Welcome, Guest: Register On Nairaland / LOGIN! / Trending / Recent / NewStats: 3,217,684 members, 8,035,120 topics. Date: Monday, 23 December 2024 at 12:31 AM |
Nairaland Forum / Nairaland / General / Politics / Foreign Affairs / Did Russia Just Threaten Turkey With Nuclear Weapons? (6985 Views)
World War 3 : North Korea Nuclear Weapons In Final Stages (pics) / Russia Just Killed ISIS Leader Abu Bakr Al-baghdadi … For At Least The 4th Time. / The Turkish Coup: For Russia From Turkey With Enough Love To Last Until The... (2) (3) (4)
(1) (2) (3) (4) (Reply) (Go Down)
Did Russia Just Threaten Turkey With Nuclear Weapons? by NairaMinted: 11:22pm On Feb 19, 2016 |
Appleyard, cyprus000, zoharariel, scully95, fineguy11, Tkester, capip120 http://thesaker.is/did-russia-just-threaten-turkey-with-nuclear-weapons/ [Note by the Saker: I do not believe that Russia has made such a threat and I will post my reasons for this in the next 24 hours. However, I might be wrong and Mercouris and Perry right, I therefore feel like I should post this analysis] Reports say a source close to Putin claims Russia warned Erdogan of readiness to use tactical nuclear weapons to defend Russian strike force in Syria from Turkish attack Russia Insiderby Alexander Mercouris for Russia Insider: http://russia-insider.com/en/politics/did-russia-just-threaten-turkey-nuclear-weapons/ri12936 The US investigative journalist Robert Parry has made an astonishing claim – and one that has gone completely unnoticed. He is reporting that the Russian government has warned Erdogan that Russia is prepared to use tactical nuclear weapons to defend its Syrian strike force from Turkish attack. Parry’s exact words are as follows: “A source close to Russian President Vladimir Putin told me that the Russians have warned Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan that Moscow is prepared to use tactical nuclear weapons if necessary to save their troops in the face of a Turkish-Saudi onslaught. Since Turkey is a member of NATO, any such conflict could quickly escalate into a full-scale nuclear confrontation.” Generally I would be skeptical of such a story from an anonymous source. However Parry is a journalist of the highest reliability and integrity so there can be no doubt he actually has been told this by a real source. Of course it is possible the source is making the story up, or that he is not as close to Putin as Parry believes. However on 11th February 2016 Russia’s Security Council held a meeting the public report of which is unusually terse, whilst on the same day the Russian military reported to Putin about a series of military exercises arranged at short notice in their southern military district, which look like they were intended to prepare the Russian military for rapid action at short notice against Turkey should the need arise. If a warning really was given it might have been given either on that day or possibly on the day after, to coincide with the military exercises whose meaning in that case would not be lost on either the US or the Turks. The meeting of the Security Council (whose importance I discussed here) would in that case have been convened to discuss and authorise it. The fact Obama telephoned Putin a day later on 14th February 2016 might also be connected to the warning, if it really was given. Both the Turks and the Russians would surely have informed the US of such a warning. It would be entirely understandable in that case that the US President would want to discuss it with the Russian President. In fact it would be astonishing if he did not want to. If it was the warning Obama and Putin discussed, then that might explain why the US and the Russians are giving such completely different accounts of the conversation. Neither side would want to make the warning public – something which would escalate the crisis to stratospheric levels – and each would want to concoct a cover story to hide what was really discussed, which given the circumstances and the urgency they might be unlikely to coordinate with each other. That might explain why the accounts of the conversation differ so much. Against that it must be said that it is by no means unusual for Russian and Western governments to publish radically different accounts of conversations Russian and Western leaders have with each other. All this it should be stressed is speculation, though as is apparent it is consistent with some of the diplomatic and military moves. If such a warning really was given it would not be the first time the US or Russia have threatened to use nuclear weapons. The US for example warned Saddam Hussein in 1990 that it was ready to retaliate with nuclear weapons if he used chemical weapons against their troops in the First Gulf War. However a threat to use nuclear weapons is one that is never made lightly. If it really was made it shows how fraught the situation in Syria has become. If the Russians really did make such a threat then it would be a further reason why the US and its European allies would be urging