Welcome, Guest: Register On Nairaland / LOGIN! / Trending / Recent / NewStats: 3,205,904 members, 7,994,103 topics. Date: Tuesday, 05 November 2024 at 07:19 AM |
Nairaland Forum / Nairaland / General / Religion / Why Some Pastors Refuse To Have More Than One Branch - Freemanan (3152 Views)
Choristers Refuse To Attend Member's Burial Because He Owed Choir Dues / Perfect Religion: Why Do Some Pastors Emphasise Mala. 3:10 More Than James 1:27? / Why Does TB Joshua Have Only One Branch In Nigeria? (2) (3) (4)
Why Some Pastors Refuse To Have More Than One Branch - Freemanan by Nobody: 7:13pm On Dec 11, 2015 |
The issue has bothered me for long and i think its high time i let it out and mix my observations with that of learned colleagues here on NL. 1. TO AVOID SHARING INCOMEUntil recently, World of Life Bible Church had just one worship centre at Ajamimogha. Every Sunday, worshippers have to spend quality amount of Naira in order to be in attendance (though there are buses to pick members at strategic junctions), but why allow people go through this stress when you can open branches around? The answer is Simple... Papa Ayo was not prepared to share his mouth watering offering and tithe with any Junior/branch pastor. He would rather have everything come home to him. 2. CRAVE FOR RELEVANCEIt is a maxim that Nigerian Pastors crave popularity and their "notice me" attitude is obvious with some of them frolicking with Head of States, Engaging Celebrities who sing secular songs to graze their programs, etc. The fact that most of these pastors want to be the centre of attraction makes them shun the idea of planting satellite churches. 3. PROPER MANAGEMENTThis is more of a positive reason than a negative one... If you want to get something done, do it by yourself. This is the case here, they believe the Church will be more bigger and richer if they do it themselves and alone, not caring how far the gospel can reach. Now, some churches have been doing great with this approach, case in point : SCOAN. Nevertheless, the idea of making a church and a gospel to reside in just one location is rather for personal gain rather than any religious reasons any of the propagator may present. The fact that the gospel can be preached by someone else and through others makes it flexible, for Chrissakes this is not the Medieval era where only the Pope and designated priests had access to holy scriptures and books. Most churches that refuse to open branches encourages iconoclasm, where the Pastors becomes God to the members and they see him as absolute. Churches like RCCG, WINNERS, CHRIST EMBASSY, CAC, CHOOSEN, MFM, etc. has shown that if money is the goal of the church, you can still get it even when you diversify your church for the convenience of her members. So, the likes of COZA, SCOAN, IGC etc should take solace in the fact that their reasons for refusing to diversify and spread across are baseless. Freeman David, a Philosopher Cc lalasticlala |
Re: Why Some Pastors Refuse To Have More Than One Branch - Freemanan by opeaceo: 8:00pm On Dec 11, 2015 |
Spot on!!! but.... In case of proper management, I don't see that as a good reason for not "branching out". Some churches have up to 4 services in a day and you'll see people spend hours on the road just to attend their church services far away from their residence. IMO, the plight of the worshippers should be their priority and if it's not, then it is mismanagement. |
Re: Why Some Pastors Refuse To Have More Than One Branch - Freemanan by Nobody: 8:05pm On Dec 11, 2015 |
opeaceo: At bolded... That's my main grievance... They Dont even care about their members, so long offering and tithes are paid. |
Re: Why Some Pastors Refuse To Have More Than One Branch - Freemanan by HCpaul(m): 10:18pm On Dec 11, 2015 |
You spoke very wise and intelligent, but your wisdom is somehow my foolishness. TB Joshua is often regarded as a senior prophet, not just as a title, but for defined reasons. Scoan is like a superset for the church of christ. You can see how many church founders went there and gained impactation and fire. Even though it is only one available in the country, you can see how they wanted to demolish the building. The man is the most persecuted pastor in the world and his character cannot sustain having branches. SCOAN is not a church but a synagogue. His calling is entirely different. Go and read the history of the ancient prophets and come back to create another sensible thread. 3 Likes 2 Shares |
Re: Why Some Pastors Refuse To Have More Than One Branch - Freemanan by trapQ: 10:26pm On Dec 11, 2015 |
