DeathStroke007:
you choose to believe it or not.. it's your choice

unphilaz:


Barnabas that empiree is more of Muslim apologetics than Christianity.

horlarwhalhe:
Know thyself

Many have adopted this accusation as the main complaint of hindrance to believing in evangelical Christianity. There is no other concept of God attacked more than this subject. There are many things about God that are not understood immediately, I've heard the same for predestination.
I’ve heard it said "people don’t join the Evangelical church because they can’t understand the teaching on the Trinity". This is just one of manystraw man arguments. People do not come to Christ because they don’t understand the numerous doctrines. They refuse to because they cannot admit they are sinful and are in need of help outside themselves. Turning over their control to God is an act of faith.
Instead faith is substituted with thecarnal mind wanting to understand something from strictly a human perspective. If I can't fully understand it I will not believe, but this is only an excuse. As Jesus stated in Jn.3:19-21" Men love darkness rather than light, they don't come to Christ because their deeds will be exposed".
Both Jews and Muslim's emphatically deny that God has a Son, if one is going to find a doctrine offensive to them, I think this would be it. No one preaches the Trinity in salvation but what is preached is that Jesus is the Son of God, he is Lord. We learn about the nature of God and other basic doctrines as we grow in the faith, not before. The simple reason is we need the Holy Spirit to be our teacher in the deeper things of God.
Is the Trinity pagan? The pagan religions had what we call trinities however on closer examination they are not the same in concept or substance. In the same way we would not agree with all the other religions that have a strict monotheistic view of God to be embraced as the same God of the Bible. (Islam, Bahai) The pagan concept was encapsulated with a Father, Mother, giving birth to a Son.
They were three major Gods with many minor god's as well. Their trinity was comprised of three Godsnot one. The Greek triad of Zeus, Athena, and Apollo, the Hindu triad of Brahma, Vishnu, and Shiva the Egyptian triad of Isis, Horus, and Sub bear no resemblance to the Biblical Trinity.
They were all separate not united as the one God and almost unanimously had a mother involved as in a heavenly family. This was really tri-theism, which has more in common with Mormonism than a triune God. Anti Trinitarians make usage of the statues with three heads and saying that is our pagan God. If one is going to discount the Trinity because of some similarities in name only and not in substance. Then maybe they should be looking at their own pagan similarities. One can still be in idolatry, if their one God is not the God of the Bible.
Anti Trinitarians make usage of the statues with three heads and saying that is our pagan God. If one is going to discount the Trinity because of some similarities in name only and not in substance. Then maybe they should be looking at their own pagan similarities. One can still be in idolatry, if their one God is not the God of the Bible.
Where did the pagans get a concept of three? Why not two or four? Where did they get the idea of a God in heaven anyway? What about their belief in a virgin and a son, where did that originate from? Rom.1:20-25 tells us that man from the beginning knew God.", 'and their foolish hearts were darkened" vs.25 "they exchanged the truth for a lie, and worshipped and served the creature rather than the creator." When mankind fell into darkness of sin, they still retained some elements of the truth but distorted its meaning and it became lost.
As Walter Martin wrote "In order to find out if the doctrine of the Trinity is true, we do not look to see if it resembles paganism, but to the bible, to see if God teaches it in his word. Pagans also believe in the concept of God. Does this mean that God must not be true? Pagans sleep. Does that mean sleeping is wrong? We must not dismiss an idea merely because it is held in common with those whom we may not approve." (The New Cults p.49) Lets not try to find all kinds of perversions from the outside that have nothing to do with the Biblical record, lets go to the Scripture to prove our major points.
Alexander Hislop, in his book, "the two Babylon's", traces the history of the practices and traditions of the Roman Catholic Church. He writes on pg. 18, "All these forms have existed from ancient times, while overcome with idolatry, the recognition of the Trinity was universal, proving how deep rooted in the human race was the doctrine on the subject, which comes out so distinctly in Genesis" Robert watts in New Apologetic says "The Pagan triads are "residuary fragments of their lost knowledge of God, not different stages in a process of evolution. But evidence of a moral and spiritual degradation" (Augustus H. Strongs systematic Theology p.352)
While their are Pagan Trinities which can be traced back to Babylon, instead of supporting anti Trinitarian views such as the Watchtower literature promotes, it is evidence for the tri-une God. Lets not try to find all kinds of perversions from the outside that have nothing to do with the Biblical record, lets go to the Scripture to prove our major points
Hislop writes that many pagan religions held to one infinite God the creator. Strict monotheism is found in Islam and a few other religions. Are we now to accept their view because God is called one (singular)?
If we are to reject the concept of the triune God, a unified one, because of the pagan distortions, then we must reject much more than this. The pagan cultures also had a virgin birth and some even had a resurrection, Tammuz died and raised 40 days later. The pagan religions had a priesthood and sacrifices, this too became distorted with human sacrifices for God’s blessings. Some Pagans believed that certain gods became men. They had Biblical symbology such as a dove, the lamb, altars, there are many religions that have distortions of the Bibles account of the flood. Are we now to reject Genesis because of their misrepresentations.
They also practiced tongues- ecstatic babble. All of these are counterfeits and distortions of truth, yet we are told since they have a counterfeit Trinity, we are to reject the Biblical Trinity on the same grounds. If you are going to do that, then you must reject all of it on the basis of it being found in some form in ancient paganism. You then annihilate the doctrine of Christ as the God/man, virgin birth, his sacrifice etc. All these are the proof of what Paul explained of what happened in history in Romans one, that mankind had a true knowledge but refused to worship him and sank into idolatry.
The God of the Bible is unique. He is tri-une, which is neither polytheistic nor is it tri-theistic. God is one in nature and is composed of three distinct eternal persons. They are one in substance with a difference in position. What makes all three the one God is that they share the same nature. This is the simple description of the God of the Bible. There is one choice from the Bibles revelation, if one denies the tri-une God, they are either left with atheism or polytheism.
https://www.nairaland.com/428340/muhammad-versus-Jesus-christ/1#5903010

