delishpot:


Because that is what they have been programmed to believe. Keep your virginity for the one man who will love and respect you. That is all a girl hears from birth and that ideology sticks in her head. It's like if you are born a racist in a racially biased society with so called proof, scientific, religious and otherwise and someone says all those proofs are not correct that people of the other race are as smart and blessed as yours. Even if you can do it and not be jailed how easy will it be for you to change that mentality? Then people will do research and say so so group of people are wired to hate on other races. With all the proof you believe you have, and what you see and hear around you that seem to be supporting the racist theory. How easy will you change?
A woman can have flings as well as a man. They just can't because they will be called hoes and bitches when found out. And that may spoil their chances of getting another partner in future. Men on the other hand do not face such pressures.

Women are societally conditioned .....
This is the well-worn excuse I'm always treated to whenever i raised an age-long human code of behaviour.

Only _prostitutes can have sex without emotional entanglement. The average woman out there isn't programmed for that.

The everyday woman is more of an emotional cheat than a physical one. Flings and crushes she could have alright and it usually revolve in the realms of fantasy and daydreaming which they find more enthralling than the physical experience itself.



It is of no masterful reckoning that were women to have the same sexual drive and indiscretion as men do, the parentage of the entire human race will be lost in the quagmire of her raging hormones.

Brother, testosterone and estrogen no be mate as far as sexual drive is concerned.

Evidently, the natural women will need emotion to really tangle, that's why they are emotional creatures.


Know this, any woman properly circumcised by her man will always squinch in disgust to another man's physical advances.


Abi, society also condition women not to ever forget their proper deflowerers too?

Evolution covered her for a purpose, bro.

She'll cry and let out blood, her drawbridge will be lowered and her temple shall receive a devout whose offering and worship will mark her being forever.

I think what the writer is stating is the facts of the scenario.
I believe in essence he is not saying that it's write or wrong he is just simply saying how it is based on statistics.
It should be taken with a grain of salt. And if love happens to mean (cheating) to one person or another those are topics that should be addressed head on the an relationship.



Nice effort, although strained and a little incoherent, I understand what you're trying to say.

However, you failed to grasp the objectivity of the thread, its practicality and cold, hard fact.


Over 80% of men will cheat on their wives once or more, and I guess those men do not love their wives.

Can you furnish us with a theory to explain this behaviour?[/quote]

Ttamara:


Over 80% of men will cheat on their wives once or more, and I guess those men do not love their wives.

how did you arrive at this statistics?

lezz:





Women are societally conditioned .....
This is the well-worn excuse I'm always treated to whenever i raised an age-long human code of behaviour.

Only _prostitutes can have sex without emotional entanglement. The average woman out there isn't programmed for that.

The everyday woman is more of an emotional cheat than a physical one. Flings and crushes she could have alright and it usually revolve in the realms of fantasy and daydreaming which they find more enthralling than the physical experience itself.



It is of no masterful reckoning that were women to have the same sexual drive and indiscretion as men do, the parentage of the entire human race will be lost in the quagmire of her raging hormones.

Brother, testosterone and estrogen no be mate as far as sexual drive is concerned.

Evidently, the natural women will need emotion to really tangle, that's why they are emotional creatures.


Know this, any woman properly circumcised by her man will always squinch in disgust to another man's physical advances.


Abi, society also condition women not to ever forget their proper deflowerers too?

Evolution covered her for a purpose, bro.

She'll cry and let out blood, her drawbridge will be lowered and her temple shall receive a devout whose offering and worship will mark her being forever.

Is this what you experienced or what you were thought to believe? Many women beg to differ. As usual, you are telling me what you have been conditioned to believe. Many men believe they know the ways and life of women more than women themselves.
All you stated goes to prove what I said. Because women have been subjected to a certain expectation and character for centuries, it is only normal that they act and behave instinctively how the society expects them to behave. For to do otherwise, would reduce their chances for survival and reproduction which is the main force guiding every living thing.
Lock up kids male and female and tell them they are designed to serve and make a certain group of people happy. Deny those kids every right and make sure they have no say in the midst of their masters. Keep this going since the creation of Adam and never change the rule. Then watch and see if generations, after generations from those kids will not be wired to act according to the conditioning of their ancestors. Does that mean they were created to be that way by God?