O.P you're wrong. prophet T.B Joshua said that he hasnt been told by the holy spirit to open more branches. its not always about the money. 1 Like |
Re: Why Some Pastors Refuse To Have More Than One Branch - Freemanan by trapQ: 10:28pm On Dec 11, 2015 |
God bless you and your entire generation for this. HCpaul: 2 Likes 1 Share |
Re: Why Some Pastors Refuse To Have More Than One Branch - Freemanan by Viktor1983(m): 6:48am On Dec 12, 2015 |
Even when they have many branches, Na their pikin or kinsman dey dey in charge of where money dey quick to fall out eg London, america, south Africa,Lagos, Abuja and port harcourt . |
Re: Why Some Pastors Refuse To Have More Than One Branch - Freemanan by Nobody: 7:01am On Dec 12, 2015 |
HCpaul: Your knowledge of the ecclesiastical calling of T.B.J speaks volume. I do not intend to attack his method of the gospel, not at all. I just find it exceptionally absurd that members from Delta state and Taraba state have to travel down to Lagos every Sunday. Whatever the gospel is, it is not fit... It just ain't right. And please, you said its not a church, yet its called SYNAGOGUE CHURCH OF ALL NATION... |
Re: Why Some Pastors Refuse To Have More Than One Branch - Freemanan by Nobody: 7:03am On Dec 12, 2015 |
trapQ: Those are the exceptionally greedy ones.... Ones whose main aim is just to get wealth from the gospel... |
Re: Why Some Pastors Refuse To Have More Than One Branch - Freemanan by Nobody: 7:06am On Dec 12, 2015 |
trapQ: I Dont know how the holy spirit work.... But Dont the holy Spirit want that man in Oron, Kebbi, Afikpo, Nembe, etc. to attend this Synagogue?? |
Re: Why Some Pastors Refuse To Have More Than One Branch - Freemanan by vooks: 7:16am On Dec 12, 2015 |
TB Joshua is a murderer and charlatan His ministry has folded London closed Greece closed US closed Ghana closed South Africa closed The only branch we know of is in Thessalonika. Am still reeling in shock that some brainwashed Neanderthal buffoons still blame ghosts for the building that collapsed. It is a shame that a Negro who can afford a $65m jet cut corners, put up a substandard structure thereby sacrificing 116 on the altar of his greed |
Re: Why Some Pastors Refuse To Have More Than One Branch - Freemanan by opeaceo: 8:17am On Dec 12, 2015 |
HCpaul: The most persecuted Pastor in the world?? How did you know that? When typing next time, leave out sentiments. |
Re: Why Some Pastors Refuse To Have More Than One Branch - Freemanan by Nobody: 8:22am On Dec 12, 2015 |
vooks: |
Re: Why Some Pastors Refuse To Have More Than One Branch - Freemanan by Nobody: 8:23am On Dec 12, 2015 |
opeaceo: Nigerian Christians for you... Bigots |
Re: Why Some Pastors Refuse To Have More Than One Branch - Freemanan by ayoku777(m): 9:00am On Dec 12, 2015 |
Freemanan: Can't those people go to other churches? Must they inconvenience themselves to attend just one particular church? Some pastors simply believe in the universality of the body of Christ, and don't think you need to be a member of their church to be a member of the body of Christ or even to be impacted by their ministries. I know many pastors with impactful ministries who don't have more than a branch. Some of them even plant churches elsewhere and give the ministries complete autonomy from them. Not as a branch of their own church. Gbile Akanni, Rick Joyner, etc are examples. When you begin to see the universal church as one body, you won't feel the compulsion to spread your branches all over as if you wana be the dominant church. Sometimes (not always) branch-based churches many times are just to increase the empire of the said ministry and man of God, not for the convenience of the members. And these are motives God will destroy in His next move. When the body of Christ truly becomes one in the next move of God, denominations and branches of church empires will become irrelevant. 1 Like |
Re: Why Some Pastors Refuse To Have More Than One Branch - Freemanan by opeaceo: 9:14am On Dec 12, 2015 |
ayoku777: You talk as if most churches have the same doctrines or idealogies. In Nigeria, I see competition amongst worshippers, at the mention of their founder of GO, they loose all sense of reasoning, now tell me, how would they comfortably go sit in another church? Pastors who plant churches and give them their full autonomy, they most times handle them to someone who has been under their tutelage and he continues in a way similar to the principles of the founder. One of the primary purpose of a church is for the expansion of the Gospel, and it can't achieve that with just a branch, it has to spread its tentacles. 1 Like 1 Share |