unphilaz:


enjoy

unphilaz:

enjoy

DeathStroke007:
you prefer historians to eye witness...



you can see that there's contradiction on Jesus last word.. gospel of Barnabas cleared it all ..




like I said, it's your choice

facheux:
Crucifiction. The 3 headed xtian so called god is a weak pathetic joke. A few rusty nails can kill it. So funny.

TruthHurts1:


First of all Abeed, Christians do not recognise the gospel of barnabas.

Secondly, the crucufixion was a public event. Even if the apostles fled, thousands of ordinary inhabitants of Jerusalem witnessed it.

Thirdly, the islamic version of Jesus is a myth and fabrication invented by MUMUhaMAD because he thought Christians would be grateful to him for it. The man was such a f.0.0.l. With all his sexual stamina he should have concentrated on servicing his 13 wives and intimacy slaves and left Christianity alone. Afterall even you abeeds admit he was a stark illiterate.

unphilaz:


Barnabas that empiree is more of Muslim apologetics than Christianity.

DeathStroke007:





I don't expect you to understand because your IQ is so low..


but, I will help you..


go read my post on the gospel of Barnabas account on crucifixion..

you will see the loopholes in the Bible account and you will realize gospel of Barnabas is truth..

TruthHurts1:


First of all, Let me say that I have read the so-called fiction of Barnabas, which was written 400 years after the crucifixion took place.

Any one with even a modicum of basic intelligence would know at once that a document which was written about an event which happened 400 years before such document came into existence cannot be relied upon as an accurate REAL-TIME account of that event.

Sadly, only you Abeeds with your low IQs would fall for such stu.pidity.

Speaking of which, an American company recently organised a training event for some Saudi Arabian pilots. Part of the training involved mandatory IQ tests and these poor muslims failed woefully. Maybe the real reason why the Saudi pilots in the 9/11 terror attacks crashed their planes is not because they were terrorists but because they were idi.ots. Sigh. Read the following article and learn:

Muslims suffer insanity, low IQ, recessive disorders from 1400 years inbreeding
Biological fallout from 50 generations of first cousin marriages

from a Lockheed employee in Saudi Arabia.

During the pilot transition program with the KV-107 and C-130 with Lockheed, we found that most Saudi pilot trainees had very limited night vision, even on the brightest of moonlit nights.

Their training retention rate was minimal including maintenance personnel. Some had dim memories and had to be constantly reminded of things that were told to them the day before. An American, British or any other western instructor is burned out pretty quick. It actually took Muslim C-130 pilots years before they could fly in the dark safely and then would be reluctant to leave the lights of a city.

Ask any Marine, Air Force or Army guy who’s been trying to train Iraqis, and especially Afghans. Islam is not only a religion; it’s a way of life all the way around. Yet another set of revealing facts about Muslim beliefs and traditions and ways of life. 1400 years of inbreeding.

