postmann:


The few that would see the light and embrace it is worth all the troubles. Quality isn't about numbers. It's about uniqueness and standing out positively different. Never going with the crowd who always are swayed by every new fad.

Now the question been asked in the climes where feminism has gained momentum is; was it all worth it? At what cost?


You don't cheat nature without paying a terrible price. I've never seen a feminist whose life isn't plagued by bitterness and grudges.

freecocoa:
It's a battle(as suggested by you), you are loosing and all you can talk about is being content with "few" positivity blah blah and more blah.

Of what use is this your positively different jargon, if you can't achieve anything with it?(since you will obviously be a minority).

Swayed by fad you say? Why the hypocrisy? Many people castigating feminism and every supposed new fad you claim, are in the white man's country, using their new technologies, their new ideas, religion, down to their food, all to better your lives, yet I and the ones who don't agree with you that an adult should be able to choose how to live, are the ones following new fads? Really?

cococandy:
Oh I see what you mean.

Well who caused these wars to start with?
You can't start wars and expect us to be grateful you fought them. (Not that we aren't.)

But on what leg will men stand on to accuse us of ingratitude for the wars they fought when most of the wars were caused by their greed,covetousness and lust for power, other men's lands/property and wives. On this your point, I think men owe the world an apology for most of the wars ever fought.

It's the height of conceit to think that we owe you guys gratitude for them.

Even though we are because we are nice like that.

My opinion

shaybebaby:

Even the English we are speaking abi na type sef, who dash us?
The religion they are using to justify "africaness" and morality, who dash them?
We know who the real sheeple are.
If they really want to reject western ways, drop the English language to start with and the Bible, no need to worry that there are power cuts, na darkness we dey before oyinbo man come.
And for anyone that wants to return to the motherland, abeg begin trek or enter canoe as per old school tradition.

freecocoa:
My sister, this kind thing no tire you? Cos I swear, e tire me o.

That religion own makes me laugh the most.

shaybebaby:

It's only here on NL where stupidity just makes me weak.
It's exhausting, I just Dey throway salute as you Dey serve volley, Dey try help some people receive sense.
It appears to be impossible though..

freecocoa:
It's a battle(as suggested by you), you are loosing and all you can talk about is being content with "few" positivity blah blah and more blah.

Of what use is this your positively different jargon, if you can't achieve anything with it?(since you will obviously be a minority).

freecocoa:

Swayed by fad you say? Why the hypocrisy? Many people castigating feminism and every supposed new fad you claim, are in the white man's country, using their new technologies, their new ideas, religion, down to their food, all to better your lives, yet I and the ones who don't agree with you that an adult should be able to choose how to live, are the ones following new fads? Really?

freecocoa:

And I take it you have met every feminist and have proven that they are miserable because they are feminists.

You my friend, I tire for.

postmann:



Your point sound reasonable and sophisticated but, I'm sorry it has no bearing to truth and reality.

A good example is this. Daddy is home with you and mommy. And there's a greedy covetous armed robber who broke into the home at night, but daddy was apt and swift to knock him off his balls. Will you tell daddy that you won't be grateful for his intervention and protection because the assailant was a man?

There would always be an aggressor. There will always be a threat to peace and security and men who risk their lives selflessly to preserve their society deserves a heroes' gratitude for all time.

The world has been deceived to think this peace will last forever. But a time of war and chaos and total disorder is approaching. Driving by famine, severe hunger, lawlessness and greed. And men will be highly sought after to defend their homes and community.

freecocoa:
It is exhausting my sister but on some days, it's amusing.

I'm glad for one thing though, they can't try this with the authorities.

cococandy:
Of course I'll be grateful to him if that should happen. Although I must make it clear that I in no way expect him to play the hero and risk his life for me. I'd rather we both sit tight and comply with whatever the assailant wants than one or both of us die over it.

Thing is you generalized over women not being grateful as per wars fought in the past and I replied via same generalization.
You didn't make room for individual cases where things might be different.

Now If we are to consider ourselves inferior and not claim equality to men because you guys supposedly do things we can't do like fight wars, doesn't it follow that guys too should be considered inferior for not being able to do some of the things we can do?

Each gender is different and uniquely so. None is superior to the other. Hence the fight for equality.

Gosh I can't believe I'm going into the diatribe again.

Okay bye.

postmann:


I've never said women are inferior. Truth is they're not. But the definition of the equality they seek is madness. The equality they seek has no gender consideration. And as a result is not attainable.

You want 50% of top executive positions in banks and all the other top blue chip firms, but no one gets to hear them feminists say the women in war fronts are almost nonexistent.

When you hear the scream of a rape victim in a dark alley, you know she's physically vulnerable as a woman, you try to come to her aid. This is gender equity not equality.

