Ksslib:

So you pulled out of a tourney just because you feel I am not qualified to judge? Haha.. kai.. I don suffer for some of these boys hand no be small.

That was how I was advising lyricist the other day on ffr with physcis scheme, but the short-sighted ninja didn't get what I was trying to tell him and called me mumu. Hehe

Darkenedrebel, hope the contestants are ok with me being a judge, else make i kuku step aside so that the tourney go run smoothly. Cos some of these guys can come up with silly excuses atimes on why they lost. e..t.c . I no wan hear say na judge matter ruin the thing.

You have proved your maturity over the months on this forum. . . . I don't think anyone should have a problem with you being a judge. . . .

kr0ne take note when you come online- I'm sending you the names of participants via whatsapp so you can draft out the fixtures for round 1

sinizia:


Dude, you'd be a judge if you want it, if Obaino doesn't want to participate coz you are judge or coz he wants a particular judge, his loss; the tourney will still go on after all the tourney wasn't created coz of him. Everyone won't like you. Judge with an unbiased mind and leave the wailers to wail.

Word

mikuz:
Darkrebel if you keep derailing this thread I'm going to ban you. You can say whatever you have to say at the chatroom. Be warned brother.

With no disrespect to you, you are clearly biased on this one. Even Emaprínce didn't blame Dark coz he's right. If you do enforce the rules here, Rédgem and other people's votes that's not tagged to vote should be hidden and warned. How you didn't hide Rédgem's comment or cautioned her but warned Dark is simply jaw-dropping. If one is not tagged to vote, the person should have no say in the battle. If the person defaults, you ban him. If you don't enforce rules, how will the sanity of this place be intact? This place is in chaos coz of disobeying of rules.


Also I opined after Coog vs Ely's battle that this issue of talking about an on-going battle should have a rule for or against it, created before any new battle starts, but alas nothing has been done about it. Now the issue of leaving a battle for many days has come up and there's no rule about it. Without rules this place will be in ruins!!

sinizia:


Dude, you'd be a judge if you want it, if Obaino doesn't want to participate coz you are judge or coz he wants a particular judge, his loss; the tourney will still go on after all the tourney wasn't created coz of him. Everyone won't like you. Judge with an unbiased mind and leave the wailers to wail.

are you brainless knowingly ....where did I say I didn't want ksslib to be a judge...and how many times have ksslib judged battles this year...better take time efulefu

YoungDaNaval:
Word

That's just the truth. Not everyone will agree to a judge's verd, that's why we usually have different judges to balance the equation. Judge A might feel a battle is a TIE, another judge might feel the battle was a win for one of the contestants. People will always complain, that's human nature. The guy is mature and gives unbiased verds, if anyone doesn't want him, the person should quit. The tourney must GO ON!!

GIYAZZ:

Dude what's your Deal na? Report back asap.

obainojazz:
are you brainless knowingly ....where did I say I didn't want ksslib to be a judge...and how many times have ksslib judged battles this year...better take time efulefu

You must amnesiac or dyslexic if you can't remember or read your own words. Go get a new brain and glasses.

Ksslib:

So you pulled out of a tourney just because you feel I am not qualified to judge?

obainojazz:
yes and no....

jreyez:


Dude what's your Deal na? Report back asap.

I'm not with that particular phone now. It developed a glitch. Working on it.

sinizia:


Dude, you'd be a judge if you want it, if Obaino doesn't want to participate coz you are judge or coz he wants a particular judge, his loss; the tourney will still go on after all the tourney wasn't created coz of him. Everyone won't like you. Judge with an unbiased mind and leave the wailers to wail.

this guy na activists!.. you get wahala..dude let them sort themselves out.. it's not like advice was asked of you haba..your comment was&is not needed!...

Supermiy:
this guy na activists!.. you get wahala..dude let them sort themselves out.. it's not like advice was asked of you haba..your comment was&is not needed!...

Well the quote button is for general purpose except the Diary section.

talking about RG and NL textbattle.... some members of NL also belong to RG

sinizia:

You must amnesiac or dyslexic if you can't remember or read your own words. Go get a new brain and glasses.

actually...the yes or no was not coz of the pulling out...don't have time for this e-argument.....
Gracias

danbrowndmf, i stay in ogbumnu-abali

Mikuz....a battle thread is not supposed to last longer than 24hours....infact...its better for the two battlers to start deciding when to close the battle..

sinizia:


With no disrespect to you, you are clearly biased on this one. Even Emaprínce didn't blame Dark coz he's right. If you do enforce the rules here, Rédgem and other people's votes that's not tagged to vote should be hidden and warned. How you didn't hide Rédgem's comment or cautioned her but warned Dark is simply jaw-dropping. If one is not tagged to vote, the person should have no say in the battle. If the person defaults, you ban him. If you don't enforce rules, how will the sanity of this place be intact? This place is in chaos coz of disobeying of rules.


Also I opined after Coog vs Ely's battle that this issue of talking about an on-going battle should have a rule for or against it, created before any new battle starts, but alas nothing has been done about it. Now the issue of leaving a battle for many days has come up and there's no rule about it. Without rules this place will be in ruins!!