Nikolai Sennels is a Danish psychologist who has done extensive research into a little-known problem in the Muslim world: the disastrous results of Muslim inbreeding brought about by the marriage of first cousins. This practice, which has been prohibited in the Judeo-Christian tradition since the days of Moses, was sanctioned by Muhammad and has been going on now for 50 generations (1,400 years) in the Muslim world.

This practice of inbreeding will never go away in the Muslim world, since Muhammad is the ultimate example and authority on all matters, including marriage.

The massive inbreeding in Muslim culture may well have done virtually irreversible damage to the Muslim gene pool, including extensive damage to its intelligence, sanity, and health. According to Sennels, close to half of all Muslims in the world are inbred. In Pakistan, the numbers approach 70%. Even in England, more than half of Pakistani immigrants are married to their first cousins, and in Denmark the number of inbred Pakistani immigrants is around 40%.

The numbers are equally devastating in other important Muslim countries: 67% in Saudi Arabia, 64% in Jordan, and Kuwait, 63% in Sudan, 60% in Iraq, and 54% in the United Arab Emirates and Qatar.

According to the BBC, this Pakistani, Muslim-inspired inbreeding is thought to explain the probability that a British Pakistani family is more than 13 times as likely to have children with recessive genetic disorders. While Pakistanis are responsible for three percent of the births in the UK, they account for 33% of children with genetic birth defects.

The risks of what are called autosomal recessive disorders such as cystic fibrosis, spinal muscular atrophy is 18 times higher, and the risk of death due to malformations is 10 times higher. Other negative consequences of inbreeding include a 100 percent increase in the risk of stillbirths and a 50% increase in the possibility that a child will die during labor.

Lowered intellectual capacity is another devastating consequence of Muslim marriage patterns. According to Sennels, research shows that children of consanguineous marriages lose 10-16 points off their IQ and that social abilities develop much slower in inbred babies. The risk of having an IQ lower than 70, the official demarcation for being classified as "retarded," increases by an astonishing 400 percent among children of cousin marriages. (Similar effects were seen in the Pharaonic dynasties in ancient Egypt and in the British royal family, where inbreeding was the norm for a significant period of time.)

In Denmark, non-Western immigrants are more than 300 percent more likely to fail the intelligence test required for entrance into the Danish army. Sennels says, "The ability to enjoy and produce knowledge and abstract thinking is simply lower in the Islamic world." He points out that the Arab world translates just 330 books every year, about 20% of what Greece alone does.

In the last 1,200 years of Islam, just 100,000 books have been translated into Arabic, about what Spain does in a single year. Seven out of 10 Turks have never even read a book. Sennels points out the difficulties this creates for Muslims seeking to succeed in the West. "A lower IQ, together with a religion that denounces critical thinking, surely makes it harder for many Muslims to have success in our high-tech knowledge societies."

Only nine Muslims have ever won the Nobel Prize, and five of those were for the "Peace Prize." According to Nature magazine, Muslim countries produce just 10 percent of the world average when it comes to scientific research measured by articles per million inhabitants.

In Denmark, Sennels’ native country, Muslim children are grossly over represented among children with special needs. One-third of the budget for Danish schools is consumed by special education, and anywhere from 51% to 70% of retarded children with physical handicaps in Copenhagen have an immigrant background. Learning ability is severely affected as well. Studies indicated that 64% of schoolchildren with Arabic parents are still illiterate after 10 years in the Danish school system. The immigrant dropout rate in Danish high schools is twice that of the native-born.

Mental illness is also a product. The closer the blood relative, the higher the risk of schizophrenic illness. The increased risk of insanity may explain why more than 40% of patients in Denmark’s biggest ward for clinically insane criminals have an immigrant background. The U.S. is not immune. According to Sennels, "One study based on 300,000 Americans shows that the majority of Muslims in the USA have a lower income, are less educated, and have worse jobs than the population as a whole."

Sennels concludes: There is no doubt that the wide spread tradition of first cousin marriages among Muslims has harmed the gene pool among Muslims. Because Muslims’ religious beliefs prohibit marrying non-Muslims and thus prevents them from adding fresh genetic material to their population, the genetic damage done to their gene pool since their prophet allowed first cousin marriages 1,400 years ago are most likely massive. This has produced overwhelming direct and indirect human and societal consequences.

Bottom line: Islam is not simply a benign and morally equivalent alternative to the Judeo-Christian tradition. As Sennels points out, the first and biggest victims of Islam are Muslims.