Erdogan to act with restraint, and would be counselling him against plunging into a war with the Russians in Syria. I had already guessed this was the case (see here and here) and in the same article in which he reports the Russian threat Parry discusses this issue extensively. Confirmation that the Western powers are warning Erdogan against an invasion of Syria has now also come from the Financial Times (see “Turkey and Saudi Arabia consider Syria intervention”, Financial Times, 18th February 2016): “The US is seeking to rein in its allies Turkey and Saudi Arabia from military action in Syria if a ceasefire planned for today in the bloody civil war fails. Despite mounting regional frustration over Washington’s allegedly passive stance on the five-year-old conflict the Obama administration and other western powers are worried that direct military interventions could lead to an escalation of the conflict and a dangerous clash with Russia. “Are they going to deploy troops there? Not if we can help it,” said one senior Nato diplomat.”” Each day now provides further news of advances by the Syrian army and its allies in northern Syria. The very latest information is that the last major rebel held town in Latakia province has been recaptured by the Syrian army, and that the Syrian army is just a few kilometres away from the city of Idlib. Slowly but surely the trap around the jihadi rebels in Aleppo is closing. Meanwhile – whether because of warnings from Moscow or Washington or for some other reason – the Turks and the Saudis have so far not matched their rhetoric with action. The much discussed Saudi aircraft deployment to the US airbase at Incirlik has turned out to be much smaller than initially reported, and may not actually have taken place. The Turks are publicly sticking to their position that they will not send their troops into Syria unilaterally – which could be taken to mean they will not invade Syria unless they have US agreement and unless the US contributes ground troops to the invasion force. Turkish action so far has been limited to cross-border shelling of Kurdish forces near Azaz and demands the Kurds stay away from Azaz, which is near the Turkish border and which the Turks say they want to make part of a buffer zone. Even these moves have been too much for some of Turkey’s NATO allies, provoking criticism by some NATO states of Turkey for its shelling of the Kurds, though claims the UN Security Council has passed a Resolution condemning Turkey’s actions are untrue. Interestingly the Western powers seem reluctant to endorse Turkey’s claims the Kurds of Iraq and Syria – as opposed to the Kurds of Turkey – were behind Wednesday’s terrorist attack on a military convoy in Ankara (see this discussion here), whilst Turkey’s response to the attack was to bomb Kurdish targets in Iraq rather than in Syria. The situation is still very tense and it is premature to say that the crisis – if one exists – is past. Whether because of Russian threats to use nuclear weapons or because of calls of restraint from the West and possibly from his own military or for some other reason, the signs for the moment however point to Erdogan backing off. With every day that passes without a Turkish ground invasion the prospects of it happening grow less. The next few weeks should decide the issue. 2 Likes 1 Share |
Re: Did Russia Just Threaten Turkey With Nuclear Weapons? by Edwinmason(m): 11:25pm On Feb 19, 2016 |
RUSSIA has been looking for a way to test their new weapon since |
Re: Did Russia Just Threaten Turkey With Nuclear Weapons? by bonechamberlain(m): 11:44pm On Feb 19, 2016 |
Putin has said it times without number, Russia only a madman would lead his country to war with nato, which Turkey is part of. but with the way things are turning turkey might be abandoned, though their officials are singing a different tune about the downing of Russia's jet. no country would ever use nuclear weapons. a conventional war with turkey would take Russia just 7days and turkey is finished. 2 Likes |
Re: Did Russia Just Threaten Turkey With Nuclear Weapons? by scully95: 4:28am On Feb 20, 2016 |
,, |
Re: Did Russia Just Threaten Turkey With Nuclear Weapons? by scully95: 4:28am On Feb 20, 2016 |
bonechamberlain: in russia's military doctrine, it can use nukes to pin point large targets and destroy it.. not like the crazy u.s bombed japan.. russia explained it in its military doctrine.. even its latest or upgraded grads, it uses hydrogen to kill.. meaning if u are within range where the Grad multiple rocket launcher system is being fired... it could choak u to death. I don't think Russia will need to use nukes. They can just use regular bombs + give Syrians more grads: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XSHjqeHw1Xs If you follow what happened in eastern Ukraine with the ' If a bunch of untrained ' 1 Like |
Re: Did Russia Just Threaten Turkey With Nuclear Weapons? by cyprus000: 7:18am On Feb 20, 2016 |