What you call evidence is the result of centuries of brain washing and mind control. Yes women need love but news flash! So do men. My point was, if you remove the stigma that says any woman that sleeps with a man that is not her husband is a LovePeddler and condition girl children that they are being natural and adventurous by sleeping with any man that catches their fancy. Believe me, they will lose that feeling of being cheap, dirty and loose. Their concience will not let them cringe when they sleep with a fellow they are not married to. They have been conditioned to act that way. Its like a man conditioned to not cheating in marriage or not killing any living thing. When he does any of the above he becomes uncomfortable.

Just like children are conditioned by parents to behave a certain way so that they can have control over the family. Children were not wired that way. They were not born obidient or disobedient they were wired to be that way by their parents and the society at large. And even though they want to do otherwise, their trained instinct makes them remember how they are supposed to and expected to behave and act as kids. This conditioning keeps them in check even when mom and dad are not there.

delishpot:





Is this what you experienced or what you were thought to believe? Many women beg to differ. As usual, you are telling me what you have been conditioned to believe. Many men believe they know the ways and life of women more than women themselves.
All you stated goes to prove what I said. Because women have been subjected to a certain expectation and character for centuries, it is only normal that they act and behave instinctively how the society expects them to behave. For to do otherwise, would reduce their chances for survival and reproduction which is the main force guiding every living thing.
Lock up kids male and female and tell them they are designed to serve and make a certain group of people happy. Deny those kids every right and make sure they have no say in the midst of their masters. Keep this going since the creation of Adam and never change the rule. Then watch and see if generations, after generations from those kids will not be wired to act according to the conditioning of their ancestors. Does that mean they were created to be that way by God?

You are gradually making assertions you can't substantiate. Not only are women conditioned to behave in a certain manner, but also you're claiming that men too are preconditioned to behave in a certain way

You are unwittingly denying the difference between men and women then. If there are no sexual differences between men and women, as you claimed, then there are basically no differences between the sexes. You are denying basic science just to give credence to your feminist theories. Women preconditioning to certain deportment is the clever excuses by feminists who seek to revolutionise society and deceive gullible people.


I've never been given satisfying answers to this poser by folks who hide under the precondition excuse to advocate similar behaviour for both male and female, so I'll hope you would do a better job:

You said women are preconditioned for millions of years by men to behave in a certain way or suppress their sexual behaviours and I want to ask you; How is it possible for women to be suprresed in all societies of the world, from Africa, to the India, to the Orient and middle East, to Europe and the new world?

These are societies that at a point in history never met or crossed! So women were coincidentally oppressed too in all cultures across the world for millions of years, across all civilisations? Keep denying nature.

With all the varying and different cultures of humanity, races, people, beliefs and customs, they all found something in common to surprress women to not express their sexual orientation? That's why your theory can't survive the fire.

You, my friend have been programmed to beleive a carelessly woven antics of a few feminists whose motive for humanity you cannot begin to comprehend in its enormity.

delishpot:


What you call evidence is the result of centuries of brain washing and mind control. Yes women need love but news flash! So do men. My point was, if you remove the stigma that says any woman that sleeps with a man that is not her husband is a LovePeddler and condition girl children that they are being natural and adventurous by sleeping with any man that catches their fancy. Believe me, they will lose that feeling of being cheap, dirty and loose. Their

If I brought up a child to be a thief, he will grow up having no inhibitions to stealing, quit this repetition of unsubstantiated points. Women who lost their parts from the unset will lose their ability for bonding with her man and consequently will find it difficult marrying love and sexual loyalty together. If I flunk my SSCE completely and employed my father's influence to get into the university, I can never remedy my lack of basic educational structure. It is so with women who lost their track , There are so many scientific journals which has proved the male and female brain perceive and assimilate sexual information similarly but also with marked difference.

delishpot:


concience will not let them cringe when they sleep with a fellow they are not married to. They have been conditioned to act that way. Its like a man conditioned to not cheating in marriage or not killing any living thing. When he does any of the above he becomes uncomfortable.