Simple Judeo-Christian compassion for Muslims and a common-sense desire to protect Western civilization from the ravages of Islam dictate a vigorous opposition to the spread of this dark and dangerous ideology.


http://cairnsnews.org/2015/09/30/muslims-suffer-insanity-low-iq-recessive-disorders-from-1400-years-inbreeding/

TruthHurts1:


First of all, Let me say that I have read the so-called fiction of Barnabas, which was written 400 years after the crucifixion took place.

Any one with even a modicum of basic intelligence would know at once that a document which was written about an event which happened 400 years before such document came into existence cannot be relied upon as an accurate REAL-TIME account of that event.

Sadly, only you Abeeds with your low IQs would fall for such stu.pidity.

Speaking of which, an American company recently organised a training event for some Saudi Arabian pilots. Part of the training involved mandatory IQ tests and these poor muslims failed woefully. Maybe the real reason why the Saudi pilots in the 9/11 terror attacks crashed their planes is not because they were terrorists but because they were idi.ots. Sigh. Read the following article and learn:

Muslims suffer insanity, low IQ, recessive disorders from 1400 years inbreeding
Biological fallout from 50 generations of first cousin marriages

from a Lockheed employee in Saudi Arabia.

During the pilot transition program with the KV-107 and C-130 with Lockheed, we found that most Saudi pilot trainees had very limited night vision, even on the brightest of moonlit nights.

Their training retention rate was minimal including maintenance personnel. Some had dim memories and had to be constantly reminded of things that were told to them the day before. An American, British or any other western instructor is burned out pretty quick. It actually took Muslim C-130 pilots years before they could fly in the dark safely and then would be reluctant to leave the lights of a city.

Ask any Marine, Air Force or Army guy who’s been trying to train Iraqis, and especially Afghans. Islam is not only a religion; it’s a way of life all the way around. Yet another set of revealing facts about Muslim beliefs and traditions and ways of life. 1400 years of inbreeding.

Nikolai Sennels is a Danish psychologist who has done extensive research into a little-known problem in the Muslim world: the disastrous results of Muslim inbreeding brought about by the marriage of first cousins. This practice, which has been prohibited in the Judeo-Christian tradition since the days of Moses, was sanctioned by Muhammad and has been going on now for 50 generations (1,400 years) in the Muslim world.

This practice of inbreeding will never go away in the Muslim world, since Muhammad is the ultimate example and authority on all matters, including marriage.

The massive inbreeding in Muslim culture may well have done virtually irreversible damage to the Muslim gene pool, including extensive damage to its intelligence, sanity, and health. According to Sennels, close to half of all Muslims in the world are inbred. In Pakistan, the numbers approach 70%. Even in England, more than half of Pakistani immigrants are married to their first cousins, and in Denmark the number of inbred Pakistani immigrants is around 40%.

The numbers are equally devastating in other important Muslim countries: 67% in Saudi Arabia, 64% in Jordan, and Kuwait, 63% in Sudan, 60% in Iraq, and 54% in the United Arab Emirates and Qatar.

According to the BBC, this Pakistani, Muslim-inspired inbreeding is thought to explain the probability that a British Pakistani family is more than 13 times as likely to have children with recessive genetic disorders. While Pakistanis are responsible for three percent of the births in the UK, they account for 33% of children with genetic birth defects.

The risks of what are called autosomal recessive disorders such as cystic fibrosis, spinal muscular atrophy is 18 times higher, and the risk of death due to malformations is 10 times higher. Other negative consequences of inbreeding include a 100 percent increase in the risk of stillbirths and a 50% increase in the possibility that a child will die during labor.

Lowered intellectual capacity is another devastating consequence of Muslim marriage patterns. According to Sennels, research shows that children of consanguineous marriages lose 10-16 points off their IQ and that social abilities develop much slower in inbred babies. The risk of having an IQ lower than 70, the official demarcation for being classified as "retarded," increases by an astonishing 400 percent among children of cousin marriages. (Similar effects were seen in the Pharaonic dynasties in ancient Egypt and in the British royal family, where inbreeding was the norm for a significant period of time.)

In Denmark, non-Western immigrants are more than 300 percent more likely to fail the intelligence test required for entrance into the Danish army. Sennels says, "The ability to enjoy and produce knowledge and abstract thinking is simply lower in the Islamic world." He points out that the Arab world translates just 330 books every year, about 20% of what Greece alone does.

In the last 1,200 years of Islam, just 100,000 books have been translated into Arabic, about what Spain does in a single year. Seven out of 10 Turks have never even read a book. Sennels points out the difficulties this creates for Muslims seeking to succeed in the West. "A lower IQ, together with a religion that denounces critical thinking, surely makes it harder for many Muslims to have success in our high-tech knowledge societies."