Re: Why Some Pastors Refuse To Have More Than One Branch - Freemanan by ayoku777(m): 10:04am On Dec 12, 2015 |
opeaceo: Don't confuse church planting for branch planting. You can plant churches without making it a branch of your own church. I'm not talking about the Nigerian model of man of God-ism and hero-worship mentality. I'm talking about the church, the way it was meant to be. Just because you mentored someone doesn't mean you should become the Holy Spirit to the person. Even those you mentor should be given the liberty to be led of the Spirit and express their unique giftings and grace. Most times, branch planting is just to spread the influence and empire of the man of God, not to spread the gospel. You can mentor someone and help him plant a church that will spread the gospel of Christ, without making his church a branch of yours. Just like Paul did for Timothy and Titus. A lot of pastors that don't have branches, are mentors that have helped other pastors plant churches. But they gave their mentees the liberty to express their grace while they continue to counsel and interceed for the churches, like Paul did. Church planting does not have to be branch planting. And God will truly prove that through what is coming. What is coming will soon make denomination and branches irrelevant. We will all be one body, a church, made up of churches, not branches of a religious empire. 1 Like 1 Share |
Re: Why Some Pastors Refuse To Have More Than One Branch - Freemanan by vooks: 10:14am On Dec 12, 2015 |
ayoku777: The different between church planting and branch planting is the INTENT How do you suppose churches should run? Start with Ayoku777 called to start a church from his basement. Next? |
Re: Why Some Pastors Refuse To Have More Than One Branch - Freemanan by ayoku777(m): 10:40am On Dec 12, 2015 |
vooks: You're right, its the intent. The matter of the heart is the heart of the matter. A true ministry is run by treating souls as its greatest asset. When you begin to see a church branch being castigated or threatened because they are not remitting enough amount to the headquarters, you cannot help but wonder, what is the goal behind opening of branches? Are these branches being opened to shore up the capital base of the mother church? Or to reach more souls? Why threaten a church with shutdown or change of leadership because membership is still low or remittance to headquarters is not increasing? I know firsthand a lot of the world-style politicking and tussle that goes on in many of such branch-based churches. The church should be run as it was run in bible days. People should be mentored in doctrine and grace, and given the liberty to express their giftings without the mentor playing the Holy Spirit to them. Let me tell you the truth. The present church model are just holding the fort for the real model that will take the church into the promised land. The present model are like Moses, feeding God's people in the wilderness as the Joshua generation matures to take the rein. When they do, demoninationalism and branch-loyalty will be replaced by the unity of the faith and of the knowledge of the Son of God, unto a perfect man, unto the measure of the stature of the fulness of Christ. Presently, the church is not even remotely close to the glorious church Christ is coming for, in power, purpose, principles and personality. And we don't even have the church discipleship model yet for arriving at it. We will get there though, because it is written. 1 Like |
Re: Why Some Pastors Refuse To Have More Than One Branch - Freemanan by tartar9(m): 11:02am On Dec 12, 2015 |
they want to be in total charge of the loot |
Re: Why Some Pastors Refuse To Have More Than One Branch - Freemanan by Nobody: 11:08am On Dec 12, 2015 |
ayoku777: What? Can't they go to another church? For real? Lawd... You guys really go to any extent to defend the lacunas done by these "men of God". |
Re: Why Some Pastors Refuse To Have More Than One Branch - Freemanan by vooks: 11:09am On Dec 12, 2015 |
ayoku777: I like your idealism but I must say NO church has ever been 'the glorious church Christ is coming for' Next, there really was NO blueprint for church structure prescribed by Jesus Christ; all churches of all generations have been innovations and this is why o can't fault one model over the other. To me it is all about optimization. Is there anything you can do to maximize the impact of the church? If there is and you know it, go for it. For now in this age of science and technological advancement not to mention population explosion, it seems insensitive having masses covering great distances even within a country just to be in church. This can be resolved by a branch network. But if a minister's influence/catchment is a few miles radius, opening branches all over may not be smart. |
