Last2comment:
So which is the first church?

An2elect2:
What says the scriptures?

joefredd006:
Don't worry your head my sister. Religious historians, archaeologist, ethnographers, Atheists, and more have tried to disprove that too. But the material evidence of presence is overwhelming. Luckily for them, they also have a writing culture of dating their history.

So just let it slide, for the fact that you senior your own church doesn't mean you now know where the stream of christian faith flows from.

Let it go dear, let it go

Moreover, i doubt if these are the questions you'll be asked at the gate of heaven (if you believe in that)

Let it slide !

joefredd006:
Jeez! have you ever heard of the book of the Acts of the Apostles, the early church in Antioch, a communion of believers in Christ, baptised by the spirit, presided over by Apostle Peter. Have you heard of the various epistles to the various churches in Samaria, Ephesus, Thessalonia, and others presided over by the Apostles. This led to the coinage of the name 'catholic' (universal) as it was fast spreading. Still presided over by Apostle Peter and he went on missionary journeys to admonish the people of the 'new faith'

What about a statement like:
"And I tell you that you are Peter, and on
this rock I will build my church, and the
gates of Hades will not overcome it" (Matt 16:18)

Now have you asked yourself which church Christ was talking about. Coza, Redeem, Or Rhema. I guess not.

'...and the gates of Hades will not overcome it'' don't turn yourself into a gate of hell that questions a direct order.

Drop your phone once in a while, and pick up the bible. it surely has all the answers, even more than google

osesology:
Does it really matter which one came first? Your Bible is there, use it and stop trying to stir up directionless and senseless debate online.

joefredd006:
You're a fine kid that still have a long way to go. Don't let your youthful exuberances take away the beauty of tomorrow.

Speechless3:
Whats this one saying. Is there anything more beautiful than serving God right? mcheeww some people just like talking anyhow. An2elect2 you have time o.

Speechless3:
BB i see truth in what you are saying but's it not rosy on the other side too. Everything is messed up.

An2elect2:
Yea, almost everything is messed up but this is according to the predetermined will of God(where our confidence lies) however there are still genuine christians scattered here and there. We are everywhere but the world knows us not. And we are the bearers of truth. Praying for you dear.

Speechless3:
BB i see truth in what you are saying but's it not rosy on the other side too. Everything is messed up.

Speechless3:
Amen. Thats what i need serious prayers!

analice107:

Babe, you mean the Bible is messed up? because what the OP means is, pick your Bible. She's not saying check the doctrine of a non Catholic Church.

Speechless3:
She knows what i mean.

An2elect2:
Yea, almost everything is messed up but this is according to the predetermined will of God(where our confidence lies) however there are still genuine christians scattered here and there. We are everywhere but the world knows us not. And we are the bearers of truth. Praying for you dear.

Rayhut:

You are using Bible put together by Catholic Church and calling them names,your case is like somebody that own and driving a mercedes benz car and calling mercedes company fake

An2elect2:
1) Is there a history of christianity in the bible?

Yes.

2) Where did the bible say it all started?

Israel.

3) Does the bible recognise an institution OR a group of people washed by the blood of the lamb as the church?

Yes.

4) Does the bible recognise any authority that concerns spirituality order than the bible itself

Yes. 1Tim3:15 "...the church of the living God, the pillar and bulwark of the truth." Matt16:18 And I tell you, you are Peter, and on this rock I will build my church, and the gates of Hades will not prevail against it. 19 I will give you the keys of the kingdom of heaven, and whatever you bind on earth will be bound in heaven, and whatever you loose on earth will be loosed in heaven.”

5) Who was Peter according to the bible?

The Prime Minister of the Kingdom of God, who had the keys to the kingdom and the authority to bind and loose on earth and heaven. (as seen in the verse above)

6) Did the other apostles/believers consult Peter for spiritual direction/judgement.

Yes. Luke22:32 but I have prayed that your own faith may not fail; and once you have turned back, you must strengthen your brothers.” Paul (even after meeting Jesus) went to Peter and stayed 15days before beginning his ministry (Gal1:18). It was Peter that resolved the first doctrinal dispute in the Council of Jerusalem Acts15). How could they not consult the one with keys to the kingdom?

7) Was Peter seen as a Jesus-representative/vicar by other believers. Or was he a fellow elder and believer who had many weaknesses like the others and had to rely solely on the grace of God?

Peter was Christ's representative and Vicar. John 21:15-17 - Jesus charges Peter to "feed my lambs," "tend my sheep," "feed my sheep." Sheep means all people, even the apostles. Yes, Peter had weaknesses, but that doesn't stop him from being the Vicar of Christ.
Acts 1:15 - Peter initiates the selection of a successor to Judas right after Jesus ascended into heaven, and no one questions him.
Acts 5:3 - Peter declares the first anathema of Ananias and Sapphira which is ratified by God, and brings about their death.

Speechless3:
BB i see truth in what you are saying but's it not rosy on the other side too. Everything is messed up.

CoolUsername:
I came here expecting to find evidence that would get into research mode for a while.

Tch! I guess I forgot that this is the Religion Section.

analice107:

You guys should protest to Seun, by writing him an open letter requesting for him to open an atheist section for you guys. It'll really make sense if you can have your section. But I know, just like the muslims, you guys will find that place too boring, so will still come out here to have fun.

CoolUsername:


Why would I need an atheism section? I'm not afraid of my views being challenged. In fact, it's kinda healthy to constantly have to rethink your stance on a subject.

It's just when I saw the title, I was expecting OP to cite some archaeological findings and what-not. I was disappointed to find some weak questions that anyone who calls himself/herself a Christian should know.

Rayhut:

You are using Bible put together by Catholic Church and calling them names,your case is like somebody that own and driving a mercedes benz car and calling mercedes company fake

italo:
Find answers within.