Only nine Muslims have ever won the Nobel Prize, and five of those were for the "Peace Prize." According to Nature magazine, Muslim countries produce just 10 percent of the world average when it comes to scientific research measured by articles per million inhabitants.

In Denmark, Sennels’ native country, Muslim children are grossly over represented among children with special needs. One-third of the budget for Danish schools is consumed by special education, and anywhere from 51% to 70% of retarded children with physical handicaps in Copenhagen have an immigrant background. Learning ability is severely affected as well. Studies indicated that 64% of schoolchildren with Arabic parents are still illiterate after 10 years in the Danish school system. The immigrant dropout rate in Danish high schools is twice that of the native-born.

Mental illness is also a product. The closer the blood relative, the higher the risk of schizophrenic illness. The increased risk of insanity may explain why more than 40% of patients in Denmark’s biggest ward for clinically insane criminals have an immigrant background. The U.S. is not immune. According to Sennels, "One study based on 300,000 Americans shows that the majority of Muslims in the USA have a lower income, are less educated, and have worse jobs than the population as a whole."

Sennels concludes: There is no doubt that the wide spread tradition of first cousin marriages among Muslims has harmed the gene pool among Muslims. Because Muslims’ religious beliefs prohibit marrying non-Muslims and thus prevents them from adding fresh genetic material to their population, the genetic damage done to their gene pool since their prophet allowed first cousin marriages 1,400 years ago are most likely massive. This has produced overwhelming direct and indirect human and societal consequences.

Bottom line: Islam is not simply a benign and morally equivalent alternative to the Judeo-Christian tradition. As Sennels points out, the first and biggest victims of Islam are Muslims.

Simple Judeo-Christian compassion for Muslims and a common-sense desire to protect Western civilization from the ravages of Islam dictate a vigorous opposition to the spread of this dark and dangerous ideology.


http://cairnsnews.org/2015/09/30/muslims-suffer-insanity-low-iq-recessive-disorders-from-1400-years-inbreeding/

DeathStroke007:




gospel of was written 400 years after crucifixion abi



when was Bible written Abeg #laughing#

cckris:

Extraordinarily brilliant Apostle Paul wrote by himself. Luke, the Medical Doctor, wrote like a scientist that he was. You want try?

Scholar8200:
You are all cordially invited to the few days remembrance ceremony of the failed 'gospel of barnabas' that passedon tragically under the hammer of Truth. Just follow this link:
https://www.nairaland.com/2912069/gospel-barnabas-laid-rest

ifenes:
The church lied.

ifenes:
These books are not worth dying for,are they?

DeathStroke007:




#laughing#


you are on your own..

according to BBC

cckris:

I choose to live by the accounts of Matthew, Mark, Luke, John, Paul, & their CONSISTENCY with the Old Testament.
I also acknowledge your right to live by the false gospel of Barnabas. If you lose your sleep because the real GOODNEWS is conquering the world, you either REPENT, or endure the guilt of your sins & failures. It's a CHOICE.

facheux:
Xtians are just straight up pagan eh. How euro centric of them

Scholar8200:
The author of the failed gospel lied!


So the Gospel of Barnabas incontrovertibly contradicts the Qur’an when it declares that Muhammad was to be the Messiah. No Muslim can be true to his own holy book while at the same time trying to defend the Gospel of Barnabas as an authentic Gospel.

O Mary! Lo! Allah gives you glad tidings of a Word from him, whose name is the Messiah, Jesus son of Mary, illustrious in the world and the hereafter. Surah 3.45

What is very interesting here is the discovery that this Gospel not only contradicts the Qur’an but also itself. In the prologue to the book it speaks of "Jesus the Nazarene, called Christ" and states that it is the "true Gospel of Jesus, called Christ". [size=15pt]The author does not seem to have been aware that Messiah and Christ are interchangeable terms, meaning the same thing[/size]. The latter derives from the Greek word Christos which is a translation of the original Hebrew word Mashiah.


We know the Truth sire!

ifenes:


The people(Arabs) who lived close to where the story happened claimed Jesus isn't god and Mohammed came after him. Who are you to say they were telling lies?