[size=13pt][b] First: thinking that NATO will be foolish to embroil itself in all out nuke exchange with russia, in bide to uphold NATO article 5, cos of turkey, is nothing short of illusive thinking with just 2% likelihood, especially when western public do not subscribe to the media barrage of criticism of russian military compaign in syria. Infact, US and other NATO countries has been calling the megalomaniacal president(Erdogan) to exercise restraint,as regards to his misadventurous plan of invading syria with his blood sucking demon ally(saudi), Which is why they changed their song to "we will not invade syria unilaterally. We'll do so under US backing." Tho I don't unequivocally buy into that. That said. Russia and turkey have never had favourable perception/opine of each other,even tho they once had good business relationship. Russia has always seen turkey as a vicious adversary,considering the fact that turkey play a key role in training and sponsoring chechen's insurgents in russia. this same turkey is trying to deploy ground troops and military hardware in northern syria(a systematic slap to russia), under the guise of stopping territorial gain of YPG, who they claim to be branch of PKK. We all know whats up. Their sunni sponsored terrorism is dying in syria, cos of massive syrian regime territorial gain, and their invented terrorists who are under siege in Aleppo, are about to be sent to God for judgement, plus supply line of ISIS, about to be cut by YPG. The last card for them to play, is send ground troops to do their dirty work using the facade of going after YPG etc, Which is overt that russia will not look the other side in such situate,especially when assad has reiterated that such move will not go unconfronted. On the flipside; With an allege claim from inside sources, that turkey is planning to deploy tactical nukes in northern syria. Russia won't give a benefit of two-blink before it nuke turkey, if turkey pose a threat to her forces in syria. We saw that play out In 1983, when NATO conducted Operation Able Archer involving 40,000 troops, which Kremlin believed to be a serious nuclear threat. Kremlin gave instructions for her aircrafts in east Germany and Poland to be fitted with nuclear weapons, then armed soviet submarines with nuclear missiles and sent them under the Arctic ice to avoid detection with 70 SS-29 missiles placed on high alert. NATO seeing the willingness and ferocity of kremlin to fight to the lattar, instantly seeked peace. Russians are not to be messed with when it comes to protecting themselves. Putin is an undisputed chess master in warfare, he proved this by deploying S-400 in syria, thats more than a smart move. with s-400 on ground in syria, casualty on russian side will be infinitesimal incase of nuclear face-off with turkey. All russia need to do is chuck nuclear bomb into straits and create a huge flood of 15-20meters that will consume most of turkey, if not all. I only pity turkish citizens who are oblivious of eminent danger their whimsical megalomania of a president is plunging them into Pardon my write up. Didn't take time to edit[/b][/size] 9 Likes 1 Share |
Re: Did Russia Just Threaten Turkey With Nuclear Weapons? by Tkester: 7:44am On Feb 20, 2016 |
Turkey is just blabbing, and they know that. Nobody in this world can stop Putin. Even US is careful when dealing with Putin. Erdogan will be toast if he hits Putin's troops. 3 Likes 1 Share |
Re: Did Russia Just Threaten Turkey With Nuclear Weapons? by cyprus000: 8:59am On Feb 20, 2016 |
Tkester:[size=13pt] In timaya voice [img]http://t1.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcSRedRkc5zJAfPf2IpkeowqYBdVgb88zcgvRIPz9r7sKvtRPUtk_Q[/img][/size] |
Re: Did Russia Just Threaten Turkey With Nuclear Weapons? by NairaMinted: 9:07am On Feb 20, 2016 |
scully95: And as deadly as the Grads are, they are even smaller compared to the Uragans or Smerchs 1 Like |
Re: Did Russia Just Threaten Turkey With Nuclear Weapons? by fineguy11(m): 11:17am On Feb 20, 2016 |
NairaMinted:Turkey as a whole isnt worthy of a "SINGLE RUSSIAN BULLET".MADMAN ERDOGAN has already put plans in place to destroy his country,all russia needs to do is to guide him tactifully on achieving his goals.. After the su-24 shooting,i stated emphatically that one of PUTIN response wld be to ARM THE KURDS with intellegence/armaments which is exactly what russia has done..currently the syrian-kurds backed by RUSSIAN airstrikes,are currently staging an OFFENSIVE to take control of the TURKISH-SYRIAN border,an action that has provoked Ankara into firing and striking kurdish positions from turkey into syria..it seems Russia has promised the kurds that they will back a proposal to create an autonomous kurdish region in the syria-turkey border, an outcome that wld put an end to MADMAN erdogan geo-political ambition in the middle east into a permanent coma..i also predicted late last year,that in a few yrs time,TURKEY wld be embroiled in a deadly civil-war that wld be sparked by armed confrontation between the turkish military vs virtually all the kurds in the middle-east..as for turkish blab about sending troops to syria...........a ''poorly'' acted stunt to scare russia..even if this s.hit escalates futher,i dont see it spreading beyond syria which is what NATO is praying for,so they wont be forced into making a choice between supporting turkey or not.. 1 Like |
