lailo:
I dnt have meg to watch nonesense

abduljabbar4:
So what they are biafrans so i dont care

FisifunKododada:
In order to have a case against the police you have to have evidence (preferably video) that show that he was killed by the cops without provocation, resisting arrest and threatening them.

FisifunKododada:
What the video showed:

1. The video started with what appears to be a dead male body lying on his back in the middle of an untarred street.

2. 4 uniformed officers were at the scene by the body and occasionally shooting into the air in the direction of a street adjacent to the first one.

3. After a while, a police truck arrived with a few more officers.

4. Also arriving on the scene at the same time is an old school (probably Volvo) hatchback.

5. 4 civilians (including the driver) alighted from the hatchback and placed the body in the back of the vehicle.

6. One woman came over from the adjacent street and looked at the body before it was loaded into the vehicle.

7. And this woman appears it seems(I am not very sure of this the audio was bad) to know the victim because it sounded like she was crying in a manner that suggests she knew the victim.

8. The hatchback drove off with the body and the police truck remained in the scene

9. A passerby was told by the cops to lie down on the street and he was beaten with a stick or wood before been told to move along.

10. An officer was shouting 'retreat' before the video finished.

Now what the video did NOT show:

1. What happened to the victim. Was he shot? If he was then why? Was he resisting? etc.

2. Any crowd gathered that the cops might be shooting at at the end of the adjacent street.

In order to have a case against the police you have to have evidence (preferably video) that show that he was killed by the cops without provocation, resisting arrest and threatening them. Otherwise, what you have here is just a video of a dead body on the ground. And even if the police admit to killing him UNTIL you are able to prove that it was done without provocation and extra judicially then you have NO case.

Mind you this is not about Pro or Anti ANYTHING - am just stating the facts of the case as we know so far.

lailo:
I dnt have meg to watch nonesense

abduljabbar4:
So what they are biafrans so i dont care

abduljabbar4:
So what they are biafrans so i dont care

lailo:
I dnt have meg to watch nonesense

abduljabbar4:


Isnt that what you guys said when we were attacked by boko haram? Its south attacking south so its not ma business

abduljabbar4:
So what they are biafrans so i dont care

chesterlee:
What a shame!!!

Watch as they tried to hide the evidence of their crimes bringing a bucket of water to wash off the blood from the road, not knowing they were being filmed!

The Nigerian Military are gradually losing their humanity...First it was the Shiites now this.....Gosh!!!

abduljabbar4:
So what they are biafrans so i dont care

abduljabbar4:


Isnt that what you guys said when we were attacked by boko haram? Its south attacking south so its not ma business

Candyrain:


Were you not the one sympathetic/crying over the killing of the Shiites? You cared because they are your people but in this case you don't care. So much for one Nigeria

Candyrain:


Dude pls use that thing in your skull. The police killed unarmed civilians and you called it south attacking south. You guys are just so impossible. Isn't it hypocritical of you to condemn the killings of unarmed Shiites muslims by the military only for you to turn around and support the killing of unarmed Biafranss but the same military?

Humanity is lost

Gboliwe:


Where's the video?

FisifunKododada:
What the video showed:

1. The video started with what appears to be a dead male body lying on his back in the middle of an untarred street.

2. 4 uniformed officers were at the scene by the body and occasionally shooting into the air in the direction of a street adjacent to the first one.

3. After a while, a police truck arrived with a few more officers.

4. Also arriving on the scene at the same time is an old school (probably Volvo) hatchback.

5. 4 civilians (including the driver) alighted from the hatchback and placed the body in the back of the vehicle.

6. One woman came over from the adjacent street and looked at the body before it was loaded into the vehicle.

7. And this woman appears it seems(I am not very sure of this the audio was bad) to know the victim because it sounded like she was crying in a manner that suggests she knew the victim.

8. The hatchback drove off with the body and the police truck remained in the scene

9. A passerby was told by the cops to lie down on the street and he was beaten with a stick or wood before been told to move along.

10. An officer was shouting 'retreat' before the video finished.

Now what the video did NOT show:

1. What happened to the victim. Was he shot? If he was then why? Was he resisting? etc.

2. Any crowd gathered that the cops might be shooting at at the end of the adjacent street.

In order to have a case against the police you have to have evidence (preferably video) that show that he was killed by the cops without provocation, resisting arrest and threatening them. Otherwise, what you have here is just a video of a dead body on the ground. And even if the police admit to killing him UNTIL you are able to prove that it was done without provocation and extra judicially then you have NO case.

Mind you this is not about Pro or Anti ANYTHING - am just stating the facts of the case as we know so far.

abduljabbar4:
So what they are biafrans so i dont care