TruthHurts1:



[size=16pt]THE HINDU ORIGINS OF MUHAMMAD AND ISLAM[/size]

Interesting account by a hindu scholar on how Islam plagiarised the polytheistic Hindu Faith:

We have mentioned in previous posts that the pagans of the Middle East during pre-Islamic times may actually refer to Hindus, not Christian pagans. Hindu scriptures refer to their own worshipers as ‘pagans’. The Hindu’s are the main polytheist’s in the world and the Hindu faith spread far beyond their own country. Some sources indicate that Hinduism was prevalent even in the Arabian peninsula. In Hinduism it is often claimed that religious verses and symbols mispronounced or used wrongly, has the opposite effect and becomes malign, destructive and evil. Islam is that distortions of what was Hindu worship in the medieval times.

Islam is corrupt. The Quran [Hadith and Sirath] gives plenty of testimony to it being a fabricated faith, created out of theft and loot, and out of greed and desire to conquer, occupy and destroy other nations and cultures. Islam is religion gone in reverse. It had no authentic leadership or prophet. It was an imaginary invention by a barbaric, illiterate crude and cruel criminal who was greedy for an empire. It was collected from booty, compiled out of bits and pieces from other faiths [360 religious customs and tribal faiths existing in the region], which the self-invented prophet of Islam gathered during his raids and genocide of innocent people.

Madman: Mohammed declares himself a ‘prophet’ – at age 40

[size=16pt]In the Hadiths the prophet of Islam is not born with any remarkable qualities. He is merely a desert thief, a savage. He is extremely cruel, crude and barbaric – a common trait in Muslims even today.[/size]It is only when Mohammed is rather old and in the late stages of his life (he lived until the age of 53) that he suddenly is made into a prophet. While prophets through history were born exceptional which is what distinguished them from ordinary people, Mohammed had nothing exceptional to him. On the contrary he suffered depression, suicidal thoughts and hallucinations and claimed he was possessed by a demon. It was one of Mohammed’s wives who convince Mohammed that his hallucinations are ‘a sign’ that he is a prophet. Thereafter to make excuses for his hallucinations, at the late age of 40, the cruel and barbaric Mohammed decides that he must be declared a prophet.

The Hadiths describe Mohammed to have “meditated” in a cave at Hira. Meditation has no background in Islam but originates from the Hindu and Buddhist religion. Furthermore Mohammed’s stepfather used to carve idols (Hindu idols for the local temple?) We say stepfather because Mohammed was born an orphan and breast fed by a slave, which indicates that he was probably an illegit child from a sexual encounter between a slave and her master. Mohammed was brought up by his slave mother and could neither read or write. He basically grew up in rough conditions, and the Hadiths testify that he earned his living from criminal activity.

Vedic teachings predates all other religions

The term “religion” used to describe the ancient form of Hinduism, pre-Hinduism or Vedic traditions, is not fully accurate. The oldest version of Hinduism before it turned into a religion was based on knowledge and instructions on a way of life that harmonized with existence. It was not held together as a religion and was not focused on a particular caste, origin, country. It was known as Sanathana Dharma, or eternal/perennial knowledge and intended for people from all backgrounds as described in the Vedic traditions.

The Vedic /Sanathana Dharma “religion” or way of life is without doubt the oldest in the world and is believed to predate all other religions. Anyone can read about Indian religious history and find references reaching beyond 15,000 years. Other religions are branches developed out of Vedas with Hinduism and then Judaism being the oldest (major) branch, followed by Buddhism, Christianity, Zoroastrianism, Jainism, Sikhism – and last of all – Islam. And each branch developed further branches depending on their interpretation of their faith.

Sikhism developed during the Punjab’s crusade battle against Muslims and was basically a form of army faith group in honor of their brave warriors. It branched off from Hinduism and became its own sect. Thus, they Sikhs adapted a separate attire from the Hindu nationals; an Arab looking turban and clothing emulating their enemies to confuse them. When Muslims would see the Sikhs riding towards them from a distance they assumed they were Muslims. In this way the Sikhs could enter the enemy lines in close proximity before a full on attack. Even to this day, some Islamic practices like honor killings exist within Sikhism while the concept of honor killing is alien in the Hindu faith. Some isolated cases of honor killing within Hinduism is an adaptation from Islam due to close association to Muslims and remnant from Islamic law and rule in the region. It is possible that honor killing within the Sikh community started when Sikhs would kill their own women and children to spare them being enslaved by Muslims during brutal slave raids.

TruthHurts1:


If you had half a brain you'd know that there were no Arabs in Jerusalem or anywhere else in ancient Judea during Jesus time in this world. SMH

ifenes:


If you had a brain at all you will know the Arabs/Syrians/Iraqis have a better opinion on Jesus(real name Yeshua) than Westerners or Africans.