Angelberry:
See where few hours pleasure landed him, you can't eat your cake and have it Mr Samuel!

hedonistic:
I don't understand what this is about. The long story about sex and recompense (or lack thereof) is unnecessary.

The only crime committed here is physical assault. Period.

Sleeping with a girl and not paying her as promised is not a crime. In any case, how can she prove that they had a fucck and pay 'contract' or agreement? By simple oral testimony? Is her word incontrovertible?

Then again, how can she even prove that the guy in question assaulted her? A random desperate girl's mere allegation should not be treated as Gospel truth. The silly guy could simply have denied anything like that (assuming there were no credible witnesses) , and the case would simply be struck out for lacking substance and merit.

Silly story all round.

adeaks:


Hmmm. Very Interesting. So she is not a sex worker but only agreed to only have sex with him provided he gave her money to 'offset her expenses'




If she is not a sex worker, then she must be a call girl.

adeaks:


Hmmm. Very Interesting. So she is not a sex worker but only agreed to only have sex with him provided he gave her money to 'offset her expenses'




If she is not a sex worker, then she must be a call girl.

dresh:
bros its "core girl" not "call girl" ;Dbros its "core girl" not "call girl"

misspicy:
Imagine,why beat her?

after all you both had an agreement,now you would pay more than the agreed amount

some [b]salvaged minded people though [/b]

misspicy:
Imagine,why beat her?

after all you both had an agreement,now you would pay more than the agreed amount

some salvaged minded people though