Just like children are conditioned by parents to behave a certain way so that they can have control over the family. Children were not wired that way. They were not born obidient or disobedient they were wired to be that way by their parents and the society at large.

I love this comparison with women and children. It still holds true to this day. But children show sign of dependency to their parents, by copying and mimicking them. Children starts bonding with their mothers from their foetal stages. It is nature. You know not what you say.

delishpot:


And even though they want to do otherwise, their trained instinct makes them remember how they are supposed to and expected to behave and act as kids. This conditioning keeps them in check even when mom and dad are not there.

You still could not tell me why women never forget their deflowerers. Were they also trained to remember them?

Or did society create women with hymen to be broken and circumsised. THE UNBLEMISHED WOMAN WHO LOVES HER MAN WILL STILL REMAIN SEXUALLY LOYAL. THIS IS HER NATURE, NOT CONDITIONING.

Tell me, if a woman were to overpower me and rapes me, I won't be scared in a marked way, but even if you rape a woman in closed doors, she'll feel a sense of shocking violation and self-loath.

Yes, society preconditioned that too

Sex for men and women will always be different, your philosophy won't change it.

lezz:
A man's love for his lady does not really or necessarily bear the mark of loyalty. Some women already know this but a vast majority still seek an escape in the consolation of illogical and subjective excuses.


Religion and the notion of ethics of morality have made few men tame thier natural deportments for women and this must be commended in all sincerity.

Nonetheless, many man can truelly love a woman in all sincerity of purpose without the idea of sex-loyalty to her. Period!!!

This is the coldblooded truth without the appeasement of reconciliatory concessions just to make some ladies feel better about life.

The majority of unblemished ladies are unable to separate love, sex and loyalty for their man.

Consequentially, love, sex and loyalty are an indivisible package in one box inscribed with a single word : Love.

It is thus designed by the ageless, intricate complexity and fixity of human evolution to remain so for women.

And it is biologically and socially expedient this remains unchanged.

But then a man's sense of loyalty to his woman is often of the nature of heritage, provision, security, affection and life-long companionship unwavering.



At the risk of being labeled a chauvinist, I make bold to say a lot of men and women know this as the uncompromising truth, but we're at the era of political and social correctness where facts and truth take the back seat to self-seeking propaganda and gender belligerence.



I do not endorse cheating in any guise, but then, men will always be swayed sexually by women whose curves and flesh bounce off just by walking; butty wobbles, laps and boobs resonate in rhyhmic vibration to their saunter.

Another unbetrayed physical affection would be formed that holds no spark of emotion for the male and emotionally uncompromising to the wife.

So u mean love cant guarantee loyalty
Be like say ... I no go marry b dat

But what about the guys that can love , still be fsithful n loyal
How many dicks heads do they have

BumBae:



So u mean love cant guarantee loyalty

I mean a man can worship the very ground you walk and may still fall into temptation without losing any love for you.

BumBae:
Be like say ... I no go marry b dat

With a butty like yours, a _diick may have found its natural habitation

BumBae:


But what about the guys that can love , still be fsithful n loyal
How many dicks heads do they have

If you found that kind of man for a husband, you may still be sliding off to me from office hours to have me _fuck you on the bare floor!

lezz:
I mean a man can worship the very ground you walk and may still fall into temptation without losing any love for you. With a butty like yours, a _diick may have found its natural habitation If you found that kind of man for a husband, you may still be sliding off to me from office hours to me _fuck you on a bare floor!

Lol on concrete now i know u dont care about me on hard ground .. Dis my silky skin
Lezz which kind levels b dat wan

BumBae:

Lol on concrete now i know u dont care about me on hard ground .. Dis my silky skin
Le.zz which kind levels b dat wan

So much you haven't learned!