Youngdanal and some other dude quoted Ksslib's vote. Some other kid placed Dark's verse on quote and said Don Marco or so. Are these not swaying?

Battlers are not supposed to comment about their battles until the battle is done and yet Dark had a field day making nonsense of all my puns. Are you ignorant of all these?

You did well brother. You are doing just fine.

u guys should not be quarrelling over some minor issues, afterall d section is nt our personal section

obainojazz:
Mikuz....a battle thread is not supposed to last longer than 24hours....infact...its better for the two battlers to start deciding when to close the battle..

Where was it said that battle threads are not supposed to last for more than a day and who said it?

I'm not a tyrant. If there's any issue that needs to be fixed I ll do something about it. This battle has highlighted two of them.


1. Personals should be put back into the voting criteria.
2. Only the first 9 voters in a battle ll count and the winner must lead by 2 votes and above otherwise it ll be declared a draw.

mikuz:


Youngdanal and some other dude quoted Ksslib's vote. Some other kid placed Dark's verse on quote and said Don Marco or so. Are these not swaying?

Battlers are not supposed to comment about their battles until the battle is done and yet Dark had a field day making nonsense of all my puns. Are you ignorant of all these?

You did well brother. You are doing just fine.

If Youngdanal and some other dude were swaying, then you ought to have hidden their posts and warned them. You are the mod. Stop sparing people.

About comment about on-going battle, I remember opining that a rule for or against it should be made and everybody must abide by it. Till now, none of such happened. Yesterday when Dark quoted my verd to talk about an on-going battle, did I reply him? NO. I didn't coz I didn't want to break any rule. What you'd have done when you saw that, was to hide his comment and remind him of the rules. You left the wound open without treatment and it's becoming an eyesore.

mikuz:


Where was it said that battle threads are not supposed to last for more than a day and who said it?

I'm not a tyrant. If there's any issue that needs to be fixed I ll do something about it. This battle has highlighted two of them.


1. Personals should be put back into the voting criteria.
2. Only the first 9 voters in a battle ll count and the winner must lead by 2 votes and above otherwise it ll be declared a draw.

i wonder why personal was excluded before

sinizia:


With no disrespect to you, you are clearly biased on this one. Even Emaprínce didn't blame Dark coz he's right. If you do enforce the rules here, Rédgem and other people's votes that's not tagged to vote should be hidden and warned. How you didn't hide Rédgem's comment or cautioned her but warned Dark is simply jaw-dropping. If one is not tagged to vote, the person should have no say in the battle. If the person defaults, you ban him. If you don't enforce rules, how will the sanity of this place be in tact? This place is in chaos coz of disobeying of rules.


Also I opined after Coog vs Ely's battle that this issue of talking about an on-going battle should have a rule for or against it, created before any new battle starts, but alas nothing has been done about it. Now the issue of leaving a battle for many days has come up and there's no rule about it. Without rules this place will be in ruins!!

You are correct in theory . . . . . but look closer . . . . who did the tagging?. . . .did he ask the other man if he has enemies?


Beyond that, I come back to what oga Kr0ne said that we need to act as a group on this section.

A single ninja cannot summarily ban half the group on this section from his battles . . . .

Giyazz
Elymaxiimus
Sosiqdude
Jason21
Richommie
DKlef
Warriblood
Dj5Naira
Captainflash

. . . . to name a few. . . .


All for only one man?

If his opponent ban the same number of people, who would be left?

Every member on this section should feel free to vote. . . . if a ninja want to throw tantrum on your vote, make he throw. . . infact, ninjas should only be allowed to bar 2 names at most from voting. . . .

mikuz:


Where was it said that battle threads are not supposed to last for more than a day and who said it?

I'm not a tyrant. If there's any issue that needs to be fixed I ll do something about it. This battle has highlighted two of them.


1. Personals should be put back into the voting criteria.
2. Only the first 9 voters in a battle ll count and the winner must lead by 2 votes and above otherwise it ll be declared a draw.

About number 2, you'd throw the suggestion out in the open, and if majority agrees to it, then it becomes a rule. Don't make the decision alone.


Also, if you will listen to me, I'll implore to ask anyone to list rules that should be observed here, once majority agrees to it, then it becomes a rule. Then you will create a thread and sticky it, with all the battle rules on it so defaulters won't cry when you ban them.

darkenedrebel:


when are you guys battling?

& I saw okoye el frezy yesterday when i was driving through yaba/bariga

lol, again??
.
We're battling 2mao. By 10 pm

Ibime:


You are correct in theory . . . . . but look closer . . . . who did the tagging?. . . .did he ask the other man if he has enemies?


Beyond that, I come back to what oga Kr0ne said that we need to act as a group on this section.

A single ninja cannot summarily ban half the group on this section from his battles . . . .

Giyazz
Elymaxiimus
Sosiqdude
Jason21
Richommie
DKlef
Warriblood
Dj5Naira
Captainflash

. . . . to name a few. . . .


All for only one man?

If his opponent ban the same number of people, who would be left?

Every member on this section should feel free to vote. . . . if a ninja want to throw tantrum on your vote, make he throw. . . infact, ninjas should only be allowed to bar 2 names at most from voting. . . . then they might learn to coexist with fellow forumites in peace.