Re: Did Russia Just Threaten Turkey With Nuclear Weapons? by mazeltov(m): 3:22pm On Feb 20, 2016 |
One of the most intellectually ignorant cum dumb and illogical human behaviours I see on internet is to see some midgets is to automatically resort to claiming victory for Russia or America. War vs. anything Russia or China will never be won or determined by anything conventional. What "nukes" during Cold War era is mutual destruction while some military industrial complex in the war always want us to believe that some war can be war with conventional weapons. I can't go further than this. 3 Likes |
Re: Did Russia Just Threaten Turkey With Nuclear Weapons? by bonechamberlain(m): 4:15pm On Feb 20, 2016 |
scully95: OK great |
Re: Did Russia Just Threaten Turkey With Nuclear Weapons? by fineguy11(m): 5:43pm On Feb 20, 2016 |
mazeltov:i agree with u to a large extent,becasue your reasoning and perceived consequence on the use of nukes is from a RATIONAL VIEWPOINT.but u need to know one thing,,if all men were as rational as u wld want them to be,earth wont have experienced two world wars..as i type this,there are men who are schemming 24hours a day on how to stage and win a nuclear war...as long as man exist,the unimaginable can happen.. 1 Like |
Re: Did Russia Just Threaten Turkey With Nuclear Weapons? by NairaMinted: 11:17pm On Feb 20, 2016 |
Week Nineteen of the Russian Intervention in Syria: would Russia use nukes to defend Khmeimim? The past week saw no decrease in the tense confrontation between Turkey and Russia over Syria. While Russia’s position is simple – ‘we are ready to fight’ – the Turkish position is much more ambiguous: Turkish politicians are saying one thing, then the opposite and then something else again. At times they make it sound like an invasion is imminent, and at times they say that “Turkey plans no unilateral invasion”. Since a UN authorized invasion of Syria will never happen, this means some kind of “coalition of the willing”, possibly NATO. The problem here is that the Europeans have no desire to end up in a war against Russia. At the same time, the US and France refuse to allow a UN Resolution which would reaffirm the sovereignty of Syria. Yup, that’s right. The US and France apparently think that the UN Charter (which affirms the sovereignty of all countries) does not apply to Syria. Go figure… There are persistent rumors that top Turkish military commanders, categorically oppose any attack on Syria and that they want no part in a war with Russia. I don’t blame them one bit as they understand perfectly well two simple things: first, Turkey does not need a war, only Erdogan does; second, when Turkey is defeated, Erdogan will blame the military. There are also signs of disagreements inside the USA over the prospects of such a war, with the Neocons backing Erdogan and pushing him towards war just as they had done with Saakashvili while the White House and Foggy Bottom are telling Erdogan to “cool it”. As for the Turks themselves, they have shelled Kurdish and Syrian positions across the border and, on at least two occasions, a small military force has been seen crossing the border. From a purely military point of view, it makes absolutely no sense for the Turks to mass at the border, declare that they are about to invade, then stop, do some shelling and then only send a few little units across the border. What the Turks should have done was to covertly begin to increase the level of readiness of their forces then and then attacked as soon as Russians detected their preparations even if that meant that they would have to initiate combat operations before being fully mobilized and ready. The advantages of a surprise attack are so big that almost every other consideration has to be put aside in order to achieve it. The Turks did the exact opposite: they advertised their intentions to invade and once their forces were ready, they simply stopped at the border and began issuing completely contradictory declarations. This makes absolutely no sense at all. What complicates this already chaotic situation is that Erdogan is clearly a lunatic and that there appears to the at least the possibility of some serious infighting between the Turkish political leaders and the military. Furthermore, there appears to be some very bad blood between the USA and the Erdogan regime. Things got so bad that Erdogan’s chief adviser, Seref Malkoc, said that Turkey might deny the US the use of the Incirlik Air Base for strikes against ISIL if the US does not name the YPG as a terrorist group. Erdogan later repudiated this statement, but the fact remains that the Turks are now directly blackmailing the USA. If Erdogan and his advisors seriously believe that they can publicly blackmail a superpower