It is impossible to go to the moon because of van Allen belt radiation. Van Allen radiation belt is a layer of energetic charged particles that is
held in place around a magnetized planet, such as the Earth,
by the planet's magnetic field . The Earth has two such belts .
The main belts extend from an altitude of about 1,000 to 60,000
kilometers above the surface in which region radiation levels
vary. Van Allen called them a SEA of DEADLY RADIATION. We all know that radiation is dangerous to human when exposed for a long time.
Now, in between the inner and outer belt, there is an encircled region called plasma shield. This plasma has a temperature of about several thousand degree Celsius which will make it impossible for their space ship to penetrate through without melting. Their space ship contain Tin foil shielding, and the melting point of tin is 231.9 degree Celsius. So this is ridiculous. It is impossible to transmit radio signal through the plasma shield even if they manage to pass through the shield.
Science has shown that not only Van allen radiation is the problem: All outer space is full of terribly deadly radiation!


If it’s NOT possible to presently pass through these deadly radiation belts, how was it possible for the
Apollo to pass through and land on the moon without any danger to the astronauts in 1969?
Are we been fooled and scammed

The distance from earth to the moon is about 280,000km which is a three day journey, but only 9 hours later after reporting they where on earths orbit, they claimed they where on the moon thereby transmitting radio signal from the moon to the earth, how can this be?

We need stop accepting everything science gives to us without questioning. Following science blindly in everything they say only makes you a FOLLOWER, it does not make you smart, intellectual or intelligent, it makes you a follower which means you have shut up your brain, you have close your mind and now you worship the dagmar of your controllers.

:@ Conspiracy theorist

This theory is only contradicting a fact.

HCpaul:
This theory is only contradicting a fact.

which fact? could you explain it

If your theory is correct then how do they send prob to Mars and the other planets. One advice for you go back to science class

This was copied from Wikipedia word for word, writen by people who actually know what they're talking about.





Spacecraft travelling beyond low Earth orbit leave the protection of earth's geomagnetic field and transit the Van Allen belts. Beyond these, they face additional hazards from cosmic rays and solar flares. A region between the inner and outer Van Allen belts lies at two to four Earth radii and is sometimes referred to as the "safe zone".

Solar cells , integrated circuits , and sensors can be damaged by radiation. Geomagnetic storms occasionally damage electronic components on spacecraft. Miniaturization and digitization of electronics and logic circuits have made satellites more vulnerable to radiation, as the total electric charge in these circuits is now small enough so as to be comparable with the charge of incoming ions. Electronics on satellites must be hardened against radiation to operate reliably. The Hubble Space Telescope , among other satellites, often has its sensors turned off when passing through regions of intense radiation. A satellite shielded by 3 mm of aluminium in an elliptic orbit (200 by 20,000 miles (320 by 32,190 km)) passing the radiation belts will receive about 2,500 rem (25 Sv ) per year (for comparison, a full-body dose of 50 Sv is deadly). Almost all radiation will be received while passing the inner belt.

The Apollo missions marked the first event where humans traveled through the Van Allen belts, which was one of several radiation hazards known by mission planners. The astronauts had low exposure in the Van Allen belts due to the short period of time spent flying through them. Apollo flight trajectories bypassed the inner belts completely to send spacecraft through only the thinner areas of the outer belts.

The command module's inner structure was an aluminum "sandwich" consisting of a welded aluminium inner skin, a thermally bonded honeycomb core, and a thin aluminium "face sheet". The steel honeycomb core and outer face sheets were thermally bonded to the inner skin.

Astronauts' overall exposure was actually dominated by solar particles once outside Earth's magnetic field. The total radiation received by the astronauts varied from mission to mission but was measured to be between 0.16 and 1.14 rads (1.6 and 11.4 mGy ), much less than the standard of 5 rem (50 mSv) per year set by the United States Atomic Energy Commission for people who work with radioactivity.




The full article is here: KNOWLEDGE! for your own enlightenment and education.

Smh, johnydon22, Come and see o!!!!!!

SirWere:
Smh, johnydon22, Come and see o!!!!!!

I have explained to someone before these things

johnydon22:
I have explained to someone before these things

Well, the op says Man can't go to space. And since I know almost next to nothing about space except for what you post, I'm all ears.

jstmee:
It is impossible to go to the moon because of van Allen belt radiation.