When you see a pregnant woman in a train or bus standing or in a long bank queue, courtesy demands you assist her. This is gender equity or consideration, not equality.

The examples go on.

Gender equality means there are no gender roles in the society. So it favours women to talk about gender equity. Women won't survive a society where men see them as equals in certain regards.


I know so many women who drive their own cars but can't change a flat tyre. That's just a perfect illustration of a feminism.

postmann:


Yes, stones are more in numbers than gems.

But stones are more useful and make more of a difference, we build with stones, stones can sustain life (e.g galapagos islands, volcanic islands, worn down will be volcanic rocks/stones, stones gather moss etc).




You must be joking!!! Please tell me you're joking! White man's what? The first white nation that ever rose to world hegemony is Rome. Before that, the Arabs and Asians held sway. And there was technology an innovation at the time. There was science and mathematics. Like everyone else, the white man learned and burrowed technology and knowledge from others.
The white man burrowed Christianity too.

We all make typos but when the word is consistently being spelt wrong, it must be corrected. [b]Borrowed not Burrowed
[/b]

But that's not the problem, the problem is having the soundness of mind to know what to adopt and know what to reject. Like I said, as far as morality goes, the whiteman has a lot to learn.
Why not create something original and stick to it in that case? You borrow, I borrow. Guilty of the same thing, no?

You're among those who erroneously mistake technology to mean Westernization.There are two different things. Westernization is an ideology, a concept and belief. Technology is science and innovation. The later is not the property of the whiteman.




Yes I have! They're all miserable discontented, greedy bunch. I've never seen a greedy person ever being satisfied. An unsatisfied man is a restless, unhappy man. That's the life of a feminist.
You can lie o

cococandy:
If both genders aren't equal, then one must be superior. I don't get people who say they don't support equality yet won't agree that they consider one gender superior.

It's simple English na. Is the English I speak different from the one others do?

shaybebaby:

postmann:


You decided to quote me after all. I saw you shadow boxing but decided to wait for you to come into the ring properly. I knew you'd come. And come you did.

Oh, don't mind my typos, android does most of my spellings and I don't bother to cross check. It's a real time typing debate, proof reading has little use for me. Though I appreciate your pointing it out.

What you wrote up there in reaction to my post, is..., what do I call it....? An inconsequential attempt at rebuffing a superior submission.

shaybebaby:

which one?
That you can lie? re: you have met all the feminists on the planet. Chimanada sef, you don meet?

That stones are more useful? are you asserting that gems are? examples pls.

That you talk out of your arse? Go back and read your posts.

postmann:


Both genders are equal in basic fundamental rights. Like right to education, freedom, security free speech, you name it.

But there are roles; gender specific roles. And this is where the problem is. And this is what the feminists want to obliterate by all means yet they want men to consider their weakness. They simply want their cakes back.

cococandy:

What kind of gender roles? Like women not bringing money to the family?

postmann:


A woman who works not out of the need for money to support her husband but to keep body and soul fit is a lucky woman.

postmann:




While I enjoy provoking a stubborn woman and dragging her helplessly to her wit's end, I'm poorly conditioned to tolerate a rude and uncultured one. Especially one who has lost her sense of origin and uniqueness.

cococandy:

What about the one who works to support her husband. Unlucky?
Do you agree with women working to support their families?

shaybebaby:

Pvssy.

postmann:



You wrote that to see my reaction, don't you? You test me, woman of little decorum. I won't be the one to blame when I start throwing my diatribes at you.

postmann:


One of the qualities of a virtuous woman is not being idle. So a woman ought to work. But the ideal situation is that her work shouldn't interfere with raising her young infant. And her work doesn't take first place before her husband.

Yes, the one who works to support her husband because they desperately need her contribution will have more pressures and emotional stress to deal with that a woman who works otherwise.

shaybebaby:

Cvntwaffle.

postmann:


Observing your love for vulgarism and lasviciousness, I can't help wonder if your muff has been icecold and abandoned or the winter-struck, flaccid dick that services you need the African weather to do his job.

postmann:


Observing your love for vulgarism and lasviciousness, I can't help wonder if your muff has been icecold and abandoned or the winter-struck, flaccid dick that services you need the African weather to do his job.

shaybebaby:

Cvntwaffle.

freecocoa:
Is this waffle edible?

You need Jesus.

postmann:
Observing your love for vulgarism and lasviciousness, I can't help wonder if your muff has been icecold and abandoned or the winter-struck, flaccid dick that services you need the African weather to do his job.

freecocoa:


You people wee not kee me.

TV01:

Ye 0! My head. Please sah, haff mercy

https://www.nairaland.com/2346403/sexless-relationship-due-man

Are you amongst the prophets?

TV