like the USA then their days are numbered. At the very least, this kind of irresponsible outbursts shows that the Turks are really crumbling under the pressure they themselves have created. Still, the fact that Turkey has not invaded yet is a tiny minute sign that maybe, just maybe, the Turks will give up on this crazy notion or that they will limit themselves to a ‘mini-invasion’ just a few miles across the border. The military would probably prefer such a minimal face saving option, but what about Erdogan and the crazies around him? Maybe the Turkish military ought to realize that the country is ruled by the madman and do something about it? Still, the Russians are taking no chances and they have put all their forces into high alert. They have very publicly dispatched a Tu-214r – her most advanced ISR (Intelligence Surveillance Reconnaissance) aircraft. You can think of the Tu-214R as an “AWACS for the ground”, the kind of aircraft you use to monitor a major ground battle (the regular Russian A-50Ms are already monitoring the Syrian airspace). In southern Russia, the Aerospace forces have organized large-scale exercises involving a large number of aircraft which would be used in a war against Turkey: SU-34s. The Airborne Forces are ready. The naval task forces off the Syrian coast is being augmented. The delivery of weapons has accelerated. The bottom line is simple and obvious: the Russians are not making any threats – they are preparing for war. In fact, by now they are ready. This leaves an important question to be asked: what would the Russians do if their still relatively small force in Syria is attacked and over-run by the Turks? Would the Russian use nuclear weapons? At least one reporter, Robert Parry, as written the following: “A source close to Russian President Vladimir Putin told me that the Russians have warned Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan that Moscow is prepared to use tactical nuclear weapons if necessary to save their troops in the face of a Turkish-Saudi onslaught”. Is that really possible? Would the Russians really use nuclear weapons of things get ugly in Syria? The Russian Military Doctrine is very clear on the use of nuclear weapons by Russia. This is the relevant paragraph: 27. The Russian Federation reserves the right to use nuclear weapons in response to the use against her and (or) her allies of nuclear and other weapons of mass destruction, as well as in the case of aggression against the Russian Federation with the use of conventional weapons in a way which would threaten her very existence as a state. The decision to use nuclear weapons is taken by the President of the Russian Federation. There is no ambiguity here. Unless Russia is threatened as a state she will not use nuclear weapons. Some will, no doubt, say that the official military doctrine is one thing, but the reality in Syria is another one and if the Turks overrun Khmeimim Russia will have no other option than to use nukes. There is a precedent for that kind of logic: when the US deployed the 82nd Airborne in Saudi Arabia as part of Desert Shield the Pentagon fully understood that if the much larger Iraqi army invaded Saudi Arabia the 82nd would be destroyed. It was hoped that the USAF and USN could provide enough air sorties to stop the Iraqi advance, but if not it was understood that tactical nuclear weapons would be used. The situation in Syria is different. For one thing, the Russian task force in Syria is not an infantry tripwire force like the 82nd in Iraq. The terrain and the opposing forces are also very different. Second, the Russian contingent in Syria can count on the firepower and support of the Russian Navy in the Caspian and Mediterranean and the Russian Aerospace Forces from Russia proper. Last but not least, the Russians can count in the support of the Syrian military, Iranian forces, Hezbollah and, probably, the Syrian Kurds who are now openly joining the 4+1 alliance (Russia, Iran, Iraq, Syria and Hezbollah) turning it into a 4+2 alliance I suppose. There is one important feature of this 4+2 alliance which ought to really give the Turks a strong incentive to be very careful before taking any action: every member of this 4+2 alliance has an extensive military experience, a much better one than the Turkish military. The modern Turkish military is much more similar to the Israeli military in 2006 – it has a great deal of experience terrorizing civilians and it is not a force trained to fight “real” wars. There is a very real risk for the Turks that if they really invade Syria they might end up facing the same nightmare as the Israelis did when they invaded Lebanon in 2006. In the meantime, the Russian backed Syrian forces are still advancing. Since the beginning of their counter-offensive the Syrians have succeeded in recapturing all of the strategic locations in western Syria in slow and incremental steps and they are now threatening Raqqa. See for yourself: The bottom line is this: the size and capabilities of the Russian task force