I agree with this. If it's the tagged-users-only thing that's in vogue now, then both parties should tag. I agree

Ibime:


You are correct in theory . . . . . but look closer . . . . who did the tagging?. . . .did he ask the other man if he has enemies?


Beyond that, I come back to what oga Kr0ne said that we need to act as a group on this section.

A single ninja cannot summarily ban half the group on this section from his battles . . . .

Giyazz
Elymaxiimus
Sosiqdude
Jason21
Richommie
DKlef
Warriblood
Dj5Naira
Captainflash

. . . . to name a few. . . .


All for only one man?

If his opponent ban the same number of people, who would be left?

Every member on this section should feel free to vote. . . . if a ninja want to throw tantrum on your vote, make he throw. . . infact, ninjas should only be allowed to bar 2 names at most from voting. . . .

word Ibime!!!

Snickz:
danbrowndmf, i stay in ogbumnu-abali

ogbumnu-abali? I get one hoe there sef.

sinizia:


If Youngdanal and some other dude were swaying, then you ought to have hidden their posts and warned them. You are the mod. Stop sparing people.

About comment about on-going battle, I remember opining that a rule for or against it should be made and everybody must abide by it. Till now, none of such happened. Yesterday when Dark quoted my verd to talk about an on-going battle, did I reply him? NO. I didn't coz I didn't want to break any rule. What you'd have done when you saw that, was to hide his comment and remind him of the rules. You left the wound open without treatment and it's becoming an eyesore.

I was very busy yesterday, I only hid the ones my hand would reach if you observe closely. Besides I can not hide up to 3 pages of battle derailment. It is the most boring and tedious thing to do on earth.

95% of regulars in here ll cop a ban if I follow the rules to the last letter. Na only me and you go come dey here?

Ibime:


You are correct in theory . . . . . but look closer . . . . who did the tagging?. . . .did he ask the other man if he has enemies?


Beyond that, I come back to what oga Kr0ne said that we need to act as a group on this section.

A single ninja cannot summarily ban half the group on this section from his battles . . . .

Giyazz
Elymaxiimus
Sosiqdude
Jason21
Richommie
DKlef
Warriblood
Dj5Naira
Captainflash

. . . . to name a few. . . .


All for only one man?

If his opponent ban the same number of people, who would be left?

Every member on this section should feel free to vote. . . . if a ninja want to throw tantrum on your vote, make he throw. . . infact, ninjas should only be allowed to bar 2 names at most from voting. . . . then they might learn to coexist with fellow forumites in peace.

A. I agree, he didn't ask about his opponent's enemies. He'd have asked for it so the eqn would be balanced. But I think his opponent didn't have a problem with it or else he'd have spoken out.

B. I don't know about Dark's history with his perceived enemies, but I know people like Jason, Sosiq and Giyaz, etc., are his sworn enemies and will always vote against him, and vice-versa. So I don't blame him if he debars them from voting in his brawl. But what I don't understand is why is Dark the one with all those enemies? It's too much. 2 or 3 is understandable but up to 6? Something must be wrong. Dark needs learn how to live in peace with others.

mikuz:


I was very busy yesterday, I only hid the ones my hand would reach if you observe closely. Besides I can not hide up to 3 pages of battle derailment. It is the most boring and tedious thing to do on earth.

95% of regulars in here ll cop a ban if I follow the rules to the last letter. Na only me and you go come dey here?

Maybe hiding the posts will be better. The whole thing tire me. Why can't people keep to rules? Simple rules for that matter.

Kids and cum drinkers everywhere. Good thing i no longer have time for juvenile klumps!

So bis isnt qualified as a judge anymore?
The mods should put that psychotic in check asap!

Na mikuz i blame though. Kings tourney has always been anchored by the mods. You mods either do it or give someone else that moderating power to do things appropriately. (someone who is mentally stable)

Btw, krone, wetin make you no list me for the audio stuff? I wack pazss wack abi?

I've just finished Reading pages of hilarious comments. Una no well for this section. Mik has upped the ante - he doesn't sound that bad again.

sinizia:


A. I agree, he didn't ask about his opponent's enemies. He'd have asked for it so the eqn would be balanced. But I think his opponent didn't have a problem with it or else he'd have spoken out.

B. I don't know about Dark's history with his perceived enemies, but I know people like Jason, Sosiq and Giyaz, etc., are his sworn enemies and will always vote against him, and vice-versa. So I don't blame him if he debars them from voting in his brawl. But what I don't understand is why is Dark the one with all those enemies? It's too much. 2 or 3 is understandable but up to 6? Something must be wrong. Dark needs learn how to live in peace with others.

Live in peace with invisible people on nl. Asides from 3 people on nl who else knows me outside nl..Abeg I'm not here to make friends.

Ibime needs to shut his trap.

Battlers are allowed to ban whoever they don't want in their battle.. Mikuz didn't debar anyone before the match, so how is that my problem

Afterall it is not a tourney. . . I have a lot of haters on this section. .. I would lose every single battle if I allow the likes of giyazz & co to vote