanchez's stead, arsenal woulda won the league? if sanchez was playing for chelsea in hazard's stead, chelsea woulda finished 3rd?

you are trolling....



it's a popularity contest....
only a sêmen slurping zombie would put hazard ahead of sanchez last season.

coogar:


very well then....

www.nairaland.com/attachments/2194955_image_jpeg9f360c5ab7736510df54c882e9dbf188

www.nairaland.com/attachments/2194956_image_jpeg9f360c5ab7736510df54c882e9dbf188

www.nairaland.com/attachments/2194957_image_jpeg9f360c5ab7736510df54c882e9dbf188

silva has been shyting on hazard since the belgian found himself in the EPL.

dopeJemi:


I said that shi.t outta anger, depay has been shyte this season, so as hazard but if na the "in" dey do you, na mistake.. na you still talk say funlord bars dey "week"

Nihilist:


No call your paddy ole bro...

Nihilist:


Wow those are some interesting stats...However what was the TOTAL SCORE for both? You know...that score that takes ALL their statistics for the year into account?

Please let me know bro. I wanna know like Joe...

coogar:


statistics like scoring from penalties, playing 3300 mins, yellow cards, etc? who cares about total? we already know what creativity entails so purists should narrow it down to goals, assists, key passes and chances created while paying attention to the minutes played by both players.

silva has been killing hazard since 12/13.

coogar:


chelsea fans are a disgrace....

if my team sits in the 16th position with the array of prima-donna players in the chelsea squad, i would be ashamed to speak in public.

yet you have shameless goats on this thread....opening their gobs like they are suffering from diarrhoea of the mouth.

Aareonakakanfo:
The hazard-depay argument just sounds funny to me. Both of them have been otondos this season. All i can see here is the comparison of two dead corpses. The one who smells better

Nihilist:


Sat at my desk overlooking the Thames and looking for the punchline...

There is a punchline though, bro?

Chelseafan1:

The same popularity contest has helped other award-winning players, that's not a convincing point
Hazard scored some 3-point winning goals towards the end of last season, he scored the only goal against Man u, scored against City, scored against Arsenal, Sanchez couldn't even score a goal against Chelsea to get a draw and you want me to rate him better than Hazard??
Who shone better when they both met over 2 legs??
It seems you didn't see the other stats in the image I posted, it was only goals you took serious.

Sanchez had a total of 16 goals, 8 assists
Hazard had a total of 14 goals, 9 assists.


Hazard had more assists, better pass accuracy, more key passes, and a whooping 65 more successful take ons...He obviously bettered Sanchez in most of the key attacking areas and to add icing to the cake, he won the league
ONLY you, my friend will ignore such stats and rate Sanchez ahead of him.

coogar:


engage your brain box, biko

hazard played 430 minutes more & about 3 awoof penalties.....and yet he was neck and neck with sanchez.

hazard - 9 assists in 3373 mins
sanchez - 8 assists in 2942 mins

according to chelseafan, hazard is better.

coogar:


engage your brain box, biko

hazard played 430 minutes more & about 3 awoof penalties.....and yet he was neck and neck with sanchez.

hazard - 9 assists in 3373 mins
sanchez - 8 assists in 2942 mins

according to chelseafan, hazard is better.

Chelseafan1:

What do u mean by awoof penalties, stop disgracing yourself Oga, who won most of the Pks?? are pks not part of the game?

U av also failed to address the other stats abi for ur own village, na goals and assists ONLY u dey take pick ur own best player.....U are the best pundit.

coogar:


how's penalty part of the game? if lampard was still at chelsea, how many goals would hazard have scored last season? do you have any brain at all? player A gets to score awoof penalties, player B has 6 players in front of him to take pens......who's more likely to get goals on a level playing field?

it's becoming increasingly difficult for the average chelsea fan to debate with his common sense. why do you think gerrard & lampard appear better than they look with stats? even when they aren't playing well, there's always a chance to score the odd penalty.