Who ever told you its impossible to pass through the Van Allen Radiation Belt seriously lied..

If it’s NOT possible to presently pass through these deadly radiation belts, how was it possible for the
Apollo to pass through and land on the moon without any danger to the astronauts in 1969? Are we been fooled and scammed

[b] It is good to ask questions and it is good to study too..

The Van Allen's belt is not impenetrable, it is a field of highly radiative particles and so poses serious radiative threat to astronomers on board a space probe that passes it and also the equipment.

This was one of the numerous problems solved before the moon mission of which Van Allen himself was part of the team that tackled this problem before Apollo mission..

There are regions in the belt were lower radiations have been recorded and so are less hazardous...

The Apollo missions marked the first event where humans traveled through the
Van Allen belts, which was one of several radiation hazards known by mission
planners.

The astronauts had low exposure in the Van Allen belts due to the short period of time spent flying through them.

Apollo flight trajectories bypassed the inner belts completely to send spacecraft through only the thinner areas of the outer belts.

The command module's inner structure was an aluminum "sandwich" consisting of a welded aluminium inner skin, a thermally bonded honeycomb core, and a thin aluminium "face sheet".

The steel honeycomb core and outer face sheets were thermally bonded to the
inner skin.

The solution to the Van Allen Radiation belt was speed of the craft of which if achieved the probe can pass through the less radiative belt in high speed with the tiny aluminium skin of the probe offering enough protection for the crew..

So learn this now.. Van Allen Belt problem was solved before the Apollo missions ..

[/b]

The distance from earth to the moon is about 280,000km which is a three day journey, but only 9 hours later after reporting they where on earths orbit, they claimed they where on the moon thereby transmitting radio signal from the moon to the earth, how can this be?

Please stop sharing false information unverified and conned by baseless conspiracy theories.

The Apollo 11 mission took 3 days not 9 hours like you have been made to believe.. It launched 16 July 1969 and landed on the moon 20 july 1969 on Mare Tranquillitatis.

Secondly, you also need to learn that distance and speed are relative, there is no fixed amount of time needed to get to a destination as long as there is no fixed amount of speed required..

The faster the body, the faster it gets to the destination and the slower the body the more time it takes.

It takes buses up to 8hours to travel from Enugu to Lagos but an aircraft gets there in 45minutes...

Please my brother, stop taking conspiracy theories more serious...

We need stop accepting everything science gives to us without questioning. Following science blindly in everything they say only makes you a FOLLOWER, it does not make you smart, intellectual or intelligent, it makes you a follower which means you have shut up your brain, you have close your mind and now you worship the dagmar of your controllers.

I agree with this, Science itself is about doubt and questions and this two factors leads to approximable truth by consistent research.

There is no dogma in science, every scientific thesis is open to doubt and refutation and i know if you prove any wrong, you earn a nobel prize for it..

So science encourages doubts and questions and empirical substantiation as a basis for a conclusive deduction..

So let your questions and doubts run wild, it gives room for improvement and paves way for scientific thesis to improve...

Cc. SirWere

There are two main Van Allen belts - the inner belt and the outer belt - and a transient third belt. The inner belt is the more dangerous one, containing energetic protons. The outer one has less-dangerous low-energy electrons (Beta particles). The Apollo spacecraft passed through the inner belt in a matter of minutes and the outer belt in about one and half hours. The astronauts were shielded from the ionizing radiation by the aluminum hulls of the spacecraft. Furthermore, the orbital transfer trajectory from Earth to the Moon through the belts was chosen to lessen radiation exposure. EVEN DR. JAMES VAN ALLEN, THE DISCOVERER OF THE VAN ALLEN RADIATION BELTS, REBUTTED THE CLAIMS THAT RADIATION LEVELS WERE TOO HARMFUL FOR THE APOLLO MISSIONS. Plait cited an average dose of less than 1 rem (10 mSv), which is equivalent to the ambient radiation received by living at sea level for three years. The total radiation received on the trip was about the same as allowed for workers in the nuclear energy field for a year and not much more than what Space Shuttle astronauts received.
Disregard conspiracy theorists who want to refute one of the greatest achievements of mankind. Science is still at the forefront and I'll rather follow the teachings of science than that of religion whose stock in trade is bombing innocent people and deceiving gullible people about a non existent heaven and hell to force them to pay tithes.