See that as my branding of you, to make you mine in ownership of body and soul.

lezz:

You are gradually making assertions you can't substantiate. Not only are women conditioned to behave in a certain manner, but also you're claiming that men too are preconditioned to behave in a certain way

You are unwittingly denying the difference between men and women then. If there are no sexual differences between men and women, as you claimed, then there are basically no differences between the sexes. You are denying basic science just to give credence to your feminist theories. Women preconditioning to certain deportment is the clever excuses by feminists who seek to revolutionise society and deceive gullible people.


I've never been given satisfying answers to this poser by folks who hide under the precondition excuse to advocate similar behaviour for both male and female, so I'll hope you would do a better job:

You said women are preconditioned for millions of years by men to behave in a certain way or suppress their sexual behaviours and I want to ask you; How is it possible for women to be suprresed in all societies of the world, from Africa, to the India, to the Orient and middle East, to Europe and the new world?

These are societies that at a point in history never met or crossed! So women were coincidentally oppressed too in all cultures across the world for millions of years, across all civilisations? Keep denying nature.

With all the varying and different cultures of humanity, races, people, beliefs and customs, they all found something in common to surprress women to not express their sexual orientation? That's why your theory can't survive the fire.

You, my friend have been programmed to beleive a carelessly woven antics of a few feminists whose motive for humanity you cannot begin to comprehend in its enormity. If I brought up a child to be a thief, he will grow up having no inhibitions to stealing, quit this repetition of unsubstantiated points. Women who lost their parts from the unset will lose their ability for bonding with her man and consequently will find it difficult marrying love and sexual loyalty together. If I flunk my SSCE completely and employed my father's influence to get into the university, I can never remedy my lack of basic educational structure. It is so with women who lost their track , There are so many scientific journals which has proved the male and female brain perceive and assimilate sexual information similarly but also with marked difference. I love this comparison with women and children. It still holds true to this day. But children show sign of dependency to their parents, by copying and mimicking them. Children starts bonding with their mothers from their foetal stages. It is nature. You know not what you say. You still could not tell me why women never forget their deflowerers. Were they also trained to remember them?

Or did society create women with hymen to be broken and circumsised. THE UNBLEMISHED WOMAN WHO LOVES HER MAN WILL STILL REMAIN SEXUALLY LOYAL. THIS IS HER NATURE, NOT CONDITIONING.

Tell me, if a woman were to overpower me and rapes me, I won't be scared in a marked way, but even if you rape a woman in closed doors, she'll feel a sense of shocking violation and self-loath.

Yes, society preconditioned that too

Sex for men and women will always be different, your philosophy won't change it.

She feels that way because rape is a violation of a persons dignity weather a boy or girl. It is the same for men believe me. If a group of women who are supperior or considered by society to have more say than you by right pick you up and debase you and forcefully have sex with you. You will feel violated too. A time comes when even a male starts feeling used sexually.
Women know that rape is a form of degradation and a way of saying they have no value. Of course if you do it behind closed doors such an abused person will feel bad. Even prostitutes feel bad after a rape act. Not because of the sex but because the rapist did not treat them with dignity. Do not fool yourself, if you were raped today, you will feel the same way as a raped woman. Take that to the bank. It is worth millions. That women trapped you, overpowered you and forced you to pleasure them. The shame that you couldnt save yourself from the clutches of women will make you lie that you enjoyed it. While a woman who claims she enjoyed a rape like you men(Not saying women do.there is nothing to enjoy in rape. As it is forceful, dehumanization of a person) will be looked upon as a LovePeddler.