in Syria has been expanding and the level of collaborations between the elements of the 4+2 alliance has been increasing. Add to this the capability to deploy a regimental-size (and fully mechanized) Airborne force in Latakia if needed, and you will begin to see that the Turks would be taking a major risk if they attacked Russian forces even if Russia does not threaten the use of tactical nukes. In fact, I don’t see any scenario short of a massive US/NATO attack under which Russia would use her tactical nuclear weapons. Frankly, this situation is far from resolved. It is no coincidence that just when a ceasefire was supposed to come into effect two terrorist attacks in Turkey are oh-so-conveniently blamed on the Kurds. It sure looks like somebody is trying hard to set Turkey on a collision course with Russia, doesn’t it? Making predictions about what the Turks and their Saudi friends will do makes no sense. We are clearly dealing with two regimes which are gradually “losing it”: they are lashing out at everybody (including their US patrons), they are terrified of their own minorities (Kurds and Shia) and their propensity for violence and terror is only matched by their inability in conventional warfare. Does that remind you of somebody else? Of course! The Ukronazis fit this picture perfectly. Well, guess what, they are dreaming of forming an anti-Russian alliance with the Turks now. Amazing no? Just imagine what a Ukrainian-Turkish-Saudi alliance would look like: a real life “Islamo-Fascist” gang of thugs combining hateful fanaticism, corruption, violence, strident nationalism and military incompetence. A toxic combination for sure, but not a viable one. The Saker 4 Likes 1 Share |
Re: Did Russia Just Threaten Turkey With Nuclear Weapons? by scully95: 7:15am On Feb 21, 2016 |
Thanks for sharing.. THis is from a military expert that understands the scope of wars and reality on ground. Anything sakers says is always on point.. The antidote to stoping Russians is don't attack their soldiers. If you do, expert them to react very fast. Turkey and saudi are scape-goats to me. the anglozionist empire will dump them last lastjust like they quickly dumped Saddam hussein after they were supporting him to attack Iran.. Iran became stronger ever since then. NOw what happened to saddam after that ?? He was hannged.. . These crooks (Turkey,Saudi and the rest ) can't win this war, even if they managed to draw the main puppet masters in U.S, Britain and Israel. When it comes to nuclear war one thing is certain and I just wrote this on one youtube vide.. U.s anglozionist empire being the leader of the empire will never sacrifice one state in the U.S for 10 countries in Europe or even 10 in Asia or 6 in middle east.. Just that you guys know what you are talking about.. The erdogan is even confused with its U.S puppet master.. U.S supporting kurds and supporting turkey.. Very contradictory in nature and on ground. Now there is no more lies to sell to the poeple.. NairaMinted: |
Re: Did Russia Just Threaten Turkey With Nuclear Weapons? by NairaMinted: 11:11am On Feb 21, 2016 |
And what is this report about Saudi Arabia now possessing nuclear weapons and threatening to use it to protect their troops in the event of a ground invasion? Empty threats? Hogwash? What is the House of Saud's and Madman Erdogan's play here? My rational thoughts tell me that they aren't crazy enough to risk a war with Russia but those same rational thoughts tell me that Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Turkey and the US have invested far too much into this Syria adventure to just throw in the towel this late.....Dangerous times these are |
Re: Did Russia Just Threaten Turkey With Nuclear Weapons? by romme2u: 3:10pm On Feb 21, 2016 |
NairaMinted: i have always known that the Saudis and Qataris were the real sponsors of the rebels and civil war in Syria (just as they sponsor Islamic terrorist in Africa with the aid of US, UK and France) but were given moral and tactical support from US, France and Turkey. if i can remember very well in 2014, Saudi and Qatar each bought $10 billions worth of arms from US, France, UK and Pakistan even when they were not engage in any war. what will a country do with that quantity of weapons during peace time if something was not brewing. Anyway, Africans are not matured and bold enough to wean themselves from their servitude to the Arabs and the Europeans even with the massive resources at our disposal. For more than 2000 years we have playing slaves and servants to these guys, i wonder when our people will get sense and awake from their mental slumber. 1 Like |
Re: Did Russia Just Threaten Turkey With Nuclear Weapons? by Missy89(f): 5:53pm On Feb 21, 2016 |
If anyone believe in Russia's right of protecting her interest in her near abroad and supported what Putin did in Ukraine and is against Turkey doing the same in Syria then you are nothing but a Russian shill. What is Good for the goose is good for the gander. 3 Likes |