Re: Why Some Pastors Refuse To Have More Than One Branch - Freemanan by opeaceo: 11:13am On Dec 12, 2015 |
ayoku777: You're talking about the way the church is supposed to be ideally, but in reality, is that how it is? Me think you're getting it wrong, from your earlier post, you wrote " I know many pastors with impactful ministries who don't have more than a branch. Some of them even plant churches elsewhere and give the ministries complete autonomy from them. Not as a branch of their own church". When they give full autonomy, they don't give it to "anyhow" Pastor, they give it to someone who practice, preach and believe their idealogies. 1 Like 1 Share |
Re: Why Some Pastors Refuse To Have More Than One Branch - Freemanan by Highcuerayte: 11:24am On Dec 12, 2015 |
Religion? Not a Fan. |
Re: Why Some Pastors Refuse To Have More Than One Branch - Freemanan by Nobody: 11:40am On Dec 12, 2015 |
ayoku777: The bolden is well noted. |
Re: Why Some Pastors Refuse To Have More Than One Branch - Freemanan by frank317: 12:04pm On Dec 12, 2015 |
You guys seem to be missing the point. Why can there be just one church with different branches all over. Why can't all the pastors come together, agree on what is right according to the teachings of Christ and be under just one umbrella. Call it HOUSE OF GOD and the whole churches would be just one name? The issue here is not about having just a branch or many branches. The issue is people claiming to worship one God, reading the same Jewish book but interpreting it differently. Each church has his style. Why the confusion? What is this God doing about it. I was raised in Watchman Catholic Charismatic and their style is completely different from roman Catholic or Christ Embassy or Jehovah's witnesses or any of the white garment churches. Every church think they are worshiping God the right way. Some think its right to have one branch while others think u can have many even ten on one street. What sort of God watch his creation drag him and yet does nothing about it for decades. If God loves us so much to even send his son to die for us, does he not see that these different ideologies are tearing us apart? Does his love not allow him see that his son just dying for us is not enough? Years are going by, generations are passing by and the confusion and segregation continues yet, the God who thought it needful to send his son to die for us does nothing about restoring peace and harmony to his creation. Is he out of ideas? Is solving the problem of the world he created beyond him? All I see is humans manipulating humans and calling it God and holy spirit. I am just surprised that my religious brother stubbornly fail to see this. Rather they chose to argue with each other and bask in ignorance while those who are manipulating them are enriching themselves. |
Re: Why Some Pastors Refuse To Have More Than One Branch - Freemanan by Princewell2012(m): 12:36pm On Dec 12, 2015 |
And you believe him |
Re: Why Some Pastors Refuse To Have More Than One Branch - Freemanan by Nobody: 2:45pm On Dec 12, 2015 |
frank317: Simple... |
Re: Why Some Pastors Refuse To Have More Than One Branch - Freemanan by Nobody: 2:46pm On Dec 12, 2015 |
Princewell2012:Believe who? |
Re: Why Some Pastors Refuse To Have More Than One Branch - Freemanan by Nobody: 3:13pm On Dec 12, 2015 |
Freemanan. Was your account hacked |
Re: Why Some Pastors Refuse To Have More Than One Branch - Freemanan by Nobody: 3:21pm On Dec 12, 2015 |
Re: Why Some Pastors Refuse To Have More Than One Branch - Freemanan by trapQ: 11:28am On Dec 13, 2015 |
Don't the holy spirit also want boko haram members to worship him? So should he go open a church in sambisa then? Freemanan: |
My Favourite Christian Song (LMFAO!) / See How Dangote Was Blessed After He Left His Plane Seat In The 19's / Should A Christian Celebrate Easter?
(Go Up)
Sections: politics (1) business autos (1) jobs (1) career education (1) romance computers phones travel sports fashion health religion celebs tv-movies music-radio literature webmasters programming techmarket Links: (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) Nairaland - Copyright © 2005 - 2024 Oluwaseun Osewa. All rights reserved. See How To Advertise. 106 |