Just 1 more point and I will say no more. If women were created to be monogamous, there wont be strict laws put to keep them in sexual loyalty. Babies are not taught to reach for the breast. If nature takes care of it, we will not be looking for a way to make it work.
A woman can love many men. She can date many men and love them each for his unique nature and character. she may even love the new one more than the past one. This is proof that a woman is not created to love 1 and 1 alone in her life.
Its like saying a horse was built to carry load. No, they may have the ability and strength if forced and trained to carry load when ever the master demands but they were created to run free and wild. Same with humans. If a group of Alien females should take over the world and turn the tables, believe me men will in 2000 years behave the way they have been sensitized or conditioned to behave. It is called adaptation in science.

delishpot:




She feels that way because rape is a violation of a persons dignity weather a boy or girl. It is the same for men believe me. If a group of women who are supperior or considered by society to have more say than you by right pick you up and debase you and forcefully have sex with you. You will feel violated too. A time comes when even a male starts feeling used sexually.
Women know that rape is a form of degradation and a way of saying they have no value. Of course if you do it behind closed doors such an abused person will feel bad. Even prostitutes feel bad after a rape act. Not because of the sex but because the rapist did not treat them with dignity. Do not fool yourself, if you were raped today, you will feel the same way as a raped woman. Take that to the bank. It is worth millions. That women trapped you, overpowered you and forced you to pleasure them. The shame that you couldnt save yourself from the clutches of women will make you lie that you enjoyed it. While a woman who claims she enjoyed a rape like you men(Not saying women do.there is nothing to enjoy in rape. As it is forceful, dehumanization of a person) will be looked upon as a LovePeddler.

Just 1 more point and I will say no more. If women were created to be monogamous, there wont be strict laws put to keep them in sexual loyalty. Babies are not taught to reach for the breast. If nature takes care of it, we will not be looking for a way to make it work.
A woman can love many men. She can date many men and love them each for his unique nature and character. she may even love the new one more than the past one. This is proof that a woman is not created to love 1 and 1 alone in her life.
Its like saying a horse was built to carry load. No, they may have the ability and strength if forced and trained to carry load when ever the master demands but they were created to run free and wild. Same with humans. If a group of Alien females should take over the world and turn the tables, believe me men will in 2000 years behave the way they have been sensitized or conditioned to behave. It is called adaptation in science.

Oga, really you are not making sense.

Women over powered me and raped me? I'm so looking forward to that!!!

Your mind is living in a world in conflict of your wishes and reality.

What's the fückery you're still churning out with women and monogamy?

Give me a buzz when you can deferentiate between love and attraction, admiration and crush, then we'll talk about love of women.

delishpot:




She feels that way because rape is a violation of a persons dignity weather a boy or girl. It is the same for men believe me. If a group of women who are supperior or considered by society to have more say than you by right pick you up and debase you and forcefully have sex with you. You will feel violated too. A time comes when even a male starts feeling used sexually.
Women know that rape is a form of degradation and a way of saying they have no value. Of course if you do it behind closed doors such an abused person will feel bad. Even prostitutes feel bad after a rape act. Not because of the sex but because the rapist did not treat them with dignity. Do not fool yourself, if you were raped today, you will feel the same way as a raped woman. Take that to the bank. It is worth millions. That women trapped you, overpowered you and forced you to pleasure them. The shame that you couldnt save yourself from the clutches of women will make you lie that you enjoyed it. While a woman who claims she enjoyed a rape like you men(Not saying women do.there is nothing to enjoy in rape. As it is forceful, dehumanization of a person) will be looked upon as a LovePeddler.

Just 1 more point and I will say no more. If women were created to be monogamous, there wont be strict laws put to keep them in sexual loyalty. Babies are not taught to reach for the breast. If nature takes care of it, we will not be looking for a way to make it work.
A woman can love many men. She can date many men and love them each for his unique nature and character. she may even love the new one more than the past one. This is proof that a woman is not created to love 1 and 1 alone in her life.
Its like saying a horse was built to carry load. No, they may have the ability and strength if forced and trained to carry load when ever the master demands but they were created to run free and wild. Same with humans. If a group of Alien females should take over the world and turn the tables, believe me men will in 2000 years behave the way they have been sensitized or conditioned to behave. It is called adaptation in science.

Though I came across this thread late, but I have to say this:
Why then did the world not change when women were running the world. We have women who have been in control of countries and even had great influence in the world. Are you then saying that their surroundings conditioned them to do so. The Queen Elizabeth of this world and so many others were conditioned by society to be rulers or what.