Re: Did Russia Just Threaten Turkey With Nuclear Weapons? by NairaMinted: 6:40pm On Feb 21, 2016 |
Missy89: Lookatchu! Is this what your "argument" has been reduced to? Oma se o! What f**king interest is Turkey (and Saudi Arabia & Qatar, their US & Israeli lords, etc) protecting by harboring, funded and training vile Islamic terrorists to unseat a stable, secular government just because they want to build a freaking pipeline or enforce their Sunni influence in that region? What f**king interest? I can't believe you are equating the events in the Donbass (won't even bother to expantiate) to Turkey's interests in Syria/Iraq! What just has the world turned to? Zoharariel, please rewrite what I just posted in that sweet manner that you always do. 2 Likes 1 Share |
Re: Did Russia Just Threaten Turkey With Nuclear Weapons? by Missy89(f): 8:34pm On Feb 21, 2016 |
NairaMinted: So people that were killed in the donbass are collateral damage for Russia's interest and it is acceptable because Russia is the only country allowed to have geopolitical goals? Please don't hide under " I won't bother to expantiate". You should. One might say what fucking interest does Russia have in Ukraine and training and arming terrorists masquerading as rebels and sepratists there. It is funny you are not seeing the hypocrisy of your logic 2 Likes |
Re: Did Russia Just Threaten Turkey With Nuclear Weapons? by fineguy11(m): 8:51pm On Feb 21, 2016 |
Missy89:hahahaha...who is aginst turkey invading syria?all pro-russian commentators are hoping and praying that turkey invades syria and in the process strike russian assets in syria,and see how the turkish military will be decimated in a conventional war against russia..Russia is prepared for war,their military has being placed on high alert.Russia has also moved some fighter jets and bombers to the Amenian airbase just 40km from the Turkish border.Tell Madman erdogan to stop delaying the party and command his troops into syria.. 5 Likes |
Re: Did Russia Just Threaten Turkey With Nuclear Weapons? by OBAGADAFFI: 10:59pm On Feb 21, 2016 |
LOL, Just look at what Russia has been reduced to in Syria. I thought they were bragging at the US government. Now the US has handed them over to the Turk's and Saudis. This is exactly what the Arab League wanted. I just pity that man called Bashar al-Assad. 2 Likes |
Re: Did Russia Just Threaten Turkey With Nuclear Weapons? by ValerianSteel(m): 11:03pm On Feb 21, 2016 |
Russia has been making threats against Turkey for two months now and hasn't actualized a single one. 1 Like |
Re: Did Russia Just Threaten Turkey With Nuclear Weapons? by OBAGADAFFI: 11:05pm On Feb 21, 2016 |
Re: Did Russia Just Threaten Turkey With Nuclear Weapons? by NairaMinted: 11:16pm On Feb 21, 2016 |
Missy89: Wow! F**king is no longer censored by Nairaland's spambot. Anyway, since your genius self has refused to see the disparity in the two situations, I'll break it down for ya in very simple English: Ukraine: a coup some days after the govt had arrived at an agreement and unity govt of some sorts with the opposition, is planned, instigated and funded by the United States (Victoria Nuland, $5 billion opposition groups investments, "f**k the EU", "Yats is the preferred choice", etc) is executed by far right Russophobic groups which in turn puts the Russian speaking inhabitants of eastern Ukraine and Crimea in harms way. The people of the Donbass and Crimea in the spirit of self determination and freedom (Uncle Sam's favorite mantra for exporting its selective democracy) are defiant and decide that they want no part in the new government that it is literally constituted in key positions by neo-nazi elements. The people of Crimea hold a referendum and decide to reunite with Russia. Russia knowing the absolute strategic importance of keeping her naval bases in the Crimea in light of the Hegemon's desire to completely encircle her, decides that it is in the best interest of Russia to annex Crimea. The people of Donbass also hold their referendum and decide to join Russia. Russia in a good will gesture (& perhaps out of uncertainty as to how US/NATO would react) rules annexation of Crimes out but is committed to protecting the Russian speaking people of the Donbass from the government's onslaught. They support the rebels, send in columns of humanitarian aid and in the wake of severe provocations such as the downing of Mh17, even manage to bring the warring sides to the negotiating table (Minsk 1.0 and Minsk 2.0 - of which the Ukranian govt is yet to fulfill the requirements but rather shells the Donbass occasionally till today). Enter Turkey: connives with its Sunni Arab middle eastern neighbors Saudi Arabia and Qatar to undermine and destabilize the government of its secular but Shia leaning Arab neighbour, Syria, by funding, training, arming and shipping extremists under the guise that these "rebels" (moderates they like to empathize) are fighting for a "democratic" Syria. These extremists following the intervention of Russia - Russia knowing fully well that they are next in line for a foreign funded sedition using these terrorists - intervenes (under international law, mind you) on behalf of its ally the Syrian government with the aim that they rather fight the Islamists here than in the Caucusus. Turkey Turkey also brazenly launches a campaign of genocide against the Kurds in Iraq and Syria - groups that are ironically also supported by the U.S. (Again in the spirit of self determination and freedom except if it runs contrary to the Hegemon's self interest like in the case of the people of the Donbass and Crimea ) Now explain to me what the similarities are genius! 2 Likes 1 Share |
Re: Did Russia Just Threaten Turkey With Nuclear Weapons? by NairaMinted: 11:20pm On Feb 21, 2016 |
ValerianSteel: Lol! What threats? Can you name just one! On the contrary, Russia is patiently waiting on Turkey do make good on its own threats (border incursion, buffer zone, no flight zone, not to let Azaz fall to the Kurds, etc) then Russia will come out to play. Right now it has no reason to. What do you want? For Russia to just attack Turkey when it achieves no strategic or geopolitical objective? When Russia's goals or personnel haven't been threatened in any way by Turkey? Please explain to me.. Russia is already doing what it's in Syria for. which is to defeat the terrorists, reinforce the legitimate government of Syria and win back territory lost to these beloved moderate rebels - and guess what, it is achieving exactly just that! We are winning, you are losing - and pathetically at that! Sorry ehn?! 3 Likes 2 Shares |
Re: Did Russia Just Threaten Turkey With Nuclear Weapons? by NairaMinted: 11:27pm On Feb 21, 2016 |
OBAGADAFFI: Hahahahaha! Geopolitics is beyond your paygrade Oga. First, if the U.S. is so tough and exceptional as they say they are ( this isn't Hollywood my friend) they should seize the opportunity and do the job themselves or at least join their Saudi wahhabi crazies and Turkish allies. Second, you are apparently not aware that the U.S. has warned Turkey that they are basically on their own should they choose to tango with Russia. "We will invade, we will invade we swear!" Is all we hear......The Russians are ready. Are Turkey and Saudi? PS: Your user name, based on your views, is an insult by the way to Ghadaffi 3 Likes 1 Share |
Re: Did Russia Just Threaten Turkey With Nuclear Weapons? by NairaMinted: 11:42pm On Feb 21, 2016 |
By the way, Missy89, so just know that I have framed this and its hanging on the wall in my room
|
Re: Did Russia Just Threaten Turkey With Nuclear Weapons? by OBAGADAFFI: 12:16am On Feb 22, 2016 |
NairaMinted: Russian troll talking about paygrade, if you really know what it means. What happened to Russia when, Gaddafi and Mubarak were going down. Can you tell me Russian adventures in Syria started? I thought by now the Russians will be shooting down every Turk's around Syria, after the SU attack. But It seems Putin is not taking any advice from you self-hyping NL trolls. 1 Like |
Re: Did Russia Just Threaten Turkey With Nuclear Weapons? by NairaMinted: 12:30am On Feb 22, 2016 |
OBAGADAFFI: "Troll" LOL! No vex you hear? I can't imagine how hard it is for you right now to see me winning and you losing and sulking. See the beautiful picture below. You see that? Just like the Debaltsevo cauldron, another is forming in Aleppo. Hurry up your Saudi wahhabi crazies and their Ottoman brothers to save their brothers before its too late o biko! Lemme get back to my propaganda. I got daily quotas to fulfill lest the Kremlin sanction me! PS: If you don't know what the Debaltsevo cauldron was, CIA agent, Missy89 would be more than capable to explain. 4 Likes 1 Share
|
Re: Did Russia Just Threaten Turkey With Nuclear Weapons? by Missy89(f): 1:22am On Feb 22, 2016 |
NairaMinted: I know you can read properly. If I support Russia's right to intervene in ukraine and think Turkey is entitled to the same right too, how is that hypocrisy. You need to keep digging. Being so pro Russia seems to be affecting your ability to think logically. Russian speaking sepratists are "rebels" fighting for self determination even thou they are engaged in a armed insurrection against a recognised state but the turkmens are "terrorists" for doing the same in syria?. You guys need to try harder. 2 Likes 1 Share |
Re: Did Russia Just Threaten Turkey With Nuclear Weapons? by OBAGADAFFI: 1:51am On Feb 22, 2016 |
NairaMinted: Lol @ winning. Who is competing with you. You seems to be masturbating too much on your fictional wars these days. 1 Like |
Bp Oil Spill: America Going Too Far? / Girl Beats Up Soldier! / Emmanuel Macron Tests Positive For COVID-19
Viewing this topic: 1 guest(s)
(Go Up)
Sections: politics (1) business autos (1) jobs (1) career education (1) romance computers phones travel sports fashion health religion celebs tv-movies music-radio literature webmasters programming techmarket Links: (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) Nairaland - Copyright © 2005 - 2024 Oluwaseun Osewa. All rights reserved. See How To Advertise. 169 |